Search

We estimated that more than 11,000 people were exposed to highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in EU/EEA countries over the outbreak period October 2016–September 2018 by cross‐linking data submitted by Member States to European Food Safety Authority and EMPRES‐i. A stronger framework for collecting human exposure data is required.

Current approaches to risk assessment in bees do not take into account co-exposures from multiple stressors. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) is deploying resources and efforts to move towards a holistic risk assessment approach of multiple stressors in bees. This paper describes the general principles of pesticide risk assessment in bees, including recent developments at EFSA dealing with risk assessment of single and multiple pesticide residues and biological hazards. The EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products in bees highlights the need for the inclusion of an uncertainty analysis, other routes of exposures and multiple stressors such as chemical mixtures and biological agents. The EFSA risk assessment on the survival, spread and establishment of the small hive beetle, Aethina tumida, an invasive alien species, is provided with potential insights for other bee pests such as the Asian hornet, Vespa velutina. Furthermore, data gaps are identified at each step of the risk assessment, and recommendations are made for future research that could be supported under the framework of Horizon 2020. Finally, the recent work conducted at EFSA is presented, under the overarching MUST-B project ("EU efforts towards the development of a holistic approach for the risk assessment on MUltiple STressors in Bees") comprising a toolbox for harmonised data collection under field conditions and a mechanistic model to assess effects from pesticides and other stressors such as biological agents and beekeeping management practices, at the colony level and in a spatially complex landscape. Future perspectives at EFSA include the development of a data model to collate high quality data to calibrate and validate the model to be used as a regulatory tool. Finally, the evidence collected within the framework of MUST-B will support EFSA's activities on the development of a holistic approach to the risk assessment of multiple stressors in bees. In conclusion, EFSA calls for collaborative action at the EU level to establish a common and open access database to serve multiple purposes and different stakeholders.

Escherichia coli (E. coli) O157:H7 can cause haemorrhagic colitis and the haemolytic uremic syndrome in humans. Ruminants are the main reservoir for this bacterium: they can harbour the bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract without showing clinical symptoms. The reason for this persistence is still unclear, although it has been suggested that E. coli O157:H7 can suppress the immune system. To investigate the effects on the immune system of ruminants, an infection model is needed that mimics a long-term infection as it can occur in both sheep and cattle. As the terminal rectum has recently been identified as a primary colonisation site in cattle, we developed a rectal inoculation model for sheep and used this model to study immune responses against selected virulence factors of E. coli O157:H7 (intimin, EspA and EspB). Sheep were infected and re-infected when E. coli O157:H7 excretion was no longer detectable. The animals did not develop serum or local antibody responses but showed a cellular response against EspA and intimin respectively 9 and 16 days after infection. This response was also present 5 days after re-infection, albeit lower, and did not prevent animals from being re-infected. These results demonstrate that E. coli O157:H7 can be persistently present in the large intestine of sheep without inducing a clear protective immune response.

Infections with F4 + enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) causes severe diarrhoea in piglets, resulting in morbidity and mortality. F4 fimbriae are the key virulence factors mediating the attachment of F4 + ETEC to the intestinal epithelium. Intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) are recently being recognized as important regulators of the intestinal immune system through the secretion of cytokines, however, data on how F4 + ETEC affect this cytokine secretion are scarce. By using ETEC strains expressing either polymeric, monomeric or F4 fimbriae with a reduced polymeric stability, we demonstrated that polymeric fimbriae are essential for adhesion to porcine IEC and the secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 by IEC. Remarkably, this cytokine secretion was not abrogated following stimulation with an F4-negative strain. Since this strain expresses flagellin, TLR5 mediated signalling could be involved. Indeed, porcine IEC express TLR5 and purified flagellin induced IL-6 and IL-8 secretion, indicating that, as for other pathogens, flagellin is the dominant virulence factor involved in the induction of proinflammatory responses in IEC. These results indicate a potential mucosal adjuvant capacity of ETEC-derived flagellin and may improve rational vaccine design against F4 + ETEC infections.

F4(+) enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infections are an important cause of postweaning diarrhoea in piglets and an oral immunization of piglets with purified F4 fimbriae protects them from a subsequent F4(+) ETEC infection. However, oral immunization of suckling piglets is hampered due to the immature status of their immune system. Targeting of antigens to Fcgamma receptors (FcgammaR) on human and murine dendritic cells (DC) has been shown to enhance DC maturation and both humoral and cellular immune responses. To investigate the effect of F4 fimbriae incorporated in immune complexes (F4-IC) on porcine DC, we used porcine monocytic-derived DC (MoDC) as a model system. The results in this study demonstrate that FcgammaRI, II and III mRNA is expressed by porcine MoDC. Furthermore, we show that FcgammaRII and III are expressed on the cell surface and that F4-IC are internalized by MoDC via FcgammaR. This FcgammaR ligation induced a significantly enhanced expression of Major Histocompatibility complex (MHCII) class II and the costimulatory molecules CD80/86 and CD40 by MoDC compared with immature MoDC. Furthermore, the phagocytic capacity of F4-IC stimulated MoDC was reduced as evidenced by a reduced uptake of DQ-ovalbumin and FITC-dextran. In an allogenic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction, these F4-IC-activated MoDC showed an improved T cell stimulatory capacity in comparison with immature MoDC. The F4-IC induced DC maturation correlated with significant higher expression levels of several pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukine (IL) 1beta, IL-6 and Tumor necrosis factor alpha, the chemokine IL-8 and IL-12p40 in comparison with immature MoDC. Altogether, these results clearly demonstrate that FcgammaR engagement enhances the maturation of porcine MoDC, which may suggest that antigen targeting to FcgammaR on DC could improve vaccine design against infections.

We previously demonstrated that intradermal (ID) delivery of plasmid DNA encoding the porcine granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) 7 days before DNA vaccination enhances both cellular and humoral responses in pigs. In the present work, we studied the effect of the GM-CSF gene on antigen-presenting cells (APC) in pigs. We demonstrated that ID delivery of this gene significantly increased the number of epidermal CD1+ cells (Langerhans’ cells, skin dendritic cells) at the injection site at day 7. This was accompanied by an enhanced percentage of APC at the immune induction site following DNA vaccination, whereas a positive effect on APC maturation could not be demonstrated. Taken together, our data suggest that both DC recruitment to the immunization site and expansion of APC in the draining LN following DNA vaccination might contribute to the immune enhancing effect of plasmid encoded GM-CSF in pigs.

Very few antigens have been described that induce an intestinal immunity when given orally. Our laboratory demonstrated that oral administration of isolated F4 (K88) fimbriae of Escherichia coli to F4-receptor positive (F4R + ) pigs induces protective mucosal immunity against challenge infection. However, presence of F4-receptors (F4R) on villous enterocytes is a prerequisite for inducing the immune response, as no F4-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC) can be induced in F4R − pigs. In this study, the in vivo binding of isolated F4 fimbriae (F4) to the gut epithelium was examined in F4R + and F4R − pigs. It was further investigated whether binding of F4 to the F4R results in endocytosis in and translocation across the gut epithelium using microscopy. F4 did not adhere to the intestinal epithelium of F4R − pigs, whereas it strongly adhered to the villous epithelium and the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) of the jejunum and ileum of F4R + pigs. Following binding to F4R, F4 was endocytosed by villous enterocytes, follicle-associated enterocytes and M cells. Transcytosis of F4 across the epithelium resulted in the appearance of F4 in the lamina propria and dome region of the jejunal and ileal PP. This is the first study showing transcytosis of fimbriae across the gut epithelium. This receptor-dependent transcytosis can explain the success of F4 fimbriae as oral immunogen for inducing protective immunity in F4R + pigs strengthening the importance of receptor-dependent endocytosis and translocation in oral vaccine strategies. Further identification of the receptor responsible for this transport is in progress.

Currently, no vaccines are available for edema disease and post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) in pigs. In the present study, a subunit vaccine containing the F18 fimbrial adhesin FedF was studied. Hereto, recombinant FedF was produced as a fusion protein with maltose-binding protein. Even though the produced MBPFedF was shown to attach in vitro to enterocytes, almost no FedF-specific immune response could be detected after oral administration to piglets. The delivery of FedF to the intestinal mucosa was improved by conjugating the MBPFedF to F4 fimbriae. Indeed, this conjugation induced a systemic and local FedF-specific immune response and led to a reduction in excretion after infection with F18+ E. coli. Although complete protection was not observed, the conjugation between FedF and F4 fimbriae can be considered as a first step towards the development of a combined vaccine against F4+ and F18+ E. coli infections.

F18(+)Escherichia coli have the ability to colonize the gut and cause oedema disease or post-weaning diarrhoea by adhering to specific F18 receptors (F18R) on the porcine epithelium. Although it is well established that a DNA polymorphism on base pair 307 of the FUT1 gene, encoding an alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase, accounts for the F18R phenotype, the F18R nature is not elucidated yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the correlation between the presence of H-2 histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) or its derivative A-2 HBGAs on the porcine gut epithelium and F18(+)E. coli adherence. A significant positive correlation was found between expression of both the H-2 (r=0.586, P

