Search

Background: Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DC-LC) is being practised in the USA and at sporadic centres in the UK including our department. The aim was to evaluate the admission rate after DC-LC., Patients and Methods: Prospectively collected data was analysed retrospectively. The case notes of all patients were retrieved from the medical records and reviewed individually. Inclusion criteria for DC-LC were cholelithiasis, non-acute cholecystitis, ASA I-III and informed consent. Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. All patients had anti-DVT prophylaxis (pneumatic compression and enoxaparin), per-operative antibiotic, oro-gastric tube, paracetamol suppository and local anaesthetic to all wounds. They were discharged the same day. The end point was 6-week follow-up (86% overall)., Results: Over a 32-month period, 164 consecutive patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and ASA score of III or less were included. M:F was 1:5 and median age 45y. There were two conversions. The direct admission rate (DAR) was 26/164 (14%). The indication for direct admission included observation alone (7/26), wound pain (6/26), nausea (3/26), suction drain (2/26) and operation in the afternoon (2/26). Six (3.6%) required re-admission. One had a cystic artery pseudo-aneurysm presenting with colonic bleeding and another with an injury to CBD. One had post-operative mild pancreatitis and three had wound pain and bruising. Fourteen out of 41 were admitted in the >55y age group compared to 12/123 from <55y age group (p=0.00054)., Conclusion: DC-LC is safe and feasible in non-acute patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Over-55y age group had a higher chance of admission, mainly due to caution.

Background: Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an established practice in the United States, but it is not well established in the United Kingdom, and evidence of experience is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy on postoperative morbidity and possible cost savings. We tried to elucidate possible predictors of unplanned admission and readmission rates after discharge., Methods: This study was conducted in 2 phases. The first phase involved 112 patients and was a retrospective analysis from January 2002 to July 2003 (19 months). The second was a prospective study involving 86 patients from August 2003 to April 2005 (21 months). Consultants, associate specialists, or higher surgical trainees performed the surgeries in a dedicated outpatient procedure unit. The study ended 6 weeks after the operation., Results: Hospital mortality was zero. Overall, 29 (15%) patients required unplanned admissions. Three (1.5%) patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy. Other causes included simple observations (7), wound pain (6), nausea and vomiting (6), suction drain (2), urinary retention (2), operation in the afternoon (2), and shoulder pain (1). Of the patients discharged, 7 (3.5%) required readmission after the initial discharge. Five of the 7 readmissions were wound related and treated conservatively. Two patients underwent laparotomy., Conclusion: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be safe, feasible, and cost-effective with a low conversion rate. The unplanned admission rate can be reduced by better training, criteria for discharge, and improvement in anesthesia. This will have implications for surgical training and healthcare resources.