Search

Meta-analysis uses numerical tools to pool data and to estimate a summary effect size for the comparison of two interventions from a set of randomised controlled trials identified in a systematic review. An effect size is a single number that expresses the difference in outcome from the interventions. The most commonly used effect sizes for dichotomous outcomes, for example, mortality, are the odds ratio and the relative risk. The results of a meta-analysis are usually presented in a complex figure, known as a forest plot, which shows both the individual studies and the summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses are performed to clarify the effect of the experimental design bias on the effect size. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the included studies are explored by the additional tools of fixed effect versus random effects models and subgroup analyses., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Part task training (PTT) focuses on dividing complex tasks into components followed by intensive concentrated training on individual components. Variable priority training (VPT) focuses on optimal distribution of attention when performing multiple tasks simultaneously with the goal of flexible allocation of attention. This study explored how principles of PTT and VPT adapted to anesthesia training would improve first-year anesthesiology residents' management of simulated adverse airway and respiratory events. The authors hypothesized that participants with PTT and VPT would perform better than those with standard training., Methods: Twenty-two first-year anesthesia residents were randomly divided into two groups and trained over 12 months. The control group received standard didactic and simulation-based training. The experimental group received similar training but with emphasis on PTT and VPT techniques. Participant ability to manage seven adverse airway and respiratory events were assessed before and after the training period. Performance was measured by the number of correct tasks, making a correct diagnosis, assessment of perceived workload, and an assessment of scenario comprehension., Results: Participants in both groups exhibited significant improvement in all metrics after a year of training. Participants in the experimental group were able to complete more tasks and answered more comprehension questions correctly. There was no difference in perceived workload or the number of correct diagnoses between groups., Conclusion: This study in part confirmed the study hypotheses. The results suggest that VPT and PTT are promising adjuncts to didactic and simulation-based training for management of adverse airway and respiratory events.