Search

Background: Intrathecal morphine provides effective analgesia for a range of operations. However, widespread implementation into clinical practice is hampered by concerns for potential side-effects. We undertook a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with the primary objective of determining whether a threshold dose for non-pulmonary complications could be defined and whether an association could be established between dose and complication rates when intrathecal morphine is administered for perioperative or obstetric analgesia., Methods: We systematically searched the literature for randomised controlled trials comparing intrathecal morphine vs control in patients undergoing any type of surgery under general or spinal anaesthesia, or women in labour. Primary outcomes were rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention within the first 24 postoperative hours, analysed according to doses (1-100 μg; 101-200 μg; 201-500 μg; >500 μg), type of surgery, and anaesthetic strategy. Trials were excluded if doses were not specified., Results: Our analysis included 168 trials with 9917 patients. The rates of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention were significantly increased in the intrathecal morphine group, with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.52 (1.29-1.79), P<0.0001; 6.11 (5.25-7.10), P<0.0001; and 1.73 (1.17-2.56), P=0.005, respectively. Meta-regression could not establish an association between dose and rates of non-pulmonary complications. There was no subgroup difference according to surgery for any outcome. The quality of evidence was low (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] system)., Conclusions: Intrathecal morphine significantly increased postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention after surgery or labour in a dose-independent manner., Systematic Review Protocol: PROSPERO (CRD42023387838)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

A 78-year-old man with postoperative recurrence of esophageal cancer was admitted to the hospital due to chest pain and dyspnea. Oral short-acting opioids provided some relief, but chest pain persisted and worsened, leading to the initiation of a transdermal fentanyl patch. However, the patient developed opioid-induced urinary retention, which was treated with a naldemedine, a medication used for opioid-induced constipation and urinary retention. Opioid switching led to recurrent urinary retention, requiring placement of a urinary catheter. The patient ultimately required continuous deep sedation for refractory symptoms and died several days later.

Objective: To systematically review available paediatric literature on comparisons between morphine (Mo) and hydromorphone (Hm), to guide clinicians to rationally use these medications., Design: Systematic review within four databases for all studies published from 1963 to July 2019., Setting: All paediatric settings., Eligibility: All studies comparing Mo to Hm in individuals younger than 21 years., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was to compare clinical efficacy and side effects of Mo and Hm. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles and the description of predefined Mo to Hm conversion ratios used across the paediatric literature., Results: Among 754 abstracts reviewed, 59 full-text articles met inclusion criteria and 24 studies were included in the analysis: 4 studies compared pharmacodynamics of Mo and Hm and 20 studies reported the use of a predefined Mo to Hm conversion ratio. Most studies had a poor methodological quality. Available evidence suggests that, when given intravenously, the equianalgesic ratio of Mo to Hm is 5:1. Intravenous administration with this ratio results in a similar rate of adverse effects, including pruritus and nausea. The epidural administration with a ratio of 10:1 results in more pruritus and urinary retention with Mo than Hm. Pharmacokinetic data were reported in only one study. A wide range of pre-established ratios for different routes of administration were reported, but few were based on evidence., Conclusion: Current literature does not permit a rational choice between Mo and Hm. A ratio of 5:1 seems adequate for intravenous administration and leads to a similar rate of adverse effects., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: There is no consensus of the ideal technique to provide analgesia in knee ligament reconstructions. The aim of this study was to compare the intensity of postoperative pain in these patients under different modalities of analgesia., Method: Randomized and controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with flexor tendons between December 2013 and 2014. All patients underwent spinal anesthesia and rescue analgesia with tramadol. The Groups C, M, R0,375 and R0,25 were compared with only the previously described technique, subarachnoid morphine (100 μg) or femoral nerve block with 25 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and 0.25%, respectively. Pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24hours, age, sex, rescue analgesia, adverse reactions and satisfaction were evaluated., Results: Among the 83 eligible patients, a predominance of males (85.7%) was observed, between 28 and 31 years. The Group C requested more opioid (27.3%) than the other groups, without significance when compared. There were no significant differences in pain intensity at 6, 12 and 24hours. There was a higher incidence of urinary retention in the Group M (23.8%) than in the R0,375 (0%) and prolonged quadriceps motor block in the R0,375 Group (30%) than in the M and C Groups (0%), with statistical significance (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: There was no difference in the intensity of postoperative pain in patients submitted to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with flexor tendons under the analgesic modalities evaluated, despite the predominance of urinary retention in the M Group and motor block in the R0,375 Group., (Copyright © 2019 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.)