We previously showed that an intradermal (i.d.) FaeG DNA prime (2x)-oral F4 protein boost immunization induces a systemic response and weakly primes a mucosal IgG response in pigs, especially when plasmid vectors encoding the A and B subunit of the E. coli thermo-labile enterotoxin (LT) are added to the DNA vaccine. In the present study, we evaluated whether addition of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (vitD(3)) to the DNA vaccine could further enhance this mucosal priming and/or modulate the antibody response towards IgA. To further clarify priming of systemic and mucosal responses by the i.d. DNA vaccination, we firstly compared the localization of the F4-specific antibody response in pigs that were orally boosted with F4 to that in pigs that received a third i.d. DNA immunization and secondly evaluated cytokine mRNA expression profiles after i.d. DNA vaccination. The i.d. DNA prime (2x)-oral F4 boost immunization as well as the 3 i.d. DNA vaccinations induced mainly a systemic response, with a higher response observed following the heterologous protocol. Co-administration of vitD(3), and especially of the LT vectors, enhanced this response. Furthermore, only the heterologous immunization resulted in a weak mucosal priming, which appeared to require the presence of the LT vectors or vitD(3) as adjuvants. In addition, the LT vectors strongly enhanced the FaeG-specific lymphocyte proliferation and this was accompanied by the absence of a clear IL-10 response. However, despite two DNA immunizations in the presence of these adjuvants and an oral F4 boost, we failed to demonstrate the secretory IgA response needed to be protective against enterotoxigenic E. coli.

One of the problems hindering the development of DNA vaccines is the relatively low immunogenicity often seen in humans and large animals compared to that in mice. In the present study, we tried to enhance the immunogenicity of a pcDNA1/ faeG 19 DNA vaccine in pigs by optimizing the FaeG expression plasmid and by coadministration of the plasmid vectors encoding the A and B subunits of the Escherichia coli thermolabile enterotoxin (LT). The insertion of a Kozak sequence and optimization of vector (cellular localization and expression) and both vector and codon usage were all shown to enhance in vitro FaeG expression compared to that of pcDNA1/ faeG 19. Subsequently, pcDNA1/ faeG 19 and the vector-optimized and the vector-codon-optimized construct were tested for their immunogenicity in pigs. In line with the in vitro results, antibody responses were better induced with increasing expression. The LT vectors additionally enhanced the antibody response, although not significantly, and were necessary to induce an F4-specific cellular response. These vectors were also added because LT has been described to direct the systemic response towards a mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) response in mice. Here, however, the intradermal FaeG DNA prime-oral F4 boost immunization resulted in a mainly systemic IgG response, with only a marginal but significant reduction in F4 + E. coli fecal excretion when the piglets were primed with pWRGFaeGopt and pWRGFaeGopt with the LT vectors.

F18 + Escherichia coli can cause post-weaning diarrhoea and oedema disease in pigs. These diseases are responsible for substantial economic losses, but a vaccine is not available. A good knowledge of the characteristic of the fimbriae is useful for the development of a vaccine composed of the fimbrial virulence factor. F18 fimbriae are composed of the major subunit FedA and the minor subunits FedE and the adhesin FedF. In the present study monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against FedA and FedF were produced. In addition to their diagnostic value, these mAbs revealed a weaker interaction between FedA and FedF compared to the subunit–subunit interactions in other fimbriae, like type 1 and P pili. Further experiments are needed to investigate if this weak interaction could be one of the reasons for the slow colonisation of the small intestinal mucosa by F18 + E. coli .

A recently developed oral immunisation model in pigs in which F4 (K88) fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli are administered to induce a protective intestinal immunity, was used to determine the optimal inductive sites of the F4-specific intestinal immune response. Hereto, pigs were immunised with F4 orally, in the lumen of the mid-jejunum, ileum or mid-colon. Throughout the small intestine, the highest number of ASC was found following jejunal immunisation, followed by ileal, oral and colonic immunisation. To determine the signifance of Peyer's patches in the induced immune response, F4 was injected into the jejunal Peyer's patches (JPP), lamina propria (LP) and ileal Peyer's patches (IPP). Immunisation in the JPP induced the highest number ASC in the small intestine, whereas immunisation in the LP and IPP resulted in lower intestinal antibody responses. In conclusion, we have shown that the JPP are the major inductive sites of the F4-specific intestinal antibody response. This knowledge could be important when using the pig as an animal model for vaccination studies.

Piglets are susceptible to F4 (K88)+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)-induced neonatal and post-weaning diarrhoea. The F4 fimbriae are composed of some minor subunits and the major subunit FaeG that also constitutes the adhesin. Parenteral vaccination of sows with an F4-containing vaccine protects the suckling piglets against neonatal F4+ ETEC-induced diarrhoea, but no commercial (mucosal) vaccine exists against F4+ ETEC-induced weaning diarrhoea. To develop a vaccine, a bioactive F4-receptor (F4R) binding FaeG molecule is required that binds to the F4R following oral immunization and induces a FaeG-specific immune response. The present study reports the altered binding of the FaeG-specific monoclonal antibody IMM01 with bioactive versus non-bioactive F4 fimbrial adhesin FaeG. The correlation of altered IMM01 binding with altered FaeG bioactivity permits the use of an IMM01-based ELISA as a fast, specific and sensitive in vitro selection for potent F4 or (recombinant) FaeG antigen formulations, useful in an F4+ ETEC vaccine.

Oral immunization of newly weaned piglets with recombinant F4 (K88) fimbrial adhesin FaeG induces a F4-specific immune response, significantly reducing F4 + Escherichia coli excretion following challenge. In order to use FaeG subunits in an oral vaccine against F4 + enterotoxigenic E. coli , it is necessary to determine the conservation of the adhesin subunit. Hereto, the faeG sequence was determined of 21 F4ac + E. coli field isolates from piglets with diarrhoea and subsequently compared with these of the reference strain GIS26 and previously reported FaeG sequences from F4ab, F4ac and F4ad antigenic variant strains. The FaeG amino acid sequence was 96–100% homologous within each F4 serotype, but only 92 and 88% when the F4ab and F4ad antigenic variants were compared with the F4ac antigenic variant. Furthermore, the conserved regions of the adhesin suggest a donor strand mechanism in F4 fimbriae assembly as reported for type 1 and P pili. In conclusion, the results of the reported experiments support the usefulness FaeG in an oral subunit vaccine against F4 + E. coli infections or as a mucosal carrier since the adhesin is conserved among F4 + E. coli field isolates.

Fimbriae often play a prominent role in anchoring bacterial cells to host tissue and mediate the first step in pathogenesis. As a consequence, there is a continuous development of new strategies to block the binding of fimbriae to their specific receptor on host cells. The present study demonstrates the specific interaction of F4 (K88) fimbriae and porcine enterocytes using a real-time biomolecular interaction analysis system (BIAcore® 3000), based on the principles of surface plasmon resonance (SPR). This method offers new opportunities to screen therapeutics for prevention of adhesion and subsequent disease without receptor purification.

Early vaccination is necessary to protect pigs against postweaning diarrhoea caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). However, at present no commercial vaccine allows successful vaccination. This is partly due to the presence of maternally derived antibodies. Since DNA vaccines are suggested to be superior to protein vaccines in young animals with maternal antibodies, we determined whether the fimbrial adhesin (FaeG) of F4ac(+) ETEC could be used as a plasmid DNA vaccine to prime piglets in a heterologous prime-boost approach. Hereto, pcDNA1/faeG19 was constructed and expression of rFaeG in Cos-7 cells was demonstrated. Thereafter, pigs were immunised (days 0, 21 and 42) intramuscularly by injection or intradermally by gene gun and humoral and cellular immune responses were analysed. Even though responses were low, results demonstrated that intramuscular injection was superior to gene gun delivery for priming the humoral immune response since higher antibody titres were raised, whereas gene gun delivery better induced a cellular response, evaluated by a lymphocyte proliferation assay. Effective priming of the humoral immune response was evidenced by high IgG titres 1 week after a protein boost with purified F4. The low responses to the pcDNA1/faeG19 DNA vaccination suggest that delivery of the DNA and/or the expression of the faeG gene should be improved.

SUMMARYPigs were injected intramuscularly (i.m.) twice with human serum albumin (HSA) with or without 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3[1α,25(OH)2D3] with a 5-week interval. The supplementation of 1α,25(OH)2D3 enhanced the HSA-specific IgA serum antibody response but decreased the IgM, IgG, IgG1 and IgG2 responses. Furthermore, higher numbers of HSA-specific IgA antibody-secreting cells were obtained in systemic lymphoid tissues (local draining lymph node, spleen and bone marrow) as well as in Peyer's patches and lamina propria of the gut (GALT). In addition, the in vivo mRNA expression for Th1 [interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL-2)], Th2 (IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10) and Th3 [transforming growth factor (TGF)-β] cytokines as well as the percentage of different cell subsets (CD2+, CD4+, CD8+, IgM+, MHC II+, CD25+) of monomorphonuclear cells from the local draining lymph node were determined at different time-points after the i.m. immunizations. Cytokine profiles did not resemble a typical Th-cytokine profile using 1α,25(OH)2D3: higher levels of IL-10 and significantly lower levels of IL-2 were observed the first day after the primary immunization. However, significantly higher levels of IL-2 and significantly lower levels of IFN-γ were observed the first day after the second immunization. Furthermore, after the second immunization TGF-β mRNA expression decreased more quickly in the 1α,25(OH)2D3 group. This difference became significant 7 days after the second immunization. One week later a significantly higher percentage of CD25+ cells was observed in this group, indicating more activated T and B cells using the steroid hormone. These results suggest that in pigs the addition of 1α,25(OH)2D3 to an intramuscularly injected antigen can enhance the antigen-specific IgA-response and prime GALT tissues, but the relation with cytokines and cell phenotype in the local draining lymph node needs further clarification.

F18+ enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are widespread and induce post-weaning diarrhoea and oedema disease, respectively. No commercial vaccine exists. Therefore, the F18 herd seroprevalence of 178 randomly selected pig-breeding farms in northern Belgium was evaluated by determining F18-specific IgG antibody titres in pooled sera of sows per breeding farm. This survey reported the first data concerning F18 herd seroprevalence and showed that F18+ E. coli seroprevalence was common in northern Belgium. Significantly more open pig-breeding farms were F18 seropositive (96.4%) compared to closed (88.8%). Furthermore, no clear association was determined between the F18 herd seroprevalence and the number of sows per breeding farm (rsp = 0.19), or with the number of fattening pigs per breeding farm (rsp = 0.17).

The intestinal mucosal immune system can discriminate actively between harmful pathogens and harmless food antigens resulting in different immune responses namely IgA production and oral tolerance, respectively. Whereas particulate antigen (microorganisms) can induce an IgA response, soluble antigen often leads to tolerance. Recently, it has been demonstrated that F4 fimbrial antigens of enterotoxigenic E. coli (F4 ETEC) can be used to immunise piglets. Oral administration of soluble F4 to F4R+ piglets (pigs with a receptor for these fimbriae (F4R+) on their small intestinal villous enterocytes) results in an intestinal mucosal immune response that completely protects the piglets against a challenge infection. In F4R- pigs, such an intestinal mucosal immune response does not occur. However, a priming of the systemic immune system can be seen similar to the priming in pigs fed with the same dose of a food antigen, suggesting that F4 in F4R- pigs behaves as a food antigen. These results indicate that a receptor-mediated mechanism is involved in the induction of a protective intestinal mucosal immune response using soluble antigen. However, oral administration of soluble F18 fimbriae of verotoxigenic E. coli to F18R+ piglets could not induce a similar protective immune response. So the type of the receptor and/or the nature of the antigen seem to be important to obtain an intestinal IgA response.

We have used FaeG DNA to immunise piglets by the intradermal (ID) and the intramuscular (IM) route in a heterologous prime/boost model. ID immunisation with DNA resulted in a better induction of cellular immunity, whereas only the IM immunisation could prime an F4(K88)-specific serum IgA response. However, ID administration of plasmid-encoded GM-CSF 1 week before the ID immunisation enhanced the F4-specific humoral and cellular immune response and even primed the F4-specific IgA response more efficiently than the IM immunisation did.

The effect of oral administration of β-1,3/1,6-glucans from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on humoral immunity in domestic dogs is not known. In this study, 15 beagle dogs were orally given MacroGard tablets, which contain 150 mg of this β-glucan, daily for 4 weeks. At the end of this period, the total serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) level decreased significantly in the group treated with the glucan compared to that in the control group as well as compared to the concentrations before supplementation. In contrast, the total serum IgM level rose significantly, whereas no effect on the IgG level occurred. Similar changes were seen in Bordetella -specific IgA and IgM titers following vaccination during the supplementation period. The IgA concentration also became significantly lower in the saliva and tears of the glucan group than in the placebo group. The effects disappeared 1 week after the cessation of the supplementation. In conclusion, the results showed a temporary change in the isotype profile during glucan supplementation.

Only a few vaccines are commercially available against intestinal infections since the induction of a protective intestinal immune response is difficult to achieve. For instance, oral administration of most proteins results in oral tolerance instead of an antigen-specific immune response. We have shown before that as a result of oral immunization of piglets with F4 fimbriae purified from pathogenic enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), the fimbriae bind to the F4 receptor (F4R) in the intestine and induce a protective F4-specific immune response. F4 fimbriae are very stable polymeric structures composed of some minor subunits and a major subunit FaeG that is also the fimbrial adhesin. In the present study, the mutagenesis experiments identified FaeG amino acids 97 (N to K) and 201 (I to V) as determinants for F4 polymeric stability. The interaction between the FaeG subunits in mutant F4 fimbriae is reduced but both mutant and wild type fimbriae behaved identically in F4R binding and showed equal stability in the gastro-intestinal lumen. Oral immunization experiments indicated that a higher degree of polymerisation of the fimbriae in the intestine was correlated with a better F4-specific mucosal immunogenicity. These data suggest that the mucosal immunogenicity of soluble virulence factors can be increased by the construction of stable polymeric structures and therefore help in the development of effective mucosal vaccines.

F18(+)Escherichia coli infections causing post-weaning diarrhoea and/or oedema disease are a major cause of economic losses in pig industry. To date, no preventive strategy can protect pigs from F18(+)E. coli infections. One of the most attractive approaches to eliminate F18(+)E. coli infections is the selection for pigs that are resistant to F18(+)E. coli infections. However, this strategy was not believed to be favourable because of reports of genetic association with the stress-susceptibility gene in the Swiss Landrace. To investigate this potential association more thoroughly, 131 randomly selected Belgian hybrid pigs were genotyped for both the F18(+)E. coli resistance alleles (FUT1(A)) and the stress-susceptibility alleles (RYR1(T)) and their association was investigated by determining the linkage disequilibrium. This linkage disequilibrium (LD=-0.0149) is close to zero and does not differ significantly from 0 (likelihood ratio test chi(1)(2)=1.123, P=0.29), demonstrating no association between the FUT1(A) and RYR1(T) alleles. Furthermore, only a small fraction (4.6%) of the Belgian pigs was found to be resistant to F18(+)E. coli infections. Our results suggest that selection for F18(+)E. coli resistant pigs might be an attractive approach to prevent pigs from F18(+)E. coli infections, unlike to what has previously been postulated.

