Search

Background: Shoulder pain is a condition that seriously discomforts patients and develops caused by a peritoneal tear in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) surgeries. Although surgeons generally prefer general anesthesia for the TEP technique, many studies have been carried out on the use of regional anesthesia in recent years. In our study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combined spinal/epidural anesthesia (CSEA) method to prevent shoulder pain in the TEP technique., Methods: The patients who operated with the TEP procedure were divided into 2 groups; SA (group 1) and CSEA (group 2). The 2 patient groups were compared in terms of sex, age, body mass index, duration of surgery, total operation time, patient satisfaction, pain scores, length of hospital stay, adverse effects, intraoperative, and postoperative complications., Results: The number of patients in group 1 was 42 and group 2 was 40. The mean operation time was recorded as 55.9 and 80.2 minutes in groups 1 and 2, respectively, which was statistically significantly shorter in group 1 ( P <0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly less in group 2 for the 4th hour ( P <0.0001) and the 12th hour ( P =0.047). There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of peritoneal tear ( P =0.860). Intraoperative and postoperative shoulder pain was significantly less in group 2 ( P =0.038, P =0015, respectively)., Conclusion: CSEA is an effective and safe anesthesia method for preventing shoulder pain that develops after TEP surgeries., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare pain during surgery among patients undergoing Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) under local anaesthesia (LA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA)., Method: Patients were randomized to undergo LIHR under LA or SA. Both intra-operative and postoperative pain was measured by NRS (numerical rating scale). Postoperative pain was managed similarly in both groups using intravenous diclofenac and paracetamol. Postoperative recovery, time to discharge, and early complications were recorded. Postoperative pain was assessed at 2, 6 and 24 h from the time of skin incision. Patient satisfaction was recorded on 5-point Likert scale 24 h after surgery., Results: Data of 30 patients of each group were analyzed. All patients successfully underwent operation using anaesthesia technique allocated. Median intra-operative pain was 0 (0,3) in SA and 2.5 (0,5) in LA group. In SA group, intra-operative pain did not exceed NRS 3, while in LA, pain greater than NRS 3 was reported in 30% patients. No patient required tramadol in either group during postoperative period. Minor postoperative complications were reported 9/30 (30%) in SA compared to 1/30 (3.33%) in LA group. The satisfaction rate was 67% in LA group, whereas 37% in SA group., Conclusion: LA should be strongly considered for all patients with unilateral inguinal hernia undergoing open repair. In spite of a slightly more severe pain during surgery, patient satisfaction was higher using LA., Trial Registration: This study was conducted as a part of a postgraduate thesis research work. The protocol was submitted to the University of Delhi after approval of the IEC. Registration with the Clinical Trials Registry of India was not successfully done., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: The aim of this meta-analysis is to systematically evaluate the clinical effects of local anesthesia and spinal anesthesia in the treatment of open inguinal hernia in adults, and provide theoretical evidence for clinical choice., Evidence Acquisition: We searched the PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library, and collected published clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of local anesthesia and spinal anesthesia for open inguinal hernia surgery in adults. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the literature was screened and the data was analyzed by using Review Manager., Evidence Synthesis: A total of 11 RCT studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 591 cases in the local anesthesia group and 584 cases in the spinal anesthesia group. Our results showed that compared with the spinal hernia repair group, the hernia repair group under local anesthesia had a lower incidence of headache (RR=0.11, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.46), urinary retention (RR=0.13, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.32) and postoperative pain score at 12 hours (SMD=-1.09, 95% CI: -1.41, -0.76), and a higher anesthesia efficiency (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.16) and satisfaction rate (RR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.24). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in operation time, the incidence of intraoperative pain, hematoma, infection, postoperative chronic pain in the groin area, and testicular pain/swelling., Conclusions: In open inguinal hernia surgery for adults, local anesthesia is better than spinal anesthesia with lower incidence of adverse events, higher efficacy and satisfaction.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the anesthesia type on the postoperative quality of life in patients who underwent trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair., Methods: In this study, 70 patients submitted to TAPP for inguinal hernia repair, were randomized between spinal and general anesthesia. Overall, 58 patients completed the follow-up process and were, therefore, included. The quality of life evaluation was based on the SF-36 questionnaire. Significance was considered at the level of P < 0.05 RESULTS: General anesthesia was applied to 31 patients, whereas 27 operations were performed under spinal anesthesia. Except gender, the two study subgroups were similar in terms of demographics. Although spinal anesthesia displayed higher energy, emotional health, and general health scores these findings were not statistically significant. A positive correlation was identified between age and physical and emotional role. Operative time was associated with the estimated energy and general health., Conclusion: Our study could not identify a difference between spinal and general anesthesia on the postoperative quality of life. Spinal anesthesia is as effective as general anesthesia and remains an attractive anesthetic alternative for TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Given several study limitations, further high-quality trials are required.