Background: The incidence of chronic opioid use (COU) is increasing with health related complications impacting both patients and healthcare services., Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the impact of COU on postoperative urinary retention (PUR) in patients following lumbar fusion surgery as well as its impact on length of stay (LOS) and non-routine discharges (NRD)., Materials & Methods: The State Inpatient Databases were utilised to identify patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion procedures. Patients with and without COU were separated into groups and matched using 3:1 propensity score matching. PUR, LOS in the upper quartile and discharge to a location other than home were the outcomes of interest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of COU on the above outcomes and Wald chi-square tests were used to determine the factors with the most significant associations., Results: COU was significant for PUR (p = 0.037), prolonged LOS (p < 0.001), and NRD (p < 0.001). Factors most significantly associated with PUR were Elixhauser Mortality Index and COU both with p < 0.05. Factors associated with prolonged LOS and NRD were Elixhauser Mortality Index, COU, and insurance status., Conclusion: COU has a notable impact on PUR, LOS, and NRD. The Elixhauser Mortality Index and insurance status of patients also showed predictive utility for these outcomes. This knowledge enables us to identify sources of pressure for health services and approach them strategically through increased awareness., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Opioids are widely used in clinical anesthesia. However, side effects include postoperative nausea and vomiting, shivering, ileus, and urine retention and are specifically discussed here. From the available evidence, it appears that the use of opioids is strongly associated with impaired gastrointestinal motility. Therefore, to prevent postoperative ileus, the use of opioids should be minimized and opioids should be replaced by other drugs. With regard to the risk of postoperative urinary retention, one problem is the lack of standardized definition. Nevertheless, the use of opioids is clearly an important risk factor. Postoperative nausea and vomiting have high incidences. Even if the mechanisms are partially understood, opioid-sparing strategies have been shown to decrease its incidence. Finally, the problem of postoperative shivering has been, at least partially, solved by the avoidance of (high doses) remifentanil and the use of alpha-2 agonists. In conclusion, postoperative urinary retention, postoperative ileus, nausea and vomiting, and shivering are complex problems seen after surgery. Management is possible, but prevention is possible with the avoidance of high doses of intraoperative opioids, conjointly to opioid-sparing techniques., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We describe the case of a young male patient who had consumed the morphine-like substance AH-7921 which is available via the internet. He was initially admitted to hospital because of obstipation and presented within a day of inpatient treatment for the first time with a generalized tonic-clonic epileptic seizure with subsequent urinary retention. Within a few hours, the patient then also developed bradycardia, while at the same time describing symptoms of physical opioid withdrawal which gradually deteriorated within the following hours. We initiated a treatment with buprenorphine which resulted in a considerable reduction of withdrawal symptoms, so the patient could be discharged from hospital., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Opioids are frequently used as part of multimodal pain management protocols for knee arthroscopy; however, their use may be associated with opioid-related adverse events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of potential analgesic-related complications after knee arthroscopy using a nationally representative database. Using 2010\endash 2012 Medicare claims data, patients undergoing knee arthroscopy procedures (including ligament repair, meniscectomy, and chondroplasty) were identified. The risk of complications related to typical modalities of analgesia, including opioids, within 90 days following surgery was assessed using multivariate Cox regression. Based on follow-up of 16,567 cases, respiratory complications (bradypnea, pulmonary insufficiency, asphyxia, and hypoxemia) were the most frequently diagnosed complications ( n = 418; 2.52%), followed by postoperative nausea and vomiting ( n = 174; 1.05%) and urinary retention complications ( n = 166; 1.00%). Risk factors including older age, male gender, lower socioeconomic status, and a high number of comorbidities were associated with development of postsurgical complications.

Objective: Delayed hair re-growth, pruritus and urinary retention are known complications after epidural anaesthesia in dogs. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of epidurally administered drugs on the occurrence of these complications in dogs., Material and Methods: Ninety dogs were included in this study. Eighty client-owned dogs undergoing surgery were randomly assigned to one of three epidural treatment groups: either morphine and bupivacaine (MB), bupivacaine (B), or saline solution 0.9% (S) was administered epidurally to these patients. Ten dogs were only clipped in the lumbosacral area (C). Follow-up started 4 weeks after clipping and was performed every 4-5 weeks in cases of delayed hair re-growth or pruritus. Hair re-growth in the lumbosacral area was observed and compared to hair re-growth in the surgical field and the fentanyl patch area. Cytological analysis and a trichogram were performed if hair re-growth was delayed after 6 months. Time interval to first urination postoperatively was recorded (n = 80)., Results: Hair re-growth was delayed in 11 dogs (12.2%; B: n = 7, S: n = 2, MB: n = 1, C: n = 1) with no differences between groups. Pruritus was evident in two dogs (2.2%; MB: n = 1, S: n = 1). After 6 months, hair had started to re-grow in all but one dog (B). After 10 months the coat of this dog had re-grown. Time to first urination did not differ between groups., Conclusion and Clinical Relevance: No direct correlation between the particular drugs injected epidurally and delayed hair re-growth, pruritus and urinary retention could be shown. Dog owners should be informed that hair re-growth after epidural anaesthesia could be markedly delayed.

