Search

Your search keyword '"Mahon, Padraig"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Mahon, Padraig" Topic anesthesia, conduction
2 results on '"Mahon, Padraig"'

1. Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project.

Author

Ahmed HM, Atterton BP, Crowe GG, Barratta JL, Johnson M, Viscusi E, Adhikary S, Albrecht E, Boretsky K, Boublik J, Breslin DS, Byrne K, Ch'ng A, Chuan A, Conroy P, Daniel C, Daszkiewicz A, Delbos A, Dirzu DS, Dmytriiev D, Fennessy P, Fischer HBJ, Frizelle H, Gadsden J, Gautier P, Gupta RK, Gürkan Y, Hardman HD, Harrop-Griffiths W, Hebbard P, Hernandez N, Hlasny J, Iohom G, Ip VHY, Jeng CL, Johnson RL, Kalagara H, Kinirons B, Lansdown AK, Leng JC, Lim YC, Lobo C, Ludwin DB, Macfarlane AJR, Machi AT, Mahon P, Mannion S, McLeod DH, Merjavy P, Miscuks A, Mitchell CH, Moka E, Moran P, Ngui A, Nin OC, O'Donnell BD, Pawa A, Perlas A, Porter S, Pozek JP, Rebelo HC, Roqués V, Schroeder KM, Schwartz G, Schwenk ES, Sermeus L, Shorten G, Srinivasan K, Stevens MF, Theodoraki K, Turbitt LR, Valdés-Vilches LF, Volk T, Webster K, Wiesmann T, Wilson SH, Wolmarans M, Woodworth G, Worek AK, and Moran EML

Subjects
Consensus, Delphi Technique, Documentation, Humans, Anesthesia, Conduction
Abstract

Background and Objectives: Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia., Methods: Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement., Results: Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29., Conclusion: By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: an expert panel Delphi consensus project

Author

Hassan M Ahmed, Benjamin P Atterton, Gillian G Crowe, Jaime L Barratta, Mark Johnson, Eugene Viscusi, Sanjib Adhikary, Eric Albrecht, Karen Boretsky, Jan Boublik, Dara S Breslin, Kelly Byrne, Alan Ch'ng, Alwin Chuan, Patrick Conroy, Craig Daniel, Andrzej Daszkiewicz, Alain Delbos, Dan Sebastian Dirzu, Dmytro Dmytriiev, Paul Fennessy, H Barrie J Fischer, Henry Frizelle, Jeff Gadsden, Philippe Gautier, Rajnish K Gupta, Yavuz Gürkan, Harold David Hardman, William Harrop-Griffiths, Peter Hebbard, Nadia Hernandez, Jakub Hlasny, Gabriella Iohom, Vivian H Y Ip, Christina L Jeng, Rebecca L Johnson, Hari Kalagara, Brian Kinirons, Andrew Kenneth Lansdown, Jody C Leng, Yean Chin Lim, Clara Lobo, Danielle B Ludwin, Alan James Robert Macfarlane, Anthony T Machi, Padraig Mahon, Stephen Mannion, David H McLeod, Peter Merjavy, Aleksejs Miscuks, Christopher H Mitchell, Eleni Moka, Peter Moran, Ann Ngui, Olga C Nin, Brian D O'Donnell, Amit Pawa, Anahi Perlas, Steven Porter, John-Paul Pozek, Humberto C Rebelo, Vicente Roqués, Kristopher M Schroeder, Gary Schwartz, Eric S Schwenk, Luc Sermeus, George Shorten, Karthikeyan Srinivasan, Markus F Stevens, Kassiani Theodoraki, Lloyd R Turbitt, Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches, Thomas Volk, Katrina Webster, T Wiesmann, Sylvia H Wilson, Morné Wolmarans, Glenn Woodworth, Andrew K Worek, E M Louise Moran, Gürkan, Yavuz (ORCID 0000-0002-2307-6943 & YÖK ID 154129), Ahmed, Hassan M., Atterton, Benjamin P., Crowe, Gillian G., Barratta, Jaime L., Johnson, Mark, Viscusi, Eugene, Adhikary, Sanjib, Albrecht, Eric, Boretsky, Karen, Boublik, Jan, Breslin, Dara S., Byrne, Kelly, Ch'ng, Alan, Chuan, Alwin, Conroy, Patrick, Daniel, Craig, Daszkiewicz, Andrzej, Delbos, Alain, Dirzu, Dan Sebastian, Dmytriiev, Dmytro, Fennessy, Paul, Fischer, H. Barrie J., Frizelle, Henry, Gadsden, Jeff, Gautier, Philippe, Gupta, Rajnish K., Hardman, Harold David, Harrop-Griffiths, William, Hebbard, Peter, Hernandez, Nadia, Hlasny, Jakub, Iohom, Gabriella, Ip, Vivian H. Y., Jeng, Christina L. ., Johnson, Rebecca L., Kalagara, Hari, Kinirons, Brian, Lansdown, Andrew Kenneth, Leng, Jody C., Lim, Yean Chin, Lobo, Clara, Ludwin, Danielle B., Macfarlane, Alan James Robert, Machi, Anthony T., Mahon, Padraig, Mannion, Stephen, McLeod, David H., Merjavy, Peter, Miscuks, Aleksejs, Mitchell, Christopher H., Moka, Eleni, Moran, Peter, Ngui, Ann, Nin, Olga C., O'Donnell, Brian D., Pawa, Amit, Perlas, Anahi, Porter, Steven, Pozek, John-Paul, Rebelo, Humberto C., Roques, Vicente, Schroeder, Kristopher M., Schwartz, Gary, Schwenk, Eric S., Sermeus, Luc, Shorten, George, Srinivasan, Karthikeyan, Stevens, Markus F., Theodoraki, Kassiani, Turbitt, Lloyd R., Valdes-Vilches, Luis Fernando, Volk, Thomas, Webster, Katrina, Wiesmann, T., Wilson, Sylvia H., Wolmarans, Morne, Woodworth, Glenn, Worek, Andrew K., Moran, E. M. Louise, Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, UCL - SSS/IONS/NEUR - Clinical Neuroscience, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'anesthésiologie, Anesthesiology, APH - Quality of Care, and Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neuroinfection & -inflammation

Subjects
Consensus, neuraxial, Delphi Technique, education, General Medicine, Documentation, international consensus, anesthesia, documentation, nerve block, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia, Conduction, Nerve block, Regional anesthesia, Anesthesia, Neuraxial, Minimum standards, Delphi process, Humans, regional anesthesia, minimum standards
Abstract

Background and objectives: documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods: following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as >= 75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results: seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion: by means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia., European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA); ASRA Pain Medicine

Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results