1. Postoperative Strength Differences at Short-Term Follow-Up Vary Based on Autograft Harvest Site After Adolescent Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
- Author
-
Bram JT, Stevens AC, Greenberg E, DeFrancesco CJ, Gans I, Parisien RL, and Ganley TJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Male, Retrospective Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Transplantation, Autologous, Quadriceps Muscle transplantation, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries surgery, Child, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction methods, Autografts, Hamstring Tendons transplantation, Muscle Strength, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of adolescent patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of adolescent patients aged 18 years or younger treated at a single tertiary care children's hospital who underwent primary transphyseal ACLR using QT or HT between January 2018 and December 2019. All patients had minimum 6-month follow-up. Outcomes included isokinetic strength testing, postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and complications; these were compared between the QT and HT cohorts., Results: A total of 84 patients (44 HT and 40 QT patients) were included. The QT cohort had a higher proportion of male patients (62.5% vs 34.1%, P = .01). At 3 months, HT patients had a lower hamstring-quadriceps (H/Q) strength ratio (60.7 ± 11.0 vs 79.5 ± 18.6, P < .01) and lower Limb Symmetry Index in flexion (85.6 ± 16.1 vs 95.5 ± 15.7, P = .01) whereas QT patients had a lower Limb Symmetry Index in extension (67.3 ± 9.5 vs 77.4 ± 10.7, P < .01). The H/Q ratio at 6 months was lower in HT patients (59.4 ± 11.5 vs 66.2 ± 7.5, P < .01). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were not different at 3 months or latest follow-up. QT patients had more wound issues (20.0% vs 2.3%, P = .01). Patients receiving HT autograft had more ipsilateral knee injuries (18.2% vs 2.5%, P = .03), but there was no difference in graft failure for ACLR using HT versus QT (9.1% vs 2.5%, P = .36)., Conclusions: There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures between patients receiving QT autografts and those receiving HT autografts. Patients with QT grafts had more postoperative wound issues but a lower rate of ipsilateral knee complications (graft failure or meniscal tear). Differences in quadriceps and hamstring strength postoperatively compared with the contralateral limb were observed for adolescent ACLR patients receiving QT and HT autografts, respectively. This contributed to higher H/Q ratios seen at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for patients receiving QT autografts., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic study., Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: I.G. receives travel support from Stryker and receives educational support from Liberty Surgical, outside the submitted work. R.L.P. receives educational support from Gotham Surgical Solutions and Devices and receives personal fees from Stryker and DePuy Synthes Sales, outside the submitted work. T.J.G. receives grant support for unrelated research from Vericel and receives personal fees from Arthrex, outside the submitted work. All other authors (J.T.B., A.C.S., E.G., and C.J.D.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material., (Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF