1. Structural Models of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) NOD1 and NOD2 NACHT Domains Suggest Differential ATP Binding Orientations: Insights from Computational Modeling, Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
- Author
-
Arunima Parida, Jitendra Maharana, Sucharita Balabantray, Bijay Kumar Behera, Bikash R. Sahoo, Sushma Rani Martha, Aritra Bej, Itishree Jena, Sukanta Kumar Pradhan, Mahesh Chandra Patra, Budheswar Dehury, and Jyoti Ranjan Sahoo
- Subjects
Models, Molecular ,Protein Conformation ,Protein domain ,Molecular Sequence Data ,Nod2 Signaling Adaptor Protein ,lcsh:Medicine ,Plasma protein binding ,Biology ,Molecular Dynamics Simulation ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Protein structure ,Adenosine Triphosphate ,Nod1 Signaling Adaptor Protein ,Animals ,Nucleotide ,Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs ,Amino Acid Sequence ,lcsh:Science ,Zebrafish ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Multidisciplinary ,Walker motifs ,lcsh:R ,Reproducibility of Results ,Hydrogen Bonding ,digestive system diseases ,body regions ,Molecular Docking Simulation ,Biochemistry ,chemistry ,NACHT domain ,Biophysics ,lcsh:Q ,Adenosine triphosphate ,Sequence Alignment ,Research Article ,Protein Binding - Abstract
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 1 (NOD1) and NOD2 are cytosolic pattern recognition receptors playing pivotal roles in innate immune signaling. NOD1 and NOD2 recognize bacterial peptidoglycan derivatives iE-DAP and MDP, respectively and undergoes conformational alternation and ATP-dependent self-oligomerization of NACHT domain followed by downstream signaling. Lack of structural adequacy of NACHT domain confines our understanding about the NOD-mediated signaling mechanism. Here, we predicted the structure of NACHT domain of both NOD1 and NOD2 from model organism zebrafish (Danio rerio) using computational methods. Our study highlighted the differential ATP binding modes in NOD1 and NOD2. In NOD1, γ-phosphate of ATP faced toward the central nucleotide binding cavity like NLRC4, whereas in NOD2 the cavity was occupied by adenine moiety. The conserved ‘Lysine’ at Walker A formed hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) and Aspartic acid (Walker B) formed electrostatic interaction with ATP. At Sensor 1, Arg328 of NOD1 exhibited an H-bond with ATP, whereas corresponding Arg404 of NOD2 did not. ‘Proline’ of GxP motif (Pro386 of NOD1 and Pro464 of NOD2) interacted with adenine moiety and His511 at Sensor 2 of NOD1 interacted with γ-phosphate group of ATP. In contrast, His579 of NOD2 interacted with the adenine moiety having a relatively inverted orientation. Our findings are well supplemented with the molecular interaction of ATP with NLRC4, and consistent with mutagenesis data reported for human, which indicates evolutionary shared NOD signaling mechanism. Together, this study provides novel insights into ATP binding mechanism, and highlights the differential ATP binding modes in zebrafish NOD1 and NOD2.
- Published
- 2015