Search

Objective: Prospective memory (PM) is the ability to execute a planned action in the future (e.g., remembering to take medication before going to bed). Prior work has suggested that PM failure can account for 50-80% of reported memory problems. Research has also shown that PM becomes increasingly impaired in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) process. To our knowledge, most PM studies use PM accuracy as a measure of PM performance. However, examining the speed of the response as it relates to the AD process remains relatively unexplored. In this study, we examined both PM accuracy and speed in healthy aging, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and AD. Participants and Methods: Participants included healthy older controls (N=65), persons with MCI (N=70), and persons with AD (N=11). The PM task was embedded within a working memory task as PM demands often occur during an ongoing activity in everyday life. For the working memory component of the PM task, participants were shown a series of words and asked to continuously monitor the words while maintaining the last 3 in memory. All words were displayed within 1 of 6 background patterns. For the PM component, participants were asked to press "1" on the keyboard whenever they were shown a particular background pattern on the screen. PM abilities were measured using the median response time and total accuracy. Results: Age was correlated with PM accuracy. An ANCOVA, controlling for age, and examining the impact of diagnosis on PM accuracy, was significant. Post-hoc tests revealed a trend toward the AD and MCI groups being less accurate than healthy controls. In contrast to accuracy, age was not related to PM speed. An ANOVA examining the impact of diagnosis on PM accuracy found that the AD group responded faster than healthy controls. The MCI group did not show differences in speed from the healthy control and AD groups. Conclusions: Overall, the pattern of results differed in accuracy and speed of PM performance. There was a trend for the MCI and AD groups being less accurate than the controls, with no difference in performance between the MCI and AD groups. However, the AD group responded more quickly than the controls, which may have impacted their accuracy. These findings indicate that PM performance differences among groups can be detected by examining speed and not just accuracy. As speed appears to be an essential aspect involved in PM performance, future research should consider incorporating speed as a measure of PM performance when examining PM differences in populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A 30-item confrontation naming test was developed in Argentina for Spanish speakers, The Cordoba Naming Test (CNT). The Boston Naming Test is an established confrontation naming task in the United States. Researchers have used the Boston Naming Test to identify individuals with different clinical pathologies (e.g., Alzheimer's disease). The current literature on how Spanish speakers across various countries perform on confrontational naming tasks is limited. To our knowledge, one study investigated CNT performance across three Spanish-speaking countries (i.e., Argentina, Mexico, and Guatemala). Investigators found that the Guatemalan group underperformed on the CNT compared to the Argentine and Mexican groups. The purpose of this study was to extend the current literature and investigate CNT performance across five Spanish-speaking countries (i.e., Argentina, Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia, United States). We predicted that the Argentine group would outperform the other Spanish-speaking countries. Participants and Methods: The present study sample consisted of 502 neurologically and psychologically healthy participants with a mean age of 29.06 (SD = 13.41) with 14.75 years of education completed (SD = 3.01). Participants were divided into five different groups based on their country of birth and current country residency (i.e., United States, Mexico, Guatemala, Argentina, & Colombia). All participants consented to voluntary participation and completed the CNT and a comprehensive background questionnaire in Spanish. The CNT consisted of 30 black and white line drawings, ranging from easy to hard in difficulty. An ANCOVA, controlling for gender, education, and age, was used to evaluate CNT performance between the five Spanish-speaking country groups. Meanwhile, a Bonferroni post-hoc test was utilized to evaluate the significant differences between Spanish-speaking groups. We used a threshold of p <.05 for statistical significance. Results: Results revealed significant group differences between the five Spanish speaking groups on the CNT, p =.000, np2 =.48. Bonferroni post-hoc test revealed that the United States group significantly underperformed on the CNT compared to all the Spanish-speaking groups. Next, we found the Guatemalan group underperformed on the CNT compared to the Argentinian, Mexican, and Colombian groups. Additionally, we found the Argentinian group outperformed the Mexican, Guatemalan, and United States groups on the CNT. No significant differences were found between the Argentinian group and Colombian group or the Mexican group and Colombian group on the CNT. Conclusions: As predicted, the Argentinian group outperformed all the Spanish-speaking groups on the CNT except the Colombian group. Additionally, we found that the United States group underperformed on the CNT compared to all the Spanish-speaking groups. A possible explanation is that Spanish is not the official language in the United States compared to the rest of the Spanish-speaking groups. Meanwhile, a possible reason why the Argentinian and Colombian groups demonstrated better CNT performances might have been that it was less culturally sensitive than the United States, Mexican, and Guatemalan groups. Further analysis is needed with bigger sample sizes across other Spanish-speaking countries (e.g., Costa Rica, Chile) to evaluate what variables, if any, are influencing CNT performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]