Search

Background: Neutropenic patients with cancer are traditionally treated with empiric antibiotic combinations when they become febrile. The availability of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ceftazidime and imipenem has made it possible to initiate therapy with a single agent (monotherapy). The objectives of this trial were to compare ceftazidime and imipenem as single agents for the therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients and to ascertain whether the addition of an aminoglycoside (amikacin) to either of these agents would provide an advantage., Methods: A prospective clinical trial was conducted in which eligible neutropenic patients with cancer were randomized to one of four treatment arms: ceftazidime alone; imipenem alone; ceftazidime plus amikacin; and imipenem plus amikacin. Efficacy analysis was done for 750 assessable episodes. A multivariate logistic-regression analysis was also performed to examine the unique contribution of various prognostic factors., Results: The overall response rates were 76% with imipenem plus amikacin, 72% with imipenem, 71% with ceftazidime plus amikacin, and 59% with ceftazidime alone. Single-organism gram-positive infections occurred in 101 of 750 episodes. Without a change in antibiotics, the response rates were 50% with imipenem, 40% with imipenem plus amikacin, 39% with ceftazidime plus amikacin, and 38% with ceftazidime. Most responded to vancomycin or other antibiotics, and the mortality associated with gram-positive infections was only 5%. Regardless of the antibiotic regimen, the majority of uncomplicated gram-negative infections responded to therapy and the majority of complicated gram-negative infections failed to respond. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis showed that recovery of the neutrophil count was the most favorable prognostic factor in a patient's response to infection, whereas the presence of gram-positive infection, acute leukemia, pulmonary or enteric infection, and therapy with ceftazidime were unfavorable factors., Conclusions: Single-agent therapy with imipenem is as effective as more conventional combination antibiotic therapy for the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with cancer.

The double beta-lactam combination of moxalactam plus piperacillin was compared with the aminoglycoside-containing regimen of moxalactam plus amikacin in a prospective, randomized trial of empiric therapy for 302 febrile episodes in granulocytopenic cancer patients. The moxalactam/piperacillin regimen was found to be as effective as the moxalactam/amikacin regimen (70 percent overall responses); responses with moxalactam/piperacillin and moxalactam/amikacin were similar for microbiologically documented infections (24 of 37, 65 percent, versus 20 of 35, 57 percent), for the subgroup with bacteremias (19 of 32 versus 14 of 28), and for clinically documented infections (41 of 58, 71 percent, versus 40 of 48, 83 percent). Responses were similar also for bacteremia in patients with persistent, profound (less than 100/microliter) granulocytopenia. Among profoundly (less than 100/microliter) granulocytopenic patients with gram-negative bacteremia, an increase in the granulocyte count to more than 100/microliter during therapy and a peak bactericidal activity of 1:16 or more (the latter noted in seven of nine moxalactam/piperacillin trials and six of nine moxalactam/amikacin trials) correlated with a favorable clinical response in 85 percent (p less than or equal to 0.00003) and 92 percent (p less than or equal to 0.044), respectively. Although serious side effects were minimal with either regimen, the double beta-lactam combination was associated with significantly less frequent nephrotoxicity (two of 145 versus 12 of 130; p less than or equal to 0.003) and ototoxicity (none of 34 versus seven of 34; p less than or equal to 0.006). The double beta-lactam combination of moxalactam plus piperacillin was found to be as effective as moxalactam plus amikacin but to have significantly less nephro- and ototoxicity.