Search

Abstract Background Obstetric anesthesia guidelines are essential for standardizing obstetric anesthesia practices globally and ensuring high-quality patient care. However, practices may vary across different settings, and there are limited data from Arab countries. This study aims to gain insights into obstetric anesthesia practices in several major hospitals across Arab countries. Methods A questionnaire was emailed to 85 obstetric anesthesiologists/anesthesia chairpersons in major hospitals, including academic medical institutions and central hospitals, across 11/22 Arab countries. This survey gathered data on key structural and process-related obstetric anesthesia indicators. Results Out of 85 contacted, we had 56 responses (65.8%), with 41 being fully completed, providing insights into obstetric anesthesia indicators. Regarding structure: 31 (76%) hospitals had an operating room adjacent to the delivery room, all had intensive care units, and 22 (54%) had a lead obstetric anesthesiologist. For equipment, 19 (46%) had a video laryngoscope in the delivery suite, and 20 (49%) occasionally used ultrasound for epidurals. Regarding process: 33 (81%) held regular meetings, and 21 (51%) conducted research. Before epidural and spinal procedures, 26 (63%) and 28 (68%) required coagulation studies for patients without a history of hemorrhagic complications, while 38 (93%) and 36 (88%) mandated a platelet count, respectively. For labor analgesia, 34 (83%) primarily used epidurals, and 15 (37%) placed preemptive catheters in high-risk pregnancies. For cesarean delivery, 40 (98%) used spinals, with 16 (39%) using intrathecal morphine and 22 (54%) administering aspiration prophylaxis before general anesthesia. Regarding spinal-induced hypotension, 6 (15%) used prophylactic phenylephrine infusion. Conclusion This survey highlights variations in obstetric anesthesia practices among various major hospitals in several Arab countries, compared to international recommendations. It emphasizes the need for obstetric anesthesia registries in the Arab world for future research. Further studies are required to outline country-specific practices, improve resource allocation, and enhance obstetric population safety and satisfaction.

Abstract Background Inadequate intraoperative mechanical ventilation (MV) can lead to ventilator-induced lung injury and increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Mechanical power (MP) was shown to be a valuable indicator for MV outcomes in critical care patients. The aim of this study is to assess the association between intraoperative MP in low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia and PPCs. Methods Two-hundred eighteen low-risk surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery were included in the study. Intraoperative mechanical ventilatory support parameters were collected for all patients. Postoperatively, patients were followed throughout their hospital stay and up to seven days post discharge for the occurrence of any PPCs. Results Out of 218 patients, 35% exhibited PPCs. The average body mass index, tidal volume per ideal body weight, peak inspiratory pressure, and MP were significantly higher in the patients with PPCs than in the patients without PPCs (30.3 ± 8.1 kg/m2 vs. 26.8 ± 4.9 kg.m2, p