Search

In 31 adult patients who had undergone spinal or epidural anesthesia, we evaluated the effect of flumazenil in reversing midazolam, flunitrazepam or diazepam. The patients received midazolam 5 mg, flunitrazepam 1 mg or diazepam 5 mg 15 min after the spinal or epidural anesthesia. After the completion of operation, flumazenil (0.2 mg-1.0 mg) was administered until the patient became awake. Blood pressure, pulse rate and respiratory rate before and after administration of flumazenil showed no statistically significant changes in these groups. There were no significant differences in necessary amount of flumazenil among these groups. The time necessary for the patient to be awake in midazolam group was significantly shorter than that in flunitrazepam or diazepam group. Half of the patients in flunitrazepam and diazepam groups slept again after leaving the operating room, but they presented no clinical problems. In conclusion, we consider that flumazenil does not affect circulation and respiration, so it seems to be safe and effective for reversing benzodiazepins in clinical situation.

Postoperative pain relief and sedation with epidural ketamine were studied. Twenty-four patients for elective upper abdominal surgery were divided into 4 groups. Epidural catheter was inserted into thoracic epidural space before induction of general anesthesia. In each group, either 0.25% bupivacaine 5 ml only, ketamine 0.1 mg.kg-1 + bupivacaine 5 ml, or ketamine 0.3 mg.kg-1 + bupivacaine 5 ml, or ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 + bupivacaine 5 ml was injected into epidural catheter for complaint of pain in recovery room. In ketamine injected groups, blood pressure and heart were unchanged, but respiration rate increased significantly. Patients in ketamine 0.3 or 0.5 mg.kg-1 injected groups, pain relief and sedation score were significantly intensified, but patients in ketamine 0.5 mg.kg-1 injected group, incidence of pain in the back during injection and headache was high. We conclude that epidural ketamine is useful for postoperative pain relief, and the superior dose of epidural ketamine is 0.3 mg.kg-1.

Interpleural block (IPB) was compared with epidural block (EB) in 17 adults with unilateral multiple rib fractures and hemopneumothorax. The study was a randomized, crossover, before-after trial on the first and second hospital days. An IPB catheter was inserted along with a chest tube, and an upper thoracic EB was also established in the same patient. We administered 10 ml of 1% lidocaine for both blocks. The range of thermohypesthesia was unilateral and shorter in IPB, whereas it was bilateral and wider in EB. The effects of pain relief were almost the same. Respiratory rate decreased, and PaO2 tended to elevate similarly. In IPB, systemic blood pressure changed minimally, but it fell significantly in EB, which would be a disadvantage of EB in trauma patients. Serum levels of lidocaine were similar and in the safe range. The technique of IPB seemed to be easier than EB. In conclusion, IPB with lidocaine is as effective for pain relief as EB.