Search

Serious neurological lesions such as vertebral canal haematoma are rare after obstetric regional analgesia/anaesthesia, but early detection may be crucial to avoid permanent damage. This may be hampered by the variable and sometimes prolonged recovery following 'normal' neuraxial block, such that an underlying lesion may easily be missed. These guidelines make recommendations for the monitoring of recovery from obstetric neuraxial block, and escalation should recovery be delayed or new symptoms develop, with the aim of preventing serious neurological morbidity., (© 2020 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.)

Labor causes severe pain for many women. There is no other circumstance in which it is considered acceptable for an individual to experience untreated severe pain that is amenable to safe intervention while the individual is under a physician's care. Many women desire pain management during labor and delivery, and there are many medical indications for analgesia and anesthesia during labor and delivery. In the absence of a medical contraindication, maternal request is a sufficient medical indication for pain relief during labor. A woman who requests epidural analgesia during labor should not be deprived of this service based on the status of her health insurance. Third-party payers that provide reimbursement for obstetric services should not deny reimbursement for labor analgesia because of an absence of "other medical indications." Anesthesia services should be available to provide labor analgesia and surgical anesthesia in all hospitals that offer maternal care (levels I-IV) (). Although the availability of different methods of labor analgesia will vary from hospital to hospital, the methods available within an institution should not be based on a patient's ability to pay.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists believes that in order to allow the maximum number of patients to benefit from neuraxial analgesia, labor nurses should not be restricted from participating in the management of pain relief during labor. Under appropriate physician supervision, labor and delivery nursing personnel who have been educated properly and have demonstrated current competence should be able to participate in the management of epidural infusions.The purpose of this document is to review medical options for analgesia during labor and anesthesia for surgical procedures that are common at the time of delivery. Nonpharmacologic options such as massage, immersion in water during the first stage of labor, acupuncture, relaxation, and hypnotherapy are not covered in this document, although they may be useful as adjuncts or alternatives in many cases.

Background: Variability in the mean durations of labor analgesia for vaginal delivery among hospitals is unknown. Such differences in means among hospitals would influence appropriate equitable fee-for-service payment to US anesthesia groups. Equitable payment is the foundational principle of relative value unit payment, which, for anesthesia in the United States, means use of the American Society of Anesthesiologist's Relative Value Guide., Methods: We analyzed data from the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Anesthesia Quality Institute to test whether there are large differences in mean durations of labor analgesia for vaginal delivery among US hospitals. We choose the statistical methodology for that analysis using detailed data from 2 individual hospitals. Analyses of the means were performed for the 172 hospitals reporting a total of at least 200 durations; having no greater than 5.0% of durations 1.0 hour or less; and at least 5 four-week periods each having a mean of at least one epidural every couple of days. The 172 hospitals provided for n = 5671 combinations of hospital and 4-week period and 551,707 labor epidurals, with an overall mean duration of 6.12 hours (SE, 0.001 hour)., Results: 55.2% of the 172 hospitals had mean durations of labor analgesia for vaginal delivery that each differed (P < 0.001) from the overall mean. Among those 55.2% were the 9.9% of hospitals with means ≤5.12 hours. Those mean durations on the low end ranged from 2.68 (SE, 0.17) to 5.10 (SE, 0.07) hours. Also, among the 55.2% were the 12.2% of hospitals with means ≥7.12 hours. Those mean durations at the high end ranged from 7.13 (SE, 0.08) to 12.03 (SE, 0.23) hours. The heterogeneity in the mean durations among hospitals would have been greater had the inclusion criteria not been applied., Conclusions: Our results show that the number of labor epidurals alone is not a valid measure to quantify obstetrical anesthesia productivity. In addition, payment to US anesthesia groups for labor analgesia based solely on the number of labor epidurals initiated is not equitable. Previous work showed lack of validity and equality of payment based on face-to-face time with the patient (i.e., like a surgical anesthetic). The use of base and time units, with one time unit per hour, is a suitable payment system.

