Search

The new European chemicals policy for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) will most probably impose a dramatic increase in the number of animals required for reproductive toxicity testing. For this purpose, the development and validation of alternative methods is urgently needed in order to reduce the use of laboratory animals. The present study describes the inter-laboratory variability and the transferability assessment of an in vitro test able to identify chemical effects during the process of oocyte maturation in a bovine model. The test was developed/optimised within ReProTect, an integrated research project funded by the European Union, joining together 35 partners with complementary expertise in reproductive toxicology. Eight chemicals with well-known toxic properties were tested (benzo[a]pyrene, busulfan, cadmium chloride, cycloheximide, diethylstilbestrol, ketoconazole, methylacetoacetate, mifepristone/RU-486 and DMSO as solvent) on the in vitro maturation (IVM) assay in two well-trained laboratories using the established Standard Operating Procedures. The statistical analysis demonstrated the concordance of results across the laboratories and the reproducibility of the test. We therefore conclude that the IVM test could advance toward the process of validation as alternative in vitro method that, in combination with additional in vitro tests, can become part of an integrated testing strategy in order to predict chemical hazards on mammalian fertility., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The selection of reference compounds is crucial for a successful in vitro test development in order to proof the relevance of the test system. This publication describes the criteria and the selection strategy leading to a list of more than 130 chemicals suitable for test development within the ReProTect project. The presented chemical inventory aimed to support the development and optimization of in vitro tests that seek to fulfill ECVAM's criteria for entering into the prevalidation. In order to select appropriate substances, a primary database was established compiling information from existing databases. In a second step, predefined selection criteria have been applied to obtain a comprehensive list ready to undergo a peer review process from independent experts with industrial, academic and regulatory background. Finally, a peer reviewed chemical list containing 13 substances challenging endocrine disrupter tests, additional 50 substances serving as reference chemicals for various tests evaluating effects on male and female fertility, and finally 61 substances were identified as known to provoke effects on the early development of mammalian offspring. The final list aims to cover relevant and specific mode/site of actions as they are known to be relevant for various substance classes. However, the recommended list should not be interpreted as a list of reproductive toxicants, because such a description requires proven associations with adverse effects of mammalian reproduction, which are subject of regulatory decisions done by involved competent authorities., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

ReProTect is a project within the 6th European Framework Program which has developed alternative methods aimed to reduce or replace animal experimentation in the field of reproductive toxicology. In its final year, a ring trial, named the "Feasibility Study", was conducted, in which 10 blinded chemicals with toxicologically well-documented profiles were analyzed by employing a test battery of 14 in vitro assays. EC(50) (half maximal effective concentration) or equivalent endpoints were determined and the test compounds were ranked relative to chemicals previously assayed in the tests of the battery. This comparative analysis together with a weight of evidence approach allowed a robust prediction of adverse effects on fertility and embryonic development of the 10 test chemicals in vivo. In summary, the vast majority of the predictions made based on the in vitro results turned out to be correct when compared to the whole animal data. The procedure used here, a nearest neighbor analysis coupled with a weight of evidence approach, may guide future activities in the field of alternative toxicity testing., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current European legislation for the registration and authorization of chemicals (REACH) will require a dramatic increase in the use of animals for reproductive toxicity testing. Since one objective of REACH is to use vertebrates only as last resort, the development and validation of alternative methods is urgently needed. For this purpose ReProTect, an integrated research project funded by the European Union, joining together 33 partners with complementary expertise in reproductive toxicology, was designed. The study presented here describes a battery of two tests developed within ReProTect. The objective of these tests is the detection of chemical effects during the processes of oocyte maturation and fertilisation in a bovine model. The corresponding toxicological endpoints are the reaching of metaphase II and the formation of the pronuclei respectively. Fifteen chemicals have been tested (Benzo[a]pyrene, Busulfan, Butylparaben, Cadmium Chloride, Carbendazim, Cycloheximide, Diethylstilbestrol, Genistein, Ionomycin, Ketoconazole, Lindane, Methylacetoacetate, Mifepristone, Nocodazole and DMSO as solvent) demonstrating high intra-laboratory reproducibility of the tests. Furthermore, the responses obtained in both tests, for several substances, had a good correlation with the available in vivo and in vitro data. These tests therefore, could predictably become part of an integrated testing strategy that combines the bovine models with additional in vitro tests, in order to predict chemical hazards on mammalian fertility.

