Search

Introduction: An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been implemented in preclinical dentistry. It was taken at an early stage (propaedeutics course). The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability, validity, and feasibility of the examination, and the effect of circuit number on OSCE score. Methods: The OSCE was designed by an expert committee on the basis of prereviewed blueprints and checklists. Eleven stations formed an interdisciplinary circuit. Six groups of students (n = 62) passed sequentially round the same circuit. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS. Reliability was determined by measurement of internal consistency (Cronbach's α, Guttman's »2), standard error of measurement (SEM) (comprising generalisability index α, dependability index φ and passfail reliability pc), consistency coefficient κ, itemscale correlation (Pearson correlation), and, because the unidimensionality of the stations could not be assumed, factor analysis including varimax rotation. Convergent validity (Pearson correlation, t-test), and predictive validity for future preclinical courses and the final preclinical examination were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). The effect of the circuit number on score improvement was calculated, including a correction for the general competence of the students (ANOVA). Cost was calculated on the basis of the time invested. Results: Fifty-three out of sixty-two students passed the OSCE (mean score: 67%, SD 7.7, range, 47-81). Scores for each station correlated significantly with total scores (r = 0.35-0.54, P < 0.01). For internal consistency, α = 0.75 (relative SEM 3.8) and λ2 = 0.766. The dependability index was φ= 0.694 (absolute SEM 4.4), pc = 0.89 and κ = 0.61. Factor analysis yielded two components: dental-materials-oriented stations and all other stations (explained variance 43%). Scores correlated significantly with success in passing practical tests (i.e. performing dental procedures under examination conditions) (known group validity, P < 0.01) and with scores for subsequent courses and the final preclinical examination (Physikum) (predictive validity, P < 0.001). Later groups performed 4% better on average (CI 95%: 1.2-6.8%; P < 0.01). The cost was 181 Euro per student. Conclusions: The OSCE is reliable and valid in the context of preclinical dentistry. The cost is substantial. The problem of improvement of students' results with ascending circuit number has to be addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Visual tooth colour assessment by use of the Vita 3D-Master® (3D; Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) is well documented. To improve handling, a new linear arrangement of the shade tabs has been introduced (LG; Linearguide 3D-Master®). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the linear design has an effect on shade matching. Fifty-six students underwent identical, theoretical and practical training, by use of an Internet learning module [Toothguide Training Software® (TT)] and a standardised training programme [Toothguide Training Box® (TTB)]. Each student then matched 30 randomly chosen shade tabs presented in an intra-oral setting by a standardised device [Toothguide Check Box® (TCB)]; 15 matches were made using the 3D and 15 using the LG shade guide system, under a daylight lamp (840 matches for each guide). It was recorded to what extent the presented and selected shade tabs, or the lightness group of the tabs, matched, also the needed time for colour matching. The results showed that 35% of perfect matches were observed for the 3D and 32% for the LG. The lightness group was correct in 59% of cases for 3D and 56% for LG. Mean time needed for matching of tabs and lightness group was no different between groups (no significant difference for any assessment). Within the limitations of the study design, the colour assessment with regard to performance and time needed in shade matching was not different with the LG or the 3D. Therefore, the user should choose which shade tab arrangement is more applicable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]