We conducted a postal survey of all consultant-led UK obstetric anaesthetic units in August 2009, to assess the standard of aseptic technique used for neuraxial blocks. One hundred and sixty-four units responded giving a response rate of 76%; 93% of units (149/160) follow recommended precautions and attach a bacterial micropore filter to the epidural catheter. Epidural top-ups are provided by 72% (116/162) of units, with about two thirds using premixed solutions (of local anaesthetic with opioid) in a variety of ways: 51% (57/111) via a continuous infusion pump; 47% (52/111) by a prefilled syringe; and 23% (25/111) by multiple use of a premixed bag of solution. For spinals, 91% of units (149/164) add diamorphine: of these 85% (126/149) draw the diamorphine from non-sterile-wrapped ampoules. If required to draw opioid from a non-sterile-wrapped ampoule, 86% (119/138) of units use a micropore filter and 21% (29/138) wipe the ampoule neck with an alcohol swab. Although sepsis secondary to neuraxial block in obstetric practice is uncommon (declared by 8.5% of units over an unspecified period of time), there is scope for further improvement., (© 2011 The Authors. Anaesthesia © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.)

While guidelines represent systematically developed aids for decision-making on appropriate courses of action, recommendations should focus the attention of the medical profession on noteworthy circumstances which are in need of amendment. The new recommendations on the "Execution of analgesia and anesthesia procedures in obstetrics" of the German Society for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, DGAI) and the Professional Association of German Anesthetists (Berufsverband Deutscher Anästhesisten, BDA) in cooperation with the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) comprehensively fulfill these requirements. The new recommendations include not only revisions in the form of updating but also supplementations in the form of the new chapters "Initial care of newborns", "Postpartum hemorrhaging" and "Morbid obesity". In the following article relevant alterations to newly formulated or completely amended sections with consequences for the clinical practice will be discussed.

Labor results in severe pain for many women. There is no other circumstance in which it is considered acceptable for a person to experience untreated severe pain, amenable to safe intervention, while under a physician's care. In the absence of a medical contraindication, maternal request is a sufficient medical indication for pain relief during labor. Pain management should be provided whenever it is medically indicated. The purpose of this document is to help obstetrician-gynecologists understand the available methods of pain relief to facilitate communication with their colleagues in the field of anesthesia, thereby, optimizing patient comfort while minimizing the potential for maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

The past year has provided us with some interesting studies concerning pharmacology and anesthesia during the puerperium. I review the prevalence of various anesthetic techniques, as well as the use of different aspiration prophylaxis regimens. I also look at innovations in the administration of epidural and subarachnoid anesthetics, including use of the Sprotte needle to prevent postoperative headache. A small study shows that vitamin administration to premature neonates may prevent periventricular hemorrhage. Furthermore, predelivery injections of glucocortoid may protect against bronchopulmonary dysplasia. I also review painstaking studies that help to better understand thyroid stimulation and regulation during pregnancy. I hope this paper helps the busy obstetrician understand some of the highlights of this year's new literature on obstetric anesthesia and pharmacology.

A six point concentration: response curved of the contractile effect of angiotensin II (AII) on helically-cut strips of human chorionic plate artery strips were established at final concentrations of between 10(-14) to 10(-9) M. The tissues were obtained from the placentae of primigravid patients who had normal pregnancy, and also from those with pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH). The tissue response were then related to mode of delivery, obstetric analgesia, and anaesthesia. A total of 36 chorionic plate arteries from 12 primigravid patients were studied. i) The overall initial EC50s of the tissues ranged from 8.0 x 10(-13) M and 4.5 x 10(-13) M. The tissues from PIH patients were significantly more sensitive to AII, when compared with tissues from the normotensive subjects (P greater than or equal to 0.01 less than or equal to 0.05). ii) The tissues from epidural vaginal deliveries were also significantly more sensitive to AII, than those from both normal vaginal deliveries and caesarean deliveries respectively. The median gradients of the semi-log transformed concentration response curved were 2.4 +/- 0.18; 1.27 +/- 0.37, and 1.5 +/- 0.49, for epidural, Caeserean and normal vaginal deliveries respectively. iii) It is suggested that whilst Lumbar epidural analgesia may be of great value in pain relief in labour and in the control of intrapartum hypertension in pre-eclampsia, this procedure may be associated with hypersensitivity and perhaps vasospasm of the placental vasculature to vasoactive agents invivo.