Background: Morphine injected into the subarachnoid space enhances the analgesic effects of spinal anaesthesia, improving the patient's comfort in the postoperative period. However, it is likely to be associated with adverse side effects that reduce patient satisfaction, e.g., urine retention. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the incidence of urine retention in patients receiving spinal anaesthesia combined with intrathecal morphine., Methods: The postoperative course of 30 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgical procedures was analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: the control group (BSH; 16 individuals anaesthetised with a 0.5% hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine) and the experimental group (BSH + MF; 14 individuals anaesthetised with a 0.5% hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine with the addition of 0.2 mg morphine). The following parameters were analysed: duration of anaesthesia, time to miction, time to urgency and need to introduce a urinary catheter., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the duration of anaesthesia, incidence of hypogastric discomfort/difficulties in urination, time to hypogastric discomfort or duration of discomfort. Patients receiving intrathecal morphine were characterised by longer time to miction, higher incidence of urinary catheterisation and longer time between anaesthesia and urinary catheterisation., Conclusions: Patients receiving spinal anaesthesia with a 0.5% hyperbaric solution of bupivacaine combined with intrathecal morphine were demonstrated to have a higher incidence of urinary catheterisation, longer time to urinary catheterisation and longer time to miction compared to patients receiving only local anaesthetics.

Cesarean delivery (CD) is the second most commonly performed surgery in the United States. As such, prevention of complications associated with this procedure is a top priority in nursing care. Nurses at the study institution perceived that postcesarean patients experienced increased urinary retention after use of spinal morphine for postoperative pain relief. This observation prompted a review of the literature indicating that limited research had been conducted in this area. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of postelective CD urinary retention and dose of spinal morphine. A retrospective, quasi-experimental, three-group design was used. Records of 150 patients, ages 17 to 39, undergoing elective primary or repeat CD were examined. Morphine doses included 100, 150, and 200 mcg. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups., (Copyright © 2013 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Urinary retention in women often presents a diagnostic difficulty, and the etiology may remain unidentified even after excluding structural and neurological causes. We evaluated a group of women referred to a specialist center with unexplained urinary retention., Materials and Methods: A total of 61 consecutive women with complete urinary retention were evaluated. Urological and neurological investigations locally had failed to identify a cause. Urethral pressure profile, sphincter volume measurement and in some cases urethral sphincter electromyography were performed to diagnose a primary disorder of sphincter relaxation (Fowler's syndrome)., Results: Mean patient age was 39 years (range 18 to 88). Following investigations, a probable etiology was identified in 25 (41%) women, the most common being Fowler's syndrome. Of the women 24 (39%) were being treated with opiates for various pain syndromes and in 13 no other cause of retention was identified. Opiates could be discontinued in only 2 patients, and both demonstrated improved sensations and voiding., Conclusions: The cause of urinary retention may remain unknown in spite of extensive investigations. Young women regularly using prescription opiates for various undiagnosed pain syndromes present a challenging clinical problem and this study suggests that iatrogenic causes should be considered if voiding difficulties emerge. An association between opiate use and constipation is well-known and, although urinary retention is a listed adverse event, it appears to be often overlooked in clinical practice. It is hypothesized that Fowler's syndrome is due to an up-regulation of spinal cord enkephalins and that exogenous opiates may compound any functional abnormalities predisposing young women to urinary retention., (Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Morphine has become the preferred drug for analgesia. However, analgesic doses of morphine can result in urinary retention, which is an intractable problem in clinical practice. Though bladder catheterization is one available therapeutic option, data supporting the technique's effectiveness are controversial. As a novel anti-cholinergic medicine developed in China, penehyclidine hydrochloride (PHC) exhibits greater selectivity for M(3)/M(1) receptors than M(2) receptors. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the efficacy of PHC in treating urinary retention., Methods: Thirty-two healthy male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided in four groups (n = 8 each) as follows: control group (C group), PHC low-dose group (PL group, 0.01 mg/kg of PHC intramuscularly), PHC middle-dose group (PM group, 0.02 mg/kg of PHC intramuscularly), and PHC high-dose group (PH group, 0.05 mg/kg of PHC intramuscularly). All rabbits were injected intravenously with morphine (1 mg/kg) to induce urinary retention and different doses of PHC were injected intramuscularly in the PL, PM and PH groups. In the C group, 1 ml saline was administered instead of PHC. The bladder pressure and the bladder sphincter pressure were recorded at different time points. The plasma concentration of PHC was measured at different time points with high performance liquid chromatography. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were recorded at different time points., Results: Bladder pressure and urinary bladder sphincter pressure rose significantly from 30 minutes after morphine administration until the end of the experiment. PHC markedly attenuated the elevations in pressure induced by morphine. Morphometric analysis also revealed histological damage, erythrocytes and ruptures of the microcirculation in regions of the submucosa and smooth muscle. Morphometric damage was ameliorated with PHC but not with saline. Hemodynamic data (mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR) did not differ between groups over the observation period., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that intravenous morphine significantly increased bladder pressure and urinary bladder sphincter pressure and induced histological damage in the bladder and urinary bladder sphincter. Importantly, preliminary data showed that PHC could decrease the extent of these changes.

Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, has been studied in adults for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in advanced illness. Here, the authors document the first neonate to receive methylnaltrexone in an attempt to resolve morphine-induced urinary retention. An asphyxiated term newborn infant underwent induced hypothermia and received morphine by continuous intravenous infusion. After 36 h, the patient developed progressive urinary retention (calculated bladder volume 63 ml), followed by venous congestion of the lower extremities. Attempted bladder catheterisation was unsuccessful. Voiding occurred within 20 min after intravenous administration of methylnaltrexone (0.15 mg/kg body weight). A relapse of urinary retention 24 h later responded well to a second dose of methylnaltrexone. There were no adverse effects and no opioid withdrawal symptoms. The neonate had normal findings in cranial MRI that was performed after elective cessation of induced hypothermia.

Intrathecal morphine is often used for postoperative analgesia after surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain more detailed information on the frequency of side-effects in patients receiving intrathecal morphine in combination with spinal anaesthesia compared with placebo treated patients. We clustered the analysis to patients receiving placebo, less than morphine 0.3 mg (M < 0.3), or equal to or more than morphine 0.3 mg (M > or = 0.3) and calculated the risk ratios of morphine vs placebo. Twenty-eight studies investigating 46 morphine groups vs placebo were included. A total of 790 patients with intrathecal morphine and 524 patients who received placebo were analysed. Compared with placebo the lower dose of morphine resulted in an increase of nausea (RR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), vomiting (RR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5-6.4) and pruritus (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2). The higher dose resulted in an increased risk ratio for pruritus (RR 5.0, 95% CI 2.9-8.6), but not nausea (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-1.6) or vomiting (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9). Overall, intrathecal morphine did not increase respiratory depression. However, the higher dose of intrathecal morphine was associated with more episodes of respiratory depression (7/80) compared with the lower dose (2/247). Intrathecal morphine is associated with a mild increase in side-effects. With a dose < 0.3 mg we found there were no more episodes of respiratory depression than in placebo patients who received systemic opioid analgesia.

This is a two-part unit on using spinal opioids to manage postoperative pain. Part 1 outlined the pharmacology of spinal opioids. Part 2 discusses the selection of patients and their nursing care. It also focuses on the incidence of and response to adverse effects. For further information on contraindications, nursing care and patients' clinical requirements, see Portfolio Pages on nursingtimes.net.

Progenics Pharmaceuticals Inc and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals are developing methylnaltrexone, a micro-receptor opioid antagonist derived from naltrexone by the addition of a methyl group. The intravenous formulation of methylnaltrexone is currently in phase III clinical trials for the potential treatment of postoperative ileus.

Peripheral mechanisms may be involved in opioid actions on the urinary bladder. This double-blind study investigated whether opioid inhibition of bladder function is reversed by methylnaltrexone, a peripheral opioid antagonist. Thirteen healthy male volunteers received an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of remifentanil, 0.15 mcg/kg/min, then a single i.v. dose of study medication (methylnaltrexone 0.3 mg/kg, naloxone 0.01 mg/kg, or saline). Urodynamics were measured with indwelling bladder and rectal catheters, and pupil size was assessed with infrared pupillometry. Remifentanil decreased detrusor pressure in 21/25 sessions and caused complete urinary retention in 18/25. Voiding was possible in 7/7, 5/12, and 0/6 sessions after naloxone, methylnaltrexone, and saline, respectively (P=0.0013). Remifentanil caused marked miosis that was reversed by naloxone, but not methylnaltrexone or placebo (P<0.0001). The pupil data confirm that methylnaltrexone did not reverse central opioid effects. Reversal of urinary retention by methylnaltrexone indicates that peripheral mechanisms may play a role in opioid-induced bladder dysfunction.