Validated alternative test methods are urgently needed for safety testing of drugs, chemicals and cosmetics. Whereas some animal tests for topical toxicity have been successfully replaced by alternative methods, systemic toxicity testing requires new test strategies in order to achieve an adequate safety level for the consumer. Substantial numbers of animals are required for the current in vivo assays for drugs, chemicals and cosmetics and a broad range of pioneering alternative methods were already developed. These prerequisites motivate the development of a tiered testing strategy based on alternative tests for reproductive toxicity hazard. In the Integrated Project ReProTect, a consortium set up by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) takes the lead to manage the development of a testing strategy in the area of reproductive toxicity. The reproductive cycle can be broken down into well-defined sub-elements, namely male and female fertility, implantation and pre/postnatal development. In this project, in vitro, in silico and sensor technologies will be developed, leading to testing strategies, that shall be implemented and disseminated.

The murine embryonal teratocarcinoma cell line, P19, was genetically manipulated in order to provide preliminary information on compounds that induce differentiation. Without chemical induction, P19 cells remain in an undifferentiated state, but can be induced to differentiate into specific cell types. For example, dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) induces cardiac and skeletal muscle differentiation, whereas retinoic acid stimulates neuronal differentiation. P19 cells were transfected with a construct containing a segment of the murineTert (mTert) promoter sequence combined with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, which acts as a reporter gene. mTert expression, the reverse transcriptase component of murine telomerase, is closely linked to telomerase activity and is down-regulated during differentiation. Three retinoids and DMSO induced the differentiation of P19 cells, which was determined by a reduction in mTert_GFP expression, detected by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy as independent methods of detection. A test substance, ethanol, and a control substance, saccharin, did not cause a decrease in mTert_GFP expression. In addition, it could be demonstrated that the mTert_GFP test detects developmentally relevant effects at non-cytotoxic concentrations. The ID50 values derived for the reduction of mTert_GFP expression were lower than the IC50 values detected with the MTT test, by a factor of 21.4 for all-trans retinoic acid, 12.7 for 9-cis retinoic acid, 29.6 for 13-cis retinoic acid, and 8.7 for DMSO. In comparison to the IC50 value for the P19 cell line, a similar IC50 value was obtained with 3T3 cells for ethanol, but there was a 2-fold increase for DMSO. The retinoids were not cytotoxic to 3T3 cells at the concentrations tested. This newly developed test is capable of detecting differentiation-inducing compounds at non-cytotoxic concentrations within 4 days. It offers a method for detecting chemicals with specific toxicological mechanisms, such as the retinoids, which could provide additional information in embryotoxicity testing as different promoters could be employed. Here, we report the use of this novel test system for the successful analysis of DMSO and three retinoids with different in vivo teratogenic potentials.

Developmental toxicology is the study of undesirable effects on the development of the organism, which may result from exposure before conception, from the period of prenatal development, or postnatally during the time of sexual maturation. The principal manifestations of developmental toxicity include: embryolethality, malformations, growth retardation, and functional impairment. In 2001, the European Commission published the future chemicals policy entitled "White Paper: Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy". The new regulation requires a toxicological evaluation with strong emphasis on reproductive toxicity, by using in vitro methods, especially for those chemicals marketed at more than 1 ton per year. For this reason, the establishment of in vitro models capable of detecting major undesirable manifestations in the fetus, are urgently required. The aim of the present review is to explore the capacity of existing in vitro systems, based on embryonic stem (ES) cells, to identify embryotoxicity with a focus on specific effects such as teratogenicity and growth retardation. In addition, we discuss the possibility to adapt the mouse ES cells based tests to human ES cells, avoiding inter-species variations in developmental toxicity studies and address related ethical issues. Considering the different manifestations of developmental toxicity, only a battery of in vitro tests will provide the necessary information for regulatory developmental toxicity assessment.

The importance of developing in vitro tests for embryotoxicity is discussed, and ECVAM's work with its collaborators is summarised. Studies are in progress to find new endpoints for use in the scientifically validated embryonic stem (ES) cell test, so that the potential for chemical effects on endodermal, mesodermal and/or ectodermal differentiation can be identified. This involves, inter alia, the use of genetically modified ES cells.