Search

Background: Genetic variants that cause autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease are highly penetrant but vary substantially regarding age at symptom onset (AAO), rates of cognitive decline, and biomarker changes. Most pathogenic variants that cause autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease are in presenilin 1 (PSEN1), which encodes the catalytic core of γ-secretase, an enzyme complex that is crucial in production of amyloid β. We aimed to investigate whether the heterogeneity in AAO and biomarker trajectories in carriers of PSEN1 pathogenic variants could be predicted on the basis of the effects of individual PSEN1 variants on γ-secretase activity and amyloid β production., Methods: For this cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis, we used data from participants enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network observational study (DIAN-OBS) via the DIAN-OBS data freeze version 15 (data collected between Feb 29, 2008, and June 30, 2020). The data freeze included data from 20 study sites in research institutions, universities, hospitals, and clinics across Europe, North and South America, Asia, and Oceania. We included individuals with PSEN1 pathogenic variants for whom relevant genetic, clinical, imaging, and CSF data were available. PSEN1 pathogenic variants were characterised via genetically modified PSEN1 and PSEN2 double-knockout human embryonic kidney 293T cells and immunoassays for Aβ37, Aβ38, Aβ40, Aβ42, and Aβ43. A summary measure of γ-secretase activity (γ-secretase composite [GSC]) was calculated for each variant and compared with clinical history-derived AAO using correlation analyses. We used linear mixed-effect models to assess associations between GSC scores and multimodal-biomarker and clinical data from DIAN-OBS. We used separate models to assess associations with Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) Logical Memory Delayed Recall, [ 11 C]Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET and brain glucose metabolism using [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET, CSF Aβ42-to-Aβ40 ratio (Aβ42/40), CSF log 10 (phosphorylated tau 181), CSF log 10 (phosphorylated tau 217), and MRI-based hippocampal volume., Findings: Data were included from 190 people carrying PSEN1 pathogenic variants, among whom median age was 39·0 years (IQR 32·0 to 48·0) and AAO was 44·5 years (40·6 to 51·4). 109 (57%) of 190 carriers were female and 81 (43%) were male. Lower GSC values (ie, lower γ-secretase activity than wild-type PSEN1) were associated with earlier AAO (r=0·58; p<0·0001). GSC was associated with MMSE (β=0·08, SE 0·03; p=0·0043), CDR-SB (-0·05, 0·02; p=0·0027), and WMS-R Logical Memory Delayed Recall scores (0·09, 0·02; p=0·0006). Lower GSC values were associated with faster increase in PiB-PET signal (p=0·0054), more rapid decreases in hippocampal volume (4·19, 0·77; p<0·0001), MMSE (0·02, 0·01; p=0·0020), and WMS-R Logical Memory Delayed Recall (0·004, 0·001; p=0·0003)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that clinical heterogeneity in people with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease can be at least partly explained by different effects of PSEN1 variants on γ-secretase activity and amyloid β production. They support targeting γ-secretase as a therapeutic approach and suggest that cell-based models could be used to improve prediction of symptom onset., Funding: US National Institute on Aging, Alzheimer's Association, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, South Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korean Ministry of Science and ICT, and Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAS receives research funding from the Alzheimer's Association and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). LL receives research funding from the US NIH; consulting fees from Korro Bio; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Biogen and Cell Signaling Technology. NJ-M receives research funding from the Alzheimer's Association and the US NIH. RJB receives research funding from the US NIH, Biogen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, the US National Intelligence Authority, US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Centene, the Rainwater Foundation, the BrightFocus Foundation, the Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration Biomarkers Initiative, Coins for Alzheimer's Research Trust Fund, the Good Ventures Foundation, Hoffman–La Roche, CogState, Signant, the Cure Alzheimer's Research Trust Fund, Eisai, and C2N Diagnostics; receives royalties or licences from C2N Diagnosticsf payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the Korean Dementia Association, the American Neurological Association, Fondazione Prada, Weill Cornell Medical College, Harvard University, Beeson, and Adler Symposium. ZS receives research funding from the BrightFocus Foundation, the Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Eli Lilly, the Health Equity Scholars Program, and the Alzheimer's Society of Canada. RAS receives research funding from the US NIH, the Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation, Eli Lilly, the Alzheimer's Assocation, and Eisai and receives consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Roche, Prothena, AC Immune, Acumen, Alector, Alnylam, Biohaven, Genentech, Janssen, the Japanese Organization for Medical Device Development, Nervgen, Neuraly, Neurocentria, Oligomerix, Renew, Shionogi, Vigil Neuroscience, Ionis, and Vaxxinity. GSD receives research funcing from the US NIH, the Alzheimer's Association, and the Chan–Zuckerberg Initiative; consulting fees from Parabon Nanolabs and Arialysis Therapeutics; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from PeerView Media, Continuing Education, Eli Lilly, DynaMed, and SixSense Concierge. EM receives research funding from the US National Intelligence Authority, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Roche, and the Gerald and Henrietta Rauenhorst Foundation; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Merck; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the Alzheimer Association, Projects in Knowledge, and Neurology Live. JPC receives research funding from the US NIH. RJP receives grants from the US NIH. JL is a consultant for and receives grants, contracts, and royalties from Eisai, Eli Lilly, the German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases, the German Ministry for Research and Education, the Anton and Petra Ehrmann Foundation, the Luneburg Foundation, Innovationsfonds, the Michael J Fox Foundation, CurePSP, the Jerome LeJeune Foundation, the Alzheimer Forschungs Initiative, Deutsche Stiftung Down Syndrom, Else Kroner Fresenius Stiftung, and MODAG. DJS receives consulting fees from Prothena Biosciences and Eisai. CX receives research funding from the US NIH and consulting fees from Diadem. PRS receives research funding from the the US NIH, the Roth Charitable Foundation, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and the Australian Medical Research Future Fund and receives consulting fees from Outside Opinion and Moira Clay Consulting. JJL receives research funding from the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, the German Ministry for Research and Education, the Anton and Petra Ehrmann Foundation, the Lüneburg Foundation, Innovationsfonds, the Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, CurePSP, the Jerome LeJeune Foundation, the Alzheimer Forschungs Initiative, Deutsche Stiftung Down Syndrom, and Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung; consulting fees from Eisai and Biogen; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Bayer Vital, Biogen, Eisai, Teva, Roche, and Zambon. MJ receives payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers, bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Eisai. TLSB receives research funding from the US NIH and Siemens; consulting fees from Biogen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Johnson & Johnson; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Medscape and PeerView. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: We aimed to illustrate how complex cognitive data can be used to create domain-specific and general cognitive composites relevant to Alzheimer disease research., Method: Using equipercentile equating, we combined data from the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center that spanned multiple iterations of the Uniform Data Set. Exploratory factor analyses revealed four domain-specific composites representing episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, and attention/processing speed. The previously defined preclinical Alzheimer disease cognitive composite (PACC) and a novel alternative, the Knight-PACC, were also computed alongside a global composite comprising all available tests. These three composites allowed us to compare the usefulness of domain and general composites in the context of predicting common Alzheimer disease biomarkers., Results: General composites slightly outperformed domain-specific metrics in predicting imaging-derived amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration burden. Power analyses revealed that the global, Knight-PACC, and attention and processing speed composites would require the smallest sample sizes to detect cognitive change in a clinical trial, while the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-PACC required two to three times as many participants., Conclusions: Analyses of cognition with the Knight-PACC and our domain-specific composites offer researchers flexibility by providing validated outcome assessments that can equate across test versions to answer a wide range of questions regarding cognitive decline in normal aging and neurodegenerative disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Importance: Effects of antiamyloid agents, targeting either fibrillar or soluble monomeric amyloid peptides, on downstream biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma are largely unknown in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD)., Objective: To investigate longitudinal biomarker changes of synaptic dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration in individuals with DIAD who are receiving antiamyloid treatment., Design, Setting, and Participants: From 2012 to 2019, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trial Unit (DIAN-TU-001) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, investigated gantenerumab and solanezumab in DIAD. Carriers of gene variants were assigned 3:1 to either drug or placebo. The present analysis was conducted from April to June 2023. DIAN-TU-001 spans 25 study sites in 7 countries. Biofluids and neuroimaging from carriers of DIAD gene variants in the gantenerumab, solanezumab, and placebo groups were analyzed., Interventions: In 2016, initial dosing of gantenerumab, 225 mg (subcutaneously every 4 weeks) was increased every 8 weeks up to 1200 mg. In 2017, initial dosing of solanezumab, 400 mg (intravenously every 4 weeks) was increased up to 1600 mg every 4 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Longitudinal changes in CSF levels of neurogranin, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), chitinase 3-like 1 protein (YKL-40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light protein (NfL), and plasma levels of GFAP and NfL., Results: Of 236 eligible participants screened, 43 were excluded. A total of 142 participants (mean [SD] age, 44 [10] years; 72 female [51%]) were included in the study (gantenerumab, 52 [37%]; solanezumab, 50 [35%]; placebo, 40 [28%]). Relative to placebo, gantenerumab significantly reduced CSF neurogranin level at year 4 (mean [SD] β = -242.43 [48.04] pg/mL; P < .001); reduced plasma GFAP level at year 1 (mean [SD] β = -0.02 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .02), year 2 (mean [SD] β = -0.03 [0.01] ng/mL; P = .002), and year 4 (mean [SD] β = -0.06 [0.02] ng/mL; P < .001); and increased CSF sTREM2 level at year 2 (mean [SD] β = 1.12 [0.43] ng/mL; P = .01) and year 4 (mean [SD] β = 1.06 [0.52] ng/mL; P = .04). Solanezumab significantly increased CSF NfL (log) at year 4 (mean [SD] β = 0.14 [0.06]; P = .02). Correlation analysis for rates of change found stronger correlations between CSF markers and fluid markers with Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography for solanezumab and placebo., Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial supports the importance of fibrillar amyloid reduction in multiple AD-related processes of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in CSF and plasma in DIAD. Additional studies of antiaggregated amyloid therapies in sporadic AD and DIAD are needed to determine the utility of nonamyloid biomarkers in determining disease modification., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04623242.

Introduction: Amyloid beta and tau pathology are the hallmarks of sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) and autosomal dominant AD (ADAD). However, Lewy body pathology (LBP) is found in ≈ 50% of AD and ADAD brains., Methods: Using an α-synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from asymptomatic (n = 26) and symptomatic (n = 27) ADAD mutation carriers, including 12 with known neuropathology, we investigated the timing of occurrence and prevalence of SAA positive reactivity in ADAD in vivo., Results: No asymptomatic participant and only 11% (3/27) of the symptomatic patients tested SAA positive. Neuropathology revealed LBP in 10/12 cases, primarily affecting the amygdala or the olfactory areas. In the latter group, only the individual with diffuse LBP reaching the neocortex showed α-synuclein seeding activity in CSF in vivo., Discussion: Results suggest that in ADAD LBP occurs later than AD pathology and often as amygdala- or olfactory-predominant LBP, for which CSF α-synuclein SAA has low sensitivity., Highlights: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) detects misfolded α-synuclein in ≈ 10% of symptomatic autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) patients. CSF RT-QuIC does not detect α-synuclein seeding activity in asymptomatic mutation carriers. Lewy body pathology (LBP) in ADAD mainly occurs as olfactory only or amygdala-predominant variants. LBP develops late in the disease course in ADAD. CSF α-synuclein RT-QuIC has low sensitivity for focal, low-burden LBP., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Objective: Maintaining attention underlies many aspects of cognition and becomes compromised early in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's disease (AD). The consistency of maintaining attention can be measured with reaction time (RT) variability. Previous work has focused on measuring such fluctuations during in-clinic testing, but recent developments in remote, smartphone-based cognitive assessments can allow one to test if these fluctuations in attention are evident in naturalistic settings and if they are sensitive to traditional clinical and cognitive markers of AD., Method: Three hundred and seventy older adults (aged 75.8 +/- 5.8 years) completed a week of remote daily testing on the Ambulatory Research in Cognition (ARC) smartphone platform and also completed clinical, genetic, and conventional in-clinic cognitive assessments. RT variability was assessed in a brief (20-40 seconds) processing speed task using two different measures of variability, the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) and the Root Mean Squared Successive Difference (RMSSD) of RTs on correct trials., Results: Symptomatic participants showed greater variability compared to cognitively normal participants. When restricted to cognitively normal participants, APOE ε4 carriers exhibited greater variability than noncarriers. Both CoV and RMSSD showed significant, and similar, correlations with several in-clinic cognitive composites. Finally, both RT variability measures significantly mediated the relationship between APOE ε4 status and several in-clinic cognition composites., Conclusions: Attentional fluctuations over 20-40 seconds assessed in daily life, are sensitive to clinical status and genetic risk for AD. RT variability appears to be an important predictor of cognitive deficits during the preclinical disease stage.

