Search

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is hallmarked by spinal canal narrowing and related cord compression and myelopathy. CSF pressure dynamics are likely disturbed due to spinal canal stenosis. The study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of continuous intraoperative CSF pressure monitoring during surgical decompression. Prospective single center study (NCT02170155) with enrolment of DCM patients that underwent surgical decompression between December 2019 and May 2021. Data from N=17 patients were analyzed, symptom severity graded with the modified Japanese Orthopedic Score (mJOA). CSF pulsations were continuously monitored with a lumbar intrathecal catheter during surgical decompression. Mean patient age was 62±9 years (range 38-73; 8F), symptoms were mild-moderate in most patients (mean mJOA 14±2, range 10-18). Measurements were well tolerated without safety concerns. In 15/16 (94%) CSF pulsations increased at the time of surgical decompression. In one case, responsiveness could not be evaluated for technical reasons. Unexpected CSF pulsation decrease was related to adverse events (i.e., CSF leakage). Median CSF pulsation amplitudes increased from pre-decompression (0.52 mmHg [IQR 0.71]) to post-decompression (0.72 mmHg [IQR 0.96]) (P=0.001). Mean baseline CSF pressure increased with lower magnitude than pulsations, from 9.5±3.5 to 10.3±3.8 mmHg (P=0.003). Systematic relations of CSF pulsations were confined to surgical decompression, independent of arterial blood pressure (P=0.927) or heart rate (P=0.102). Intraoperative CSF pulsation monitoring was sensitive, timely, and specifically related to surgical decompression while in addition adverse events could be discerned. Further investigation of the clinical value of intraoperative guidance for decompression in complex DCM surgery is promising.

BACKGROUND Intra-operative muscle relaxation is often required in orthopaedic surgery and the hand train-of-four (TOF) test is usually used for its quantification. However, even though full muscle relaxation is claimed by anaesthesiologists based on a TOF count of zero, surgeons observe residual muscle activity. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess if hand or foot TOF adequately represents intra-operative muscle relaxation compared with multiple motor evoked potentials. DESIGN Prospective observational study. SETTING A single-centre study performed between February 2016 and December 2018 at the Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. PATIENTS Twenty patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal fusion were prospectively enrolled in this study after giving written informed consent. INTERVENTIONS To assess neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with the intermediate duration nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent rocuronium, hand TOF (adductor pollicis) and foot TOF (flexor hallucis brevis) monitoring, and muscle motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) from the upper and lower extremities were assessed prior to surgery under general anaesthesia. Following baseline measurements, muscle relaxation was performed with rocuronium until the spinal surgeon observed sufficient relaxation for surgical intervention. At this timepoint, NMB was assessed by TOF and MMEP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was to determine the different effect of rocuronium on muscle relaxation comparing hand and foot TOF with the paraspinal musculature assessed by MMEP. RESULTS Hand TOF was more resistant to NMB and had a shorter recovery time than foot TOF. When comparing MMEPs, muscle relaxation occurred first in the hip abductors, and the paraspinal and deltoid muscles. The most resistant muscle to NMB was the abductor digiti minimi. Direct comparison showed that repetitive MMEPs simultaneously recorded from various muscles at the upper and lower extremities and from paraspinal muscles reflect muscle relaxation similar to TOF testing. CONCLUSION Hand TOF is superior to foot TOF in assessing muscle relaxation during spinal surgery. Hand TOF adequately represents the degree of muscle relaxation not only for the paraspinal muscles but also for all orthopaedic surgical sites where NMB is crucial for good surgical conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicalTrials.gov (NCT03318718).

Andrea Saporito,1 José Aguirre,2 Alain Borgeat,2 Andreas Perren,3 Luciano Anselmi,1 Roberto Poggi,4 Bruno Minotti,5 Stefano Cafarotti,6 Davide La Regina,7 Samuele Ceruti81Service of Anesthesiology, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland; 3Department of Intensive Care, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; 4Service of Anesthesiology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland; 5Department of Emergency Medicine, St Gallen General Hospital, St Gallen, Switzerland; 6Service of Thoracic Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; 7Service of Visceral Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, Bellinzona, Switzerland; 8Department of Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Geneva, SwitzerlandIntroduction: Breast surgery is associated with persistent postsurgical pain; usually related to poorly treated acute pain. Paravertebral block has been successfully employed in analgesic protocols for breast surgery; its impact on postdischarge pain (PDP) has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess characteristics of PDP after breast surgery, the development of chronic postoperative pain (CPP) and its impact on health care costs.Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational study on a continuous cohort of adult female patients undergoing local breast cancer surgery under combined anesthesia. All patients were interviewed 6 months after hospital discharge. The survey was specifically conceived to assess incidence, features and duration of PDP. The overall cost of additional healthcare resources consumed with a specific relationship to persistent PDP was estimated.Results: A database of 244 patients was preliminarily analyzed. Of these, 188 were included in the following statistical analysis; 123 patients (65.2%) reported significant PDP, with a median intensity on NRS of 6 (IQR=2), more frequently described as burning and associated with paresthesia and/or hyperalgesia (87 patients, 46%). One hundred and six patients (56.5%) reported this pain as interfering with their normal daily activities, work and sleep. In 26.8% of cases (50 patients) symptoms lasted more than 1 month and in 28 patients (15.0%) pain became chronic. The majority of patients self-treated their pain with non-steroideal anti-inflammatory drugs, but in 50 patients (26.8%) this therapy was reported as ineffective. This additional consumption of healthcare resources led to a significant economical impact.Conclusion: PDP and CPP seem to be common complications after breast cancer surgery, even if a combined anesthesia technique with a thoracic paravertebral block is performed, leading to severe consequences on patients’ quality of life and increasing consumption of healthcare resources after discharge.Trial number: NCT03618459 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).Keywords: breast surgery, paravertebral block, regional anesthesia, postoperative pain

Study objectives The aim of this study was to assess the impact of intravenous general anesthesia and controlled hypotension on cerebral saturation (rScO2), cerebral blood flow measured as middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (Vmax MCA) and neurobehavioral outcome in patients scheduled for shoulder surgery in beach chair position. Design Prospective, assessor-blinded observational study. Setting University hospital, shoulder surgery operating room. Patients Forty ASA I-II patients scheduled for shoulder surgery in beach chair position and controlled hypotension. Interventions Neurological and neurobehavioral tests were performed prior and the day after surgery. The baseline data for near-infrared spectroscopy, bispectral index, cerebral blood flow, PaCO2 and invasive blood pressure (radial artery) were taken prior anesthesia and after anesthesia induction, after beach chair positioning and all 20 min after surgery start until discharge of the patient. Measurements Neurological and neurobehavioral tests, cerebral saturation (rScO2) using near-infrared spectroscopy, BIS, cerebral blood flow using Doppler of the middle cerebral artery (Vmax MCA), PaCO2 and invasive blood pressure assessed at heart and at the external acoustic meatus level. Main results The incidence of cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) was 25%. The blood pressure drop 5 min after beach chair position measured at the acoustic meatus level in the CDE group was higher compared to patients without CDEs (p = 0.009) as was the rScO2 (p = 0.039) and the Vmax MCA (p = 0.002). There were no neurological deficits but patients with CDEs showed a greater negative impact on neurobehavioral tests 24 h after surgery compared to patients without CDEs (p = 0.001). Conclusions In ASA I-II patients intravenous general anesthesia and controlled hypotension in the beach chair position affects cerebral blood flow and cerebral oxygenation with impact on the neurobehavioral outcome.

Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) leads to functional impairment by compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. In DCM, the dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and intraspinal pressure (ISP), as well as spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) remain not investigated yet. Recent technical advances have enabled investigation of these parameters in acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We aim to investigate the properties of CSFP/ISP and spinal cord hemodynamics during and after decompressive surgery in DCM.

IntroductionDegenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a disabling spinal disorder characterised by sensorimotor deficits of upper and lower limbs, neurogenic bladder dysfunction and neuropathic pain. When suspected, cervical MRI helps to reveal spinal cord compression and rules out alternative diagnoses. However, the correlation between radiological findings and symptoms is weak. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) analysis may complement the appreciation of cord compression and be used for intraoperative and postoperative monitorings in patients undergoing surgical decompression.Methods and analysisTwenty patients diagnosed with DCM undergoing surgical decompression will receive standardised lumbar CSFP monitoring immediately before, during and 24 hours after operation. Rest (ie, opening pressure, CSF pulsation) and stimulated (ie, Valsalva, Queckenstedt’s) CSFP—findings in DCM will be compared with 20 controls and results from CSFP monitoring will be related to clinical and neurophysiological findings. Arterial blood pressure will be recorded perioperatively and postoperatively to calculate spinal cord perfusion pressure and spinal vascular reactivity index. Furthermore, measures of CSFP will be compared with markers of spinal cord compression by means of MR imaging.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol conformed to the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Zurich (KEK-ZH number PB-2016-00623). The main publications from this study will cover the CSFP fluid dynamics and pressure analysis preoperative, perioperative and postoperative correlated with imaging, clinical scores and neurophysiology. Other publications will deal with preoperative and postoperative spinal perfusion. Furthermore, we will disseminate an analysis on waveform morphology and the correlation with blood pressure and ECG. Parts of the data will be used for computational modelling of cervical stenosis.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02170155).

BACKGROUND Data from patient questionnaires reveal that the intensity of postoperative pain is widely underestimated. Insufficient pain control may contribute to impaired short- and long-term outcome. Preoperative administration of methadone might potentially improve postoperative pain control due to its long pharmacological half-life. METHODS The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of methadone administered at anesthesia induction on postoperative analgesic requirements in ASA I-III patients after moderate-to-severely painful surgery scheduled for ≥90 minutes. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of methadone (0.2 mg/kg) or fentanyl (standard, 0.003 mg/kg) intravenously (IV) at anesthesia induction. For postoperative pain control, all study patients were accommodated with morphine on the basis of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). RESULTS Per-protocol analysis revealed that the median cumulative morphine consumption was significantly lower in patients receiving a single dose of methadone, in the Postanesthesia Care Unit (0 mg vs. 7 mg of morphine, P

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Spinal anesthesia is well suited for day-care surgery, however a persisting motor block after surgery can delay discharge. Among the new drugs available, chloroprocaine has been associated with a short onset time, and motor block duration and a quicker discharge. However, it is not clear if those outcomes are clinically significantly superior compared to those associated with the use of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. DESIGN: Aim of the study was to determine if spinal 2-chloroprocaine was superior to low-dose spinal bupivacaine regarding the following outcomes: onset time, block duration, time to ambulation and time to discharge. PATIENTS/INTERVENTIONS: We performed a systematic literature search of the last 30 years using PubMed Embase and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. We included only blinded, prospective trials comparing chloroprocaine with a low dose of bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Low dose bupivacaine was defined as a dose of 10 mg or less. Outcomes of interest were time to motor block regression (primary outcome), time to ambulation and time to discharge (secondary outcomes), as indirect indicators of a complete recovery after spinal anesthesia. MAIN RESULTS: Compared to a low dose bupivacaine, spinal 2-chloroprocaine was associated with significantly faster motor and sensory block regression (pMD = -57 min-140.3 min; P = 0.015 and

Study objective Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in postoperative pain management. While an increasing number of in vitro and animal studies point toward an inhibitory effect of NSAIDs on bone healing process, the few existing retro- and prospective clinical studies present conflicting data. Design The aim of this qualitative, systematic review was to investigate the impact of perioperative use of NSAIDs in humans on postoperative fracture/spinal fusion healing compared to other used analgesics measured as fracture nonunion with radiological control. Patients/interventions We performed a systematic literature search of the last 38 years using PubMed Embase and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register including retro- and prospective clinical, human trials assessing the effect of NSAIDs on postoperative fracture/spinal fusion healing when used for perioperative pain management with a radiological follow up to assess eventual nonunion. Due to different study designs, drugs, dosages/exposition times and different methods to assess fracture nonunion, these studies were not pooled for a meta-analysis. A descriptive summary of all studies, level of evidence, study quality and study bias assessment using different scores were used. Main results Three prospective randomized controlled studies and thirteen retrospective cohort human studies were identified for a total of 12′895 patients. The overall study quality was low according to Jadad and Oxford Levels of Evidence scores. Conclusions Published results of human trials did not show strong evidence that NDAIDs for pain therapy after fracture osteosynthesis or spinal fusion lead to an increased nonunion rate. Reviewed studies present such conflicting data, that no clinical recommendation can be made regarding the appropriate use of NSAIDs in this context. Considering laboratory data of animal, human tissue research and recommendation of clinical reviews, a short perioperative exposition to NSAIDs is most likely not deleterious. However, randomized, controlled studies are warranted to support or refute this hypothesis.

More stable perioperative hemodynamic conditions, lower costs and a lower perioperative complication rate were reported in young healthy patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in spinal anesthesia (SA) compared to general anesthesia (GA). However, the benefits of SA in high risk patients (ASA≥II suffering from cardiovascular and/or pulmonary pathologies) undergoing this surgery are unclear. Our objective was to analyze whether SA leads to an improved perioperative hemodynamic stability and to a more cost-effective management compared to GA in high risk patients undergoing this surgery.In a retrospective analysis 146 ASA II-III patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery in SA were compared with 292 ASA I-III patients who were operated in GA between 2000 and 2014. Hemodynamic effects, hospitalization times, complications, and costs according to the Swiss billing system were assessed. The data extraction was conducted according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) initiative for cohort studies.The patients in the SA group were older (75years (±9.6) vs 69 (±11.5), p0.001), had a lower BMI (25.8kg/m2 (±4.8) vs 27.2 (±4.7), p=0.003) and showed a higher ASA score (3 vs 2, p0.001). However, SA was associated with significantly better perioperative hemodynamic stability with less need for intraoperative vasopressors (15% vs 57%, p0.001), volume supplementation (1113ml ±458 vs 1589±644, p0.001) and transfusions (0% vs 4%, p0.001). Additionally, the number of hypotension episodes was lower in the SA group (15% vs 47%, p0.001). Furthermore, the SA group showed a significantly shorter duration of surgery (70min (±1.2) vs 91 (±41), p0.001), lower postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (4% vs 28%, p0.001) and pain in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) (visual analogue scale (VAS) 2.3 (±1.1) vs 0.8 (±0.8), p0.001), whereas pain after 24h did not differ (VAS 0.9 (±1) vs 0.8 (±1.1), p=ns). The postoperative complication (7% vs 5%, p=0.286) and revision rates (4% vs 5%, p=0.626) were similar in both groups. Total costs (United States Dollars (USD) 6377 (±2332) vs 7018 (±4056), p=0.003) and PACU time were significantly lower in the SA group (35min (±12) vs 109 (±173), p0.001).Lumbar spine surgery in cardiovascular high risk patients with SA is safe, allows good perioperative hemodynamic stability and might lead to lower health care costs. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Local anesthetics are the pharmacologic cornerstone of regional anesthesia producing reversible and complete blockade of neuronal transmission when applied near the axons. Their application results in complete interruption of nerve impulse conduction, allowing abolition of sensation from the area innervated by the corresponding nerves and leading also to motor block.

Background The influence of the muscular response elicited by neurostimulation on the success rate of interscalene block using a catheter (ISC) is unknown. In this investigation, we compared the success rate of ISC placement as indicated by biceps or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches. Methods Three hundred (ASA I-II) patients presenting for elective arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were prospectively randomized to assessment by biceps (Group B) or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches (Group DT). All ISCs were placed with the aid of neurostimulation. The tip of the stimulating needle was placed after disappearance of either biceps or deltoid, triceps, or both twitches at 0.3 mA. The catheter was advanced 2-3 cm past the tip of the needle and the block was performed using 40 ml ropivacaine 0.5%. Successful block was defined as sensory block of the supraclavicular nerve and sensory and motor block involving the axillary, radial, median, and musculocutaneous nerves within 30 min. Results Success rate was 98.6% in Group DT compared with 92.5% in Group B (95% confidence interval 0.01-0.11; P

Introduction Continuous regional analgesia is an established technique for effective postoperative pain treatment, particularly after orthopedic surgical procedures. Even if it has been increasingly applied to the outpatient setting as well, many anesthesiologists are still reluctant to discharge patients with a perineural catheter in place. Aim of this review was to clarify the evidences about safety and effectiveness of outpatient continuous peripheral nerve blocks. Evidence acquisition A systematic review of all prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of the last 20 years on outpatient continuous peripheral nerve blocks after ambulatory orthopedic surgery was performed, using both PubMed and OVID databases were. Study quality was assessed using the modified Jadad Scale. Primary outcomes were pain at 24 and 48 hours and morphine consumption. Evidence synthesis Five studies matched the inclusion criteria and were considered of good quality to be included in the review process. All these studies consistently showed a better pain control both at rest and during movement within the first postoperative day, leading to a reduced opioid consumption in patients treated with outpatient continuous regional analgesia. However, only three studies showed these advantages to be sustained longer than the first 24 hours postoperatively. No severe complications were reported. Conclusions High-quality evidences about outpatient regional analgesia are scarce. Considering the advantages of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in the inpatient setting more prospective studies assessing also functional recovery are needed to further implement these techniques in the ambulatory setting.

Background Significant hypotension is frequent after spinal anaesthesia and fluid administration as therapy is usually empirical. Inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasound (US) is effective to assess fluid responsiveness in critical care patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the IVCUS-guided volume optimization to prevent post-spinal hypotension. Methods In this prospective, randomized, cohort study, 160 patients scheduled for surgery under spinal anaesthesia were randomized into a study group (IVCUS-group), consisting of an IVCUS analysis before spinal anaesthesia with IVCUS-guided volume management and a control group (group C) with no IVCUS assessment. The primary outcome was a relative risk reduction in the incidence of hypotension between the groups; secondary outcomes were the need for vasoactive drugs and the amounts of fluids required after spinal anaesthesia. We also tested the hypothesis of a correlation between IVC collapsibility index and hypotension after spinal anaesthesia. Results The relative risk reduction of hypotension between the groups was 35% (IVCUS-group 27.5%, Group C 42.5%, P =0.044, CI=95%). The need for vasoactive drugs in the IVCUS-group was significantly lower compared to the C-group ( P =0.015), while the total amount of fluids was significantly superior higher in the IVCUS group ( P r 2 =0.32), but could not be used to predict postspinal anaesthesia hypotension. Conclusions IVCUS is an effective method to prevent postspinal anaesthesia hypotension by IVCUS-guided fluid administration before spinal anaesthesia. Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.gov - NCT02271477.

Summary Regional anaesthesia has been shown to have several advantages over general anaesthesia in reducing the need for, and hence cost of, unscheduled outpatient visits or readmission to hospital. However, the benefit has not been evaluated in a direct comparison between day-care patients and inpatients. We randomly allocated 120 patients undergoing unilateral foot surgery to either inpatient (two-day postoperative stay) or day-care management under continuous regional anaesthesia, and compared the impact on unscheduled postoperative outpatient visits, readmissions to hospital and the associated costs. The operations were performed under popliteal sciatic nerve block. A perineural catheter was inserted before surgery and removed from all patients on the third postoperative day. We found no significant difference in the incidence of outpatient visits (3.3% day-care vs 5.0% inpatient, p = 0.640), readmissions (6.7% day-care vs 3.3% inpatient, p = 0.395) or complications between the two groups. Costs were also significantly lower in the day-care group (net difference €8011 (£6684; $10 986) per patient, p

The question of whether anesthetic, analgesic or other perioperative intervention during cancer resection surgery might influence long-term oncologic outcomes has generated much attention over the past 13 years. A wealth of experimental and observational clinical data have been published, but the results of prospective, randomized clinical trials are awaited. The European Union supports a pan-European network of researchers, clinicians and industry partners engaged in this question (COST Action 15204: Euro-Periscope). In this narrative review, members of the Euro-Periscope network briefly summarize the current state of evidence pertaining to the potential effects of the most commonly deployed anesthetic and analgesic techniques and other non-surgical interventions during cancer resection surgery on tumor recurrence or metastasis. Funding Agencies|European Union [COST ACTION 15204]

Clinical and basic science studies have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory properties of local anaesthetics. Recent studies have begun to unravel molecular pathways linking inflammation and cancer. Regional anaesthesia is associated in some retrospective clinical studies with reduced risk of metastasis and increased long-term survival. The potential beneficial effects of regional anaesthesia have been attributed mainly to the inhibition of the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery and to the reduction in the requirements of volatile anaesthetics and opioids. Because cancer is linked to inflammation and local anaesthetics have anti-inflammatory effects, these agents may participate in reducing the risk of metastasis, but their mechanism of action is unknown. We demonstrated in vitro that amide local anaesthetics attenuate tumour cell migration as well as signalling pathways enhancing tumour growth and metastasis. This has provided the first evidence of a molecular mechanism by which regional anaesthesia might inhibit or reduce cancer metastases.

Background To potentially optimize intubation skill teaching in an American Heart Association® Airway Management Course® for novices, we investigated the transfer of skills from video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy and vice versa using King Vision® and Macintosh blade laryngoscopes respectively. Methods Ninety volunteers (medical students, residents and staff physicians) without prior intubation experience were randomized into three groups to receive intubation training with either King Vision® or Macintosh blade or both. Afterwards they attempted intubation on two human cadavers with both tools. The primary outcome was skill transfer from video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy assessed by first attempt success rates within 60 s. Secondary outcomes were skill transfer in the opposite direction, the efficacy of teaching both tools, and the success rates and esophageal intubation rates of Macintosh blade versus King Vision®. Results Performance with the Macintosh blade was identical following training with either Macintosh blade or King Vision® (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.5–2.6). Performance with the King Vision® was significantly better in the group that was trained on it (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2–5.9). Success rate within 60 s with Macintosh blade was 48% compared to 52% with King Vision® (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.4–2.0). Rate of esophageal intubations with Macintosh blade was significantly higher (17% versus 4%, OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.1–23). Conclusions We found better skill transfer from King Vision® to Macintosh blade than vice versa and fewer esophageal intubations with video laryngoscopy. For global skill improvement in an airway management course for novices, teaching only video laryngoscopy may be sufficient. However, success rates were low for both devices. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12871-016-0296-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Short-acting regional anesthetics have already been successfully used for peripheral nerve blocks in an ambulatory surgery setting. However, the impact on direct and indirect perioperative costs comparing 2 different short-acting local anesthetics has not been performed yet.Observational, prospective, case-control, cost-minimization study.Operating room, regional hospitalOne hundred adult American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III patients scheduled for popliteal block after minor ambulatory foot surgery.Application of 30 mL chloroprocaine 3% or of 30 mL mepivacaine 1.5% for anesthesia.Cost-minimization evaluation. Direct and indirect perioperative costs were calculated. Block success, onset time and block duration, patient satisfaction, and unplanned outpatient visits or readmissions after discharge were also assessed.Onset time (sensory: 4.3 ± 2.4 vs 11.5 ± 3.2 minutes; motor: 7.1 ± 3.7 vs 18.4 ± 4.5 minutes) and block duration (sensory: 105 ± 26 vs 317 ± 46 minutes; motor: 91 ± 25 vs 216 ± 31 minutes) were significantly shorter (P.001) when chloroprocaine 3% was used. This translated to P.001, basically due to a faster discharge home 55 ± 1 vs 175 ± 2 minutes; P.001) in favor of chloroprocaine 3%, without negatively affecting either block efficacy or patients satisfaction. There were no unplanned outpatient visits or readmissions and no complications in the follow-up at 6 weeks.We conclude that the more expensive chloroprocaine 3% for ambulatory foot surgery can reduce total perioperative costs and reduce length of stay in outpatient patients. Moreover, the saved time and personal resources could be used for additional cases, further increasing the revenues of an ambulatory surgical center.

Study objective Beach chair position is considered a potential risk factor for central neurological events particularly if combined with low blood pressure. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of regional anesthesia on cerebral blood flow and neurobehavioral outcome. Design This is a prospective, assessor-blinded observational study evaluating patients in the beach chair position undergoing shoulder surgery under regional anesthesia. Setting University hospital operating room. Patients Forty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I-II physical status scheduled for elective shoulder surgery. Interventions Cerebral saturation and blood flow of the middle cerebral artery were measured prior to anesthesia and continued after beach chair positioning until discharge to the postanesthesia care unit. The anesthesiologist was blinded for these values. Controlled hypotension with systolic blood pressure≤100mm Hg was maintained during surgery. Measurements Neurobehavioral tests and values of regional cerebral saturation, bispectral index, the mean maximal blood flow of the middle cerebral artery, and invasive blood pressure were measured prior to regional anesthesia, and measurements were repeated after placement of the patient on the beach chair position and every 20 minutes thereafter until discharge to postanesthesia care unit. The neurobehavioral tests were repeated the day after surgery. Main results The incidence of cerebral desaturation events was 5%. All patients had a significant blood pressure drop 5 minutes after beach chair positioning, measured at the heart as well as the acoustic meatus levels, when compared with baseline values ( P P =.136) or the maximal blood flow of the middle cerebral artery ( P =.212) at the same time points. Some neurocognitive tests showed an impairment 24 hours after surgery ( P Conclusions Beach chair position in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery had no major impact on cerebral blood flow and cerebral oxygenation. However, some impact on neurobehavioral outcome 24 hours after surgery was observed.

Background:In this study, we investigated the impact of a continuous wound infusion with ropivacaine 0.3% on pain and morphine consumption after minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.Methods:Seventy-six consecutive patients scheduled for elective minimally invasive hip replacement using spinal anesthesia were prospectively included in this double-blind study. Epicapsular placement of a 15-cm fenestrated catheter was performed by the surgeon. Patients were randomized to receive either 20 mL ropivacaine 0.3% (R-group) or 20 mL NaCl 0.9% (P-group) applied into the wound as a bolus before wound closure. A continuous infusion of either ropivacaine 0.3% or placebo was then infused at 8 mL/h for 48 hours after surgery with an elastomeric pump. Morphine IV-patient-controlled analgesia was offered to all patients. Morphine consumption, pain at rest and with motion, and total and unbound ropivacaine plasma concentration were recorded during the 48-hour study period. Postoperative follow-up was performed at 3 months.Results:Demographic and surgical data were similar in both groups. Mean morphine consumption was significantly lower in the R-group than in the P-group during the first 48 postoperative hours: 45.4 ± 9.5 vs 69.7 ± 9.6 (P < 0.0001). There was a mean reduction of 14.4 mg for the first 24 postoperative hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.6 to 16.1) and 20.8 mg for the next 24 hours (95% CI 19.1 to 22.4). Pain scores at rest and with motion were lower in the R-group (P < 0.0001). Mean patient satisfaction increased 22.7% from baseline (CI 95% 15.9 to 29.6) in the R-group. Total and unbound ropivacaine plasma concentrations were below toxic levels in the R-group. The free ropivacaine concentration was 0.14 and 0.11 μgmol/L at T(24) and T(48), respectively, in the R-group. At 3 months postoperatively, hip pain and analgesic consumption were similar, but a significant reduction in wound discomfort to touch (31.2; 95% CI 27.7 to 34.7) and pressure (24; 95% CI 20.1 to 27.9) was observed in the R-group (P < 0.0001).Conclusions:Continuous epicapsular wound infusion with ropivacaine 0.3% after minimally invasive hip replacement is an efficient technique for reducing morphine consumption and improving the quality of postoperative analgesia. The beneficial effects of this technique are still present 3 months after surgery.

The incidence of neurologic damage after regional anesthesia is rare. However, this complication may have dramatic consequences for the patient because recovery may take several months. As nerve conduction studies and electromyography are the cornerstones of investigations in cases of postblock deficit, it is mandatory for the anesthesiologist performing regional anesthesia to have a basic understanding of these tests to discuss the cause with the surgeon and inform the patient about the prognosis.

A 33-YR-OLD woman, American Society of Anesthesiologists risk classification I, was referred for surgical treatment of left shoulder instability. Her medical history was unremarkable, but she had undergone two previous shoulder surgeries: anterior stabilization of left shoulder 3 yr ago followed by a posterior Bankart stabilization 2 yr later because of recurrent luxation and pain. At examination, she still complained about pain in her left shoulder, and movement was severely limited. A left Bankart operation and capsulotomy were scheduled. A preoperative interscalene catheter was placed according to the modified lateral approach. The interscalene brachial plexus was identified using a nerve stimulator (Stimuplex® HNS II, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) connected to the proximal end of the metal inner part of a short beveled needle. A contraction of the deltoid muscle was observed with a current output of 0.35 mA, with an impulse duration of 0.1 ms. The insertion of the perineural catheter was performed using the cannula-over-needle technique with a plastic cannula (Polymedic®, Polyplex N-50 T, 20 gauge external diameter, te me na, Bondy, France). The catheter was introduced distally between the anterior and middle scalene muscle up to 3 cm. A bolus of 30 ml ropivacaine (0.5%) was administered, and the procedure was uneventful. No pain, dysesthesias, or paresthesias occurred at any time. Fifteen minutes later, a complete sensorimotor block of the left arm was observed. Then, general anesthesia with targetcontrolled infusion (TCI Diprifusor, SIMS Graseby Ltd., Watford, Herts, United Kingdom) of propofol and remifentanil was administered. The patient was positioned in the beach chair for surgery. The procedure lasted 3 h 30 min and was described by the surgeon as difficult. Postoperative analgesia was performed with patient-controlled interscalene analgesia using ropivacaine (0.2%) and was started 4 h after the end of the surgery. The pump settings were basal rate of 5 ml/h with supplementary boli of 4 ml for every 20 min. The patient was pain free, and the patient-controlled interscalene analgesia was stopped after 54 h. Even after 36 h of termination of patient-controlled interscalene analgesia, no motor or sensory recovery was observed. An ultrasonography of the brachial plexus was performed to exclude a hematoma and revealed no irregular finding. A complete neurologic examination including neurophysiologic recordings on the following day (72 h after surgery) demonstrated a motor and sensory incomplete lesion of nerve fibers originating from the upper brachial plexus (involving the following muscles: deltoid M0/5, biceps M0/5, and triceps M3/5). Motor nerve conduction studies (figs. 1 and 2) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) of the median and ulnar nerves that originate from the lower brachial plexus revealed normal recordings. Electromyography at the initial examination did not show signs of denervation (fibrillation or positive waves) but resulted in complete paralysis (no retrievable voluntary electromyography activity). The later finding at this early stage after injury can be in line with a neurapraxia (conduction failure) or axonotmesis (structural neural damage). Eventually, 1 month later, at the first follow-up, electromyographies showed signs of denervation most severe within the deltoid and biceps muscles, disclosing objective signs of neural damage (fig. 3) congruent to the clinical condition in which no motor improvement was observed. Six months later, although no clinical improvement occurred, a surgical exploration was performed that revealed no pathologic findings. At this time, a perioperative stimulation of the trunks of the brachial plexus elicited reliable responses for the three trunks. In repeated electromyographic recordings during a period of 2 yr, increasing signs of motor recovery could be observed, although the patient still demonstrated severe proximal muscle weakness that could not be * Professor and Chief-of-Staff, † Consultant, Department of Anesthesiology, ‡ Professor and Chairman, Spinal Cord Injury Center, University of Zurich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sedation is a well recognized technique to improve patients' acceptance and comfort during regional anesthesia. The use of this technique is growing exponentially and is nowadays applied not only in the operating room but also in many other different locations within and outside the hospital. RECENT FINDINGS: Different methods of applying sedation are used. Recent studies have shown that the target-controlled infusion technique is advantageous in this context, as the incidence of side effects is lower and the amount of infused drugs is decreased. Several devices have been investigated in this setting, but, to date, none of them has been shown to be reliable. The combination of propofol and remifentanil for the purpose of analgosedation is increasingly used. The benefits of these drugs given simultaneously are supported by several investigations. Dexmedetomidine, the most recently introduced sedative, still needs to be more extensively studied in this context. Nurse-driven sedation will be inevitable in the future. Anesthesiologists should build up guidelines and nurse-teaching programs to fulfill this new development. SUMMARY: The explosion of sedation well beyond the world of regional anesthesia has raised new challenges. Some sedative procedures will be performed more and more often by nonanesthesiologists in the future. This trend is inevitable due to limited resources and stresses on the importance of building up education and teaching programs for nonanesthesiologists. The need for reliable devices for monitoring of sedation and new hypnotics, which have even better phamacokinetics than those available, are needed to match the new issues of sedation.

