Search

Background and Purpose: We have previously reported the development of CB-25 and CB-52, two ligands of CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors. We assessed here their functional activity., Experimental Approach: The effect of the two compounds on forskolin-induced cAMP formation in intact cells or GTP-gamma-S binding to cell membranes, and their action on nociception in vivo was determined., Key Results: CB-25 enhanced forskolin-induced cAMP formation in N18TG2 cells (EC50 approximately 20 nM, max. stimulation = 48%), behaving as an inverse CB1 agonist, but it stimulated GTP-gamma-S binding to mouse brain membranes, behaving as a partial CB1 agonist (EC50 =100 nM, max. stimulation = 48%). At human CB1 receptors, CB-25 inhibited cAMP formation in hCB1-CHO cells (EC50 = 1600 nM, max. inhibition = 68% of CP-55,940 effect). CB-52 inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP formation by N18TG2 cells (IC50 = 450 nM, max. inhibition = 40%) and hCB1-CHO cells (EC50 = 2600 nM, max. inhibition = 62% of CP-55,940 effect), and stimulated GTP-gamma-S binding to mouse brain membranes (EC50 = 11 nM, max. stimulation approximately 16%). Both CB-25 and CB-52 showed no activity in all assays of CB2-coupled functional activity and antagonized CP55940-induced stimulation of GTP-gamma-S binding to hCB2-CHO cell membranes. In vivo, both compounds, administered i.p., produced dose-dependent nociception in the plantar test carried out in healthy rats, and antagonised the anti-nociceptive effect of i.p. WIN55,212-2. In the formalin test in mice, however, the compounds counteracted both phases of formalin-induced nociception., Conclusions and Implications: CB-25 and CB-52 behave in vitro mostly as CB1 partial agonists and CB2 neutral antagonists, whereas their activity in vivo might depend on the tonic activity of cannabinoid receptors.

Despite their different chemical structures, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and anandamide (AEA) have common pharmacological properties. This study was aimed at finding new cannabinoid receptor ligands that overcome the instability of AEA and its analogues. To this end we planned the synthesis of a series of compounds which retained both a rigid structure, like that of plant cannabinoids, and a flexible portion similar to that of anandamide. Binding studies on CB1 and CB2 receptors, anandamide membrane transporter (AMT), and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) showed that some of the newly developed compounds have high affinity and specificity for cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. Compound 25 is a potent CB1 and CB2 ligand, with affinity constants significantly lower than AEA and similar to WIN 55-212, compound 52 is a potent CB2 ligand, although not very selective over CB1 receptors, and compound 43 is CB2 ligand, with at least a 26-fold selectivity over CB1 receptors. Compound 25 behaved as a inverse agonist at CB1 receptors as assessed in the cyclic AMP functional assay.