Post-weaning diarrhoea and oedema disease in weaned piglets are caused by infection with F4+ or F18+ Escherichia coli strains. There is no commercial vaccine available, but it is shown that oral immunization of weaned piglets with purified F4 fimbriae induces a protective mucosal immune response. In the present study, piglets were orally and nasally immunized with purified F18 fimbriae in the presence of the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G) or CTA1-DD, respectively. This immunization could not lead to protection against F18+ E. coli infection. The induced F18-specific immune response was directed towards the major subunit FedA and weakly towards the adhesive subunit FedF. The results of these experiments demonstrate that it is difficult to induce protective immunity against F18+ E. coli using the whole fimbriae due to the low response against the adhesin.

The present study analysed quantitatively the mucin 4 polymorphism for determing the F4ac/ab receptor status of a total of 63 pigs by comparing it with the invitro villous adhesion assay. The probability of a susceptible genotype for the mucin 4 increases significantly with increasing F4ab or F4ac ETEC adhesion per 250 mm villi (P = 0.029 for F4ab, P = 0.030 for F4ac), with the odds ratio for each unit increase of F4ab or F4ac equal to, respectively, 1.036 (95% CI [1.004–1.069]) and 1.018 (95% CI [1.002– 1.034]). In the phenotypic in vitro villous adhesion test, a cut-off value of 5 bacteria was chosen as a criteria for the distinction between an F4R positive and F4R negative pig. The sensitivity and specificity for the in vitro villous adhesion test, with the genotyping test for mucin 4 as golden standard, is 100% and 24%, respectively, for F4ab as well as F4ac. Absence of adhesion of F4ac and F4ab ETEC to the villous brush borders was not associated with genotypic resistance suggesting that there is at least one other receptor for F4ab/ac Escherichia coli. As a consequence, not only mucin 4 gene polymorphism but also expression of these other receptor(s) has to be included in a screening assay for F4ac/ab receptor negative pigs. # 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

In developing veterinary mucosal vaccines and vaccination strategies, mucosal adjuvants are one of the key players for inducing protective immune responses. Most of the mucosal adjuvants seem to exert their effect via binding to a receptor/or target cells and these properties were used to classify the mucosal adjuvants reviewed in the present paper: (1) ganglioside receptor-binding toxins ( cholera toxin, LT enterotoxin, their B subunits and mutants); ( 2) surface immunoglobulin binding complex CTA1-DD; (3) TLR4 binding lipopolysaccharide; (4) TLR2-binding muramyl dipeptide; (5) Mannose receptor-binding mannan; (6) Dectin-1-binding beta 1,3/1,6 glucans; (7) TLR9-binding CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides; (8) Cytokines and chemokines; (9) Antigen-presenting cell targeting ISCOMATRIX and ISCOM. In addition, attention is given to two adjuvants able to prime the mucosal immune system following a systemic immunization, namely 1 alpha, 25(OH)(2)D-3 and cholera toxin. ispartof: Veterinary research vol:37 issue:3 pages:511-539 ispartof: location:England status: published

Transgenic plants are attractive bioreactors to large-scale production of recombinant proteins because of their relatively low cost. This study reports for the first time the use of transgenic plants to reduce enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) excretion in its natural host species. The DNA sequence encoding the major subunit and adhesin FaeG of F4+ ETEC was transformed into edible alfalfa plants. Targeting of FaeG production to chloroplasts led to FaeG levels of up to 1% of the total soluble protein fraction of the transgenic alfalfa. Recombinant plant-produced FaeG (pFaeG) remained stable for 2 years when the plant material was dried and stored at room temperature. Intragastric immunization of piglets with pFaeG induced a weak F4-specific humoral response. Co-administration of pFaeG and the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT) enhanced the immune response against FaeG, reflected a better induction of an F4-specific immune response. In addition, the intragastric co-administration of CT with pFaeG significantly reduced F4+ E. coli excretion following F4+ ETEC challenge as compared with pigs that had received nontransgenic plant material. In conclusion, transgenic plants producing the FaeG subunit protein could be used for production and delivery of oral vaccines against F4+ ETEC infections.

Receptor-mediated uptake of orally administered antigen can lead to an antigen-specific immune response, whereas oral administration of most other non-replicating soluble antigens results in the induction of oral tolerance. In the present study, it is shown that fimbriae purified from an F4(K88)(+) enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain can function as a mucosal carrier molecule for the model antigen human serum albumin (HSA). Glutaraldehyde-coupled F4/HSA conjugates were able to bind F4 receptor positive (F4R(+)) enterocytes, but not to F4R(-) enterocytes. Moreover, oral immunization of F4R(+) pigs with F4/HSA conjugates induced a HSA-specific immune response, whereas oral immunization with HSA/HSA conjugates did not. This mucosal carrier function of F4 fimbriae was improved following oral co-administration of the F4/HSA conjugates with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT) to F4R(+) pigs, since both humoral and cellular HSA-specific responses were significantly increased. In comparison with F4R(+) pigs, the HSA-specific response was reduced following oral F4/HSA+CT immunization of F4R(-) pigs. This indicates that F4 fimbriae as mucosal carrier and CT as adjuvant synergistically improve the induction of a HSA-specific immune response following oral immunization of pigs. These results could open new perspectives in the development of vaccines against enteropathogens.

Oral immunization of both humans and animals with non-replicating soluble antigens often results in the induction of oral tolerance. However, receptor-dependent uptake of orally administered soluble antigens can lead to the induction of an antigen-specific immune response. Indeed, oral immunization of pigs with recombinant FaeG (rFaeG), the adhesin of the F4(K88) fimbriae of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC), induces an F4-specific humoral and cellular immune response. This response is accompanied with a reduction in the excretion of F4 + E. coli following challenge. To improve the immune response against F4, rFaeG was orally co-administered with the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin (CT). Oral immunization of pigs with rFaeG and CT significantly improved the induction of an F4-specific humoral and cellular immune response and also significantly reduced the faecal F4 + E. coli excretion following F4 + ETEC challenge as compared to rFaeG-immunized pigs. Therefore, the present study demonstrates that CT can act in pigs as a mucosal adjuvant for antigens that bind to the intestinal epithelium by a CT-receptor-independent mechanism.

Newly weaned piglets can be orally immunised against F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection with F4 fimbriae. However, to efficiently develop a vaccine against ETEC induced postweaning diarrhoea, knowledge of the stability of the F4 fimbriae to different pH and gastric digestion is needed. The gastrointestinal pH in suckling and recently weaned piglets was measured and the stability of F4 fimbriae to different pH and to pepsin was assessed in vitro. In the stomach the lowest pH was found in the fundus gland region. Gastric pH values below 2.5 were not found in suckling piglets or at the day of weaning, in contrast to piglets 1 and 2 weeks postweaning. Along the first half of the small intestine and in the caecum, a negative correlation was found between pH and age. The F4 fimbriae were stable to pH 1.5 and 2 for 2 h, whereas longer incubation periods resulted in conversion of the multimeric forms into monomers. The F4 fimbriae were partially degraded by incubation for 15-30 min in simulated gastric fluid at pH 1.5 and 2, and completely digested from 3 h onwards. At pH 3, the fimbriae maintained their antigenicity for at least 4h. The results demonstrate that gastric digestion will only have a limited impact on oral immunisation since liquid passes through the stomach relatively quickly (50% within 2 h). However, we previously demonstrated that the transit times are prolonged shortly after weaning. Shortly after weaning it could be necessary to protect the F4 fimbriae against gastric digestion to obtain efficient oral immunisation of the piglets.

Enterotoxigenic and verotoxigenic F18+ Escherichia coli colonising the pig small intestine, adhere to receptors on intestinal villous enterocytes by F18 fimbriae. The aim of the present study was to define the F18R nature. The knowledge on the nature of this receptor could be important for the development of receptor-based treatments against F18+ E. coli-induced disease. The adhesion of F18+ E. coli to pig intestinal villous enterocytes was analysed in an in vitro assay. The adhesion of F18+ E. coli but not of F4ac+ E. coli was strongly inhibited by monoclonal antibodies (mAb) with blood group H-2 specificity. Conversely, blood group H-1 specific mAb could not inhibit the adhesion of F18+ E. coli nor F4ac+ E. coli. Moreover, the blood group H-2 trisaccharide strongly inhibited the adhesion of F18+ E. coli, but only partially the adhesion of F4ac+ E. coli. These data demonstrate that the F18 receptor contains the blood group antigen H-2 (alpha-fuc-(1-2)-beta-Gal-(1-4)-GlcNAc) as major carbohydrate.

In this study it was analysed whether intramuscular (IM) immunisation of piglets with F4 during the suckling period could protect against oral challenge with F4 + - Escherichia coli and whether addition of 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 or CpG-ODN could improve this protection. F4-seronegative F4-receptor positive pigs were divided into four groups of five pigs each. The pigs were intramuscularly injected with F4 fimbriae only or supplemented with 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 (D 3 -group) or CpG-ODN (CpG-group). The control group received PBS in IFA. Seven days after the second immunisation, all pigs were intragastrically inoculated with 1×10 10 CFU of F4 + - E. coli . All F4-injected groups, showed a reduced faecal excretion of F4 + - E. coli . However, this reduction was only statistically significant in the D 3 -group 2 days post challenge. Pigs in the latter group showed a secondary antibody response upon challenge, indicating that F4-primed memory B-cells were present in the gut-associated lymphoid tissues at that moment. CpG-ODN, on the other hand, did not enhance the F4-specific antibody response. However, CpG-ODN significantly increased the F4-specific as well as mitogen-induced proliferation of pheripheral blood monomorphonuclear cells indicating a direct or indirect overall effect on T-lymphocytes. In conclusion, supplementation with 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 or CpG-ODN improved protection against an F4 + - E. coli infection. This protection was most obvious for 1α,25(OH) 2 D 3 and indicates its potential use in veterinary vaccines against enteropathogens.