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane can be used as sedative-analgesic drug with endothelial protective properties. We tested whether low-dose sevoflurane inhalation provides sustained inhibition of detrimental granulocyte-platelet aggregation in humans. METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this crossover study. Each subject inhaled sevoflurane for 1 h at 0.5-1 vol % end-tidal concentration in oxygen (50 vol %). Inhaling oxygen (50 vol %) alone served as control. Venous blood samples were collected at baseline before inhalation, immediately after inhalation, and 24 h thereafter, and were used for flow cytometry to determine platelet surface marker (CD41, CD42b, CD62P/P-selectin, and PAC-1) on platelets and granulocytes and for kaolin-induced clot formation, as assessed by thromboelastography. In flow cytometry experiments, platelets were stimulated with arachidonic acid (AA, 30 microM), adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 1 microM), and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-6 (TRAP-6, 6 microM). RESULTS: AA, ADP, and TRAP-6 markedly increased the expression of CD62P on platelets, whereas CD42b (shedding) and PAC-1 (heterotypic conjugates) expression decreased. The amount of granulocyte-platelet aggregates increased upon agonist stimulation. Low-dose sevoflurane inhalation reduced ADP-induced CD62P expression on platelets 24 h after inhalation, and inhibited the formation of granulocyte-platelet aggregates under stimulation with AA and ADP after 1 and 24 h, and with TRAP-6 after 24 h compared with control. Inhibition of granulocyte-platelet aggregates was accompanied by reduced clot firmness 24 h after sevoflurane inhalation compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated for the first time that inhaling low-dose sevoflurane (

Background: Short-duration spinal anesthesia is a good option for ambulatory knee surgery. Hyperbaric 2% prilocaine has short onset and rapid recovery times and, therefore, may be well suited in this setting. The aim of this study was to compare the times to reach motor block, motor block resolution, and discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between hyperbaric 2% prilocaine and 0.4% plain ropivacaine. Methods: In this prospective randomized double-blind study, 140 patients (ages 18-80 yr and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II) scheduled for elective unilateral arthroscopic knee surgery lasting < 45 min were allocated to either 3 mL of 2% prilocaine (60 mg) or 3 mL of 0.4% plain ropivacaine (12 mg). Time to reach complete recovery of motor block, time to reach criteria for discharge, as well as side effects up to 48 hr after discharge were recorded. Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recovery from the motor block was faster in the 2% prilocaine group compared with the 0.4% ropivacaine group (180 [169-240] min vs 240 [180-300] min, respectively; median difference, 60 min, 95% confidence interval (CI), 23 to 97 min; P = 0.036). The median [IQR] time to reach discharge criteria was similar between the two groups (330 [295-365] min vs, 335 [290-395] min; median difference 5 min, 95% CI, −25 to 35 min; P = 0.330). The incidence of side effects was low and similar in both groups. No case of transient neurologic symptoms occurred in either group. Conclusion: The recovery of motor block was faster after intrathecal administration of hyperbaric 2% prilocaine compared with 0.4% plain ropivacaine; however, discharge time was similar between the two groups. Both drugs showed a similar risk profile.

We studied the impact of transcutaneous continuous carbon dioxide tension (PtcCO2) monitoring on ventilation and oxygenation during monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) in patients scheduled for shoulder surgery with continuous interscalene block. 50 patients were randomised either to the intervention (I-group) or the control (C-group) group. In both groups MAC was performed using target controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil. MAC regimen was adapted to PtcCO2 values in the I-group, whereas the C-group was blinded for these values. Primary outcome was the incidence, degree and duration of hypoventilation stages. In the I-group and the C-group the mean ± SD [range] of PtcCO2 and PaCO2 was 5.79 ± 0.84 [4.37] and 5.44 ± 0.59 [2.78] kPa, as well as 6.41 ± 1.17 [6.29] and 6.01 ± 0.96 [7.15] kPa. Periods of PtcCO2/PaCO2 > 6.5 kPa were 21.0 ± 35.7/1.2 ± 4.2 min in the I-group and 45.6 ± 40.0/18.6 ± 26.8 min in the C-group. Severe hypercapnia (PtcCO2 and/or PaCO2 > 7.5 kPa) was dected in 3/0 patients of the I-group and in 10/3 patients of the C-group. PtcCO2 and PaCO2 showed a strong correlation (r = 0.78), but only moderate agreement with a mean bias (LOA) of −0.37 (−1.69; +0.95) kPa showing an overestimation of the PaCO2. Sensitivity and specificity of PtcCO2 to detect changes of PaCO2 was 0.94 and 0.56, respectively. In no patient SpO2 or SaO2 values lower than 90 % were measured. Despite a moderate agreement between PaCO2 and PtcCO2 the PtcCO2 monitoring significantly reduced incidence, degree and duration of hypercapnia in shoulder surgery patients with MAC.

Background and objectives: Same-day surgery is common for foot surgery. Continuous regional anesthesia for outpatients has been shown effective but the economic impact on the perioperative process-related healthcare costs remains unclear. Methods: One hundred twenty consecutive patients were included in this assessor-blinded, prospective cohort study and allocated according to inclusion criteria in the day-care or in the in-patient group. Standardized continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed in both groups for 48 h using an elastomeric pump delivering ropivacaine 0.2 % at a rate of 5 ml/h with an additional 5 ml bolus every 60 min. Outpatients were discharged the day of surgery and followed with standardized telephone interviews. The total direct health costs of both groups were compared. Moreover, the difference in treatment costs and the difference in terms of quality of care and effectiveness between the groups were compared. Results: Total management costs were significantly reduced in the day-care group. There was no difference between the groups regarding pain at rest and with motion, persistent pain after catheter removal and the incidence of PONV. Persistent motor block and catheter inflammation/infection were comparable in both groups. There was neither a difference in the number of unscheduled ambulatory visits nor in the number of readmissions. Conclusions: Day-care continuous regional analgesia leads to an overall positive impact on costs by decreasing the incidence of unplanned ambulatory visits and unscheduled readmissions, without compromising on the quality of analgesia, patients’ satisfaction, and safety.

