1. Computerized Occlusion Rating: A Superior Predictor of Aneurysm Rebleeding for Ruptured Embolized Aneurysms
- Author
-
H. Milavec, Andreas Gruber, A. Di Ieva, Ernst Schuster, M. Wiesender, Christian Dorfer, G. Bavinszki, Daniel Gibson, E. Lahnsteiner, Engelbert Knosp, B. Feichter, M. Krawagna, and Camillo Sherif
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Aneurysm, Ruptured ,Aneurysm ,Recurrence ,Occlusion ,Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular diseases ,Embolization ,Cerebral Hemorrhage ,Observer Variation ,Carat ,Interventional ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Angiography, Digital Subtraction ,food and beverages ,Intracranial Aneurysm ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Embolization, Therapeutic ,Cerebral Angiography ,respiratory tract diseases ,Surgery ,Angiography ,cardiovascular system ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Radiology ,business ,After treatment ,Cerebral angiography - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The initial angiographic occlusion rate is the strongest predictor of later rebleeding in previously ruptured coil-embolized cerebral aneurysms. Angiographic estimations of aneurysmal occlusion rates are, however, subjective in nature and confounded by methodologic problems. COR has been developed, and its superiority has been experimentally established to overcome subjective bias. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of COR as a more objective predictor of aneurysm rebleeding when compared with SOR as described in the Raymond Classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied COR in a consecutive series of 249 patients. Two DSA projections were selected independently by 2 blinded investigators. In cases of disagreement on the selected projections, a consensus decision was obtained. SOR were determined by 2 independent observers according to the Raymond classification. COR was measured by 2 blinded investigators. Interobserver variations were determined for SOR and COR. COR results were compared with SOR results and stratified as 100%, 99.9%–90%, 89.9%–70%, and
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF