Search

Introduction: Traditionally, partially threaded cancellous lag screws (PTCS) are used for most medial malleolar fractures but are often challenging to execute in elderly patients because of the high risk of postoperative complications. Limited literature explores whether hook-type locking compression plates (LCPs) reliably offer better outcomes than PTCS in elderly patients. We aimed to compare the midterm radiologic and clinical outcomes between hook-type LCP and PTCS for medial malleolar fractures in an elderly population., Methods: We included 258 patients, aged 65 years and above, treated with either a hook-type locking plate (hook LCP group: 121 patients) or PTCS (screw group: 137 patients), and with follow-ups of at least 36 months in this retrospective study. Radiographic assessments included the union rate and interval to fracture union. Clinical assessment included the postoperative complications and revision procedures., Results: Although a significantly higher rate of comminuted fractures was observed in the hook LCP group than in the screw group (p < .001), no significant difference in the union rate was observed between the two groups (hook LCP group: 93.4% vs. screw group: 89.8%, p = .151), and a significantly shorter interval to union was observed in the hook LCP group (10.2 ± 7.0 vs. 12.3 ± 6.7 weeks, p = .015). There was a trend toward a lower rate of complications, including revision procedures, in the hook LCP group than in the screw group (19.9% vs. 28.5%, p = .107 and 6.6% vs. 13.8%, p = .074)., Conclusion: Hook-type LCP may be an alternative option for treating medial malleolar fractures with comminution in elderly patients., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We aimed to compare midterm radiological and clinical outcomes between closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) using the fibular intramedullary nail (IMN) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using the locking plate for the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in active young patients., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 204 patients treated with CRIF using the fibular IMN (94 patients) or ORIF using the locking plate (110 patients) were included after at least 3 years of follow-up. The mean patient age was 41.4 years. Radiographic evaluation included the quality of reduction assessed by plain radiography and 3-dimensional (3D)-reconstructed computed tomography as well as the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) of the ankle assessed by weightbearing plain radiography. Clinical evaluation included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score, Olerud and Molander Score, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, and visual analog scale pain score as well as complications., Results: At median follow-up greater than 4 years, we found no significant differences in measured clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. There were significantly fewer postoperative complications in the IMN group than in the ORIF group (9.5% vs 39%, P < .001). However, we did find a greater proportion of radiographically fair or poor reductions in the IMN group than in the ORIF group ( P < .001). The poor reductions in the IMN group were primarily related to Weber type C, pronation-type injury, and comminuted fibular and trimalleolar fractures ( P < .001). PTOA was also more frequently observed in the IMN group than in the ORIF group (21.3% vs 9.1%, P = .024)., Conclusion: Given the current prevailing technologies for fracture fixation, this study suggests that surgeons should consider ORIF for unstable ankle fractures in active young patients with Weber type C, pronation-type injury, and comminuted fibular and trimalleolar fractures., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Background: We examined whether the intramedullary nailing (IMN) can be used as an alternative modality to the plate fixation (PF) in patients with distal fibular fracture with displaced fragments., Patients and Methods: The eligible patients of two treatment arms (IMN group: n=30 and the group: n=31) were evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively, for which functional outcome measures include differences in the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Scores (AOFAS) and the Olerud Molander Ankle Scores (OMAS) between the two groups. In addition, radiological outcome measures include differences in radiological outcome scores at 12 months between the two groups. Differences in the percentage of frequency of postoperative complications between the two groups served as safety outcome measures., Results: At 3 months, the AOFAS and OMAS were significantly higher in the IMN group as compared with the PF group (p<0.0001 and p=0.0177, respectively). At 6 months, the AOFAS were significantly higher in the IMN group as compared with the PF group (p=0.0255). But there were no significant differences in the OMAS between the two groups (p=0.1077). At 9 and 12 months, there were no significant differences in the AOFAS and OMAS between the two groups (p=0.4334 and 0.3227, respectively at 9 months and p=0.8731 and 0.7610, respectively, at 12 months). These results indicate that the IMN group achieved a faster recovery as compared with the PF group. At 12 months, the radiological outcome scores were 3.67±0.60 in the IMN group and 3.71±0.52 in the PF group (p=0.7816). All the patients of each group achieved a bony union at 12 months. At 12 months, the percentage of frequency of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the IMN group as compared with the PF group (p=0.0227)., Conclusions: The IMN might be considered as an alternative surgical modality to the PF in patients with distal fibular fracture with displaced fragments. But further large-scale, multi-center studies are warranted to establish our results., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: This retrospective comparative study was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after surgical treatment for Bosworth fracture-dislocation, and to analyse the prognostic factors related to postoperative outcomes., Methods: Fifteen patients were followed for ≥2 years after Bosworth fracture-dislocation. Twenty-five ankle fracture-dislocations as control group were enrolled to compare clinical outcomes. Clinical evaluation consisted of the AOFAS and Olerud-Molander scores. Patient and injury factors were analysed to identify the outcome predictors., Results: There were no significant differences in either clinical evaluation score as compared to control group (P=0.245, .302, respectively). The time interval to operation and number of manual reduction attempts were found to be predictive factors for poor outcomes (P=0.004, .038, respectively)., Conclusion: As compared to more common patterns of ankle fracture-dislocations, intermediate-term clinical outcomes after Bosworth fracture-dislocations were statistically comparable. Delayed surgical reduction and repeated attempts at closed reduction appear to be negative outcome predictors., (Copyright © 2018 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Featured Application: Using Deep Learning to Detect Ankle Fractures. Ankle fractures are common and, compared to other injuries, tend to be overlooked in the emergency department. We aim to develop a deep learning algorithm that can detect not only definite fractures but also obscure fractures. We collected the data of 1226 patients with suspected ankle fractures and performed both X-rays and CT scans. With anteroposterior (AP) and lateral ankle X-rays of 1040 patients with fractures and 186 normal patients, we developed a deep learning model. The training, validation, and test datasets were split in a 3/1/1 ratio. Data augmentation and under-sampling techniques were administered as part of the preprocessing. The Inception V3 model was utilized for the image classification. Performance of the model was validated using a confusion matrix and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). For the AP and lateral trials, the best accuracy and AUC values were 83%/0.91 in AP and 90%/0.95 in lateral. Additionally, the mean accuracy and AUC values were 83%/0.89 for the AP trials and 83%/0.9 for the lateral trials. The reliable dataset resulted in the CNN model providing higher accuracy than in past studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]