Search

Chemokines are small protein inflammatory mediators that were classically known for their elicitation of inflammatory cells out of the vasculature. However, more contemporary studies show that these ubiquitous factors impinge on many facets of biology, including hematopoiesis, angiogenesis, and mitogeneis. The elucidation of mechanisms involved in the immunopathogenesis of liver disease has magnified the importance of chemokines in this organ. Accordingly, a number of in vitro and in vivo studies have highlighted the importance of chemokine biology in both acute and chronic liver disease, and a variety of liver diseases have been shown to involve chemokines and their receptors during the initiation and main tenance of liver pathology. A greater understanding of the role chemokines play during liver disease may permit the employment of therapies that target or enhance chemokines in the liver. This review will highlight the current clinical and experimental research in the immunopathogenesis of acute and chronic liver diseases.

Hyperacute rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation remains an extremely unusual occurrence. In this study, we examined a porcine model of liver transplantation in which recipient animals were sensitized prior to transplantation with three serial full-thickness skin grafts. Three experimental groups were studied. Group I recipients (n = 6) were specifically sensitized against their liver donors with biweekly skin grafts followed by hepatic grafting. Group II recipients (n = 6) underwent third-party skin graft sensitization prior to liver transplantation. Group III recipients (n = 6) underwent liver grafting without sensitization. Mixed lymphocyte cultures were done before each skin graft and prior to transplantation. Lymphocytotoxic antibody (LCTA) titers were measured before the first skin graft, at weekly intervals thereafter, intraoperatively, and daily postoperatively until death. Intraoperative and postmortem liver biopsies were obtained in all recipients. Five of six recipients in Group I died within 4 hr of hepatic revascularization. The remaining animal survived for four days. Mean survival time in group I was 0 +/- 0.7 days. In contrast, MST in groups II and III were 4.0 +/- 1.2 and 6.2 +/- 1.3 days, respectively. The MST in group I was significantly shorter than in groups II and III (P less than 0.026 and P less than 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference in survival between groups II and III. MLC reactivity between recipients and skin donors increased progressively following each skin graft, reaching a peak just prior to liver transplantation. LCTA titers also increased following each skin graft, reaching peak levels immediately prior to hepatic grafting. Intraoperative LCTA titers decreased within 2 min of graft revascularization and were undetectable within 4 hr. In group III (unsensitized recipients), MLC reactivity was low and at no time was LCTA detectable. Histologic examination of the livers from group I recipients showed parenchymal hemorrhage, endophlebitis, and neutrophil infiltration. Histologic examination of postmortem liver biopsies from animals in groups II and III revealed acute cellular rejection. In conclusion, hyperacute rejection resulting in graft failure and recipient death can be consistently produced in a porcine model of hepatic transplantation by donor-specific sensitization of the recipient. It is postulated that high titers of donor-specific antibody are required to exceed the liver's capacity for antibody absorption and elimination and produce the clinical picture of hyperacute rejection.