Search

Context: Genetic determinants of Alzheimer disease (AD) have not been comprehensively examined in Caribbean Hispanics, a population in the United States in whom the frequency of AD is higher compared with non-Hispanic whites., Objective: To identify variant alleles in genes related to familial early-onset AD among Caribbean Hispanics., Design and Setting: Family-based case series conducted in 1998-2001 at an AD research center in New York, NY, and clinics in the Dominican Republic., Patients: Among 206 Caribbean Hispanic families with 2 or more living members with AD who were identified, 19 (9.2%) had at least 1 individual with onset of AD before the age of 55 years., Main Outcome Measure: The entire coding region of the presenilin 1 gene and exons 16 and 17 of the amyloid precursor protein gene were sequenced in probands from the 19 families and their living relatives., Results: A G-to-C nucleotide change resulting in a glycine-alanine amino acid substitution at codon 206 (Gly206Ala) in exon 7 of presenilin 1 was observed in 23 individuals from 8 (42%) of the 19 families. A Caribbean Hispanic individual with the Gly206Ala mutation and early-onset familial disease was also found by sequencing the corresponding genes of 319 unrelated individuals in New York City. The Gly206Ala mutation was not found in public genetic databases but was reported in 5 individuals from 4 Hispanic families with AD referred for genetic testing. None of the members of these families were related to one another, yet all carriers of the Gly206Ala mutation tested shared a variant allele at 2 nearby microsatellite polymorphisms, indicating a common ancestor. No mutations were found in the amyloid precursor protein gene., Conclusions: The Gly206Ala mutation was found in 8 of 19 unrelated Caribbean Hispanic families with early-onset familial AD. This genetic change may be a prevalent cause of early-onset familial AD in the Caribbean Hispanic population.

Background: Mutations in the presenilin-1 gene (PS1) account for a majority of patients with early-onset familial AD. However, the clinical indications and algorithms for genetic testing in dementia are still evolving., Methods: The entire open reading frame of the PS1 gene was sequenced in a series of 414 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic testing, including 372 patients with AD and 42 asymptomatic persons with a strong family history of AD., Results: Forty-eight independent patients screened had a PS1 mutation including 21 novel mutations. In addition, 3% of subjects (11/413) had a known polymorphism, the Glu318Gly substitution. The majority of the mutations were missense substitutions but there were three insertions and Delta exon 10 mutation. With six exceptions (codons 35, 178, 352, 354, 358, and 365) most of the mutations occurred at residues conserved in the homologous PS2 gene or in PS1 of other species., Conclusions: Eleven percent of a referral-based series of patients with AD can be explained by coding sequence mutations in the PS1 gene. The high frequency of PS1 mutations in this study indicates that screening for PS1 mutations in AD is likely to be successful, especially when directed at patients with a positive family history with onset before 60 years (90% of those with PS1 mutations were affected by age 60 years). This will also have significance for the secondary identification of at-risk relatives who might be candidates for future prophylactic therapies for AD.

The importance of obtaining an accurate and early diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease is now becoming recognized. Nonpharmacological as well as pharmacological therapies can be best initiated once a diagnosis is obtained. Biochemical markers to identify Alzheimer's disease have been sought for many years, with many candidates proposed. Recently criteria were established to evaluate putative diagnostic tests. Several biomarkers now show utility in identifying those with Alzheimer's disease. The ApoE e4 allele, while a risk factor rather than a deterministic gene, in the context of an individual with suspicion of AD has a positive predictive value of 94-98% and may come to have utility in predicting response to certain classes of pharmacological agents. Independent groups have shown that the markers in cerebrospinal fluid tau and Ab42 are, respectively, elevated and reduced in patients with AD versus other patient groups and that the lumbar puncture itself is usually well tolerated. For early-onset AD, sequencing presenilin 1 has come into use and the positive frequency is similar to that found in other genetic-based laboratory tests.

Objective: To evaluate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of amyloid beta protein ending at amino acid 42 (Abeta42) and tau as markers for Alzheimer disease (AD) and to determine whether clinical variables influence these levels., Design: Cohort study., Setting: Six academic research centers with expertise in dementia., Subjects: Eighty-two patients with probable AD, including 24 with very mild dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score >23/30) (AD group); 60 cognitively normal elderly control subjects (NC group); and 74 subjects with neurological disorders, including dementia (ND group)., Main Outcome Measures: Levels of Abeta42 and tau were compared among AD, NC, and ND groups. Relationships of age, sex, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and apolipoprotein E (Apo E) genotype with these levels were examined using multiple linear regression. Classification tree models were developed to optimize distinguishing AD from NC groups., Results: Levels of Abeta42 were significantly lower, and levels of tau were significantly higher, in the AD group than in the NC or ND group. In the AD group, Abeta42 level was inversely associated with Apo E epsilon4 allele dose and weakly related to Mini-Mental State Examination score; tau level was associated with male sex and 1 Apo E epsilon4 allele. Classification tree analysis, comparing the AD and NC subjects, was 90% sensitive and 80% specific. With specificity set at greater than 90%, the tree was 77% sensitive for AD. This tree classified 26 of 74 members of the ND group as having AD. They had diagnoses difficult to distinguish from AD clinically and a high Apo E epsilon4 allele frequency. Markers in CSF were used to correctly classify 12 of 13 patients who later underwent autopsy, including 1 with AD not diagnosed clinically., Conclusions: Levels of CSF Abeta42 decrease and levels of CSF tau increase in AD. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 had a dose-dependent relationship with CSF levels of Abeta42, but not tau. Other covariates influenced CSF markers minimally. Combined analysis of CSF Abeta42 and tau levels discriminated patients with AD, including patients with mild dementia, from the NC group, supporting use of these proteins to identify AD and to distinguish early AD from aging. In subjects in the ND group with an AD CSF profile, autopsy follow-up will be required to decide whether CSF results are false positive, or whether AD is a primary or concomitant cause of dementia.