Search

Background: Antibiotic resistance plays a crucial role in the treatment failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. This study aimed to determine the trend of changes in the primary, secondary and tertiary antibiotic resistance of H. pylori in Taiwan over the last 7 years. Methods: We retrospectively analysed H. pylori -infected isolates from patients with primary resistance (n = 1369), secondary resistance (n = 196) and tertiary resistance (n = 184) from January 2013 to December 2019. The H. pylori strains were tested for susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole and tetracycline using the Epsilometer test method. Results: A progressively higher primary resistance rate was observed for clarithromycin (11.8–20.4%, p = 0.039 in χ2 test for linear trend), levofloxacin (17.3–38.8%, p < 0.001) and metronidazole (25.6–42.3%, p < 0.001) among naïve patients who received first-line eradication therapy. The dual primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole also progressively increased in a linear trend (2.4–10.4%, p = 0.009). For secondary resistance, an increase was observed for levofloxacin (30.5–64.7%, p = 0.006) and metronidazole (40.5–77.4%, p < 0.001). For tertiary resistance, the observed increase was even more significant for levofloxacin (65.9–100.0%, p = 0.106) and metronidazole (44.4–88.2%, p < 0.001). The resistance to amoxicillin and tetracycline remained very low in Taiwan regardless of primary, secondary and tertiary resistance. Conclusion: Primary, secondary and tertiary antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin and metronidazole for H. pylori has been increasing in Taiwan since 2013. Treatment should be targeted for eradication success rates of more than 90%. Third-line treatment should be based on antibiotic susceptibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eradication rates of standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections have decreased in recent years due to a worldwide increase in bacterial resistance. Sequential therapy has the advantage of a two-phase treatment regimen and achieves a superior result for H. pylori eradication in peptic ulcer disease. However, no study has yet compared the efficacy of sequential therapy for H. pylori eradication exclusively in inactive duodenal ulcer (iDU) or non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).Method: We retrospectively recruited 408 patients with endoscopic proven iDU (170 patients) or NUD (238 patients) infected with H. pylori. Patients with iDU were assigned into two groups: iDU triple therapy group, 44 patients treated with 40 mg pantoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin, twice daily for 7 days; iDU sequential therapy group, 126 patients treated with 40 mg pantoprazole and 1000 mg amoxicillin, twice daily for the first 5 days, followed by 40 mg pantoprazole, 500 mg clarithromycin and 500 mg tinidazole, twice daily for the next 5 days. All patients with NUD were treated with sequential therapy and assigned as the NUD sequential group. Post-treatment H. pylori status was confirmed by a (13)C-urea breath test.Result: The eradication rates of intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis were 77.3 % (95 % CI 64.9-89.7 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 73.9-96.1 %) in the iDU triple therapy group and 87.3 % (95 % CI 81.5-93.1 %) and 92.4 % (95 % CI 87.6-97.2 %) in the iDU sequential therapy group. The overall eradication efficacy was superior in the sequential group than in the triple group, both with ITT analysis (83.5 % vs. 77.3 %, P = 0.29) and PP analysis (88.1 % vs. 85.0 %, P = 0.57). Eradication rates for ITT and PP analysis were 81.5 % (95 % CI 76.6-86.4 %) and 85.8 % (95 % CI 83.5-88.2 %) in the NUD sequential therapy group. Eradication rate was statistically better in the iDU sequential therapy group than the NUD sequential therapy group according to per protocol analysis (P = 0.04). Eradication rate was not significantly different between the iDU sequential- and iDU triple therapy groups according to protocol analysis (P = 0.14).Conclusion: The sequential regimen has a better eradiation rate in the iDU group than in the NUD group. There is no statistically difference between 10-day sequential therapy and 7-day standard triple in iDU group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]