Background: Paravertebral block (PVB) as a sole anesthetic technique is difficult even in experienced hands. Hence, this study was undertaken to study the safety and efficacy of PVB and to compare with subarachnoid block (SAB) for inguinal hernia repair surgery (IHRS) in elderly male patients., Materials and Methods: Sixty-five male patients aged 65 to 89 scheduled for IHRS were allocated randomly by computer-generated randomisation sequence into two groups. They underwent PVB (Group PVB: 33 patients were injected with 10 ml ropivacaine 0.5% at each level from T12 to L1) or SAB (Group SAB: 32 patients were injected with 15 mg ropivacaine 0.5% at L3-L4 level). Primary outcomes were hemodynamic changes and duration of postoperative analgesia. Secondary outcomes were dosage of remedial analgesics, time to perform the block, side effects and satisfaction of patients., Results: The hemodynamics in the Group PVB were more stable than those in the Group SAB during surgery (P < 0.05). The duration of post-operative analgesia was significantly longer in the Group PVB (P < 0.001). The total dose of fentanyl was smaller in the Group PVB in the first 24 h (P < 0.001). The time to perform the block was significantly longer in the Group PVB (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the visual analogue scales (VAS) scores between the two groups at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 10 h (P < 0.05) but not at 2 h, 12 h and 24 h (P > 0.05). The VAS scores were lowest at 2 h for both the 2 groups, highest at 12 h for Group PVB and at 8 h for Group SAB respectively. The Group PVB had fewer adverse effects (P < 0.05) and higher satisfaction of patients (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided PVB can ensure the anesthetic effects of unilateral-opened IHRS in elderly male patients. It has a small impact on hemodynamics, a longer postoperative analgesia time and less complications., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: General anesthesia has been used as a standard type of anesthesia for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach, regional anesthesia being occasionally used in high-risk patients. We had previously designed a controlled randomized trial, comparing spinal with general anesthesia in non-high-risk patients undergoing TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Our results suggested that spinal anesthesia offers some advantages in postoperative pain and additional opioid consumption during the early postoperative period. In the context of this trial, hemodynamic effects of each type of anesthesia are presented., Methods: Seventy patients, undergoing elective TAPP inguinal hernia repair were randomized to either general or spinal anesthesia. Data regarding patients' hemodynamic status during the procedure under general or spinal anesthesia were collected, measuring systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR)., Results: There was no significant effect of anesthesia type on systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure values after induction of anesthesia and induction of pneumoperitoneum, respectively. There was a significant effect on heart rate values after induction of anesthesia and induction of pneumoperitoneum, respectively., Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia is as effective as general anesthesia concerning hemodynamic stability and seems to provide a better result in maintaining hemodynamic stability with fewer fluctuations in blood pressure and mild alterations in heart rate values during TAPP inguinal hernia repair.

Hypotension and bradycardia are commonly observed after the spinal anesthesia and various mechanisms have been postulated for these hemodynamic changes.A middle-aged otherwise healthy male Caucasian patient developed several episodes of bradycardia postoperatively after the umbilical hernia repair under subarachnoid block (SAB) while trying to lean forward and move his legs. Episodes were aborted when patient was advised to relax in supine position.The common mechanism of bradycardia and hypotension under SAB is postulated as sympathetic blockade, decrease venous return, and parasympathetic over-dominance leading to a decrease in right arterial pressure and pressure in the great veins as they enter the right atrium. But over time, the parasympathetic inhibition is usually withdrawn first, leading to the risk of severe bradycardia that is probably favored by the reverse Trendelenburg position as described in our case.Postoperative severe hemodynamic changes can occur even under stable spinal anesthesia; however, can be prevented by vigilant monitoring and simple maneuver which includes maintenance of relax posture on the bed.

Inguinal herniorrhaphy is a common surgical procedure. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether unilateral paravertebral block could provide better control of postoperative pain syndrome compared with unilateral subarachnoid block (SAB). A randomized controlled study was conducted using 50 patients with unilateral inguinal hernias. The patients were randomized to receive either paravertebral block (S group) or SAB (C group). Paravertebral block was performed by injecting a total of 20 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine from T9 to T12 under ultrasound guidance, whereas SAB was performed by injecting 13 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine at the L3 to L4 level. Data regarding anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, side effects, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit, the Karnofsky Performance Status, acute pain and neuropathic disturbances were recorded. Paravertebral block provided good anesthesia of the inguinal region without patient or surgeon discomfort, with better hemodynamic stability and safety and with a reduced time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit compared with SAB. During the postsurgical and posthospital discharge follow-ups, rest and incident pain and neuropathic positive phenomena were better controlled in the S group than in the C group. The consumption of painkillers was higher in the C group than in the S group throughout the follow-up period. Paravertebral block can be considered a viable alternative to common anesthetic procedures performed for inguinal hernia repair surgery. Paravertebral block provided good management of acute postoperative pain and limited neuropathic postoperative disturbances.

Background: Preclinical data suggest that general anaesthetics affect brain development. There is mixed evidence from cohort studies that young children exposed to anaesthesia can have an increased risk of poor neurodevelopmental outcome. We aimed to establish whether general anaesthesia in infancy has any effect on neurodevelopmental outcome. Here we report the secondary outcome of neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age in the General Anaesthesia compared to Spinal anaesthesia (GAS) trial., Methods: In this international assessor-masked randomised controlled equivalence trial, we recruited infants younger than 60 weeks postmenstrual age, born at greater than 26 weeks' gestation, and who had inguinal herniorrhaphy, from 28 hospitals in Australia, Italy, the USA, the UK, Canada, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either awake-regional anaesthesia or sevoflurane-based general anaesthesia. Web-based randomisation was done in blocks of two or four and stratified by site and gestational age at birth. Infants were excluded if they had existing risk factors for neurological injury. The primary outcome of the trial will be the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence Third Edition (WPPSI-III) Full Scale Intelligence Quotient score at age 5 years. The secondary outcome, reported here, is the composite cognitive score of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III, assessed at 2 years. The analysis was as per protocol adjusted for gestational age at birth. A difference in means of five points (1/3 SD) was predefined as the clinical equivalence margin. This trial is registered with ANZCTR, number ACTRN12606000441516 and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00756600., Findings: Between Feb 9, 2007, and Jan 31, 2013, 363 infants were randomly assigned to receive awake-regional anaesthesia and 359 to general anaesthesia. Outcome data were available for 238 children in the awake-regional group and 294 in the general anaesthesia group. In the as-per-protocol analysis, the cognitive composite score (mean [SD]) was 98.6 (14.2) in the awake-regional group and 98.2 (14.7) in the general anaesthesia group. There was equivalence in mean between groups (awake-regional minus general anaesthesia 0.169, 95% CI -2.30 to 2.64). The median duration of anaesthesia in the general anaesthesia group was 54 min., Interpretation: For this secondary outcome, we found no evidence that just less than 1 h of sevoflurane anaesthesia in infancy increases the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age compared with awake-regional anaesthesia., Funding: Australia National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Health Technologies Assessment-National Institute for Health Research UK, National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society, Pfizer Canada, Italian Ministry of Heath, Fonds NutsOhra, and UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN)., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inguinal field block (IFB) is a recommended technique for pain control after inguinal hernia repair but is also underused by surgeons. Currently, there is no decisive evidence on which technique, IFB or spinal anesthesia block (SAB), provides better pain control during the first day after hernia repair. In this study, we compared ultrasound-guided IFB performed by anesthesiologists and SAB for pain control during the first day after hernia repair., Methods: We compared static and dynamic pain scores measured with a numerical rating scale in 86 male patients scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair with either ultrasound-guided IFB (n = 42) or SAB (n = 44)., Results: Dynamic and static pain at 4 hours (P < .01, r > 0.34, "large effect size"), and dynamic pain the morning after operation (P = .04, r > 0.20, "medium effect size") were less in the field block group compared with the SAB group. Postoperative analgesic consumption was reduced during hospital stay (P = .005, r > 0.34, "large effect size") and for 7 postoperative days in the field block group (P = .03, r > 0.20, "medium effect size")., Conclusion: In this study, ultrasound-guided IFB provided lesser dynamic pain scores during the first postoperative day and reduced use of analgesics for 1 week compared with spinal anesthesia after inguinal hernia repair. Our technique could become a substitute performed by anesthesiologists in settings in which IFB is not performed routinely by surgeons., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under spinal anesthesia in obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m(2))., Methods: From January 2007 to February 2010, 23 obese patients had their elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair under spinal anesthesia. We looked primarily for intra-operative incidences as well as immediate postoperative complications. Long term results and especially recurrences were also to be evaluated., Results: Median operative time was 55 min (range 20-100). Intraoperatively, six patients (26%) complained of shoulder pain, three patients (13%) developed bradycardia and two (8.7%) hypotension. Postoperatively, nausea and/or vomiting were recorded in four patients (17.4%), four patients (17.4%) experienced urinary retention and one patient developed wound infection. Median pain score at 4th, 8th and 24th postoperative hour was 0.5 (0-5), 1.5 (0-6), and 1.5 (0-5) respectively. The median length of hospital stay was one day (1-2). At a median follow up of 39 months, one patient was diagnosed with a recurrence., Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia for LVHR in obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m(2)) proved an efficient and safe alternative to general anesthesia in the given patient sample., (Copyright © 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair is indicated for recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernias and traditionally is performed under general anesthesia. However, the feasibility of performing TAPP under spinal anesthesia has been recently reported by our team., Aim: To assess the long-term results of TAPP repair under spinal anesthesia for primary inguinal hernia., Materials and Methods: Between January 2006 and October 2009, 94 consecutive patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia were submitted to laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair under spinal anesthesia. We looked at the immediate postoperative outcome as well as the long-term outcome, mainly recurrences and incidence of chronic pain., Results: One patient experienced a scrotal hematoma, one patient a trocar site infection, two patients were diagnosed with an operation-related orchitis, while 31 patients (33 %) developed symptoms of urinary retention. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range 14-59), four patients (4.3 %) were diagnosed with a recurrence, while 89 % of patients reported satisfied from the procedure in the long-term. Chronic pain was not encountered in any of the patients studied. Four patients (4.3 %) reported an intermitted foreign body sensation and/or rigidity and two patients (2.1 %) numbness in the operated inguinal area., Conclusion: Laparoscopic TAPP hernia repair under spinal anesthesia is associated with satisfactory short- and long-term results. Use of regional anesthesia instead of the traditional general anesthesia does not seem to adversely affect the quality of repair, and moreover, it offers the patient an attractive anesthetic alternative.