Background: The introduction of intrathecal opioid administration for intractable chronic non-malignant pain and cancer pain is considered as one of the most important breakthroughs in pain management. Morphine, the only opioid approved by FDA for intrathecal administration, has been increasingly utilized for this purpose. For over 3 decades, there have been numerous reports on the non-nociceptive side effects associated with ever increasing long-term intrathecal morphine usage., Objectives: To review the literature on side effects due to long-term intrathecal morphine therapy with discussions of alternate treatment options., Design: English-language publications were identified through MEDLINE search and the bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed., Results: Most side effects of intrathecal morphine therapy are dose dependent and mediated by opioid receptors. Common ones include nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, constipation, sexual dysfunction, and edema. Less common ones include respiratory depression, and hyperalgesia. Catheter tip inflammatory mass formation is a less common complication that may not be mediated by opioid receptors., Conclusion: The utilization of intrathecal morphine administration for cancer and intractable non-malignant chronic pain represents an important leap forward in pain management. Yet, a wide variety of non-nociceptive side effects may also occur in susceptible patients. The side effects due to intrathecal morphine administration are mostly mediated by opioid receptors. Treatment usually involves the utilization of opioid receptor antagonist, such as naloxone. Patients considering intrathecal opioid pump therapy should be informed and advised about the possible side effects associated with long-term intrathecal morphine administration prior to placement of a permanent morphine infusion pump.

The study aimed to determine the occurrence of urinary retention in patients using opioid analgesic and to describe the method used for vesical relief. A prospective and consecutive series of 1,316 patients undergoing surgery from September 1999 to April 2003 and using opioids post surgery were studied. From the 1,136 patients, 594 did not use urinary catheters pre-surgery. From these 594 patients, 128 (22%) suffered post operative urinary retention. Urinary retention was significantly related to the use of continuous epidural analgesia (p=0.009). About 69% of patients experiencing urinary retention post surgery returned to spontaneous micturition following a single catheterization. The incidence found of urinary retention was similar to the literature, more frequent in men who received continuous epidural analgesia. The findings suggest orientation and careful nursing team observation of post operative micturition, emphasizing the intermittent aseptically catheterization for urinary retention in order to prevent potential complications of the urinary tract.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and side effects of intrathecal morphine in the dose range 0.2-0.5 mg. One-hundred patients scheduled for elective lower limb orthopedic operation under spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% with morphine in dose from 0.2 to 0.5 mg. Pain score, duration of analgesia and the incidence of adverse effects like nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and respiratory depression were assessed for 48 hr postoperatively. There were significant differences in the duration and efficacy analgesia and the incidence of pruritus the morphine dose-related. We did not observe the increased frequency of nausea and vomiting with increased dose. The respiratory depression not observed in connection with intrathecal morphine. The evidence from this current study suggests that spinal anesthesia with combination of local anesthetic and morphine can be employed to provide safe and efficacious analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic operations. The adverse effects which developed due to intrathecal morphine were able to treat with success.

Background: Although epidural opioids have excellent analgesic property, their side-effects limit its use in patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). This study was designed to compare side-effects of epidural sufentanil in ropivacaine with that of morphine in ropivacaine focusing on lower urinary tract function after major abdominal surgery., Methods: In total 60 patients undergoing gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either sufentanil in ropivacaine (Group S, n=30) or morphine in ropivacaine (Group M, n=30) for their PCEA. Epidural catheter was inserted between the 7th and 8th thoracic spine. Visual analogue pain score and side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, hypotension and urinary retention were evaluated during postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 2 in the postanaesthetic care unit., Results: The incidence of serious to major micturition problem in Group S was lower than that in Group M (P<0.001). The incidence of pruritus, nausea and vomiting was also lower in Group S than in Group M on POD 1., Conclusions: The lower incidence of major/serious micturition problem in patients receiving sufentanil in ropivacaine thoracic epidural analgesia suggests that continuation of urinary drainage may not be necessary from POD 1 onwards.

Background: Urinary bladder function is impaired during labor and delivery, predisposing to urinary retention. The effect of low-dose epidural opioid on bladder function remains unclear. We tested the hypothesis that adding low-dose fentanyl to epidural ropivacaine for patient-controlled labor analgesia does not promote urinary retention., Methods: Laboring women who requested patient-controlled epidural analgesia were randomly assigned in a double blind study to 0.2% ropivacaine (R-group, n=100) or 0.2% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg/mL (RF-group, n=98). Urinary bladder distension was assessed clinically every hour. The post-void residual urine volume was measured by ultrasonography. Urine volume exceeding 100 mL was drained by catheterization. Bladder volume of > or =300 mL, as determined by catheterization was considered as evidence of urinary retention., Results: Thirty percent of the patients in each group developed urinary retention during labor. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. There was an excellent correlation between bladder volume as estimated by ultrasonography and that by catheterization: catheterization volume=0.93 x ultrasound volume + 25; r(2)=0.83. The bias (mean error) was -1+/-99 mL and the precision (average absolute error) between the ultrasound estimate and actual bladder volume determined by catheterization was 58+/-79 mL., Conclusion: Addition of fentanyl to patient-controlled epidural analgesia did not increase the risk of urinary retention. Ultrasound measurements were effective and reliable in assessing urinary bladder volumes during labor.

