Search

Inertial measurement units and normative values enable clinicians to quantify clinical walking tests and set rehabilitation goals. Objectives of this study were (1) to compare time- and distance-based walking tests in individuals with lower limb amputation (iLLA) and normative values following rehabilitation discharge (T1) and 6 weeks after discharge (T2) and (2) to investigate spatiotemporal and foot kinematic parameters over a 6-minute walk test using inertial measurement units. Twelve iLLA participated in this study. Distance, cadence, stance ratio, loading rate ratio, push-up ratio, path length, and minimum toe clearance were analyzed during 6-minute walk test. Nonparametric repeated-measures analysis of variance tests, Bonferroni corrections, were performed. Time of distance-based walking tests diminished at T2 (P < .02). Compared with normative values, walking performance in iLLA was reduced. Cadence at T2 increased significantly (P = .026). Stance ratio increased in both legs at T2 (P < .05). Push-up ratio tended to decrease at T2 in the amputated leg (P = .0003). Variability of path length and minimum toe clearance at T2 were less than at T1 in the nonamputated leg (P < .05). Spatiotemporal improvement at T2 could be due to prosthesis adaptation in iLLA. The lower performance of the functional walk test compared with normative values could be due to amputation and pain-related fatigue.

Background: A recent amputation leads to decreased functional capacities in the lower limb amputees (LLA), especially during walking. Assessments of LLA's gait in clinical settings are used to provide feedback on their evolution without quantifying gait parameters distinctly, unlike new technologies, such as inertial sensors (IMUs), which have demonstrated their effectiveness in different environments and populations., Research Question: How do the spatial-temporal gait parameters and kinematics of the LLA evolve quantitatively over a six-minute walk test (6MWT) and is the use of inertial sensors relevant in clinical practice to quantify those parameters?, Methods: Fifteen LLA from a study cohort performed a 6MWT post-rehabilitation, wearing inertial sensors on both feet to provide gait parameters (i.e., minimum toe clearance (minTC), speed, cadence, stance time and foot flat ratio (FFr)) over this test. A non-parametric ANOVA was conducted comparing the evolution of each parameter over the 6MWT (12 intervals of 30 s). Significance level was set at P ≤  0.05. Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed if a main effect was detected., Results: MinTC and stance phase variability along the 6MWT were significantly different over time. Cadence variability and speed variation were significantly different between both feet (amputated and non-amputated leg)., Significance: The increased variability in gait parameters along the 6MWT suggests a greater risk of future mobility problems following a return in community. The data provided by the IMUs reflect the potential of the clinical rehabilitation programme and could, therefore, help clinicians to refine their interventions., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)