To the Editor, We thank Dr. Manassero et al. for both their interest in our article and their comments. As discussed in our paper, we decided to perform spinal anesthesia with 60 mg of 2% hyperbaric prilocaine instead of 40 mg as suggested in the article by Camponovo et al. because their report specified that 13% of patients had required additional intraoperative analgesia. A regional anesthesia regimen in which one patient in ten needs supplemental analgesia does not fulfill our clinical quality criteria and cannot be recommended as the standard of care. The achievement of a T10 level is not nearly as important as patient safety and comfort. Therefore, it is not surprising that use of only 40 mg of prilocaine would show a faster recovery, but as mentioned above, it has a failure rate of 13%. We also discussed that it is difficult to compare discharge time as different discharge criteria were selected in different papers. Our criterion of bladder voiding prior to discharge is much more stringent than the criteria by Camponovo et al.—i.e., ‘‘resolution of motor block, defined as time to unassisted ambulation or Bromage’s score = 0’’. The mean (SD) time to motor block resolution in the 40-mg group was 92 (36) min compared with 118 (37) min in the 60-mg group. Nevertheless, the mean (SD) time to void was 195 (60) min in the 40-mg group and 218 (56) min in the 60-mg group, which is comparable with our results. If we are going to offer ambulatory spinal anesthesia to all patients, including the elderly male population, we recommend including spontaneous voiding in the discharge criteria to avoid expensive unscheduled readmissions due to urinary retention. The times measured for this study represent real life. We could have opted for measuring the time from spinal anesthesia until readiness for discharge, which would have meant that the clock would have been stopped once the patient achieved all the criteria for discharge. In real life, however, it is clear that, once the patient has achieved all discharge criteria, the discharge procedure starts (discharge instructions are handed out, a clinic visit is booked, a taxi is summoned, etc.). The goal of our study was to present an image depicting the clinical reality so that clinicians could determine the likely impact of introducing a new technique. The choice of dose and concentration of ropivacaine is extensively discussed in our paper. The two chosen doses and concentrations are comparable and differ only in the onset of sensory block and offset of motor block, which is explained by the pharmacological properties of prilocaine. Therefore, we believe that the results of our study are clinically relevant, and the chosen doses and discharge criteria are clinically appropriate.

BACKGROUND: Severe postoperative pain is a major problem after unilateral and bilateral foot surgery. Continuous regional anaesthesia is often used for unilateral surgery. However, for bilateral surgery, the incidence of complications of continuous bilateral compared with unilateral regional anaesthesia is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of catheter-related complications of bilateral compared with unilateral continuous regional anaesthesia. DESIGN: A prospective observational study.SETTING: Bellinzona Regional Hospital, a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Patients (n = 130) scheduled for elective bilateral or unilateral hallux valgus repair treated with continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block using a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.15% at 5 ml h for each popliteal catheter by elastomeric pumps. INTERVENTIONS: The incidence of catheter-related complications, effectiveness, pain levels at rest and with motion, patient satisfaction for the first three postoperative days and the incidence of ambulatory visits or readmissions after discharge were measured. A follow-up for neurological or other complications related to regional anaesthesia was performed 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of catheter-related complications comparing bilateral with unilateral continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block. RESULTS: There were no differences in the incidence of catheter-related complications between the groups. Pain scores at rest and with motion were comparable between the groups. All patients were fit for discharge home 3 days after surgery. Patient satisfaction was similar between the groups. There were no unplanned ambulatory visits or readmissions due to complications in either group. No complications related to regional anaesthesia were reported during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: The complication rate, effectiveness and patient satisfaction of bilateral continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block was comparable with unilateral continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block. The follow-up showed that bilateral continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block does not increase the complication rate. However, an outpatient-based study should confirm these data prior to introduction in the ambulatory setting.

Ischemic brain damage has been reported in healthy patients after beach chair position for surgery due to cerebral hypoperfusion. Near-infrared spectroscopy has been described as a non-invasive, continuous method to monitor cerebral oxygen saturation. However, its impact on neurobehavioral outcome comparing different anesthesia regimens has been poorly described.In this prospective, assessor-blinded study, 90 patients undergoing shoulder surgery in beach chair position following general (G-group, n=45) or regional anesthesia (R-group; n=45) were enrolled to assess the prevalence of cerebral desaturation events comparing anesthesia regimens and their impact on neurobehavioral and neurological outcome. Anesthesiologists were blinded to regional cerebral oxygen saturation values. Baseline data assessed the day before surgery included neurological and neurobehavioral tests, which were repeated the day after surgery. The baseline data for regional cerebral oxygen saturation/bispectral index and invasive blood pressure both at heart and auditory meatus levels were taken prior to anesthesia, 5 min after induction of anesthesia, 5 min after beach chair positioning, after skin incision and thereafter all 20 min until discharge.Patients in the R-group showed significantly less cerebral desaturation events (p0.001), drops in regional cerebral oxygen saturation values (p0.001), significantly better neurobehavioral test results the day after surgery (p0.001) and showed a greater hemodynamic stability in the beach chair position compared to patients in the G-group.The incidence of regional cerebral oxygen desaturations seems to influence the neurobehavioral outcome. Regional anesthesia offers more stable cardiovascular conditions for shoulder surgery in beach chair position influencing neurobehavioral test results at 24h.

Purpose: Continuous regional anesthesia applied as pain therapy at home is clinically established standard practice after upper and lower limb surgery. Persistent motor block at discharge or after continuous infusion of local anesthetics, however, might lead to complications related to the insensate extremity. We report a rare case of a foot fracture due to stumbling after continuous sciatic nerve block at home and discuss the related clinical implications. Clinical features: After uncomplicated ambulatory foot surgery under regional anesthesia, a patient was discharged with a continuous sciatic popliteal nerve block for pain therapy at home. After stumbling, the patient remained symptom-free even until catheter removal three days after surgery. Radiography done one week after surgery revealed a styloid fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone. Her subsequent recovery was uneventful. Conclusions: The true incidence of complications related to falls at home associated with lower extremity blockade remains unknown, as symptoms of possible complications may be masked by the effects of the local anesthetic. However, with increasing use of postoperative regional anesthesia, it is mandatory to develop and adhere to clinical care maps, and to elaborate and teach strategies to further enhance patient safety

Local anesthetics are the pharmacologic cornerstone of regional anesthesia producing reversible and complete blockade of neuronal transmission when applied near the axons. Their application results in complete interruption of nerve impulse conduction, allowing abolition of sensation from the area innervated by the corresponding nerves and leading also to motor block. A number of compounds with local anesthetic activity occur in nature such as cocaine, eugenol derived from plants, tetrodotoxin derived from fish species in the family Teraodontiformes, and saxitoxin derived from algae (dinoflagellates).