Introduction: Previous approaches pursuing in vivo staging of tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have typically relied on neuropathologically defined criteria. In using predefined systems, these studies may miss spatial deposition patterns which are informative of disease progression., Methods: We selected discovery (n = 418) and replication (n = 132) cohorts with flortaucipir imaging. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) was applied to learn tau covariance patterns and develop a tau staging system. Flortaucipir components were also validated by comparison with amyloid burden, gray matter loss, and the expression of AD-related genes., Results: We found eight flortaucipir covariance patterns which were reproducible and overlapped with relevant gene expression maps. Tau stages were associated with AD severity as indexed by dementia status and neuropsychological performance. Comparisons of flortaucipir uptake with amyloid and atrophy also supported our model of tau progression., Discussion: Data-driven decomposition of flortaucipir uptake provides a novel framework for tau staging which complements existing systems., Highlights: NMF reveals patterns of tau deposition in AD. Data-driven staging of flortaucipir tracks AD severity. Learned flortaucipir patterns overlap with AD-related gene expression., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Background: Neuroimaging studies often quantify tau burden in standardized brain regions to assess Alzheimer disease (AD) progression. However, this method ignores another key biological process in which tau spreads to additional brain regions. We have developed a metric for calculating the extent tau pathology has spread throughout the brain and evaluate the relationship between this metric and tau burden across early stages of AD., Methods: 445 cross-sectional participants (aged ≥ 50) who had MRI, amyloid PET, tau PET, and clinical testing were separated into disease-stage groups based on amyloid positivity and cognitive status (older cognitively normal control, preclinical AD, and symptomatic AD). Tau burden and tau spatial spread were calculated for all participants., Findings: We found both tau metrics significantly elevated across increasing disease stages (p < 0.0001) and as a function of increasing amyloid burden for participants with preclinical (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0056) and symptomatic (p = 0.010, p = 0.0021) AD. An interaction was found between tau burden and tau spatial spread when predicting amyloid burden (p = 0.00013). Analyses of slope between tau metrics demonstrated more spread than burden in preclinical AD (β = 0.59), but then tau burden elevated relative to spread (β = 0.42) once participants had symptomatic AD, when the tau metrics became highly correlated (R = 0.83)., Interpretation: Tau burden and tau spatial spread are both strong biomarkers for early AD but provide unique information, particularly at the preclinical stage. Tau spatial spread may demonstrate earlier changes than tau burden which could have broad impact in clinical trial design., Funding: This research was supported by the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC, NIH grants P30AG066444, P01AG026276, P01AG003991), Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN, NIH grants U01AG042791, U19AG03243808, R01AG052550-01A1, R01AG05255003), and the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation Willman Scholar Fund., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Data collection and sharing for this project was supported by the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN, U19-AG032438) funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the Alzheimer's Association (SG-20-690363-DIAN), the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), the Queen Square Dementia Biomedical Research Centre and the Medical Research Council Dementias Platform UK (MR/L023784/1 and MR/009076/1). Partial support has also been provided by research and development grants for dementia from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP22dk0207049), AMED, the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), Korea Dementia Research Center (KDRC) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (HI21C0066), the Spanish Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (TAD-125697), the Canadian Consortium of Neurodegeneration and Aging, the Brain Canada Foundation, Fonds de Recherche du Québec, and the Raul Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI). In addition to the acknowledged funding sources for this research, the authors of this manuscript have received financial support from the National Institutes of Health (BMA, TLSB, JH, JCM, CX), National Institute on Aging (AJA, RJB, CC), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (RJB), Alzheimer's Association (RJB, CC), DIAN-TU-001 Tau NextGen and OLE (RJB), Biogen (RJB), AbbVie (RJB), Bristol Myers Squibb (RJB), Novartis (RJB), Centene Corporation (RJB), Rainwater Foundation (RJB), Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration FTD Biomarkers Initiative (RJB), BrightFocus Foundation (RJB), Cure Alzheimer's Fund (RJB), Coins for Alzheimer's Research Trust Fund (RJB), Eisai (RJB), The Foundation for Barnes-Jewish Hospital (RJB), TargetALS (RJB), Good Ventures Foundation (RJB), DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (RJB), Eli Lilly (RJB, TLSB), Avid Radiopharmaceuticals (TLSB), Hoffman-La Roche (RJB), CogState (RJB), Signant (RJB), Siemens (TLSB), and Michael J. Fox Foundation (CC). Travel support was received from Hoffman-La Roche (RJB), Alzheimer's Association Roundtable (RJB), Duke Margolis Alzheimer's Roundtable (RJB), BrightFocus Foundation (RJB), Tau Consortium Investigator's Meeting (RJB), Fondazione Prada (RJB), NAPA Advisory Council on Alzheimer's Research (RJB), and Somalogics (CC). Consultations have been declared for Biogen (TLSB), Eli Lilly (TLSB), Eisai (TLSB), Siemens (TLSB), Bristol Myers Squibb (TLSB), Alector (CC), Circular Genomics (CC), Parabon Nanolabs (JH), Hoffman-La Roche (JH), AlzPath (JH), Prothena (JH), Barcelona Brain Research Center (JCM), Native Alzheimer Disease-Related Resource Center in Minority Aging Research (JCM), and Diadem (CX). Honoraria was received from Korean Dementia Association (RJB), American Neurological Association (RJB), Fondazione Prada (RJB), Weill Cornell Medical College (RJB), Harvard University (RJB), Biogen (TLSB), Eisai (TLSB), Montefiore Grand Rounds NY (JCM), and Tetra-Inst ADRC seminar series Grand Rounds NY (JCM). Patents have been declared for NfL as a marker for ICANs due to CAR-T (BMA), methods for measuring the metabolism of CNS derived biomolecules in vivo (RJB), methods for measuring the metabolism of neutrally derived biomolecules in vivo (RJB), plasma based methods for detecting CNS amyloid disposition (RJB), plasma based methods for determining A-Beta amyloidosis (RJB), methods of treating based on site-specific tau phosphorylation (RJB), and tau kinetic measurements (RJB). Authors participated on advisory boards for VID (BMA), NNTC (BMA), Hoffman-La Roche/Genentech (RJB), Biogen (RJB), UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London (RJB), Stanford University (RJB), Next Generation Translational Proteomics for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias (RJB), C2N Diagnostics (RJB), Eisai (TLSB), Siemens (TLSB), Eli Lilly (TLSB), Bristol Myers Squibb (TLSB), NIH-sponsored external advisor grants (TLSB), NIA-sponsored Caring Bridge and Wall-E (JH), Cure Alzheimer's Fund Research Strategy Council (JCM), Indiana University LEADS Advisory Board (JCM), and FDA Advisory Committee on Imaging Medical Products (CX). Other declared interests include royalties with equity ownership from C2N Diagnostics (RJB), partnering and receiving stock from Circular Genomics (CC), and being the executive director of DIAN (AD). Participation in the ASNR Alzheimer's and ARIA Study Group, QIBA Amyloid PET Working Group, Alzheimer's Association Clinical Tau PET Work Group, and American College of Radiology/AlzNet Work Group (TLSB). Precursors for radiopharmaceuticals and technology transfer were received from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals/Eli Lilly, LMI, and Cerveau/Lantheus (TLSB). Drugs and services were received from Eisai, Janssen, and Hoffman- La Roche for the DIAN-TU Next Generation Trial and DIAN-TU Gantenerumab Open Label Extension (RJB). All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Biological staging of individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) may improve diagnostic and prognostic workup of dementia in clinical practice and the design of clinical trials. In this study, we used the Subtype and Stage Inference (SuStaIn) algorithm to establish a robust biological staging model for AD using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Our analysis involved 426 participants from BioFINDER-2 and was validated in 222 participants from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center cohort. SuStaIn identified a singular biomarker sequence and revealed that five CSF biomarkers effectively constituted a reliable staging model (ordered: Aβ42/40, pT217/T217, pT205/T205, MTBR-tau243 and non-phosphorylated mid-region tau). The CSF stages (0-5) demonstrated a correlation with increased abnormalities in other AD-related biomarkers, such as Aβ-PET and tau-PET, and aligned with longitudinal biomarker changes reflective of AD progression. Higher CSF stages at baseline were associated with an elevated hazard ratio of clinical decline. This study highlights a common molecular pathway underlying AD pathophysiology across all patients, suggesting that a single CSF collection can accurately indicate the presence of AD pathologies and characterize the stage of disease progression. The proposed staging model has implications for enhancing diagnostic and prognostic assessments in both clinical practice and the design of clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In people with genetic forms of Alzheimer's disease, such as in Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, pathological changes specific to Alzheimer's disease (ie, accumulation of amyloid and tau) occur in the brain at a young age, when comorbidities related to ageing are not present. Studies including these cohorts could, therefore, improve our understanding of the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease and be useful when designing preventive interventions targeted at disease pathology or when planning clinical trials. We compared the magnitude, spatial extent, and temporal ordering of tau spread in people with Down syndrome and autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease., Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) from two cohort studies. First, we collected data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network studies (DIAN-OBS and DIAN-TU), which include carriers of autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls recruited in Australia, Europe, and the USA between 2008 and 2022. Second, we collected data from the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium-Down Syndrome study, which includes people with Down syndrome and sibling controls recruited from the UK and USA between 2015 and 2021. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group of familial controls. All participants had completed structural MRI and tau PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir) imaging. We applied Gaussian mixture modelling to identify regions of high tau PET burden and regions with the earliest changes in tau binding for each cohort separately. We estimated regional tau PET burden as a function of cortical amyloid burden for both cohorts. Finally, we compared the temporal pattern of tau PET burden relative to that of amyloid., Findings: We included 137 people with Down syndrome (mean age 38·5 years [SD 8·2], 74 [54%] male, and 63 [46%] female), 49 individuals with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease (mean age 43·9 years [11·2], 22 [45%] male, and 27 [55%] female), and 85 familial controls, pooled from across both studies (mean age 41·5 years [12·1], 28 [33%] male, and 57 [67%] female), who satisfied the PET quality-control procedure for tau-PET imaging processing. 134 (98%) people with Down syndrome, 44 (90%) with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, and 77 (91%) controls also completed an amyloid PET scan within 3 years of tau PET imaging. Spatially, tau PET burden was observed most frequently in subcortical and medial temporal regions in people with Down syndrome, and within the medial temporal lobe in people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Across the brain, people with Down syndrome had greater concentrations of tau for a given level of amyloid compared with people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease. Temporally, increases in tau were more strongly associated with increases in amyloid for people with Down syndrome compared with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease., Interpretation: Although the general progression of amyloid followed by tau is similar for people Down syndrome and people with autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease, we found subtle differences in the spatial distribution, timing, and magnitude of the tau burden between these two cohorts. These differences might have important implications; differences in the temporal pattern of tau accumulation might influence the timing of drug administration in clinical trials, whereas differences in the spatial pattern and magnitude of tau burden might affect disease progression., Funding: None., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TLSB has received funding from the National Institutes of Health and Siemens; has a licensing agreement from Sora Neuroscience but receives no financial compensation; has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, or educational events from Biogen and Eisai Genetech; has served on a scientific advisory board for Biogen; holds a leadership role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups for the American Society for Neuroradiology (unpaid) and Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (unpaid); and has participated in radiopharmaceuticals and technology transfers with Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Cerveau, and LMI. EMD received support from the National Institute on Aging, an anonymous organisation, the GHR Foundation, the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium, Eli Lilly, and F Hoffmann La-Roche; has received speaking fees from Eisai and Eli Lilly; and is on the data safety and monitoring board and advisory boards of Eli Lilly, Alector, and Alzamend. WS has received research funding from the National Institute on Aging and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. JPC serves as the chair of the American Neurological Association Dementia and Aging Special Interest Group and is on the medical advisory board of Humana Healthcare. CC has received consulting fees from GSK and Alector. AMF reports personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, Araclon/Grifols, and Diadem Research and grants from Biogen, outside the submitted work. BLH has received research funding from Roche and Autism Speaks; receives royalties from Oxford University Press for book publications; and is the chair of the data safety and monitoring board for the US Department of Defense-funded study Comparative Effectiveness of EIBI and MABA (NCT04078061). BTC receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health. EH receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the BrightFocus Foundation. FL is supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging. HDR has received funding from the National Institutes of Health and is on the scientific advisory committee for the Hereditary Disease Foundation. J-HL has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Aging. RJP receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Aging. RJB is Director of DIAN-TU and Principal Investigator of DIAN-TU001; receives research support from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health, DIAN-TU trial pharmaceutical partners (Eli Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Eisai, Biogen, and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals), the Alzheimer's Association, the GHR Foundation, an anonymous organisation, the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (active members Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; previous members AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and United Neuroscience), the NfL Consortium (F Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb), and the Tau SILK Consortium (Eli Lilly, Biogen, and AbbVie); has been an invited speaker and consultant for AC Immune, F Hoffmann-La Roche, the Korean Dementia Association, the American Neurological Association, and Janssen; has been a consultant for Amgen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Eisai; and has submitted the US non-provisional patent application named Methods for Measuring the Metabolism of CNS Derived Biomolecules In Vivo (13/005,233 [RJB and DH]) and a provisional patent application named Plasma Based Methods for Detecting CNS Amyloid Deposition (PCT/UC2018/030518 [VO and RJB]). BMA receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and has a patent (Markers of Neurotoxicity in CAR T Patients). MSR has received consulting fees from AC Immune, Embic, and Keystone Bio and has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Avid, Baxter, Eisai, Elan, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, and Roche. JHR has received funding from the Korea Dementia Research Project through the Korea Dementia Research Center, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare and the Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (HU21C0066). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: A clock relating amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) to time was used to estimate the timing of biomarker changes in sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD)., Methods: Research participants were included who underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collection within 2 years of amyloid PET. The ages at amyloid onset and AD symptom onset were estimated for each individual. The timing of change for plasma, CSF, imaging, and cognitive measures was calculated by comparing restricted cubic splines of cross-sectional data from the amyloid PET positive and negative groups., Results: The amyloid PET positive sub-cohort (n = 118) had an average age of 70.4 ± 7.4 years (mean ± standard deviation) and 16% were cognitively impaired. The amyloid PET negative sub-cohort (n = 277) included individuals with low levels of amyloid plaque burden at all scans who were cognitively unimpaired at the time of the scans. Biomarker changes were detected 15-19 years before estimated symptom onset for CSF Aβ42/Aβ40, plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, CSF pT217/T217, and amyloid PET; 12-14 years before estimated symptom onset for plasma pT217/T217, CSF neurogranin, CSF SNAP-25, CSF sTREM2, plasma GFAP, and plasma NfL; and 7-9 years before estimated symptom onset for CSF pT205/T205, CSF YKL-40, hippocampal volumes, and cognitive measures., Interpretation: The use of an amyloid clock enabled visualization and analysis of biomarker changes as a function of estimated years from symptom onset in sporadic AD. This study demonstrates that estimated years from symptom onset based on an amyloid clock can be used as a continuous staging measure for sporadic AD and aligns with findings in autosomal dominant AD. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:951-965., (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

With the emergence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) disease-modifying therapies, identifying patients who could benefit from these treatments becomes critical. In this study, we evaluated whether a precise blood test could perform as well as established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests in detecting amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles. Plasma %p-tau217 (ratio of phosporylated-tau217 to non-phosphorylated tau) was analyzed by mass spectrometry in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 cohort (n = 1,422) and the US Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) cohort (n = 337). Matched CSF samples were analyzed with clinically used and FDA-approved automated immunoassays for Aβ42/40 and p-tau181/Aβ42. The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of brain Aβ or tau pathology, respectively, using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging as the reference standard. Main analyses were focused on individuals with cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia), which is the target population for available disease-modifying treatments. Plasma %p-tau217 was clinically equivalent to FDA-approved CSF tests in classifying Aβ PET status, with an area under the curve (AUC) for both between 0.95 and 0.97. Plasma %p-tau217 was generally superior to CSF tests in classification of tau-PET with AUCs of 0.95-0.98. In cognitively impaired subcohorts (BioFINDER-2: n = 720; Knight ADRC: n = 50), plasma %p-tau217 had an accuracy, a positive predictive value and a negative predictive value of 89-90% for Aβ PET and 87-88% for tau PET status, which was clinically equivalent to CSF tests, further improving to 95% using a two-cutoffs approach. Blood plasma %p-tau217 demonstrated performance that was clinically equivalent or superior to clinically used FDA-approved CSF tests in the detection of AD pathology. Use of high-performance blood tests in clinical practice can improve access to accurate AD diagnosis and AD-specific treatments., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Increasing evidence suggests that amyloid reduction could serve as a plausible surrogate endpoint for clinical and cognitive efficacy. The double-blind phase 3 DIAN-TU-001 trial tested clinical and cognitive declines with increasing doses of solanezumab or gantenerumab., Methods: We used latent class (LC) analysis on data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit 001 trial to test amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) reduction as a potential surrogate biomarker., Results: LC analysis categorized participants into three classes: amyloid no change, amyloid reduction, and amyloid growth, based on longitudinal amyloid Pittsburgh compound B PET standardized uptake value ratio data. The amyloid-no-change class was at an earlier disease stage for amyloid amounts and dementia. Despite similar baseline characteristics, the amyloid-reduction class exhibited reductions in the annual decline rates compared to the amyloid-growth class across multiple biomarker, clinical, and cognitive outcomes., Discussion: LC analysis indicates that amyloid reduction is associated with improved clinical outcomes and supports its use as a surrogate biomarker in clinical trials., Highlights: We used latent class (LC) analysis to test amyloid reduction as a surrogate biomarker. Despite similar baseline characteristics, the amyloid-reduction class exhibited remarkably better outcomes compared to the amyloid-growth class across multiple measures. LC analysis proves valuable in testing amyloid reduction as a surrogate biomarker in clinical trials lacking significant treatment effects., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: Amyloidosis, including cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and markers of small vessel disease (SVD) vary across dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease (DIAD) presenilin-1 (PSEN1) mutation carriers. We investigated how mutation position relative to codon 200 (pre-/postcodon 200) influences these pathologic features and dementia at different stages., Methods: Individuals from families with known PSEN1 mutations (n = 393) underwent neuroimaging and clinical assessments. We cross-sectionally evaluated regional Pittsburgh compound B-positron emission tomography uptake, magnetic resonance imaging markers of SVD (diffusion tensor imaging-based white matter injury, white matter hyperintensity volumes, and microhemorrhages), and cognition., Results: Postcodon 200 carriers had lower amyloid burden in all regions but worse markers of SVD and worse Clinical Dementia Rating ® scores compared to precodon 200 carriers as a function of estimated years to symptom onset. Markers of SVD partially mediated the mutation position effects on clinical measures., Discussion: We demonstrated the genotypic variability behind spatiotemporal amyloidosis, SVD, and clinical presentation in DIAD, which may inform patient prognosis and clinical trials., Highlights: Mutation position influences Aβ burden, SVD, and dementia. PSEN1 pre-200 group had stronger associations between Aβ burden and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had stronger associations between SVD markers and disease stage. PSEN1 post-200 group had worse dementia score than pre-200 in late disease stage. Diffusion tensor imaging-based SVD markers mediated mutation position effects on dementia in the late stage., (© 2024 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Introduction: Studies suggest distinct differences in the development, presentation, progression, and response to treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) between females and males. We investigated sex differences in cognition, neuroimaging, and fluid biomarkers in dominantly inherited AD (DIAD)., Methods: Three hundred twenty-five mutation carriers (55% female) and one hundred eighty-six non-carriers (58% female) of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study were analyzed. Linear mixed models and Spearman's correlation explored cross-sectional sex differences in cognition, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography ( 11 C-PiB PET) and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Results: Female carriers performed better than males on delayed recall and processing speed despite similar hippocampal volumes. As the disease progressed, symptomatic females revealed higher increases in MRI markers of neurodegeneration and memory impairment. PiB PET and established CSF AD markers revealed no sex differences., Discussion: Our findings suggest an initial cognitive reserve in female carriers followed by a pronounced increase in neurodegeneration coupled with worse performance on delayed recall at later stages of DIAD., (© 2023 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

The use of biomarkers for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for developing potential therapeutic treatments. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a well-established tool used to detect β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques in the brain. Previous studies have shown that cross-sectional biomarkers can predict cognitive decline (Schindler et al.,2021). However, it is still unclear whether longitudinal Aβ-PET may have additional value for predicting time to cognitive impairment in AD. The current study aims to evaluate the ability of baseline- versus longitudinal rate of change in- 11 C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) Aβ-PET to predict cognitive decline. A cohort of 153 participants who previously underwent PiB-PET scans and comprehensive clinical assessments were used in this study. Our analyses revealed that baseline Aβ is significantly associated with the rate of change in cognitive composite scores, with cognition declining more rapidly when baseline PiB Aβ levels were higher. In contrast, no signification association was identified between the rate of change in PiB-PET Aβ and cognitive decline. Additionally, the ability of the rate of change in the PiB-PET measures to predict cognitive decline was significantly influenced by APOE ε4 carrier status. These results suggest that a single PiB-PET scan is sufficient to predict cognitive decline and that longitudinal measures of Aβ accumulation do not improve the prediction of cognitive decline once someone is amyloid positive., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Benzinger has held investigator-initiated research funding from the NIH, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, Siemens Healthiness and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly). Dr. Benzinger participates as a site investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Biogen, Eisai, Jansen, and Roche. Dr. Benzinger performs paid and unpaid consulting for Biogen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Roche and Siemens. SES is analyzing biomarker data provided by C2N Diagnostics to Washington University., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: "Brain-predicted age" estimates biological age from complex, nonlinear features in neuroimaging scans. The brain age gap (BAG) between predicted and chronological age is elevated in sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD), but is underexplored in autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), in which AD progression is highly predictable with minimal confounding age-related co-pathology., Methods: We modeled BAG in 257 deeply-phenotyped ADAD mutation-carriers and 179 non-carriers from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network using minimally-processed structural MRI scans. We then tested whether BAG differed as a function of mutation and cognitive status, or estimated years until symptom onset, and whether it was associated with established markers of amyloid (PiB PET, CSF amyloid-β-42/40), phosphorylated tau (CSF and plasma pTau-181), neurodegeneration (CSF and plasma neurofilament-light-chain [NfL]), and cognition (global neuropsychological composite and CDR-sum of boxes). We compared BAG to other MRI measures, and examined heterogeneity in BAG as a function of ADAD mutation variants, APOE ε4 carrier status, sex, and education., Results: Advanced brain aging was observed in mutation-carriers approximately 7 years before expected symptom onset, in line with other established structural indicators of atrophy. BAG was moderately associated with amyloid PET and strongly associated with pTau-181, NfL, and cognition in mutation-carriers. Mutation variants, sex, and years of education contributed to variability in BAG., Conclusions: We extend prior work using BAG from sporadic AD to ADAD, noting consistent results. BAG associates well with markers of pTau, neurodegeneration, and cognition, but to a lesser extent, amyloid, in ADAD. BAG may capture similar signal to established MRI measures. However, BAG offers unique benefits in simplicity of data processing and interpretation. Thus, results in this unique ADAD cohort with few age-related confounds suggest that brain aging attributable to AD neuropathology can be accurately quantified from minimally-processed MRI., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Carriers of mutations responsible for dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease provide a unique opportunity to study potential imaging biomarkers. Biomarkers based on routinely acquired clinical MR images, could supplement the extant invasive or logistically challenging) biomarker studies. We used 1104 longitudinal MR, 324 amyloid beta, and 87 tau positron emission tomography imaging sessions from 525 participants enrolled in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Observational Study to extract novel imaging metrics representing the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of standardized image intensities of T1-weighted and Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR scans. There was an exponential decrease in FLAIR-μ in mutation carriers and an increase in FLAIR and T1 signal heterogeneity (T1-σ and FLAIR-σ) as participants approached the symptom onset in both supramarginal, the right postcentral and right superior temporal gyri as well as both caudate nuclei, putamina, thalami, and amygdalae. After controlling for the effect of regional atrophy, FLAIR-μ decreased and T1-σ and FLAIR-σ increased with increasing amyloid beta and tau deposition in numerous cortical regions. In symptomatic mutation carriers and independent of the effect of regional atrophy, tau pathology demonstrated a stronger relationship with image intensity metrics, compared with amyloid pathology. We propose novel MR imaging intensity-based metrics using standard clinical T1 and FLAIR images which strongly associates with the progression of pathology in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease. We suggest that tau pathology may be a key driver of the observed changes in this cohort of patients., (© 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Importance: Increased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume is a common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) finding in both autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) and late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD), but it remains unclear whether increased WMH along the AD continuum is reflective of AD-intrinsic processes or secondary to elevated systemic vascular risk factors., Objective: To estimate the associations of neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis with WMH accumulation and investigate whether systemic vascular risk is associated with WMH beyond these AD-intrinsic processes., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from 3 longitudinal cohort studies conducted in tertiary and community-based medical centers-the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN; February 2010 to March 2020), the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI; July 2007 to September 2021), and the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS; September 2010 to December 2019)., Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcomes were the independent associations of neurodegeneration (decreases in gray matter volume), parenchymal amyloidosis (assessed by amyloid positron emission tomography), and vessel amyloidosis (evidenced by cerebral microbleeds [CMBs]) with cross-sectional and longitudinal WMH., Results: Data from 3960 MRI sessions among 1141 participants were included: 252 pathogenic variant carriers from DIAN (mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.2] years; 137 [54%] female), 571 older adults from ADNI (mean [SD] age, 72.8 [7.3] years; 274 [48%] female), and 318 older adults from HABS (mean [SD] age, 72.4 [7.6] years; 194 [61%] female). Longitudinal increases in WMH volume were greater in individuals with CMBs compared with those without (DIAN: t = 3.2 [P = .001]; ADNI: t = 2.7 [P = .008]), associated with longitudinal decreases in gray matter volume (DIAN: t = -3.1 [P = .002]; ADNI: t = -5.6 [P < .001]; HABS: t = -2.2 [P = .03]), greater in older individuals (DIAN: t = 6.8 [P < .001]; ADNI: t = 9.1 [P < .001]; HABS: t = 5.4 [P < .001]), and not associated with systemic vascular risk (DIAN: t = 0.7 [P = .40]; ADNI: t = 0.6 [P = .50]; HABS: t = 1.8 [P = .06]) in individuals with ADAD and LOAD after accounting for age, gray matter volume, CMB presence, and amyloid burden. In older adults without CMBs at baseline, greater WMH volume was associated with CMB development during longitudinal follow-up (Cox proportional hazards regression model hazard ratio, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.72-4.03; P < .001)., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that increased WMH volume in AD is associated with neurodegeneration and parenchymal and vessel amyloidosis but not with elevated systemic vascular risk. Additionally, increased WMH volume may represent an early sign of vessel amyloidosis preceding the emergence of CMBs.

Aggregated insoluble tau is one of two defining features of Alzheimer's disease. Because clinical symptoms are strongly correlated with tau aggregates, drug development and clinical diagnosis need cost-effective and accessible specific fluid biomarkers of tau aggregates; however, recent studies suggest that the fluid biomarkers currently available cannot specifically track tau aggregates. We show that the microtubule-binding region (MTBR) of tau containing the residue 243 (MTBR-tau243) is a new cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker specific for insoluble tau aggregates and compared it to multiple other phosphorylated tau measures (p-tau181, p-tau205, p-tau217 and p-tau231) in two independent cohorts (BioFINDER-2, n = 448; and Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, n = 219). MTBR-tau243 was most strongly associated with tau-positron emission tomography (PET) and cognition, whereas showing the lowest association with amyloid-PET. In combination with p-tau205, MTBR-tau243 explained most of the total variance in tau-PET burden (0.58 ≤ R 2  ≤ 0.75) and the performance in predicting cognitive measures (0.34 ≤ R 2  ≤ 0.48) approached that of tau-PET (0.44 ≤ R 2  ≤ 0.52). MTBR-tau243 levels longitudinally increased with insoluble tau aggregates, unlike CSF p-tau species. CSF MTBR-tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau aggregate pathology, which may be utilized in interventional trials and in the diagnosis of patients. Based on these findings, we propose to revise the A/T/(N) criteria to include MTBR-tau243 as representing insoluble tau aggregates ('T')., (© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology develops many years before the onset of cognitive symptoms. Two pathological processes-aggregation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide into plaques and the microtubule protein tau into neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs)-are hallmarks of the disease. However, other pathological brain processes are thought to be key disease mediators of Aβ plaque and NFT pathology. How these additional pathologies evolve over the course of the disease is currently unknown. Here we show that proteomic measurements in autosomal dominant AD cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) linked to brain protein coexpression can be used to characterize the evolution of AD pathology over a timescale spanning six decades. SMOC1 and SPON1 proteins associated with Aβ plaques were elevated in AD CSF nearly 30 years before the onset of symptoms, followed by changes in synaptic proteins, metabolic proteins, axonal proteins, inflammatory proteins and finally decreases in neurosecretory proteins. The proteome discriminated mutation carriers from noncarriers before symptom onset as well or better than Aβ and tau measures. Our results highlight the multifaceted landscape of AD pathophysiology and its temporal evolution. Such knowledge will be critical for developing precision therapeutic interventions and biomarkers for AD beyond those associated with Aβ and tau., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Although pathogenic variants in PSEN1 leading to autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) are highly penetrant, substantial interindividual variability in the rates of cognitive decline and biomarker change are observed in ADAD. We hypothesized that this interindividual variability may be associated with the location of the pathogenic variant within PSEN1. PSEN1 pathogenic variant carriers participating in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) observational study were grouped based on whether the underlying variant affects a transmembrane (TM) or cytoplasmic (CY) protein domain within PSEN1. CY and TM carriers and variant non-carriers (NC) who completed clinical evaluation, multimodal neuroimaging, and lumbar puncture for collection of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as part of their participation in DIAN were included in this study. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine differences in clinical, cognitive, and biomarker measures between the NC, TM, and CY groups. While both the CY and TM groups were found to have similarly elevated Aβ compared to NC, TM carriers had greater cognitive impairment, smaller hippocampal volume, and elevated phosphorylated tau levels across the spectrum of pre-symptomatic and symptomatic phases of disease as compared to CY, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. As distinct portions of PSEN1 are differentially involved in APP processing by γ-secretase and the generation of toxic β-amyloid species, these results have important implications for understanding the pathobiology of ADAD and accounting for a substantial portion of the interindividual heterogeneity in ongoing ADAD clinical trials., (© 2023 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) is an international collaboration studying autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD). ADAD arises from mutations occurring in three genes. Offspring from ADAD families have a 50% chance of inheriting their familial mutation, so non-carrier siblings can be recruited for comparisons in case-control studies. The age of onset in ADAD is highly predictable within families, allowing researchers to estimate an individual's point in the disease trajectory. These characteristics allow candidate AD biomarker measurements to be reliably mapped during the preclinical phase. Although ADAD represents a small proportion of AD cases, understanding neuroimaging-based changes that occur during the preclinical period may provide insight into early disease stages of 'sporadic' AD also. Additionally, this study provides rich data for research in healthy aging through inclusion of the non-carrier controls. Here we introduce the neuroimaging dataset collected and describe how this resource can be used by a range of researchers., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Objectives: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) correlate with Alzheimer disease (AD) biomarkers cross-sectionally and modulate AD pathogenesis. Longitudinal changes have been reported for AD biomarkers, including concentrations of CSF β-amyloid (Aβ) 42, Aβ40, total tau and phosphorylated tau181, standardized uptake value ratio from the molecular imaging of cerebral fibrillar Aβ with PET using [ 11 C] Pittsburgh Compound-B, MRI-based hippocampal volume, and cortical thickness. Correlations between established AD biomarkers and the longitudinal change for WMH have not been fully evaluated, especially among cognitively normal individuals across the adult life span., Methods: We jointly analyzed the longitudinal data of WMH volume and each of the established AD biomarkers and cognition from 371 cognitively normal individuals whose baseline age spanned from 19.6 to 88.20 years from 4 longitudinal studies of aging and AD. A 2-stage algorithm was applied to identify the inflection point of baseline age whereby older participants had an accelerated longitudinal change in WMH volume, in comparison with the younger participants. The longitudinal correlations between WMH volume and AD biomarkers were estimated from the bivariate linear mixed-effects models., Results: A longitudinal increase in WMH volume was associated with a longitudinal increase in PET amyloid uptake and a decrease in MRI hippocampal volume, cortical thickness, and cognition. The inflection point of baseline age in WMH volume was identified at 60.46 (95% CI 56.43-64.49) years, with the annual increase for the older participants (83.12 [SE = 10.19] mm 3 per year) more than 13 times faster ( p < 0.0001) than that for the younger participants (6.35 [SE = 5.63] mm 3 per year). Accelerated rates of change among the older participants were similarly observed in almost all the AD biomarkers. Longitudinal correlations of WMH volume with MRI, PET amyloid biomarkers, and cognition seemed to be numerically stronger for the younger participants, but not significantly different from those for the older participants. Carrying APOE ε4 alleles did not alter the longitudinal correlations between WMH and AD biomarkers., Discussion: Longitudinal increases in WMH volume started to accelerate around a baseline age of 60.46 years and correlated with the longitudinal change in PET amyloid uptake, MRI structural outcomes, and cognition., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Heterogeneity in progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses challenges for both clinical prognosis and clinical trial implementation. Multiple AD-related subtypes have previously been identified, suggesting differences in receptivity to drug interventions. We identified early differences in preclinical AD biomarkers, assessed patterns for developing preclinical AD across the amyloid-tau-(neurodegeneration) [AT(N)] framework, and considered potential sources of difference by analysing the CSF proteome. Participants (n = 10) enrolled in longitudinal studies at the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center completed four or more lumbar punctures. These individuals were cognitively normal at baseline. Cerebrospinal fluid measures of amyloid-β (Aβ)42, phosphorylated tau (pTau181), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) as well as proteomics values were evaluated. Imaging biomarkers, including PET amyloid and tau, and structural MRI, were repeatedly obtained when available. Individuals were staged according to the amyloid-tau-(neurodegeneration) framework. Growth mixture modelling, an unsupervised clustering technique, identified three patterns of biomarker progression as measured by CSF pTau181 and Aβ42. Two groups (AD Biomarker Positive and Intermediate AD Biomarker) showed distinct progression from normal biomarker status to having biomarkers consistent with preclinical AD. A third group (AD Biomarker Negative) did not develop abnormal AD biomarkers over time. Participants grouped by CSF trajectories were re-classified using only proteomic profiles (AUCAD Biomarker Positive versus AD Biomarker Negative = 0.857, AUCAD Biomarker Positive versus Intermediate AD Biomarkers = 0.525, AUCIntermediate AD Biomarkers versus AD Biomarker Negative = 0.952). We highlight heterogeneity in the development of AD biomarkers in cognitively normal individuals. We identified some individuals who became amyloid positive before the age of 50 years. A second group, Intermediate AD Biomarkers, developed elevated CSF ptau181 significantly before becoming amyloid positive. A third group were AD Biomarker Negative over repeated testing. Our results could influence the selection of participants for specific treatments (e.g. amyloid-reducing versus other agents) in clinical trials. CSF proteome analysis highlighted additional non-AT(N) biomarkers for potential therapies, including blood-brain barrier-, vascular-, immune-, and neuroinflammatory-related targets., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Neurofilament light chain, a putative measure of neuronal damage, is measurable in blood and CSF and is predictive of cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. There has been limited prior work linking neurofilament light and functional connectivity, and no prior work has investigated neurofilament light associations with functional connectivity in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Here, we assessed relationships between blood neurofilament light, cognition, and functional connectivity in a cross-sectional sample of 106 autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutation carriers and 76 non-carriers. We employed an innovative network-level enrichment analysis approach to assess connectome-wide associations with neurofilament light. Neurofilament light was positively correlated with deterioration of functional connectivity within the default mode network and negatively correlated with connectivity between default mode network and executive control networks, including the cingulo-opercular, salience, and dorsal attention networks. Further, reduced connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and executive control networks was associated with reduced cognitive function. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that neurofilament levels and functional connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and the dorsal attention network explained significant variance in cognitive composite scores when controlling for age, sex, and education. A mediation analysis demonstrated that functional connectivity within the default mode network and between the default mode network and dorsal attention network partially mediated the relationship between blood neurofilament light levels and cognitive function. Our novel results indicate that blood estimates of neurofilament levels correspond to direct measurements of brain dysfunction, shedding new light on the underlying biological processes of Alzheimer's disease. Further, we demonstrate how variation within key brain systems can partially mediate the negative effects of heightened total serum neurofilament levels, suggesting potential regions for targeted interventions. Finally, our results lend further evidence that low-cost and minimally invasive blood measurements of neurofilament may be a useful marker of brain functional connectivity and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Comparisons of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) and autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) are confounded by age., Methods: We compared biomarkers from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), magnetic resonance imaging, and amyloid imaging with Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) across four groups of 387 cognitively normal participants, 42 to 65 years of age, in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) and the Adult Children Study (ACS) of LOAD: DIAN mutation carriers (MCs) and non-carriers (NON-MCs), and ACS participants with a positive (FH+) and negative (FH-) family history of LOAD., Results: At baseline, MCs had the lowest age-adjusted level of CSF Aβ42 and the highest levels of total and phosphorylated tau-181, and PiB uptake. Longitudinally, MC had similar increase in PiB uptake to FH+, but drastically faster decline in hippocampal volume than others, and was the only group showing cognitive decline., Discussion: Preclinical ADAD and LOAD share many biomarker signatures, but cross-sectional and longitudinal differences may exist., (© 2023 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Background: Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a promising candidate blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis and prognostication. The timing of its disease-associated changes, its clinical correlates, and biofluid-type dependency will influence its clinical utility., Methods: We evaluated plasma, serum, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) GFAP in families with autosomal dominant AD (ADAD), leveraging the predictable age at symptom onset to determine changes by stage of disease., Results: Plasma GFAP elevations appear a decade before expected symptom onset, after amyloid beta (Aβ) accumulation and prior to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Plasma GFAP distinguished Aβ-positive from Aβ-negative ADAD participants and showed a stronger relationship with Aβ load in asymptomatic than symptomatic ADAD. Higher plasma GFAP was associated with the degree and rate of neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment. Serum GFAP showed similar relationships, but these were less pronounced for CSF GFAP., Conclusion: Our findings support a role for plasma GFAP as a clinical biomarker of Aβ-related astrocyte reactivity that is associated with cognitive decline and neurodegeneration., Highlights: Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) elevations appear a decade before expected symptom onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD). Plasma GFAP was associated to amyloid positivity in asymptomatic ADAD. Plasma GFAP increased with clinical severity and predicted disease progression. Plasma and serum GFAP carried similar information in ADAD, while cerebrospinal fluid GFAP did not., (© 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

Objective: Smartphones have the potential for capturing subtle changes in cognition that characterize preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) in older adults. The Ambulatory Research in Cognition (ARC) smartphone application is based on principles from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and administers brief tests of associative memory, processing speed, and working memory up to 4 times per day over 7 consecutive days. ARC was designed to be administered unsupervised using participants' personal devices in their everyday environments., Methods: We evaluated the reliability and validity of ARC in a sample of 268 cognitively normal older adults (ages 65-97 years) and 22 individuals with very mild dementia (ages 61-88 years). Participants completed at least one 7-day cycle of ARC testing and conventional cognitive assessments; most also completed cerebrospinal fluid, amyloid and tau positron emission tomography, and structural magnetic resonance imaging studies., Results: First, ARC tasks were reliable as between-person reliability across the 7-day cycle and test-retest reliabilities at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups all exceeded 0.85. Second, ARC demonstrated construct validity as evidenced by correlations with conventional cognitive measures ( r = 0.53 between composite scores). Third, ARC measures correlated with AD biomarker burden at baseline to a similar degree as conventional cognitive measures. Finally, the intensive 7-day cycle indicated that ARC was feasible (86.50% approached chose to enroll), well tolerated (80.42% adherence, 4.83% dropout), and was rated favorably by older adult participants., Conclusions: Overall, the results suggest that ARC is reliable and valid and represents a feasible tool for assessing cognitive changes associated with the earliest stages of AD.

Background and Objectives: Increasing evidence indicates that a subset of cognitively normal individuals has subtle cognitive impairment at baseline. We sought to identify them using the Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) system. Symptomatic cognitive impairment was operationalized by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ≥0.5. We hypothesized that incident impairment would be higher for participants with subtle retrieval impairment (SOMI-1), higher still for those with moderate retrieval impairment (SOMI-2), and highest for those with storage impairment (SOMI-3/4) after adjusting for demographics and APOE ε4 status. A secondary objective was to determine whether including biomarkers of β-amyloid, tau pathology, and neurodegeneration in the models affect prediction. We hypothesized that even after adjusting for in vivo biomarkers, SOMI would remain a significant predictor of time to incident symptomatic cognitive impairment., Methods: Among 969 cognitively normal participants, defined by a CDR = 0, from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, SOMI stage was determined from their baseline Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test scores, 555 had CSF and structural MRI measures and comprised the biomarker subgroup, and 144 of them were amyloid positive. Cox proportional hazards models tested associations of SOMI stages at baseline and biomarkers with time to incident cognitive impairment defined as the transition to CDR ≥0.5., Results: Among all participants, the mean age was 69.35 years, 59.6% were female, and mean follow-up was 6.36 years. Participants in SOMI-1-4 had elevated hazard ratios for the transition from normal to impaired cognition in comparison with those who were SOMI-0 (no memory impairment). Individuals in SOMI-1 (mildly impaired retrieval) and SOMI-2 (moderately impaired retrieval) were at nearly double the risk of clinical progression compared with persons with no memory problems. When memory storage impairment emerges (SOMI-3/4), the hazard ratio for clinical progression increased approximately 3 times. SOMI stage remained an independent predictor of incident cognitive impairment after adjusting for all biomarkers., Discussion: SOMI predicts the transition from normal cognition to incident symptomatic cognitive impairment (CDR ≥0.5). The results support the use of SOMI to identify those cognitively normal participants most likely to develop incident cognitive impairment who can then be referred for biomarker screening., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Cortical tau accumulation is a key pathological event that partly defines Alzheimer's disease (AD) onset and is associated with cognitive decline and future disease progression. However, an improved understanding of the timing and pattern of early tau deposition in AD and how this may be tracked in vivo is needed. Data from 59 participants involved in two longitudinal cohort studies of autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) were used to investigate whether tau PET can detect and track presymptomatic change; seven participants were symptomatic, and 52 were asymptomatic but at a 50% risk of carrying a pathogenic mutation. All had baseline flortaucipir (FTP) PET, MRI and clinical assessments; 26 individuals had more than one FTP PET scan. Standardised uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in prespecified regions of interest (ROIs) were obtained using inferior cerebellar grey matter as the reference region. We compared the changes in FTP SUVRs between presymptomatic carriers, symptomatic carriers and non-carriers, adjusting for age, sex and study site. We also investigated the relationship between regional FTP SUVRs and estimated years to/from symptom onset (EYO). Compared to both non-carriers and presymptomatic carriers, FTP SUVRs were significantly higher in symptomatic carriers in all ROIs tested (p < 0.001). There were no significant regional differences between presymptomatic carriers and non-carriers in FTP SUVRs, or their rates of change (p > 0.05), although increased FTP signal uptake was seen posteriorly in some individuals around the time of expected symptom onset. When we examined the relationship of FTP SUVR with respect to EYO, the earliest significant regional difference between mutation carriers and non-carriers was detected within the precuneus prior to estimated symptom onset in some cases. This study supports preliminary studies suggesting that presymptomatic tau tracer uptake is rare in ADAD. In cases where early uptake was seen, there was often a predilection for posterior regions (the precuneus and post-cingulate) as opposed to the medial temporal lobe, highlighting the importance of examining in vivo tau uptake beyond the confines of traditional Braak staging., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: As Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers rapidly develop, tools are needed that accurately and effectively communicate risk of AD dementia., Methods: We analyzed longitudinal data from >10,000 cognitively unimpaired older adults. Five-year risk of AD dementia was modeled using survival analysis., Results: A demographic model was developed and validated on independent data with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 5-year prediction of AD dementia of 0.79. Clinical and cognitive variables (AUC = 0.79), and apolipoprotein E genotype (AUC = 0.76) were added to the demographic model. We then incorporated the risk computed from the demographic model with hazard ratios computed from independent data for amyloid positron emission tomography status and magnetic resonance imaging hippocampal volume (AUC = 0.84), and for plasma amyloid beta (Aβ)42/Aβ40 (AUC = 0.82)., Discussion: An adaptive tool was developed and validated to compute absolute risks of AD dementia. This approach allows for improved accuracy and communication of AD risk among cognitively unimpaired older adults., (© 2022 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-β peptide (Aβ)42/Aβ40 and the concentration of tau phosphorylated at site 181 (p-tau181) are well-established biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The present study used mass spectrometry to measure concentrations of nine phosphorylated and five nonphosphorylated tau species and phosphorylation occupancies (percentage phosphorylated/nonphosphorylated) at ten sites. In the present study we show that, in 750 individuals with a median age of 71.2 years, CSF pT217/T217 predicted the presence of brain amyloid by positron emission tomography (PET) slightly better than Aβ42/Aβ40 (P = 0.02). Furthermore, for individuals with positive brain amyloid by PET (n = 263), CSF pT217/T217 was more strongly correlated with the amount of amyloid (Spearman's ρ = 0.69) than Aβ42/Aβ40 (ρ = -0.42, P < 0.0001). In two independent cohorts of participants with symptoms of AD dementia (n = 55 and n = 90), CSF pT217/T217 and pT205/T205 were better correlated with tau PET measures than CSF p-tau181 concentration. These findings suggest that CSF pT217/T217 and pT205/T205 represent improved CSF biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology in AD., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Off-target binding of [ 18 F]flortaucipir (FTP) can complicate quantitative PET analyses. An underdiscussed off-target region is the skull. Here, we characterize how often FTP skull binding occurs, its influence on estimates of Alzheimer disease pathology, its potential drivers, and whether skull uptake is a stable feature across time and tracers. Methods: In 313 cognitively normal and mildly impaired participants, CT scans were used to define a skull mask. This mask was used to quantify FTP skull uptake. Skull uptake of the amyloid-β PET tracers [ 18 F]florbetapir and [ 11 C]Pittsburgh compound B ( n = 152) was also assessed. Gaussian mixture modeling defined abnormal levels of skull binding for each tracer. We examined the relationship of continuous bone uptake to known off-target binding in the basal ganglia and choroid plexus as well as skull density measured from the CT. Finally, we examined the confounding effect of skull binding on pathologic quantification. Results: We found that 50 of 313 (∼16%) FTP scans had high levels of skull signal. Most were female ( n = 41, 82%), and in women, lower skull density was related to higher FTP skull signal. Visual reads by a neuroradiologist revealed a significant relationship with hyperostosis; however, only 21% of women with high skull binding were diagnosed with hyperostosis. FTP skull signal did not substantially correlate with other known off-target regions. Skull uptake was consistent over longitudinal FTP scans and across tracers. In amyloid-β-negative, but not -positive, individuals, FTP skull binding impacted quantitative estimates in temporal regions. Conclusion: FTP skull binding is a stable, participant-specific phenomenon and is unrelated to known off-target regions. Effects were found primarily in women and were partially related to lower bone density. The presence of [ 11 C]Pittsburgh compound B skull binding suggests that defluorination does not fully explain FTP skull signal. As signal in skull bone can impact quantitative analyses and differs across sex, it should be explicitly addressed in studies of aging and Alzheimer disease., (© 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Background: Estimates of 'brain-predicted age' quantify apparent brain age compared to normative trajectories of neuroimaging features. The brain age gap (BAG) between predicted and chronological age is elevated in symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD) but has not been well explored in presymptomatic AD. Prior studies have typically modeled BAG with structural MRI, but more recently other modalities, including functional connectivity (FC) and multimodal MRI, have been explored., Methods: We trained three models to predict age from FC, structural (S), or multimodal MRI (S+FC) in 390 amyloid-negative cognitively normal (CN/A-) participants (18-89 years old). In independent samples of 144 CN/A-, 154 CN/A+, and 154 cognitively impaired (CI; CDR > 0) participants, we tested relationships between BAG and AD biomarkers of amyloid and tau, as well as a global cognitive composite., Results: All models predicted age in the control training set, with the multimodal model outperforming the unimodal models. All three BAG estimates were significantly elevated in CI compared to controls. FC-BAG was significantly reduced in CN/A+ participants compared to CN/A-. In CI participants only, elevated S-BAG and S+FC BAG were associated with more advanced AD pathology and lower cognitive performance., Conclusions: Both FC-BAG and S-BAG are elevated in CI participants. However, FC and structural MRI also capture complementary signals. Specifically, FC-BAG may capture a unique biphasic response to presymptomatic AD pathology, while S-BAG may capture pathological progression and cognitive decline in the symptomatic stage. A multimodal age-prediction model improves sensitivity to healthy age differences., Funding: This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P01-AG026276, P01- AG03991, P30-AG066444, 5-R01-AG052550, 5-R01-AG057680, 1-R01-AG067505, 1S10RR022984-01A1, and U19-AG032438), the BrightFocus Foundation (A2022014F), and the Alzheimer's Association (SG-20-690363-DIAN)., Competing Interests: PM, BG, PL, RP, RA, HM, GN, JM, BA No competing interests declared, TB received doses (AV45, AV1451) and partial support for PET scanning through an investigator-initiated research grant awarded to Washington University from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly and Company). The author received consulting fees from Eisai, Siemens, and received payment for Biogen speaker's bureau. Tammie Benzinger acts as site investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Biogen, Eisai, Jaansen and Roche. The author has no other competing interests to declare, CC has received research support from Biogen, EISAI, Alector and Parabon. Carlos Cruchaga is a member of the advisory board of Vivid Genetics, Circular Genomics and Alector. The author has no other competing interests to declare, AF has received consulting fees from DiamiR and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc and has received consulting fees for participation on Scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Genentech and Diadem. The author has received travel support for in-person attendance at ABC-DS Meeting/Retreat and travel support/honorarium for in-person attendance at Scientific Advisory Board meeting for South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). The author has no other competing interests to declare, JH has received consulting fees from Roche and Parabon Nanolabs. The author has no other competing interests to declare, SS received personal honoraria for presenting lectures from the University of Wisconsin, St. Luke's Hospital, Houston Methodist Medical Center, personal Honoraria for serving on the Alzheimer Disease Center Clinical Task Force from University of Washington and personal honoraria for serving on the National Centralized Repository for Alzheimer's Disease biospecimen review committee from University of Indiana. The author received travel support from National Institute on Aging grant R01AG070941, and is a board member of the Greater Missouri Alzheimer's Association. The author received plasma Ab42/Ab40 data provided by C2N Diagnostics at no cost. No payments/research funding was provided by C2N Diagnostics. No gifts/financial incentives of any kind have been provided to Dr. Schindler by C2N Diagnostics. The author has no other competing interests to declare, GD received fees for consulting and for acting as Dementia Topic Editor from DynaMed (EBSCO Health) and received fees for consulting, grant writing / implementation Parabon Nanonlabs. The author received payment for CME Content development from PeerView Media and Continuing Education Inc, payment for educational content development and focus group participation from Eli Lilly Co, and payment for continuum manuscript authorship from the American Academy of Neurology. The author received payment for expert testimony in the case of Wernicke encephalopathy from Barrow Law. Gregory S Day acts as Clinical Director for Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis Foundation, Inc. The author has stock holdings at ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc and stock options at Parabon Nanolabs. The author has no other competing interests to declare, MF received grants from AbbVie, Eisai, Novartis, ADCS Posiphen, Genentech and Suven Life Sciences (no grant numbers available). The author has received consulting fees from Artery Therapeutics, Avanir, Biogen, Cyclo Therapeutics, Green Valley, Lexeo, McClena, Nervive, Oligomerix, Pinteon, Prothena, Vaxinity, Athira, AZTherapies, Cognition Therapeutics, Gemvax, Ionis, Longeveron, Merck, Neurotrope Biosciences, Otsuka, Proclara and SToP-AD. The author has no other competing interests to declare, received funding and non-financial support for the DIAN-TU-001 trial from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, and funding for the DIAN-TU-001 trial from Janssen, Hoffman La-Roche/Genentech, Eli Lilly & Co., Eisai, Biogen, AbbVie and Bristol Meyer Squibb. The author has equity ownership interest in C2N Diagnostics and receives royalty income based on technology (stable isotope labeling kinetics and blood plasma assay) licensed by Washington University to C2N Diagnostics. The author received International Conference Lecture Honoraria from Korean Dementia Association and Conference Lecture Honoraria from Weill Cornell Medical College. The author received support for travel expenses from Alzheimer's Association Roundtable and Duke Margolis Alzheimer's Roundtable. The author participates on an unpaid Advisory Board for Roche Gantenerumab Steering Committee and Biogen - Combination Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease, and participates on an unpaid Scientific Advisory Board for UK Dementia Research Institute at University College London and Stanford University, Next Generation Translational Proteomics for Alzheimer's and Related Dementias. The author receives an income from C2N Diagnostics for serving on the scientific advisory board. The author has received equipment and materials from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly & Co, Hoffman La-Roche, Eisai and Janssen. Unrelated to this article, Randall Bateman serves as principal investigator of the DIAN-TU, which is supported by the Alzheimer's Association, GHR Foundation, an anonymous organization and the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (Active: Eli Lilly and Company/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, F. Hoffman-La Roche/Genentech, Biogen, Eisai, and Janssen. Previous: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and United Neuroscience). In addition, in-kind support has been received from CogState and Signant Health. Unrelated to this article Randall Bateman has submitted the US nonprovisional patent application "Methods for Measuring the Metabolism of CNS Derived Biomolecules In Vivo" and provisional patent application "Plasma Based Methods for Detecting CNS Amyloid Deposition". The author has no other competing interests to declare, RB has received consulting fees from Barcelona Brain Research Center BBRC and Native Alzheimer Disease-Related Resource Center in Minority Aging Research, Ext Adv Board. The author has received payment or honoraria for lectures from Montefiore Grand Rounds, NY and Tetra-Inst ADRC seminar series, Grand Rds, NY. The author has participated on the Research Strategy Council for the Cure Alzheimer's Fund, the Diverse VCID Observational Study Monitoring Board and the LEADS Advisory Board, Indiana University. The author has no other competing interests to declare, (© 2023, Millar et al.)

Introduction: As the number of biomarkers used to study Alzheimer's disease (AD) continues to increase, it is important to understand the utility of any given biomarker, as well as what additional information a biomarker provides when compared to others., Methods: We used hierarchical clustering to group 19 cross-sectional biomarkers in autosomal dominant AD. Feature selection identified biomarkers that were the strongest predictors of mutation status and estimated years from symptom onset (EYO). Biomarkers identified included clinical assessments, neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid amyloid, and tau, and emerging biomarkers of neuronal integrity and inflammation., Results: Three primary clusters were identified: neurodegeneration, amyloid/tau, and emerging biomarkers. Feature selection identified amyloid and tau measures as the primary predictors of mutation status and EYO. Emerging biomarkers of neuronal integrity and inflammation were relatively weak predictors., Discussion: These results provide novel insight into our understanding of the relationships among biomarkers and the staging of biomarkers based on disease progression., (© 2022 the Alzheimer's Association.)

Objective: To investigate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and neuroimaging correlates of Stages of Objective Memory Impairment (SOMI) based on Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) performance, and to evaluate the effect of APOE ε4 status on this relationship., Methods: Data from 586 cognitively unimpaired individuals who had FCSRT, CSF, and volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures available was used. We compared CSF measures of β-amyloid (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), phosphorylated tau (p-Tau181), total tau (t-Tau), hippocampal volume, and PIB-PET mean cortical binding potential with partial volume correction (MCBP) among SOMI groups in the whole sample and in subsamples stratified by APOE ε4 status., Results: Participants had a mean age of 67.4 (SD=9.1) years, had 16.1 (SD=2.6) years of education, 57.0% were female, and 33.8% were APOE ε4 positive. In the entire sample, there was no significant difference between SOMI stages in Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, p-Tau181, t-Tau, or PIB-PET MCBP when adjusted for age, sex, and education. However, higher SOMI stages had smaller hippocampal volume (F=3.29, p=0.020). In the stratified sample based on APOE ε4 status, in APOE ε4 positive individuals, higher SOMI stages had higher p-Tau181 (F=2.94, p=0.034) higher t-Tau (F=3.41, p=0.019), and smaller hippocampal volume (F=5.78, p<0.001). There were no significant differences in CSF or imaging biomarkers between SOMI groups in the APOE ε4 negative subsample., Conclusion: Cognitively normal older individuals with higher SOMI stages have higher in-vivo tau and neurodegenerative pathology only in APOE ε4 carriers. These original results indicate the potential usefulness of the SOMI staging system in assessing of tau and neurodegenerative pathology., Competing Interests: K.K.P. has no disclosures. A.E. serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from: Eisai, PCORI Health Care Horizon Scanning System, BioDelivery Sciences International, Inc, and is the owner of Neurodiction, LLC. R.B.L. receives research support from the following sources unrelated to this manuscript: 5U10 NS077308 (PI), R21 AG056920 (Investigator), 1RF1 AG057531 (Site PI), RF1 AG054548 (Investigator), 1RO1 AG048642 (Investigator), R56 AG057548 (Investigator), U01062370 (Investigator), RO1 AG060933 (Investigator), RO1 AG062622 (Investigator), 1UG3FD006795 (mPI), 1U24NS113847 (Investigator). He holds stock options in eNeura Therapeutics and Biohaven Holdings; serves as consultant, advisory board member, or has received honoraria from: Abbvie (Allergan), American Academy of Neurology, American Headache Society, Amgen, Avanir, Biohaven, Biovision, Boston Scientific, Dr. Reddy’s (Promius), Electrocore, Eli Lilly, eNeura Therapeutics, Equinox, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Lundbeck (Alder), Merck, Pernix, Pfizer, Supernus, Teva, Trigemina, Vector, Vedanta. He receives royalties from Wolff’s Headache 7th and 8th Edition, Oxford Press University, 2009, Wiley and Informa. B.A.G has no disclosures. J.H. has no disclosures. J.C.M. and his family do not own stock or have equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. E.G. receives a small royalty for commercial use of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (FCSRT+IR). The test is available at no cost to researchers and clinicians. The Albert Einstein College of Medicines holds the copyright for the test. Inquiries should be addressed to Dr. Benjamin Neymotin (Benjamin.Neymotin@einsteinmed.org) in the Office of Biotechnology and Business Development.

Background: Important insights into the early pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease can be provided by studies of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. However, it is unclear whether the timing and spatial distribution of amyloid accumulation differs between people with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and those with Down syndrome. We aimed to directly compare amyloid changes between these two groups of people., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included participants (aged ≥25 years) with Down syndrome and sibling controls who had MRI and amyloid PET scans in the first data release (January, 2020) of the Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) study. We also included carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease genetic mutations and non-carrier familial controls who were within a similar age range to ABC-DS participants (25-73 years) and had MRI and amyloid PET scans at the time of a data freeze (December, 2020) of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) study. Controls from the two studies were combined into a single group. All DIAN study participants had genetic testing to determine PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP mutation status. APOE genotype was determined from blood samples. CSF samples were collected in a subset of ABC-DS and DIAN participants and the ratio of amyloid β42 (Aβ42) to Aβ40 (Aβ42/40) was measured to evaluate its Spearman's correlation with amyloid PET. Global PET amyloid burden was compared with regards to cognitive status, APOE ɛ4 status, sex, age, and estimated years to symptom onset. We further analysed amyloid PET deposition by autosomal dominant mutation type. We also assessed regional patterns of amyloid accumulation by estimated number of years to symptom onset. Within a subset of participants the relationship between amyloid PET and CSF Aβ42/40 was evaluated., Findings: 192 individuals with Down syndrome and 33 sibling controls from the ABC-DS study and 265 carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutations and 169 non-carrier familial controls from the DIAN study were included in our analyses. PET amyloid centiloid and CSF Aβ42/40 were negatively correlated in carriers of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease mutations (n=216; r=-0·565; p<0·0001) and in people with Down syndrome (n=32; r=-0·801; p<0·0001). There was no difference in global PET amyloid burden between asymptomatic people with Down syndrome (mean 18·80 centiloids [SD 28·33]) versus asymptomatic mutation carriers (24·61 centiloids [30·27]; p=0·11) and between symptomatic people with Down syndrome (77·25 centiloids [41·76]) versus symptomatic mutation carriers (69·15 centiloids [51·10]; p=0·34). APOE ɛ4 status and sex had no effect on global amyloid PET deposition. Amyloid deposition was elevated significantly earlier in mutation carriers than in participants with Down syndrome (estimated years to symptom onset -23·0 vs -17·5; p=0·0002). PSEN1 mutations primarily drove this difference. Early amyloid accumulation occurred in striatal and cortical regions for both mutation carriers (n=265) and people with Down syndrome (n=128). Although mutation carriers had widespread amyloid accumulation in all cortical regions, the medial occipital regions were spared in people with Down syndrome., Interpretation: Despite minor differences, amyloid PET changes were similar between people with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease versus Down syndrome and strongly supported early amyloid dysregulation in individuals with Down syndrome. Individuals with Down syndrome aged at least 35 years might benefit from early intervention and warrant future inclusion in clinical trials, particularly given the relatively high incidence of Down syndrome., Funding: The National Institute on Aging, Riney and Brennan Funds, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TLSB has received funding from the National Institutes of Health and Siemens; has a licensing agreement from Sora Neuroscience but receives no financial compensation; has received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, or educational events from Biogen and Eisai Genetech; has served on a scientific advisory board for Biogen; holds a leadership role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy groups for the American Society for Neuroradiology (unpaid) and Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (unpaid); and has participated in radiopharmaceuticals and technology transfers with Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Cerveau, and LMI. EMD received support from the National Institute on Aging, an anonymous organisation, the GHR Foundation, the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium, Eli Lilly, and F Hoffmann La-Roche; has received speaking fees from Eisai and Eli Lilly; and is on the data safety and monitoring board and advisory boards of Eli Lilly, Alector, and Alzamend. WS has received research funding from the National Institute on Aging and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. JPC serves as the chair of the American Neurological Association Dementia and Aging Special Interest Group and is on the medical advisory board of Humana Healthcare. CC has received consulting fees from GSK and Alector. AMF reports personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, Araclon/Grifols, and Diadem Research and grants from Biogen, outside the submitted work. BLH has received research funding from Roche and Autism Speaks; receives royalties from Oxford University Press for book publications; and is the chair of the data safety and monitoring board for the Department of Defense-funded study, “Comparative Effectiveness of EIBI and MABA”. BTC receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health. EH receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the BrightFocus Foundation. FL is supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging. HDR has received funding from the National Institutes of Health and is on the scientific advisory committee for the Hereditary Disease Foundation. JHL has received research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Aging. RJP receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Aging. RJB is Director of DIAN-TU and Principal Investigator of DIAN-TU001; receives research support from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health, DIAN-TU trial pharmaceutical partners (Eli Lilly, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Eisai, Biogen, and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals), the Alzheimer's Association, the GHR Foundation, an anonymous organisation, the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (active members Biogen, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech; previous members AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and United Neuroscience), the NfL Consortium (F Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb), and the Tau SILK Consortium (Eli Lilly, Biogen, and AbbVie); has been an invited speaker and consultant for AC Immune, F Hoffmann-La Roche, the Korean Dementia Association, the American Neurological Association, and Janssen; has been a consultant for Amgen, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Eisai; and has submitted the US non-provisional patent application named “Methods for Measuring the Metabolism of CNS Derived Biomolecules In Vivo” and a provisional patent application named “Plasma Based Methods for Detecting CNS Amyloid Deposition”. BMA receives research funding from the National Institutes of Health and has a patent pending (“Markers of Neurotoxicity in CAR T patients”). MSR has received consulting fees from AC Immune, Embic, and Keystone Bio and has received research support from the National Institutes of Health, Avid, Baxter, Eisai, Elan, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are widely accepted as surrogate markers of underlying neuropathological changes. However, few studies have evaluated whether preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers predict Alzheimer's neuropathology at autopsy. We sought to determine whether amyloid PET imaging or CSF biomarkers accurately predict cognitive outcomes and Alzheimer's disease neuropathological findings. This study included 720 participants, 42-91 years of age, who were enrolled in longitudinal studies of memory and aging in the Washington University Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center and were cognitively normal at baseline, underwent amyloid PET imaging and/or CSF collection within 1 year of baseline clinical assessment, and had subsequent clinical follow-up. Cognitive status was assessed longitudinally by Clinical Dementia Rating®. Biomarker status was assessed using predefined cut-offs for amyloid PET imaging or CSF p-tau181/amyloid-β42. Subsequently, 57 participants died and underwent neuropathologic examination. Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes were assessed using standard criteria. We assessed the predictive value of Alzheimer's disease biomarker status on progression to cognitive impairment and for presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes. Among cognitively normal participants with positive biomarkers, 34.4% developed cognitive impairment (Clinical Dementia Rating > 0) as compared to 8.4% of those with negative biomarkers. Cox proportional hazards modelling indicated that preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarker status, APOE ɛ4 carrier status, polygenic risk score and centred age influenced risk of developing cognitive impairment. Among autopsied participants, 90.9% of biomarker-positive participants and 8.6% of biomarker-negative participants had Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes. Sensitivity was 87.0%, specificity 94.1%, positive predictive value 90.9% and negative predictive value 91.4% for detection of Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes by preclinical biomarkers. Single CSF and amyloid PET baseline biomarkers were also predictive of Alzheimer's disease neuropathological changes, as well as Thal phase and Braak stage of pathology at autopsy. Biomarker-negative participants who developed cognitive impairment were more likely to exhibit non-Alzheimer's disease pathology at autopsy. The detection of preclinical Alzheimer's disease biomarkers is strongly predictive of future cognitive impairment and accurately predicts presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology at autopsy., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) ε4 allele is strongly linked with cerebral β-amyloidosis, but its relationship with tauopathy is less established. We investigated the relationship between APOE ε4 carrier status, regional amyloid-β (Aβ), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetrics, tau positron emission tomography (PET), APOE messenger RNA (mRNA) expression maps, and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (CSF ptau 181 ). Three hundred fifty participants underwent imaging, and 270 had ptau 181 . We used computational models to evaluate the main effect of APOE ε4 carrier status on regional neuroimaging values and then the interaction of ε4 status and global Aβ on regional tau PET and brain volumes as well as CSF ptau 181 . Separately, we also examined the additional interactive influence of sex. We found that, for the same degree of Aβ burden, APOE ε4 carriers showed greater tau PET signal relative to noncarriers in temporal regions, but no interaction was present for MRI volumes or CSF ptau 181 . This potentiation of tau aggregation irrespective of sex occurred in brain regions with high APOE mRNA expression, suggesting local vulnerabilities to tauopathy. There were greater effects of APOE genotype in females, although the interactive sex effects did not strongly mirror mRNA expression. Pathology is not homogeneously expressed throughout the brain but mirrors underlying biological patterns such as gene expression.

Objective: To investigate whether herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection was associated with rates of cognitive decline or whole brain atrophy among individuals from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN)., Methods: Among two subsets of the DIAN cohort (age range 19.6-66.6 years; median follow-up 3.0 years) we examined (i) rate of cognitive decline (N = 164) using change in mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, (ii) rate of whole brain atrophy (N = 149), derived from serial MR imaging, calculated using the boundary shift integral (BSI) method. HSV-1 antibodies were assayed in baseline sera collected from 2009-2015. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare outcomes by HSV-1 seropositivity and high HSV-1 IgG titres/IgM status., Results: There was no association between baseline HSV-1 seropositivity and rates of cognitive decline or whole brain atrophy. Having high HSV-1 IgG titres/IgM was associated with a slightly greater decline in MMSE points per year (difference in slope - 0.365, 95% CI: -0.958 to -0.072), but not with rate of whole brain atrophy. Symptomatic mutation carriers declined fastest on both MMSE and BSI measures, however, this was not influenced by HSV-1. Among asymptomatic mutation carriers, rates of decline on MMSE and BSI were slightly greater among those who were HSV-1 seronegative. Among mutation-negative individuals, no differences were seen by HSV-1. Stratifying by APOE4 status yielded inconsistent results., Interpretation: We found no evidence for a major role of HSV-1, measured by serum antibodies, in cognitive decline or whole brain atrophy among individuals at high risk of early-onset AD., (© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Prior studies of aging and Alzheimer disease have evaluated resting state functional connectivity (FC) using either seed-based correlation (SBC) or independent component analysis (ICA), with a focus on particular functional systems. SBC and ICA both are insensitive to differences in signal amplitude. At the same time, accumulating evidence indicates that the amplitude of spontaneous BOLD signal fluctuations is physiologically meaningful. We systematically compared covariance-based FC, which is sensitive to amplitude, vs. correlation-based FC, which is not, in affected individuals and controls drawn from two cohorts of participants including autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD), late onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD), and age-matched controls. Functional connectivity was computed over 222 regions of interest and group differences were evaluated in terms of components projected onto a space of lower dimension. Our principal observations are: (1) Aging is associated with global loss of resting state fMRI signal amplitude that is approximately uniform across resting state networks. (2) Thus, covariance FC measures decrease with age whereas correlation FC is relatively preserved in healthy aging. (3) In contrast, symptomatic ADAD and LOAD both lead to loss of spontaneous activity amplitude as well as severely degraded correlation structure. These results demonstrate a double dissociation between age vs. Alzheimer disease and the amplitude vs. correlation structure of resting state BOLD signals. Modeling results suggest that the AD-associated loss of correlation structure is attributable to a relative increase in the fraction of locally restricted as opposed to widely shared variance., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Randall J. Bateman Randall Bateman (RJB), Professor of Neurology at Washington University's School of Medicine (WUSM) receives lab research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Alzheimer's Association, BrightFocus Foundation, Rainwater Foundation Tau Consortium, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, the Cure Alzheimer's Fund, Centene Corporation, Tau SILK Consortium (AbbVie, Biogen, and Eli Lilly and Company), and an anonymous organization. RJB has received honoraria as a speaker/consultant/advisory board member from Amgen, AC Immune, Eisai, F. Hoffman-LaRoche, and Janssen; and reimbursement of travel expenses from AC Immune, F. Hoffman-La Roche and Janssen. Unrelated to this article, RJB serves as principal investigator of the DIAN-TU, which is supported by the Alzheimer's Association, GHR Foundation, an anonymous organization and the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (Active: Eli Lilly and Company/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, F. Hoffman-La Roche/Genentech, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen, and United Neuroscience. Previous: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi). The DIAN-TU-001 Clinical Trial is supported by Pharmaceutical Partners Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche and Janssen, the Alzheimer's Association, NIH U01AG042791, NIH U01AG42791-S1 (FNIH and Accelerating Medicines Partnership), NIH R01AG046179, NIH R56AG053267, NIH R01AG053267, NIH U01AG059798, NIH R01AG068319, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GHR Foundation, and an anonymous organization. In-kind support has been received from CogState and Bracket. Washington University, Randall Bateman, and David Holtzman have equity ownership interest in C2N Diagnostics and receive royalty income based on technology (stable isotope labeling kinetics and blood plasma assay) licensed by Washington University to C2N Diagnostics. RJB receives income from C2N Diagnostics for serving on the scientific advisory board. Washington University, with RJB as co-inventor, has submitted the US nonprovisional patent application “Methods for Measuring the Metabolism of CNS Derived Biomolecules In Vivo” and provisional patent application “Plasma Based Methods for Detecting CNS Amyloid Deposition”. Tammie L.S. Benzinger Dr. Benzinger reports grants and non-financial support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals/ Eli Lilly, during the conduct of the study; grants and non-financial support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals/ Eli Lilly, other from Eli Lilly, Biogen, Eisai, Jaansen, personal fees from Biogen, non-financial support from Eisai, non-financial support from Siemens, outside the submitted work. Matthew R. Brier Dr. Brier reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study. Gregory S. Day Dr. Day reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Parabon Nanolabs, Inc, personal fees from DynaMed (EBSCO Health), outside the submitted work. Brian A. Gordon Dr. Gordon reports participation in clinical trials of therapies to alter the course of Alzheimer Disease. Neill Graff-Radford Dr. Graff-Radford reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; grants from Biogen, grants from AbbVie, grants from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Taleshi Ikeuchi Dr. Ikeuchi reports grants from AMED (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development), during the conduct of the study. Daniel S. Marcus Dr. Marcus reports other from Radiologics, Inc, outside the submitted work. John C. Morris Dr. Morris reports grants from NIH grant P30 AG066444, grants from NIH grant P01AG003991, grants from NIH grant P01AG026276, grants from NIH grant UF1AG032438, during the conduct of the study. Richard J. Perrin Dr. Perrin reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. Stephen Salloway Dr. Salloway reports grants and personal fees from Biogen, grants and personal fees from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Avid, grants and personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. Peter Schofield Dr. Schofield reports grants from NIH, grants from Anonymous Foundation, grants from Roth Charitable Foundation, during the conduct of the study. Abraham Z. Snyder Dr. Snyder is a consultant for Sora Neuroimaging, LLC., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the characteristics of participants with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in a trial of gantenerumab or solanezumab in dominantly inherited Alzheimer disease (DIAD)., Methods: 142 DIAD mutation carriers received either gantenerumab SC (n = 52), solanezumab IV (n = 50), or placebo (n = 40). Participants underwent assessments with the Clinical Dementia Rating® (CDR®), neuropsychological testing, CSF biomarkers, β-amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor ARIA. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses evaluated potential ARIA-related risk factors., Results: Eleven participants developed ARIA-E, including 3 with mild symptoms. No ARIA-E was reported under solanezumab while gantenerumab was associated with ARIA-E compared to placebo (odds ratio [OR] = 9.1, confidence interval [CI][1.2, 412.3]; p = 0.021). Under gantenerumab, APOE-ɛ4 carriers were more likely to develop ARIA-E (OR = 5.0, CI[1.0, 30.4]; p = 0.055), as were individuals with microhemorrhage at baseline (OR = 13.7, CI[1.2, 163.2]; p = 0.039). No ARIA-E was observed at the initial 225 mg/month gantenerumab dose, and most cases were observed at doses >675 mg. At first ARIA-E occurrence, all ARIA-E participants were amyloid-PET+, 60% were CDR >0, 60% were past their estimated year to symptom onset, and 60% had also incident ARIA-H. Most ARIA-E radiologically resolved after dose adjustment and developing ARIA-E did not significantly increase odds of trial discontinuation. ARIA-E was more frequently observed in the occipital lobe (90%). ARIA-E severity was associated with age at time of ARIA-E., Interpretation: In DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. Gantenerumab dose over 225 mg increased ARIA-E risk, with additional risk for individuals APOE-ɛ4(+) or with microhemorrhage. ARIA-E was reversible on MRI in most cases, generally asymptomatic, without additional risk for trial discontinuation. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:729-744., (© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

The extent to which the pathophysiology of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease corresponds to the pathophysiology of 'sporadic' late onset Alzheimer's disease is unknown, thus limiting the extrapolation of study findings and clinical trial results in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease to late onset Alzheimer's disease. We compared brain MRI and amyloid PET data, as well as CSF concentrations of amyloid-β42, amyloid-β40, tau and tau phosphorylated at position 181, in 292 carriers of pathogenic variants for Alzheimer's disease from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network, with corresponding data from 559 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Imaging data and CSF samples were reprocessed as appropriate to guarantee uniform pipelines and assays. Data analyses yielded rates of change before and after symptomatic onset of Alzheimer's disease, allowing the alignment of the ∼30-year age difference between the cohorts on a clinically meaningful anchor point, namely the participant age at symptomatic onset. Biomarker profiles were similar for both autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and late onset Alzheimer's disease. Both groups demonstrated accelerated rates of decline in cognitive performance and in regional brain volume loss after symptomatic onset. Although amyloid burden accumulation as determined by PET was greater after symptomatic onset in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease than in late onset Alzheimer's disease participants, CSF assays of amyloid-β42, amyloid-β40, tau and p-tau181 were largely overlapping in both groups. Rates of change in cognitive performance and hippocampal volume loss after symptomatic onset were more aggressive for autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease participants. These findings suggest a similar pathophysiology of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease and late onset Alzheimer's disease, supporting a shared pathobiological construct., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) workgroups have proposed biological research criteria intended to identify individuals with preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD)., Objective: To assess the clinical value of these biological criteria to identify older individuals without cognitive impairment who are at near-term risk of developing symptomatic AD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used data from 4 independent population-based cohorts (PREVENT-AD, HABS, AIBL, and Knight ADRC) collected between 2003 and 2021. Participants were older adults without cognitive impairment with 1 year or more of clinical observation after amyloid β and tau positron emission tomography (PET). Median clinical follow-up after PET ranged from 1.94 to 3.66 years., Exposures: Based on binary assessment of global amyloid burden (A) and a composite temporal region of tau PET uptake (T), participants were stratified into 4 groups (A+T+, A+T-, A-T+, A-T-). Presence (+) or absence (-) of neurodegeneration (N) was assessed using temporal cortical thickness., Main Outcomes and Measures: Each cohort was analyzed separately. Primary outcome was clinical progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), identified by a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 or greater in Knight ADRC and by consensus committee review in the other cohorts. Clinical raters were blind to imaging, genetic, and fluid biomarker data. A secondary outcome was cognitive decline, based on a slope greater than 1.5 SD below the mean of an independent subsample of individuals without cognitive impairment. Outcomes were compared across the biomarker groups., Results: Among 580 participants (PREVENT-AD, 128; HABS, 153; AIBL, 48; Knight ADRC, 251), mean (SD) age ranged from 67 (5) to 76 (6) years across cohorts, with between 55% (137/251) and 74% (95/128) female participants. Across cohorts, 33% to 83% of A+T+ participants progressed to MCI during follow-up (mean progression time, 2-2.72 years), compared with less than 20% of participants in other biomarker groups. Progression further increased to 43% to 100% when restricted to A+T+(N+) individuals. Cox proportional hazard ratios for progression to MCI in the A+T+ group vs other biomarker groups were all 5 or greater. Many A+T+ nonprogressors also showed longitudinal cognitive decline, while cognitive trajectories in other groups remained predominantly stable., Conclusions and Relevance: The clinical prognostic value of NIA-AA research criteria was confirmed in 4 independent cohorts, with most A+T+(N+) older individuals without cognitive impairment developing AD symptoms within 2 to 3 years.

"Brain-predicted age" quantifies apparent brain age compared to normative neuroimaging trajectories. Advanced brain-predicted age has been well established in symptomatic Alzheimer disease (AD), but is underexplored in preclinical AD. Prior brain-predicted age studies have typically used structural MRI, but resting-state functional connectivity (FC) remains underexplored. Our model predicted age from FC in 391 cognitively normal, amyloid-negative controls (ages 18-89). We applied the trained model to 145 amyloid-negative, 151 preclinical AD, and 156 symptomatic AD participants to test group differences. The model accurately predicted age in the training set. FC-predicted brain age gaps (FC-BAG) were significantly older in symptomatic AD and significantly younger in preclinical AD compared to controls. There was minimal correspondence between networks predictive of age and AD. Elevated FC-BAG may reflect network disruption during symptomatic AD. Reduced FC-BAG in preclinical AD was opposite to the expected direction, and may reflect a biphasic response to preclinical AD pathology or may be driven by inconsistency between age-related vs. AD-related networks. Overall, FC-predicted brain age may be a sensitive AD biomarker., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interests. JC Morris is funded by NIH grants # P30 AG066444; P01AG003991; P01AG026276; U19 AG032438; and U19 AG024904. Neither Dr. Morris nor his family owns stock or has equity interest (outside of mutual funds or other externally directed accounts) in any pharmaceutical or biotechnology company. Dr. Salloway reports personal fees from EISAI, NOVARTIS, GENENTECH, ROCHE, GEMVAX, AVID, and LILLY. Dr. Bateman is on the scientific advisory board of C2N Diagnostics and reports research support from Abbvie, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, Centene, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Genentech, Hoffman-LaRoche, Janssen, and United Neuroscience., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Objectives: To evaluate whether plasma biomarkers of amyloid (Aβ42/Aβ40), tau (p-tau181 and p-tau231), and neuroaxonal injury (neurofilament light chain [NfL]) detect brain amyloidosis consistently across racial groups., Methods: Individuals enrolled in studies of memory and aging who self-identified as African American (AA) were matched 1:1 to self-identified non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals by age, APOE ε4 carrier status, and cognitive status. Each participant underwent blood and CSF collection, and amyloid PET was performed in 103 participants (68%). Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 was measured by a high-performance immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry assay. Plasma p-tau181, p-tau231, and NfL were measured by Simoa immunoassays. CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 and amyloid PET status were used as primary and secondary reference standards of brain amyloidosis, respectively., Results: There were 76 matched pairs of AA and NHW participants (n = 152 total). For both AA and NHW groups, the median age was 68.4 years, 42% were APOE ε4 carriers, and 91% were cognitively normal. AA were less likely than NHW participants to have brain amyloidosis by CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 (22% vs 43% positive; p = 0.003). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status with the plasma biomarkers was as follows: Aβ42/Aβ40, 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.92); p-tau181, 0.76 (0.68-0.84); p-tau231, 0.69 (0.60-0.78); and NfL, 0.64 (0.55-0.73). In models predicting CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status with plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 that included covariates (age, sex, APOE ε4 carrier status, race, and cognitive status), race did not affect the probability of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 positivity. In similar models based on plasma p-tau181, p-tau231, or NfL, AA participants had a lower probability of CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 positivity (odds ratio 0.31 [95% CI 0.13-0.73], 0.30 [0.13-0.71], and 0.27 [0.12-0.64], respectively). Models of amyloid PET status yielded similar findings., Discussion: Models predicting brain amyloidosis using a high-performance plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 assay may provide an accurate and consistent measure of brain amyloidosis across AA and NHW groups, but models based on plasma p-tau181, p-tau231, and NfL may perform inconsistently and could result in disproportionate misdiagnosis of AA individuals., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Hyperphosphorylation of tau leads to conformational changes that destabilize microtubules and hinder axonal transport in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, it remains unknown whether white matter (WM) decline due to AD is associated with specific Tau phosphorylation site(s)., Methods: In autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) mutation carriers (MC) and non-carriers (NC) we compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylation at tau sites (pT217, pT181, pS202, and pT205) and total tau with WM measures, as derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and cognition. A WM composite metric, derived from a principal component analysis, was used to identify spatial decline seen in ADAD., Results: The WM composite explained over 70% of the variance in MC. WM regions that strongly contributed to the spatial topography were located in callosal and cingulate regions. Loss of integrity within the WM composite was strongly associated with AD progression in MC as defined by the estimated years to onset (EYO) and cognitive decline. A linear regression demonstrated that amyloid, gray matter atrophy and phosphorylation at CSF tau site pT205 each uniquely explained a reduction in the WM composite within MC that was independent of vascular changes (white matter hyperintensities), and age. Hyperphosphorylation of CSF tau at other sites and total tau did not significantly predict WM composite loss., Conclusions: We identified a site-specific relationship between CSF phosphorylated tau and WM decline within MC. The presence of both amyloid deposition and Tau phosphorylation at pT205 were associated with WM composite loss. These findings highlight a primary AD-specific mechanism for WM dysfunction that is tightly coupled to symptom manifestation and cognitive decline., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain (NfL) reflects neuro-axonal damage and is increasingly used to evaluate disease progression across neurological conditions including Alzheimer disease (AD). However, it is unknown how NfL relates to specific types of brain tissue. We sought to determine whether CSF NfL is more strongly associated with total gray matter, white matter, or white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and to quantify the relative importance of brain tissue volume, age, and AD marker status (i.e., APOE genotype, brain amyloidosis, tauopathy, and cognitive status) in predicting CSF NfL., Methods: 419 participants (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] Scale > 0, N = 71) had CSF, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neuropsychological data. A subset had amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and tau PET. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the association between CSF NfL and age. Multiple regression was used to determine which brain volume (i.e., gray, white, or WMH volume) most strongly associated with CSF NfL. Stepwise regression and dominance analyses were used to determine the individual contributions and relative importance of brain volume, age, and AD marker status in predicting CSF NfL., Results: CSF NfL increased with age (r = 0.59, p < 0.001). Elevated CSF NfL was associated with greater total WMH volume (p < 0.001), but not gray or white matter volume (p's > 0.05) when considered simultaneously. Age and WMH volume were consistently more important (i.e., have greater R 2 values) than AD markers when predicting CSF NfL., Conclusions: CSF NfL is a non-specific marker of aging and white matter integrity with limited sensitivity to specific markers of AD. CSF NfL likely reflects processes associated with cerebrovascular disease., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Although often unmeasured in studies of cognition, many older adults possess Alzheimer disease (AD) pathologies such as beta-amyloid (Aβ) deposition, despite being asymptomatic. We were interested in examining whether the behavior-structure relationship observed in later life was altered by the presence of preclinical AD pathology. A total of 511 cognitively unimpaired adults completed magnetic resonance imaging and three attentional control tasks; a subset (n = 396) also underwent Aβ-positron emissions tomography. A vertex-wise model was conducted to spatially represent the relationship between cortical thickness and average attentional control accuracy, while moderation analysis examined whether Aβ deposition impacted this relationship. First, we found that reduced cortical thickness in temporal, medial- and lateral-parietal, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, predicted worse performance on the attention task composite. Subsequent moderation analyses observed that levels of Aβ significantly influence the relationship between cortical thickness and attentional control. Our results support the hypothesis that preclinical AD, as measured by Aβ deposition, is partially driving what would otherwise be considered general aging in a cognitively normal adult population., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Therapeutic modulation of TREM2-dependent microglial function might provide an additional strategy to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease. Although studies in animal models suggest that TREM2 is protective against Alzheimer's pathology, its effect on tau pathology and its potential beneficial role in people with Alzheimer's disease is still unclear. Our aim was to study associations between the dynamics of soluble TREM2, as a biomarker of TREM2 signalling, and amyloid β (Aβ) deposition, tau-related pathology, neuroimaging markers, and cognitive decline, during the progression of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease., Methods: We did a longitudinal analysis of data from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) observational study, which includes families with a history of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Participants aged over 18 years who were enrolled in DIAN between Jan 1, 2009, and July 31, 2019, were categorised as either carriers of pathogenic variants in PSEN1, PSEN2, and APP genes (n=155) or non-carriers (n=93). We measured amounts of cleaved soluble TREM2 using a novel immunoassay in CSF samples obtained every 2 years from participants who were asymptomatic (Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR]=0) and annually for those who were symptomatic (CDR>0). CSF concentrations of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau (t-tau), and tau phosphorylated on threonine 181 (p-tau) were measured by validated immunoassays. Predefined neuroimaging measurements were total cortical uptake of Pittsburgh compound B PET (PiB-PET), cortical thickness in the precuneus ascertained by MRI, and hippocampal volume determined by MRI. Cognition was measured using a validated cognitive composite (including DIAN word list test, logical memory delayed recall, digit symbol coding test [total score], and minimental status examination). We based our statistical analysis on univariate and bivariate linear mixed effects models., Findings: In carriers of pathogenic variants, a high amyloid burden at baseline, represented by low CSF Aβ42 (β=-4·28 × 10 -2 [SE 0·013], p=0·0012), but not high cortical uptake in PiB-PET (β=-5·51 × 10 -3 [0·011], p=0·63), was the only predictor of an augmented annual rate of subsequent increase in soluble TREM2. Augmented annual rates of increase in soluble TREM2 were associated with a diminished rate of decrease in amyloid deposition, as measured by Aβ42 in CSF (r=0·56 [0·22], p=0·011), in presymptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants, and with diminished annual rate of increase in PiB-PET (r=-0·67 [0·25], p=0·0060) in symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants. Presymptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants with annual rates of increase in soluble TREM2 lower than the median showed a correlation between enhanced annual rates of increase in p-tau in CSF and augmented annual rates of increase in PiB-PET signal (r=0·45 [0·21], p=0·035), that was not observed in those with rates of increase in soluble TREM2 higher than the median. Furthermore, presymptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants with rates of increase in soluble TREM2 above or below the median had opposite associations between Aβ42 in CSF and PiB-PET uptake when assessed longitudinally. Augmented annual rates of increase in soluble TREM2 in presymptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants correlated with decreased cortical shrinkage in the precuneus (r=0·46 [0·22]), p=0·040) and diminished cognitive decline (r=0·67 [0·22], p=0·0020)., Interpretation: Our findings in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease position the TREM2 response within the amyloid cascade immediately after the first pathological changes in Aβ aggregation and further support the role of TREM2 on Aβ plaque deposition and compaction. Furthermore, these findings underpin a beneficial effect of TREM2 on Aβ deposition, Aβ-dependent tau pathology, cortical shrinkage, and cognitive decline. Soluble TREM2 could, therefore, be a key marker for clinical trial design and interpretation. Efforts to develop TREM2-boosting therapies are ongoing., Funding: German Research Foundation, US National Institutes of Health., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HZ has served at scientific advisory boards for Alector, Eisai, Denali, Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Pinteon Therapeutics, Nervgen, AZTherapies, and CogRx, and has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Alzecure, and Biogen. MS-C has served as a consultant and at advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics International and has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Roche Diagnostics, Sociedad Limitada Unipersonal, and Roche Farma, Sociedad Anónima. AMF participates in the scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, and DiamiR, and collaborates as a consultant for DiamiR and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. TLSB collaborates with Biogen and Siemens as a consultant and participates in the Advisory board of Eisai and Biogen. JH collaborates as a consultant for Roche and Parabon Nanolabs, and participates in the Advisory board of Eisai, CaringBridge, and WallE. EM collaborates as a consultant for Eli Lilly, has received funding for attending meetings from the Alzheimer Association and Foundation Alzheimer, and participates in the Data Safety Monitoring Board of Eli Lilly, Alector, and in the Advisory Board of Fondation Alzheimer, and Alzmend. KS received royalties for co-developing the therapeutic anti-TREM2 mouse antibody 4D9. JCM has served as consultant for Barcelona Beta Brain Research Center, TS Srinivasan Advisory Board (Chennai, India), has received honoraria for lectures given at Montefiori Grand Rounds (NY, USA) and Tetra-Institute Alzheimer Disease Research Center Seminar Series, and participates in the Advisory Boards of Cure Alzheimer's Fund Research Strategy Council and Leads Advisory Board (IN, USA). KB collaborates as a consultant for Abcam, Axon, BioArctic, Biogen, Japanese Organization for Medical Device Development and Shimadzu, Lilly, MagQu, Pharmatrophix, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers, has received honoraria for lectures from Grupo de Estudos de Envelhecimento Cerebral e Demência and Roche Diagnostics, and IFCC and SNIBE, has served at data monitoring committees for Julius Clinical and Novartis, and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, which is a part of Gothenburg University Ventures Incubator programme. JL participates as a consultant in Axon Neuroscience and Biogen, has received honoraria for lectures given by Bayer Vital and Roche, support for attending meetings by AbbVie and Biogen, and has participated in the Advisory board of Axon Neuroscience. JL has also received author fees from Thieme medical publishers, W Kohlhammer GmbH medical publishers, and a compensation for duty as part-time chief marketing officer by MODAG GmbH. RJB collaborates as a consultant with Eisai, Amgen, and Hoffman La-Roche, has received travel support from Hoffman La-Roche, and participates in the C2N Diagnostics Scientific Advisory board. RJB also serves as principal investigator of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network-Treatment Unit (DIAN-TU), which is supported by the Alzheimer's Association, GHR Foundation, an anonymous organisation, and the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (active members include Eli Lilly and Company, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, F Hoffman-La Roche, Genentech, Biogen, Eisai, and Janssen. Previous members include Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and United Neuroscience). In addition, in-kind support has been received from CogState and Signant Health. CH collaborates with Denali Therapeutics, and has participated on one advisory board meeting of Biogen. CH is also chief advisor of ISAR Bioscience and a member of the scientific advisory board of AviadoBio. CH has received honoraria for lectures at Weill Cornell Medicine, Sheikh Hamdan Webinar Series, Washington University, Eisai, and UT Southwestern Medical Center, and participates in the US Patent Application (number 16/319,373)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)