A 5-year-old German Shepherd dog which presented for total hip replacement developed myoclonus and urinary retention after the subarachnoid injection of preservative-free morphine. Myoclonus was resistant to treatment, except pentobarbital anesthesia. Urinary retention was treated with bethanechol and subsided within a few days. Involuntary muscular activity can result from the epidural, subarachnoid or systemic injection of various opioid drugs, or as a result of the toxic or irritant effect of preservatives or autologous blood. The latter were not causative factors in this case. Opioid agonist inhibition of central inhibitory neurotransmitter action may have explained the myoclonus. Postoperative urinary retention was attributed to the spinal action of morphine inhibiting efferent parasympathetic nervous activity.

Objectives: To compare analgesic efficacy of intramuscular opioids: meperidine and tramadol with epidural analgesia., Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight term nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation were randomized to receive either epidural (n=43), meperidine (n=39) or tramadol (n=44). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the severity of pain. The parameters analyzed were analgesic efficacy, effect on labor, other maternal side effects, perinatal outcome and maternal satisfaction., Results: Median VAS scores following first dose were 0 (0-5), 5 (3-8) and 5 (3-8) in epidural, meperidine and tramadol groups, respectively. Ninety percent of women rated analgesia as good to excellent in the epidural group as compared with 72% of women in the meperidine group and 65% in tramadol group. However, epidural caused a significant prolongation of first (P<0.05) and second (P<0.01) stage of labor with an increased number of operative deliveries (27% in the epidural, 7.6% in the meperidine, and 11.4% in the tramadol groups, P<0.05). In the epidural group 40% women had urinary retention and 16% had motor weakness, whereas sedation was the only side effect seen in the meperidine (41%) and tramadol groups (9%). Respiratory depression was noted among three neonates in the meperidine group, two in the tramadol group and none in the epidural group., Conclusions: The analgesic efficacy and maternal satisfaction is better with epidural analgesia than with opioids. Analgesia provided by meperidine and tramadol is comparable and approximately 50% of women rated the analgesia as good. Meperidine is better in the second stage than tramadol. Hence in developing nations where availability of facilities is the main limiting factor, intramuscular opioids can be considered suitable alternatives.

Sedation has been commonly used in the neonate to decrease the stress and pain from the noxious stimuli and invasive procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit, as well as to facilitate synchrony between ventilator and spontaneous breaths. Fentanyl, an opioid analgesic, is frequently used in the neonatal intensive care unit setting for these very purposes. Various reported side effects of fentanyl administration include chest wall rigidity, hypotension, respiratory depression, and bradycardia. Here, 2 cases of urinary bladder retention leading to renal pelvocalyceal dilatation mimicking hydronephrosis as a result of continuous infusion of fentanyl are reported.

The effect of intrathecal (i.t.) injection of morphine and fentanyl on the urinary bladder was studied by ascending cystogram in 18 anaesthetized dogs. Examinations were performed before and 60 and 120 minutes after i.t. injection of saline (group I), 0.03 mg/kg morphine (group II) and 1.5 microg/kg fentanyl (group III). A significant increase in maximal volume and compliance and a decrease in voiding pressure were observed, indicating relaxation of the detrusor muscle after i.t. administration of morphine or fentanyl. I.t. morphine produced greater and more prolonged bladder relaxation than i.t. fentanyl. We conclude that i.t. morphine and fentanyl cause variable degrees of urinary retention. As fentanyl produced milder and shorter bladder relaxation than morphine, it may be useful in patients with urinary disturbances.

Unlabelled: We compared the analgesic effect of lumbar intrathecal (IT) 0.5 mg morphine (Group M, n = 10), 50 microg sufentanil (Group S, n = 10), and their combination (Group S-M, n = 10) given before general anesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia with IV morphine (Group C, n = 19) in a randomized, double-blinded study performed in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) and morphine consumption were assessed for 24 h. In Group S-M the number of patients initially titrated with IV morphine was less than in group C (30 vs 84%, P < 0.05). Morphine requirement was higher in Group C (71 +/- 30 mg) than in Groups S (46 +/- 34 mg, P < 0.05), M (38 +/- 31 mg, P < 0.05) and S-M (23 +/- 16 mg, P < 0.01). VAS scores were significantly decreased during the first 0-11 postoperative h at rest and during the first 0-8 postoperative h on coughing in Groups M and S-M rather than in Group C. The incidence of side effects was infrequent except for urinary retention. Preoperative IT morphine or combined sufentanil and morphine could be given as a booster to achieve rapidly effective analgesia in the immediate postoperative period., Implications: As compared with IV patient-controlled analgesia, intrathecal morphine or combined sufentanil and morphine provided superior postoperative pain relief both at rest (11 h) and on coughing (8 h) than did IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine alone. IV morphine requirement was decreased during the first postoperative day after posterolateral thoracotomy.

Objective: To study the effects of preoperative phenoxybenzamine (o.p) on preventing epidural-morphine-induced urinary retention and effects of neostigmine on releasing it., Methods: 80 patients who received epidural morphine to release postoperative pain were divided into 4 groups randomly and received preoperative phenoxybenzamine (group P, n = 20), neostigmine (i. m) when urinary retention happened (group N, n = 20), both drugs (group U, n = 20), and without drugs (Control, n = 20), respectively. The incidences of urinary retention and release were observed., Results: No significant decrease (P > 0.05) happened after operation in the incidence of epidural-morphine-induced urinary retention both in the group P and in the group N. Neostigmine(i. m) could significantly release (P < 0.001) the epidural-morphine-induced urinary retention when phenoxybenzamine was administrated preoperatively., Conclusion: Preoperative phenoxybenzamine can not prevent epidural-morphine-induced urinary retention. Neostigmine can release the urinary retention only when preoperative phenoxybenzamine is used.

Serious neurological complications following long-term intrathecal application of opiates have seldom been published. This report describes complications which developed three months after reimplantation of a spinal catheter for pain therapy. The symptoms which occurred were paraparesis of the legs with sensory loss and urinary retention. A regression of these symptoms occurred only after explantation of the spinal catheter-pump-system. Possible reasons and consequences are discussed.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the incidence of clinically significant adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in paediatric patients receiving continuous intravenous morphine infusions for acute postoperative pain. Definitions were established for ADRs and data were collected in an immediately retrospective fashion for a maximum of 72 h in 110 patients >/=5 three months of age (0.3-16.7 years) receiving morphine infusions and admitted to a general ward over a three month convenience sampling period. Inadequate analgesia occurred in 65.5% of patients during the first 24 h of therapy and occurred most frequently in patients with infusion rates of 20 microg.kg-1.h-1 or less. Nausea/vomiting was the most commonly experienced ADR (42.5%). The incidence of respiratory depression was 0% (95% CI=0-3.3%). Other ADRs included: urinary retention (13.5%), pruritus (12.7%), dysphoria (7.3%), hypoxaemia (4.5%), discontinuation of morphine for treatment of an ADR (3.6%), and difficulty in arousal (0.9%). The most common ADRs associated with morphine infusions were inadequate analgesia (in the first 24 h) and nausea/vomiting. There were no cases of respiratory depression. Methods of avoiding initial inadequate analgesia and treating nausea and vomiting associated with morphine infusions are needed.

To try to decrease the incidence of side-effects associated with postoperative extradural infusions of local anaesthetics in combination with opioids, we have used plain ropivacaine solutions in 200 children. The first 72 children received an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% + diamorphine 20 microg x ml-1, then 200 children received plain ropivacaine solutions. The children who received ropivacaine were found to have lower incidences of nausea, pruritus, urinary retention, and were less sedated, despite comparable analgesia. The management of plain ropivacaine for extradural analgesia is discussed.

Purpose: Two modalities of epidural analgesia in children with two types of cerebral palsy (CP) were compared for differences in the incidence of common complications (inadequate analgesia, hypopnea, hypoxaemia, sedation, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and seizures)., Methods: Demographic, procedural and postoperative complication data were collected on children with CP receiving epidural analgesia. Information was recorded contemporaneously with the child's care by one of the authors on 92 consecutive children with CP (age, 107 +/- 50.1 mo; weight, 26 +/- 14.2 kg) who had undergone infra-umbilical orthopaedic or Nissen fundoplication procedures between December 1994 and December 1996. The first 44 patients received intermittent bolus (IB) epidural morphine and the next 48 received continuous infusion (CI) bupivacaine and fentanyl. Two forms of CP (spastic diplegia and quadriplegia) and the two modalities of analgesia were compared., Results: Excellent analgesia was obtained in 91/92 patients. Excessive sedation occurred in six patients (6.5%) but only in IB patients, (P < 0.02 vs CI). Emesis occurred in 52% of patients, and was more common in diplegic than in quadriplegic patients (68% vs 38%, P < 0.01). Pruritus was observed in 29% of patients and was more common in diplegia than quadriplegia (48% vs 12.5%, P < 0.001). The incidences of hypopnea, hypoxaemia, urinary retention and seizures were not affected by the types of CP or analgesia and no difference in sedation was observed between spastic diplegic and quadriplegic patients., Conclusions: Continuous infusion of epidural bupivacaine and fentanyl provided excellent analgesia for children with CP without serious complications. Intermittent bolus epidural morphine was associated with a high incidence of excessive sedation and should be avoided in this population.

The incidence of side-effects occurring with epidural diamorphine (0.05 mg.ml-1), fentanyl (2.0 micrograms.ml-1), methadone (0.1 mg.ml-1), morphine (0.05 mg.ml-1) and pethidine (1.0 mg.ml-1) used by infusion in combination with bupivacaine has been compared. One hundred and sixty patients were studied, 32 receiving each opioid. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly greater with morphine than fentanyl (p = 0.0097) and pethidine (p = 0.0021). The incidence of pruritus was significantly greater with morphine and diamorphine than with methadone (p = 0.012) and pethidine (p = 0.027). Morphine was also associated with a significantly greater incidence of urinary retention than pethidine (p = 0.012) and methadone (p = 0.025).

Urinary retention, overflow incontinence, and subsequent detrusor atony were observed following surgery in which a morphine with bupivacaine epidural injection was used for perioperative analgesia. The premise that the urinary retention may have been due to the effects of the morphine component of the epidural is discussed, along with other possible causes.

Background: Morphine has been the standard opioid in patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Oxycodone, the analgesic potency of which in i.v. administration has been suggested to be slightly greater than that of morphine, has not yet been studied for its efficacy in PCA., Methods: Fifty patients, undergoing a plastic reconstruction of the breast or a major operation of the vertebrae, such as lumbar spinal fusion, used PCA for postoperative pain. Patients were randomized to receive either morphine 45 microg/kg or oxycodone 30 microg/kg as i.v. bolus doses. Patients were assessed for pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and side effects at 3, 9 and 24 h. Venous blood samples for the measurement of plasma concentration of oxycodone and that of morphine and its metabolites were taken., Results: In this study patients needed, on average, the same amount of oxycodone and morphine in the recovery room and on the ward. There was no difference in the quality of analgesia (VAS) or incidence of side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus and urinary retention. The plasma concentrations of morphine-6-glucuronide showed that this metabolite might contribute to the analgesia resulting from morphine administration., Conclusions: The same dose of intravenous oxycodone and morphine administered by PCA pump was needed for immediate postoperative analgesia. The two drugs appear to be equipotent.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare morphine with ketamine to morphine alone in a double-blind investigation of postsurgical pain control., Methods: Forty-two ASA 1 and 2 patients undergoing elective microdiscectomy were administered either 1 mg.ml-1 of morphine (n = 20) or 1 mg.ml-1 of both morphine and ketamine (n = 22) via iv patient controlled analgesia (IVPCA). Pain relief and side effects were assessed at 24 hr after surgery., Results: The mean (SD) visual analogue scale (VAS) pain rating of 2.3 (1.67) for patients receiving morphine with ketamine was lower (P < 0.001) than the VAS scores of patients receiving only morphine 4.5 (1.54). Patients receiving morphine and ketamine also had less difficulty with side effects, reporting less nausea (P < 0.05), pruritus (P < 0.001), and urinary retention (P < 0.05). Although dysphoria is reported to be a common side effect of ketamine, complaints of dysphoria were rare in both groups, with only one subject (5%) in the morphine with ketamine group and three (15%) subjects receiving morphine alone reporting this side effect., Conclusion: IVPCA ketamine in combination with morphine provides superior postsurgical pain relief at lower dosage and with fewer side effects than morphine alone.

This is a retrospective study covering the ten-year period 1984-1993. Single shot spinal morphine (ITM) is compared with PCA nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief in children having abdominal or thoracic procedures. The records of 52 patients meeting selection criteria were examined. Nursing and physician notations were reviewed for hourly pain assessments, evidence of associated complications, respiratory depression, nausea and or vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention. ITM provided significantly better pain relief (2.2 h in pain) during the first 24 h postoperatively than PCA nalbuphine (9.2 h in pain). With the exception of urinary retention which was significantly more frequent following ITM (58.6%) compared to PCA nalbuphine (8.7%), narcotic related complications were not different between the two groups. No difference in duration of hospital stay or ICU stay could be demonstrated. We conclude that ITM provides better pain relief, without more serious complications, than PCA nalbuphine. We recommend it as a safe, effective technique to treat postoperative pain in children following thoracic or upper abdominal procedures.

Patients who receive narcotics by epidural injection or infusion have the potential to develop pharmacological side effects. Theories of epidural pain control and a brief review of spinal anatomy and pain physiology are presented in this article. Narcotic medications used for epidural infusion are pharmacologically distinguished by their hydrophilic or lipophilic character. Important side effects of epidurally administered narcotics, clinical presentation, manifestations, and appropriate nursing interventions are discussed.

The administration of narcotics in the subarachnoid or the epidural space is gaining acceptance for postoperative pain relief. However, the potential side effects of intrathecal and epidural use of opioids are the following: early and late respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention. Early respiratory depression is low and may occur 6 or 12 hours after the epidural narcotics injection. Many factors contribute to the delayed phase of breathing disorders and a close respiratory monitoring is needed during at least 24 hours after epidural morphine injection. Naloxone can be used to reverse the depression. Pruritus can occur in 10 to 30% of patients receiving morphine; 10 to 30% nausea and vomiting, and urinary retention occurs in 20 to 50% of patients.