Search

Context: Joint loading following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is thought to influence long-term outcomes. However, our understanding of the role of meniscus repair at the time of ACL-R on early joint loading is limited. Objective: To assess if differences in total energy absorption and energy absorption contribution of the hip, knee, and ankle exist in the early stages of rehabilitation between patients who received an isolated ACL-R and those with concomitant meniscal repairs. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Clinical laboratory. Patients: Fifty-nine human subjects, including 27 who underwent ACL-R and 32 who underwent ACL-R with concomitant meniscal repairs. Main outcome measure: The total energy absorption and the energy absorption contribution of each joint of both the involved and uninvolved limbs during a double-limb squat task. Results: There were significant differences in energy absorption contribution between groups at the knee joint (P = .01) and the hip joint (P = .04), but not at the ankle joint (P = .48) of the involved limb. Post hoc analysis indicates that preoperative hip and knee loading differences exist and when you control for preoperative loading (analysis of covariance), the postsurgery difference was not significant. Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the additional surgical procedure of MR may not have had negative effects on joint loading during squatting at 12 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Dynamic balance is a vital aspect of everyday life. It is important to incorporate an exercise program that is useful for maintaining and improving balance in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, there is a lack of evidence supporting the effectiveness of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on improving dynamic balance. Purpose To determine the effectiveness of SSEs on dynamic balance in adults with CLBP. Study Design A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Methods Forty participants with CLBP were assigned randomly into either an SSE group or a general exercise (GE) group, which consisted of flexibility and range-of-motion exercises. Participants attended a total of four to eight supervised physical therapy (PT) sessions and performed their assigned exercises at home in the first four weeks of the eight-week intervention. In the last four weeks, the participants performed their exercises at home with no supervised PT sessions. Participants' dynamic balance was measured using the Y-Balance Test (YBT) and the normalized composite scores, Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire scores were collected at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks. Results A significant difference between groups from two weeks to four weeks (p = 0.002) was found, with the SSE group demonstrating higher YBT composite scores than the GE group. However, there were no significant between-group differences from baseline to two weeks (p =0.098), and from four weeks to eight weeks (p = 0.413). Conclusions Supervised SSEs were superior to GEs in improving dynamic balance for the first four weeks after initiating intervention in adults with CLBP. However, GEs appeared to have an effect equivalent to that of SSEs after 8-week intervention. Levels of Evidence 1b. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a musculoskeletal disorder that affects more than 80% of people in the United States at least once in their lifetime. LBP is one of the most common complaints prompting individuals to seek medical care. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of spinal stabilization exercises (SSEs) on movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level in adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Methods Forty participants, 20 in each group, with CLBP were recruited and randomly allocated into one of two interventions: SSEs and general exercises (GEs). All participants received their assigned intervention under supervision one to two times per week for the first four weeks and then were asked to continue their program at home for another four weeks. Outcome measures were collected at baseline, two weeks, four weeks, and eight weeks, including the Functional Movement ScreenTM (FMSTM), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (OSW) scores. Results There was a significant interaction for the FMSTM scores (p = 0.016), but not for the NPRS and OSW scores. Post hoc analysis showed significant between-group differences between baseline and four weeks (p = 0.005) and between baseline and eight weeks (p = 0.026) favor SSEs over GEs. Further, the results demonstrated that all participants, regardless of group, had significant improvements in movement performance, pain intensity, and disability level over time. Conclusion The results of the study favor SSEs over GEs in improving movement performance for individuals with CLBP, specifically after four weeks of the supervised SSE program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The Movement System Impairment (MSI) model is useful for identifying spine-hip mobility and motor control deficits that may contribute to low back pain (LBP). While previous studies have found differences in global spine-hip movement impairments between lumbar MSI subgroups, no studies have compared segmental spine movement impairments between these subgroups. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze segmental lumbar mobility in participants with LBP and a lumbar flexion- or extension-based MSI. METHODS: Forty participants with subacute-chronic LBP were placed into one of three age groups (< 35, 35–54, or > 54 years-old) and then classified into a flexion- or extension-based MSI sub-group. Segmental lumbar range of motion (ROM) was measured in degrees using a skin-surface device. Total lumbar and segmental flexion and extension ROM of L1-L2 to L5-S1 was compared between MSI sub-groups for each age group using separate two-way ANOVAs. RESULTS: Significant main effects were found for the independent variables of MSI subgroup and age. Participants in all three age groups with a flexion-based MSI displayed significantly less lumbar extension (- 0.6 ∘) at L4-5 as compared to participants with an extension-based MSI (- 2.1 ∘), p = 0.03. In addition, lumbar total and segmental ROM was significantly less for older individuals in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with LBP may demonstrate a pattern of lumbar segmental hypomobility in the opposite direction of their MSI. Future studies may investigate the added value of direction-specific spinal mobilization to a program of MSI-based exercise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of deep dry needling (DN) with and without needle manipulation on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and electromyographic (EMG) amplitude of the lumbosacral multifidus (LM) in adults with low back pain (LBP). Methods: Participants were randomized into two treatment groups: with needle manipulation (n = 21) and without needle manipulation (n = 21). All participants received a single session of the assigned DN intervention. PPTs and EMG amplitude of the LM muscle were collected three times: before DN, immediately after DN, and one week after DN. Results: The needle manipulation group had a significantly greater increase in PPT immediately after the intervention and at the one-week follow-up as compared to the no needle manipulation group. The increase of PPT in the needle manipulation group was significant immediately after the intervention, and the increase remained significant at the one-week follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in EMG amplitude of the LM muscle between groups across the three time points. Discussion: Deep DN with needle manipulation appeared to reduce mechanical pressure sensitivity more than DN without manipulation for patients with LBP. Although a single session of DN could reduce pressure pain sensitivity, it may not be sufficient to improve LM muscle function. Level of Evidence: 1b. Trial registration numbers: NCT03970486. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. Randomized clinical trial. Objectives. Early physical therapy (PT) with specific stabilization training has been shown to benefit individuals after lumbar spinal surgery but has not been studied in patients after cervical spine surgery. The primary purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between early cervical spine stabilizer (ECS) training and usual care (UC) in patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. The secondary purpose was to determine test-retest reliability of strength and endurance tests of cervical spinal stabilizers in this patient population. Methods. Forty participants who were scheduled for ACDF surgery were randomized into either the ECS group or the UC group. After surgery, participants received their assigned group intervention during their hospital stay and continued their assigned intervention for 12 weeks. All participants had phone follow-ups twice during the first 6 weeks to address questions or problems. Clinical outcome measures including pain level using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), disability level using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Craniocervical Flexor Strength (CCF-S), and Craniocervical Flexor Endurance (CCF-E) were collected three times: before surgery and 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. Test-retest reliability was assessed in the first 10 participants. Results. There was no significant interaction between the groups over time for any of the outcome measures. However, all participants made significant improvements in all four outcome measures at 6 and 12 weeks post surgery. The results showed good-to-excellent test-retest reliability for the CCF-S and CCF-E tests. Conclusions. Both ECS training and UC resulted in the same amount of improvement at 6 and 12 weeks; therefore, both therapy approaches appear to have similar and positive effects on patients in their first 3 months of recovery after ACDF. Both the CCF-S and CCF-E tests can be used reliably to assess the strength and endurance of the cervical spinal stabilizers for patients after ACDF surgery. The study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH, U.S. National Library of Medicine, identifier # NCT01519115) Protocol Registration system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To examine the effects of lumbopelvic stabilization exercises (LSE) and pelvic compression belts on muscle behavior in women with sacroiliac joint. Study Design: Feasibility randomized clinical trial. Background: Patients with unilateral lumbopelvic pain have been shown to have altered muscle recruitment patterns of the transverse abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique muscles. The effects of LSE and pelvic compression belts on muscle behavior are unknown in this population. Methods and Measures: Twenty-five women with unilateral sacroiliac joint pain were randomly assigned to the LSE plus belt (LSE + belt) group or the LSE group. Both groups received the same LSE for 12 weeks with the first 4 weeks under supervision. The LSE + belt group also received a pelvic compression belt for the first 4 weeks. Outcome measures, including the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, and percent change of muscle thickness for the TrA and internal oblique, were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. In addition, Global Rating of Change Scale scores were collected at 4 and 12 weeks. Results: The analysis of variance results revealed no significant interaction for Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, or percent change of TrA and internal oblique; however, all had significant improvements in over time. There was no significant difference in Global Rating of Change Scale scores between groups. Conclusion: The results of this feasibility study did not offer clear evidence of the benefit of pelvic compression belt over LSE for those with sacroiliac joint pain. All participants demonstrated an increased muscle thickness of TrA in the first 4 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Researchers have demonstrated moderate evidence for the use of exercise in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome (SAIS). Recent evidence also supports eccentric exercise for patients with lower extremity and wrist tendinopathies. However, only a few investigators have examined the effects of eccentric exercise on patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of an eccentric progressive resistance exercise (PRE) intervention to a concentric PRE intervention in adults with SAIS. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial Methods: Thirty-four participants with SAIS were randomized into concentric (n = 16, mean age: 48.6 ± 14.6 years) and eccentric (n = 18, mean age: 50.1 ± 16.9 years) exercise groups. Supervised rotator cuff and scapular PRE's were performed twice a week for eight weeks. A daily home program of shoulder stretching and active range of motion (AROM) exercises was performed by both groups. The outcome measures of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, pain-free arm scapular plane elevation AROM, pain-free shoulder abduction and external rotation (ER) strength were assessed at baseline, week five, and week eight of the study. Results: Four separate 2x3 ANOVAs with repeated measures showed no significant difference in any outcome measure between the two groups over time. However, all participants made significant improvements in all outcome measures from baseline to week five (p < 0.0125). Significant improvements also were found from week five to week eight (p < 0.0125) for all outcome measures except scapular plane elevation AROM. Conclusion: Both eccentric and concentric PRE programs resulted in improved function, AROM, and strength in patients with SAIS. However, no difference was found between the two exercise modes, suggesting that therapists may use exercises that utilize either exercise mode in their treatment of SAIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of two clinical measurements of cervical lordosis and to compare these measurements of individuals with cervical spine symptoms to those of asymptomatic individuals. METHODS: Fifty-seven participants were recruited for the study: 18 following cervical fusion, 20 with neck pain and no surgery, and 19 with no neck pain. Cervical lordosis was measured using a flexible ruler (flexirule) and a modified bubble inclinometer. Intertester and intratester reliability were calculated for both methods. Validity was assessed by correlating measurements taken using both methods to Cobb angles between C2 and C7 on lateral view radiography of the participants in the cervical fusion and the neck pain groups. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) revealed good intratester reliability for both methods. Intertester reliability was fair for the flexirule method but good for the inclinometer method. Pearson correlations with radiographic angles were poor for both methods. ANOVAs showed no significant difference in cervical lordosis measurements between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. CONCLUSION: Although both the flexirule and inclinometer methods are reliable, neither method correlated with the Cobb angle on the radiography, suggesting these methods may measure different aspects of cervical spine alignment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: The estimated prevalence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is 13–30% in patients with non-specific low back pain. One common presentation is pain at or near the SIJ, and common physical therapy interventions include lumbopelvic stabilisation programmes and pelvic compression belts. The aim of this study was to: i) assess how compression of the SIJ affects the thickness of the deep abdominal muscles during the active straight leg raise (ASLR); ii) determine between-day intra-tester reliability of ultrasound imaging to assess percentage change in thickness of the deep abdominal muscles. Methods: Participants (n=15) with unilateral symptoms near the SIJ and age-matched and sex-matched controls (n=15) were recruited for this study. Ultrasound imaging was used to obtain the thickness of the transverse abdominis (TrA) and internal oblique (IO) muscles. Measurements were taken at rest and during the ASLR, with and without pelvic compression. Results: Two separate two-way (group×pelvic compression) analysis of variance (ANOVA) designs with repeated measures were used to analyse the thickness of the TrA and IO muscles; interactions were not significant for percentage change in the TrA (p=0.57) or IO (p=0.10) muscles. Intra-tester reliability was higher when testing with pelvic compression and in the control group (ICC: 0.85–0.89 vs 0.70–0.76). Conclusions: Pelvic compression did not immediately affect the muscular response of the TrA or IO muscles during the ASLR. Pelvic compression belts may be used to address the passive systems of the pelvis by increasing stability; however, specific localised exercises may be needed to improve the percentage change in thickness of the deep abdominal muscles during the ASLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]