To develop a vaccine against Escherichia coli -induced post-weaning diarrhea and edema disease, insights in the induction of the protective immune response following infection with these pathogenic E. coli is needed. Therefore, the fimbriae-specific antibody response of newly weaned pigs following infection with the Shiga-like toxin type II variant (SLT-IIv) producing F18 + verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) (strain 107/86) was compared with the response following an infection with LT producing F4 + enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) (strain GIS 26). F4 + ETEC were able to colonize the gut very soon after infection, as peak excretion of F4 + E. coli bacteria was seen 2 days post-infection (dpi), but had already disappeared 7 dpi. On the other hand, F18 + VTEC infection resulted in a slower colonization of the gut as the peak excretion of F18 + E. coli was observed between 3 and 5 dpi, but this colonization remained longer as F18 + E. coli were detected till 9 dpi in feces. Furthermore, this fast colonization pattern of F4 + ETEC is accompanied with the presence of F4-specific antibodies in mucosal tissues and serum from 4 dpi onward, with maximal amounts of F4-specific IgA in the jejunal lamina propria and serum 7 dpi. In contrast, F18-specific IgA was only readily detected in the jejunal lamina propria 15 dpi and showed a maximum serum titer 21 dpi. Besides this faster induction and higher antibody response, the switch from IgM to IgA and IgG was also earlier following the F4 + ETEC infection.

The intestinal mucosal immune system can discriminate actively between harmful pathogenic agents and harmless food antigens resulting in different immune responses namely IgA production and oral tolerance, respectively. Recently, a pig model has been developed for studying intestinal mucosal immune responses in which F4 fimbrial antigens of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (F4 ETEC) are used as oral antigens. A unique feature of this model is that soluble F4 antigens can be administered to pigs which have a receptor for this fimbriae (F4R(+)) on their small intestinal villous enterocytes and pigs which do not have this receptor (F4R(-)). Oral administration of F4 to the F4R(+) pigs results in an intestinal mucosal immune response that completely protects the pigs against a challenge infection. In F4R(-) pigs such an intestinal mucosal immune response does not occur. However, a priming of the systemic immune system can be seen similar to the priming in pigs fed with the same dose of a food antigen, suggesting that F4 in F4R(-) pigs behaves as a food antigen. The fact that different mucosal immune responses can be induced with soluble F4, makes it an interesting model to study mucosal immune mechanisms in the pig.

In this study, the effect of two oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) sequences 5'GCT-AGA-CGT-TAG-CGT-3' (CpG-ODN) and 5'-GCT-AGA-GCT-TAG-GCT-3' (GpC-ODN) on the antigen-specific antibody and cellular immune response after intramuscular immunizations with OVA was analyzed in pigs. Pigs immunized with OVA supplemented with these ODNs showed a significantly enhanced primary antibody response in comparison with the control group which received OVA without ODN. This enhanced primary antibody response appeared ODN-sequence-independent as similar effects were seen in both ODN-groups. The OVA-specific antibody titers obtained after a single injection of antigen combined with either of both ODNs were as high as the titers in the control group after two injections. Furthermore, the ODN-supplemented animals showed significantly higher OVA-specific IgA antibodies in their saliva and nasal secretions at some time points after the first immunization. Proliferation assays showed that CpG- as well as GpC-ODN significantly enhanced the antigen-specific as well as the mitogen-induced proliferation in different lymphoid tissues. Furthermore, 48h after the third immunization the CpG-group showed a significantly decreased IL-6 mRNA expression in cells of the local draining lymph node but no significant difference in TGF-beta (Th3-like) and IL-10 (Th2-like). The ODN injected animals showed the tendency to have higher IFN-gamma (Th1-like) mRNA-expression in comparison with the control group. To our knowledge, these are the first in vivo studies in pigs, which demonstrate the appropriateness of CpG-ODN as immunostimulating adjuvants in vaccines for farm animals.

Since the beginning of November 2014, nine outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) A(H5N8) in poultry have been detected in four European countries. In this report, similarities and differences between the modes of introduction of HPAIV A(H5N1) and A(H5N8) into Europe are described. Experiences from outbreaks of A(H5N1) in Europe demonstrated that early detection to control HPAIV in poultry has proven pivotal to minimise the risk of zoonotic transmission and prevention of human cases.