1. Inspiratory Effort Sensation to Added Resistive Loading in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Author
-
Yoshihiro Kikuchi, Wataru Hida, Kunio Shirato, Hajime Kurosawa, Shinichi Okabe, Ye Tun, and Masao Tabata
- Subjects
Male ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Polysomnography ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Sensation ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Positive-Pressure Respiration ,Pressure ,medicine ,Humans ,Continuous positive airway pressure ,Analysis of Variance ,Mouth ,Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ,Sleep disorder ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Airway Resistance ,Respiration ,Epworth Sleepiness Scale ,Apnea ,Carbon Dioxide ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,nervous system diseases ,respiratory tract diseases ,Airway Obstruction ,Oxygen ,Obstructive sleep apnea ,Inhalation ,Apnea–hypopnea index ,Spirometry ,Case-Control Studies ,Anesthesia ,Respiratory Mechanics ,Breathing ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Pulmonary Ventilation ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Study objectives Repeated episodes of upper-airwayocclusion are the main characteristics of patients with obstructivesleep apnea (OSA) during sleep. It has been reported that an impairmentin the sensation of detection and a depression of ventilatorycompensation to added load could be observed in such patients. In thisstudy, we examined patients with OSA to evaluate the inspiratory effortsensation (IES), ventilation, and mouth occlusion pressures duringadded resistive loading while awake and to determine whether they canbe reversed by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)treatment. Design A hospital-based case-controlstudy. Setting A sleep laboratory of a medical unitin Japan. Subjects Seventeen patients with moderateto severe OSA and 10 control subjects were included in this study. Measurements All patients with OSA had undergone standardnocturnal polysomnography. Patients with OSA and control subjects wereevaluated for IES measured by a modified Borg score, ventilation, andmouth occlusion pressure during control and inspiratory resistiveloaded breathing. These tests were repeated in all patients with OSAafter 2 weeks of nasal CPAP treatment. Results IES toinspiratory resistive loading was lower in patients with OSA than incontrol subjects. There were no differences in ventilation and mouthocclusion pressure between patients and control subjects during loadedbreathing. After 2 weeks of nasal CPAP, the decreased IES was increasedin patients with OSA. Conclusion In patients withOSA, the decreased IES to inspiratory resistive loaded breathing isreversible with nasal CPAP. This could be one additional benefit ofnasal CPAP in the treatment of OSA.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF