1. Influence of synoptic weather patterns on methane mixing ratios in the Baltimore/Washington region.
- Author
-
Sahu, Sayantan, Ahn, Doyeon, Loughner, Christopher P., and Dickerson, Russell R.
- Subjects
- *
FRONTS (Meteorology) , *CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) , *ANIMAL culture , *CITIES & towns , *METHANE - Abstract
We investigated winter methane observations from three towers in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan region (BWR) including a ten-year record, 2013–2022, from Bucktown (BUC), Maryland located ∼100 km southeast of these urban areas. We combined the observations with a HYSPLIT clustering analysis for all years to determine the major synoptic patterns influencing methane mixing ratios at BUC. The cluster analysis revealed four characteristic pathways of transport into BUC – from the west (W), southwest (SW), northwest (NW), and east (E) and these showed significant differences in methane mixing ratios. We corroborated our conclusions from BUC using 2018–2022 data from towers in Stafford, Virginia (SFD) and Thurmont, Maryland (TMD); results confirmed the influence of synoptic patterns on methane concentrations. No significant temporal trend was detected overall or within any cluster. For BUC, low concentrations were typically observed for air off the North Atlantic Ocean (E cluster) and flowing rapidly behind cold fronts (NW cluster). High methane mixing ratios were observed, as expected, in the W cluster due to the proximity of the BWR and oil and gas operations in the Marcellus. Less expected were high mixing ratios for the SW cluster – we attribute these to agricultural sources in North Carolina. Swine production, ∼500 km to the SW, impacts methane in eastern Maryland as much or more than local urban emissions and oil and gas operations, 100–300 km to the west; results support the high end of emission estimates for animal husbandry and suggest strategies for future research and mitigation. • Back trajectories and cluster analyses help determine the major sources of methane to the Mid Atlantic States. • No temporal trend in methane emissions was discernable. • Swine production ~500 km away has as much or more impact on methane as local urban areas plus oil and gas operations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF