Search

Background: Opioids are efficacious and safe analgesic drugs in short-term use for acute pain but chronic use can lead to tolerance and dependence. Opioid-induced microglial activation may contribute to the development of tolerance and this process may differ between males and females. A link is suggested between this microglial activation and inflammation, disturbances of circadian rhythms, and neurotoxic effects. We set out to further delineate the effects of chronic morphine on pain behaviour, microglial and neuronal staining, and the transcriptome of spinal microglia, to better understand the role of microglia in the consequences of long-term high-dose opioid administration. Experimental Approach: In two experiments, we administered increasing subcutaneous doses of morphine hydrochloride or saline to male and female rats. Thermal nociception was assessed with the tail flick and hot plate tests. In Experiment I, spinal cord (SC) samples were prepared for immunohistochemical staining for microglial and neuronal markers. In Experiment II, the transcriptome of microglia from the lumbar SC was analysed. Key Results: Female and male rats had similar antinociceptive responses to morphine and developed similar antinociceptive tolerance to thermal stimuli following chronic increasing high doses of s.c. morphine. The area of microglial IBA1-staining in SC decreased after 2 weeks of morphine administration in both sexes. Following morphine treatment, the differentially expressed genes identified in the microglial transcriptome included ones related to the circadian rhythm , apoptosis, and immune system processes. Conclusions: Female and male rats showed similar pain behaviour following chronic high doses of morphine. This was associated with decreased staining of spinal microglia, suggesting either decreased activation or apoptosis. High-dose morphine administration also associated with several changes in gene expression in SC microglia, e.g., those related to the circadian rhythm ( Per2, Per3, Dbp ). These changes should be considered in the clinical consequences of long-term high-dose administration of opioids.

Descending facilitatory circuitry that involves the rostroventromedial medulla (RVM) exerts a significant role in the development of antinociceptive tolerance and hyperalgesia following chronic morphine treatment. The role of the RVM in the development of antinociceptive tolerance to oxycodone, another clinically used strong opioid, is not yet known. Ketamine, an N -methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, attenuates opioid antinociceptive tolerance, but its effect on RVM cell discharge in opioid-tolerant animals is not known. Here, we compared chronic effects of morphine and oxycodone on the discharge properties of RVM cells and attempted to attenuate chronic treatment-induced changes with ketamine. Parallel recordings of RVM cell discharge and limb withdrawal response were performed under light pentobarbital anesthesia in male rats following sustained systemic treatment with morphine or oxycodone at equianalgesic doses. Ongoing activity and the response to noxious heat and pinch were determined in pronociceptive RVM ON-cells and antinociceptive OFF-cells on the sixth treatment day. Proportions of RVM cell types were not changed. Chronic oxycodone induced antinociceptive tolerance both in limb withdrawal and RVM cell activity. Chronic morphine induced antinociceptive tolerance in limb withdrawal that was accompanied by pronociceptive heat response changes in RVM ON- and OFF-cells. A behaviorally subantinociceptive dose of acute ketamine reversed antinociceptive tolerance both to morphine and oxycodone in limb withdrawal and reversed the chronic morphine-induced pronociceptive discharge changes in RVM cells. The results indicate that an NMDA receptor-dependent descending pronociceptive circuitry involving the RVM has an important role in behavioral antinociceptive tolerance to morphine but not oxycodone. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Morphine and oxycodone are two clinically used strong opioids. Chronic treatment with oxycodone as well as morphine can lead to analgesic tolerance and paradoxical hyperalgesia. Here we show that an N -methyl-d-aspartate receptor-dependent pronociceptive change in discharge properties of rostroventromedial medullary neurons controlling spinal nociception has an important role in antinociceptive tolerance to morphine but not oxycodone. Interestingly, chronic oxycodone did not induce pronociceptive changes in the rostroventromedial medulla.

Ketamine and its primary metabolite norketamine attenuate morphine tolerance by antagonising N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Ketamine is extensively metabolized to several other metabolites. The major secondary metabolite (2S,6S;2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine (6-hydroxynorketamine) is not an NMDA antagonist. However, it may modulate nociception through negative allosteric modulation of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. We studied whether 6-hydroxynorketamine could affect nociception or the effects of morphine in acute or chronic administration settings. Male Sprague Dawley rats received subcutaneous 6-hydroxynorketamine or ketamine alone or in combination with morphine, as a cotreatment during induction of morphine tolerance, and after the development of tolerance induced by subcutaneous minipumps administering 9.6 mg morphine daily. Tail flick, hot plate, paw pressure and rotarod tests were used. Brain and serum drug concentrations were quantified with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ketamine (10 mg/kg), but not 6-hydroxynorketamine (10 and 30 mg/kg), enhanced antinociception and decreased rotarod performance following acute administration either alone or combined with morphine. Ketamine efficiently attenuated morphine tolerance. Acutely administered 6-hydroxynorketamine increased the brain concentration of morphine (by 60%), and brain and serum concentrations of 6-hydroxynorketamine were doubled by morphine pre-treatment. This pharmacokinetic interaction did not, however, lead to altered morphine tolerance. Co-administration of 6-hydroxynorketamine 20 mg/kg twice daily did not influence development of morphine tolerance. Even though morphine and 6-hydroxynorketamine brain concentrations were increased after co-administration, the pharmacokinetic interaction had no effect on acute morphine nociception or tolerance. These results indicate that 6-hydroxynorketamine does not have antinociceptive properties or attenuate opioid tolerance in a similar way as ketamine., (© 2017 The Authors. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Development of tolerance is a well known pharmacological characteristic of opioids and a major clinical problem. In addition to the known neuronal mechanisms of opioid tolerance, activation of glia has emerged as a potentially significant new mechanism. We studied activation of microglia and astrocytes in morphine tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia in rats using immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and RNA sequencing in spinal- and supraspinal regions. Chronic morphine treatment that induced tolerance and hyperalgesia also increased immunoreactivity of spinal microglia in the dorsal and ventral horns. Flow cytometry demonstrated that morphine treatment increased the proportion of M2-polarized spinal microglia, but failed to impact the number or the proportion of M1-polarized microglia. In the transcriptome of microglial cells isolated from the spinal cord (SC), morphine treatment increased transcripts related to cell activation and defense response. In the studied brain regions, no activation of microglia or astrocytes was detected by immunohistochemistry, except for a decrease in the number of microglial cells in the substantia nigra. In flow cytometry, morphine caused a decrease in the number of microglial cells in the medulla, but otherwise no change was detected for the count or the proportion of M1- and M2-polarized microglia in the medulla or sensory cortex. No evidence for the activation of glia in the brain was seen. Our results suggest that glial activation associated with opioid tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia occurs mainly at the spinal level. The transcriptome data suggest that the microglial activation pattern after chronic morphine treatment has similarities with that of neuropathic pain., (Copyright © 2018 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Opioid analgesics are effective in the treatment of chronic pain, but they have serious adverse effects such as development of tolerance and dependence. Adrenergic α(2) agonists and μ-opioid receptor agonists show synergistic potentiation and cross-tolerance in spinal analgesia, whereas α(2)-adrenergic antagonists have shown pronociceptive effects. However, at ultralow doses, spinal α(2)-adrenergic antagonists have been reported to paradoxically enhance opioid antinociception. New data have suggested a functional μ-opioid-α(2)-adrenoceptor complex, which may help in interpreting the paradoxical effect of the α(2)-adrenergic antagonists. In the present study we assessed the effects of low doses of atipamezole, a nonselective α(2)-adrenergic antagonist, on both systemic and spinal morphine antinociception and tolerance., Methods: Antinociception was assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats using hotplate, tail-flick, and paw pressure tests. Spinal or systemic opioid tolerance was induced for 4 days. The effects of both intrathecal and subcutaneous atipamezole on acute morphine-induced antinociception and established morphine tolerance were studied., Results: Systemic or spinal atipamezole itself did not produce antinociception at the doses studied (subcutaneous 0.03, 0.3, 3 μg/kg or intrathecal 0.1, 1, 10 ng). The combined administration of spinal morphine and 1 ng of atipamezole increased the antinociceptive effect of acute spinal morphine 30 minutes after the administration of test drugs in the tail-flick test. Furthermore, 10 ng of intrathecal atipamezole attenuated established morphine tolerance 30 minutes after the administration of test drugs in the tail-flick test. However, subcutaneous atipamezole had no significant effect on systemic morphine antinociception, and it did not attenuate morphine tolerance., Conclusions: Spinal coadministration of low doses of atipamezole augmented the antinociceptive effect of morphine in naïve and tolerant rats. Heterodimerization of μ-opioid- and α(2A)-adrenoceptors with consequent changes in function and interaction could explain these results. This also suggests an interesting explanation for the variability in opioid response and tolerance in patients experiencing stress or having an increased noradrenergic tone due to other causes, e.g., drugs.

Background: Opioid analgesics are effective in relieving chronic pain, but they have serious adverse effects, including development of tolerance and dependence. Ibudilast, an inhibitor of glial activation and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, has shown potential in the treatment of neuropathic pain and opioid withdrawal. Because glial cell activation could also be involved in the development of opioid tolerance in rats, the authors studied the antinociceptive effects of ibudilast and morphine in different models of coadministration., Methods: Antinociception was assessed using male Sprague- Dawley rats in hot plate and tail-flick tests. The effects of ibudilast on acute morphine-induced antinociception, induction of morphine tolerance, and established morphine tolerance were studied., Results: Systemic ibudilast produced modest dose-related antinociception and decreased locomotor activity at the studied doses of 2.5-22.5 mg/kg. The highest tested dose of 22.5 mg/kg produced 52% of the maximum possible effect in the tail-flick test. It had an additive antinociceptive effect when combined with systemic morphine. Coadministration of ibudilast with morphine did not attenuate the development of morphine tolerance. However, in morphine-tolerant rats, ibudilast partly restored morphine-induced antinociception., Conclusions: Ibudilast produces modest antinociception, and it is effective in restoring but not in preventing morphine tolerance. The mechanisms of the effects of ibudilast should be better understood before it is considered for clinical use.