Search

Objectives: To assess safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) according to "tailored-CAS" algorithm in the elderly (≥75 years) in relation to younger patients., Background: Although CAS has grown as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy the data on safety of CAS in the very elderly are inconsistent., Material and Methods: 1,139 patients with significant carotid stenosis underwent 1,252 CAS procedures in one high-volume center between years 2001-2011. CAS procedures were performed with lesion and patient dependent selection of neuroprotection type ("tailored-CAS"). There were 193 subjects ≥75-years-old (17%) and 946 <75-years-old. No major differences in atherosclerosis risk factors and comorbidities between groups were noted. In both groups the majority of patients were male (70.4% vs. 68.6%, P = NS) and half of the patients were symptomatic (50.2% vs. 55.2%, P = NS). Bilateral carotid stenosis was present in 25% of patients from CAS ≥75 group and 22% from CAS< 75 group, P = NS. Proximal neuroprotection devices use for high risk or symptomatic lesions accounted for 31% in CAS≥ 75 group and 32% in CAS<75 group, P = NS., Results: In symptomatic patients aged ≥75 years 30-day stroke and death rate was 7% versus 1.9% in symptomatic patients aged <75; P = 0.01 and vs. 1.8% in asymptomatic elderly, P = 0.09. No myocardial infarcts were noted., Conclusions: Symptomatic elderly is a group of highest CAS risk and the use of "tailored CAS" algorithm does not equalize CAS risk in this patients' group. "Tailored CAS" remains a safe procedure for asymptomatic elderly as well as symptomatic and asymptomatic young patients., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a balloon-mounted drug-eluting stent (DES) for recurrent carotid in-stent stenosis (ISS)., Methods: As part of our targeted carotid artery stenting (TARGET-CAS) protocol, neurological and ultrasound evaluations have been performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually since 2001 in all carotid stent patients. For angiographically-confirmed >70% ISS, balloon angioplasty was performed as a first-line treatment. Recurrent ISS was treated with a 4.0-mm zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent (ZES) that was postdilated according to intravascular ultrasound imaging. Among the 1350 neuroprotected CAS procedures performed between January 2001 and March 2011, there were 7 (0.52%) patients (5 men; ages 51-72 years), all neurologically asymptomatic, with >70% recurrent ISS that occurred at 5 to 11 months after the initial balloon angioplasty treatment for ISS., Results: ZES implantation under distal embolic protection was technically successful and uncomplicated. Angiographic stenosis was reduced from 84.6%±7.5% to 10.7%±3.6% (p<0.01). In 5 patients with ZES implanted fully within the self-expanding carotid stent, duplex ultrasound follow-up (mean 17 months, range 6-36) revealed no evidence of restenosis or stent fracture/deformation. In the 2 other patients, the ZES had been implanted for distal edge ISS such that the ZES protruded beyond the original carotid stent. This protruding segment of the ZES demonstrated deformation/kinking in both; in one, this led to symptomatic stent occlusion., Conclusion: The use of coronary ZES in the treatment of recurrent carotid ISS is feasible and appears effective provided the ZES is placed entirely within the original stent. Placement of a coronary ZES outside the carotid stent scaffold should be avoided.

Purpose: To report the utility of proximal brain protection by flow reversal in endovascular management of critical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis coexisting with ipsilateral external carotid artery (iECA) occlusion., Case Report: Four patients with a symptomatic, critical ICA stenosis (in-stent restenosis in one) and iECA occlusion were admitted for carotid artery stenting (CAS). In all cases, the stenosis severity and high-risk lesion morphology precluded the use of filter protection. The "tailored" CAS algorithm indicated that a proximal anti-embolism system should be used to maximize the potential for effective neuroprotection. The flow reversal system, which consists of an independent guiding sheath balloon positioned in the common carotid artery (CCA) and an iECA balloon-wire, was employed, using the CCA balloon only. The system was well-tolerated, and the CAS procedures were uneventful., Conclusion: Due to a unique design with separate CCA and iECA balloons, the flow reversal system can be used for proximal neuroprotection during CAS in severe, symptomatic ICA lesions coexisting with iECA occlusion.

Purpose: To develop and prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of an algorithm for tailoring neuroprotection devices (NPD) and stent types to the patient/lesion in carotid artery stenting (CAS)., Methods: From November 2002 to October 2007, 499 patients (360 men; mean age 65.2+/-8.4 years, range 36-88) were prospectively enrolled in a safety and efficacy study of tailored CAS using proximal (flow blockade or reversal) or distal (filters or occlusion) NPDs and closed- or open-cell self-expanding stents. Of the 535 lesions treated in the study, 175 (32.7%) were "high risk" by morphology. Half (50.1%) the patients were symptomatic., Results: A quarter (137, 25.6%) of the procedures were performed under proximal protection and the remainder (398, 74.4%) with distal NPDs; the direct stenting rate was 66.9%. High-risk lesions were treated predominantly with a proximal NPD and closed-cell stent (77.1% and 82.9%, respectively) and less frequently by direct stenting (37.1%, p<0.0001 versus non-high-risk lesions). The in-hospital death/stroke rate was 2.0% (95% CI 0.85% to 3.23%), and the death/major stroke rate was 0.7% (95% CI 0.02% to 1.48%). There were no myocardial infarctions, but there was 1 (0.2%) further death within 30 days. With the tailored approach, symptom status and high-risk lesion morphology were not risk factors for an adverse outcome after CAS; only age >75 years (p<0.001) was a predictor of short-term death. Long-term survival (95.4% at 1 and 88.3% at 5 years) was similar for symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients, direct stenting versus predilation, and closed- vs. open-cell stent design; only coronary artery disease adversely impacted survival (p = 0.04). The rates of freedom from death/ipsilateral stroke were 94.9% at 1 year and 85.9% at 5 years., Conclusion: Tailored CAS is associated with a low complication rate and high long-term efficacy. CAS operators should have a practical knowledge of different NPDs, including at least one proximal type.