Background and Objective: Low-dose mixture of hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl is commonly used in day-case spinal anaesthesia. Using hyperbaric articaine, the onset may be faster and duration more predictable than with bupivacaine-fentanyl. We compared these two spinal anaesthetics for inguinal herniorrhaphy., Methods: Adult patients were randomised to spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric articaine 84 mg (group A, n = 40) or hyperbaric bupivacaine 7 mg along with fentanyl 10 μg (group B+F, n = 40). A blinded observer tested the block characteristics. Aiming at sensory block spread to T10 dermatome, the operating table was tilted head-end up or down 10° (once or twice), as required. Postoperative telephone interviews were performed., Results: All patients in group A had a sensory block to T10 in a median time of 4 (range 2-20) min. In group B+F, the median onset time of T10 analgesia was 10 (2-30) min (P < 0.001), but T10 analgesia was not reached in seven of 40 B+F patients. A head-up tilt was needed in 37 of 40 group A patients to prevent from too extensive cephalad spread of block, and 34 of 40 group B+F patients needed a head-down tilt to enhance cephalad spread of analgesia. To treat hypotension, 6.4 mg of ephedrine was required, on average, in group A and 1.8 = mg in group B+F (P = 0.01). Median time to recovery from sensory block was significantly shorter in group A (2.5 h) than in group B+F (3 h; P = 0.002). General anaesthesia was needed in three patients (group A, two patients: sensory block too short; group B+F, one patient: sensory block too limited)., Conclusion: Hyperbaric articaine leads to faster onset of block and faster recovery than bupivacaine along with fentanyl. Hypotension is more common with articaine. The onset and extension of the spinal block are unpredictable when using these techniques.

Purpose: Primary abdominal hernia is a prevalent condition that weighs heavily on human and financial health-care resources (e.g., 1.12% of the total budget of our hospital in 2008). Tension-free hernioplasty is the standard repair procedure, but the anesthetic technique varies, including local anesthesia with sedation (Lsed), regional (Reg), and general (Gen) anesthesia. As the cost-outcome relation of different anesthetic options has never been examined in our health district, we proposed to identify the most cost-effective anesthetic technique out of three options for primary abdominal hernia repair in terms of clinical outcome and health-care economics in this retrospective review., Methods: The study sample of 400 patients with primary abdominal hernia in 2008 underwent tension-free hernioplasty using one of three anesthetic techniques: 74 Lsed, 283 Reg, and 43 Gen. The comparability of outcomes was ensured by dividing the sample into homogeneous groups according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA 1 and 2) and adjusting for technical complexity, risk factors, and anatomic location., Results: The clinical outcome of hernioplasty with Lsed was significantly better in terms of shorter hospital stay, lower early- and intermediate-term complication rate, and shorter time to recovery after discharge. The short-term recurrence rate did not differ between groups. The mean cost per hernioplasty procedure was 3,270.37 (Lsed), 4,740.37 (Reg), and 7,318.44 (Gen)., Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness and incremental cost per patient showed the advantage of hernioplasty with Lsed versus Reg (794.59) and Lsed versus Gen (704.01), respectively.