Background The contribution of the saphenous nerve in pain after major ankle surgery is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate its contribution in this context. Methods Fifty patients were included in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. In all patients [Group P (popliteal) and Group F (popliteal+femoral)], a popliteal catheter was placed before operation and ropivacaine 0.5% (30 ml) administered via this catheter; major ankle surgery was then performed under spinal anaesthesia. In Group PF patients, an additional femoral catheter was sited before operation and ropivacaine 0.5% (10 ml) administered. Six hours after spinal anaesthesia (defined as T0), a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.3% (14 ml h−1) was started through the popliteal catheter until T24. Then, the concentration was reduced to 0.2% until T48. Patients in Group PF received continuous ropivacaine 0.2% (5 ml h−1) through the femoral catheter from T0 to T48. I.V. morphine patient-controlled analgesia was used as a rescue analgesia. Pain at rest, pain with movement, adverse effects, and i.v. morphine consumption were assessed. Pain at rest and on movement was evaluated 6 months after operation. Results Pain at rest was comparable in the two groups. In Group PF, patients had significantly reduced pain during movement in the postoperative period (P=0.01) and 6 months after operation (P=0.03). Morphine consumption was significantly reduced in Group PF at T0–T24 and T24–T48 (P=0.01). Adverse effects were comparable in both groups. Conclusions The addition of continuous femoral catheter infusion of ropivacaine to a continuous popliteal catheter infusion improved postoperative analgesia during movement after major ankle surgery. This effect was still present 6 months after surgery.

BACKGROUND: Interscalene analgesia is a recognized technique for the management of postoperative pain after major shoulder surgery. The most effective local anesthetic concentration in this setting is still controversial. In this study, we compared the analgesia and side effects of a continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% and 0.3% administered through an interscalene catheter for the first 48 hours after surgery. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients scheduled for elective open rotator cuff repair were randomized into 2 groups to receive a continuous infusion of either ropivacaine 0.2% or ropivacaine 0.3% for 48 hours at a rate of 14 mL/h through an interscalene catheter after a preoperative bolus of 40 mL ropivacaine 0.5% in all patients. Pain score (visual analog scale 0–100), intensity of motor block, quality of sleep during the first postoperative night, morphine consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction were assessed by an anesthesiologist masked to treatment group. RESULTS: Total morphine consumption was significantly reduced in group 0.3% (12 vs 30 mg). Quality of sleep was significantly better in group 0.3% (4% vs 27% of awakening during the first postoperative night). Handgrip strength, visual analog scale scores, and side effects were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The use of ropivacaine 0.3% through an interscalene catheter for the first 48 hours after open rotator cuff repair provided a significant reduction of morphine consumption and a better sleep quality for the first postoperative night without increasing the intensity of motor block or side effects. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:1543–7) I nterscalene patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after shoulder surgery was shown to provide better pain relief and a higher degree of patient satisfaction compared with IV PCA with opioids. 1 After major open shoulder surgery, ropivacaine 0.2% was associated with better preservation of strength in the hand and less paresthesia in the fingers than bupivacaine 0.15%, while providing comparable analgesia. 2 The influence of 2 different concentrations of ropivacaine used for perineural interscalene postoperative analgesia after open rotator cuff repair has not been reported. The aim of this study was to compare ropivacaine 0.3% versus ropivacaine 0.2% with regard to the quality of postoperative analgesia. We hypothesized that there would be better postoperative analgesia with similar degree of motor block in the hand and paresthesia in the fingers with ropivacaine 0.3% compared with 0.2%. The primary outcome was postoperative IV morphine consumption 24 hours after the initial ropivacaine administration through the interscalene catheter.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Local anesthetics are not only used as drugs to block the sodium channel to provide analgesia and antiarrhythmic action. The purpose of this review is to highlight the new indications and limitations of this class of drugs. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research has focused on the use of intravenous local anesthetics to improve bowel function after surgery or trauma, to protect the central nervous system, to find new clues about local anesthetic effects in chronic neuropathic pain, and to investigate the long-term effect of anesthesia/analgesia provided by local anesthetics on cancer recurrence. Recent facts dealing with myotoxicity and chondrotoxicity are presented. SUMMARY: There is growing evidence that local anesthetics have a broad spectrum of indications in addition to analgesia and antiarrhythmic effect. Most of them are still insufficiently known and investigated. These new indications will no doubt be intensively studied in the coming years.

This study warrants comment due to the low success rates reported after axillary brachial plexus block, despite the authors’ internation-ally recognized experience with these techniques. The study compared regional anesthesia of the upper limb using an ultrasound-guided (US) approach (the most expensive technique) or a combined nerve stimulator (NS) ultrasound-guided (USNS) approach (the most sophisticated technique) to NS alone. The authors reported 30-min post-block success rates of 62.9%, 80.7% and 82.8% for NS, USNS and US techniques, respectively. These success rates are considerably lower than those reported after brachial plexus block using a transarterial technique, which is no longer recom-mended. Stan et al.

Background Endothelial cells can be protected against cytokine-induced toxicity by volatile anesthetics. The authors tested whether inhalation of sevoflurane at subanesthetic concentrations provides protection against postocclusive endothelial dysfunction induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury of the forearm in humans. Methods Five healthy male volunteers were enrolled in this study with crossover design. Each subject was randomly exposed to 15 min of forearm ischemia in the presence or absence of sevoflurane. Sevoflurane was inhaled at 0.5-1 vol% end-tidal concentrations from 15 min before ischemia until 5 min after the onset of reperfusion. Hyperemic reaction, an indicator of ischemic injury and endothelial function, was determined at 15 and 30 min of reperfusion using venous occlusion plethysmography. Also, markers of leukocyte activation (CD11b, CD42b) were measured by flow cytometry during reperfusion. Results Fifteen minutes of forearm ischemia followed by reperfusion diminished postocclusive endothelium-dependent hyperemic reaction at 15 and 30 min of reperfusion. Peri-ischemic inhalation of sevoflurane, targeted at 0.5-1 vol% end-tidal concentrations, markedly improved postocclusive hyperemic reaction. In addition, inhalation of sevoflurane attenuated activation of leukocytes, as measured by CD11b expression, after ischemia-reperfusion injury. No changes in CD42b expression were observed after ischemia-reperfusion of the forearm. Conclusions These data suggest that human endothelium, a key component of all vital organs, is receptive to protection by sevoflurane in vivo. Peri-ischemic administration of sevoflurane mimics a combination of pharmacologic preconditioning and postconditioning and protects at even low sedative concentrations (< 1 vol%). Inhibition of leukocyte adhesion is likely to be involved in the protection.