Search

Objective: To compare the activated coagulation times (ACTs) measured with the blood-saving kaolin i-STAT 1 ACT technique (Abbott Point of Care Inc, Princeton, NJ) with ACTs obtained from the widely used ACTR II device (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) in children undergoing cardiac surgery., Design: A prospective, observational single-center study., Participants: Forty-four pediatric cardiac surgery patients., Intervention: Surgery was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) necessitating heparinization., Methods and Main Results: ACTs measured on the i-STAT 1 device (2 × 95 μL) were compared with those obtained from the Medtronic ACTR II device (2 × 0.5 mL). Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after heparinization for CPB and paired for statistical analysis. The 2 techniques were compared using simple and multiregression analyses and the Bland-Altman method. In total, 179 intrarater and 142 interrater data pairs were analyzed. The intrarater reliability of the 2 devices was good, with a mean bias and limits of agreement of +2.0 and -55.5/+59.5 seconds for the Medtronic ACTR II and +0.5 and -59.9/+60.9 seconds for the i-STAT 1. An interrater reliability analysis of the mean of simultaneously measured ACT of the Medtronic ACTR II and both i-STAT 1 devices yielded a mean bias of -5.3 seconds and limits of agreement of -210.1/+199.5 seconds. A comparison of the higher of the paired ACT values from both devices showed similar results. After the removal of heparin, the i-STAT 1's ACT values became significantly lower than those measured on the Medtronic ACTR II (p < 0.001). Simple and multiregression analyses revealed that base excess independently influenced the mean bias of the ACT values from the Medtronic ACTR II (p = 0.037) and i-STAT 1 devices (p = 0.036)., Conclusion: The kaolin i-STAT 1 ACT technique agreed well with the Medtronic ACTR II technique during the nonheparinized phase that preceded CPB. The overall agreement between the ACT obtained from the 2 devices was poor. The routine use of i-STAT 1 measured ACT values cannot be recommended as a reliable alternative to the Medtronic ACTR II., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Measures of the sonorheometry based Quantra® viscoelastic hemostatic analyzer (HemoSonics, LCC, Charlottesville, VA, USA) were compared with corresponding results of the ROTEM® sigma device (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA). Methods: In thirty-eight patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery between December 2018 and October 2019, blood samples were taken after induction of anesthesia (sample 1) and after heparin neutralization (sample 2) and measured on Quantra (QPlus® Cartridge) and ROTEM sigma (ROTEM® sigma complete + hep Cartridge). Clot times and clot stiffness values were recorded. Clot stiffness values of ROTEM amplitudes (A in mm) were converted to shear modulus (G) in hectoPascal (hPa): G (hPa) = (5 x A)/(100-A). Additionally, time-to-results was recorded. Spearman rank test correlation and Bland Altman analysis were performed. Results: Clot stiffness parameters of the Quantra correlated strongly with corresponding measurements of the ROTEM with r = 0.93 and 0.94 for EXTEM A10 vs CS and r = 0.94 and 0.96 for FIBTEM A10 vs FCS for sample 1 and 2, respectively. Quantra clot time correlated strongly with ROTEM INTEM CT with r = 0.71 for sample 1 and r = 0.75 for sample 2. However, Bland Altman analysis showed no agreement in all compared assays of both methods. The median time to delivery of first and complete results was significantly shorter for Quantra (412 and 658 s) compared to ROTEM sigma (839 and 1290 s). Conclusions: The Quantra showed a strong correlation with the ROTEM sigma for determining clot times and clot stiffness and the parameters assess similar aspects of clot development. However, these parameters are not directly interchangeable and implicate that separate cut-off values need to be established for users of the Quantra device. Word count: 278. Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04210830) at December 20th 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate whether volatile anesthetics used for postoperative sedation have any beneficial effects on myocardial injury in cardiac surgery patients after on-pump valve replacement. Methods: Anesthesia was performed with propofol. After arrival in the intensive care unit (ICU), 117 patients were randomized to be sedated for at least 4 hours with either propofol or sevoflurane. Sevoflurane was administered by using the anesthetic-conserving device. Troponin T, creatine kinase, creatine kinase from heart muscle tissue, myoglobin, and oxygenation index were determined on arrival at the ICU, 4 hours after sedation, and in the morning of the first postoperative day (POD1). Primary end points were cardiac injury markers on POD1. As secondary end points oxygenation, postoperative pulmonary complications, and ICU and hospital stay were documented. Results: Fifty-six patients were analyzed in the propofol arm, and 46 patients in the sevoflurane arm. Treatment groups were comparable with regard to patient demographics and intraoperative characteristics. Concentration of troponin T as the most sensitive marker for myocardial injury at POD1 was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group compared with the propofol group (unadjusted difference, -0.4; 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1; P < 0.01; adjusted difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.02; P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusions: The data presented in this investigation indicate that late postconditioning with the volatile anesthetic sevoflurane might mediate cardiac protection, even with a late, brief, and low-dose application. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The study''s aim was to compare response entropy (RE) and state entropy (SE) with bispectral index (BIS) electroencephalography (EEG) as an alternative cerebral monitoring tool in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Design: Prospective, observational single-center study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Thirty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery receiving remifentanil-propofol anesthesia. Interventions: Surgery was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardiac arrest in 15 patients, with CPB without cardiac arrest in 9 patients and without CPB in 6 patients. Measurements and Main Results: RE, SE, BIS, burst suppression ratio (BSR), and frontal electromyography (f-EMG) were detected simultaneously. RE and SE compared favorably with BIS and their correlations were strong (r 2 = 0.6, r 2 = 0.55, respectively). The mean bias of RE and BIS was −1.8, but limits of agreement were high (+20.5/−24.1). RE and SE tended to be lower than the BIS values in the CPB subgroups. The detection of BSR was similar with RE and SE and the BIS. A strong correlation existed between BIS and f-EMG (r 2 = 0.62) in contrast to RE (r 2 = 0.45) and SE (r 2 =0.39). BIS monitoring was significantly more disturbed than RE and SE with 9.1% ±10.9% and 0.1% ± 0.2% of the total anesthesia time, respectively. Neither implicit nor explicit memory was shown. Conclusion: RE and SE are comparable with the BIS but showed significantly less interference from f-EMG and superior resistance against artifacts. Thus, spectral entropy is more suitable than the BIS during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in cardiac surgery patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]