151. Quantitative Comparison of the E-book and Paper-book by using Eye-tracker
- Author
-
Seung Nam Min, Young-Jin Cho, Min Ho Lee, Jun Hyeok Choi, and Jung Yong Kim
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Speech recognition ,education ,Audiology ,Legibility ,humanities ,symbols.namesake ,Bonferroni correction ,Post-hoc analysis ,Saccade ,Multiple comparisons problem ,Fixation (visual) ,medicine ,symbols ,Eye tracking ,Analysis of variance ,Psychology - Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study is to evaluate the difference of legibility between e-book and paper-book by using eye-tracker. Background: Despite of many researches on the e-book and paper-book, there are few researches on the difference between e-book and paper-book. In addition, the researches on the e-book were only dependent on the e-book reader. This study focused on the comparison of e-book and paper-book controlled with the same environments. Method: This study was conducted with 2×3 within-subject design. Independent variables include the types of book (e-book, paper-book) and font sizes (8pt, 10pt, 12pt). Dependent variables are four measures of fixation duration, saccade length, blink rate and subjective discomfort. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with repeated measured design was used to investigate the main and interaction effects of independent variables on each of the dependent variables. The multiple comparisons were performed by post hoc analysis and Bonferroni correction was applied. Results Fixation duration at e-book was longer than paper-book (p
- Published
- 2012