Search

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the 1‐year implant outcome and patient‐related outcome measures (PROMs) after maxillary sinus membrane elevation and coagulum (test) compared with maxillary sinus floor augmentation and a 1:1 ratio of autogenous bone graft from the buccal antrostomy and deproteinised porcine bone mineral (DPBM) (control). Materials and methods: Forty patients (30 female, 10 male) with a mean age of 50 years (range 25–71 years) and an alveolar ridge height between 4 and 7 mm were randomly allocated to test or control. Outcome measures included survival of suprastructures and implants, implant stability quotient, health status of the peri‐implant tissue, peri‐implant marginal bone loss, frequency of complications and PROMs using Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 combined with questionnaires assessing patient's perception of the peri‐implant soft tissue, implant crown, function of the implant, and total implant treatment outcome using visual analogue scale. Mean differences were expressed with standard deviation and 95% confidence interval. Level of significance was 0.05. Results: All suprastructures and implants were well‐functioning after 1‐year of functional implant loading. No significant difference in any of the applied outcome measures was observed between test and control. Both treatments revealed high patient satisfaction scores and significant improvement in oral health‐related quality of life. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in implant outcome and PROMs between test and control, after 1‐year of functional implant loading. Neither of the treatments can therefore be considered better than the other. Thus, long‐term randomized controlled trials are needed before definitive conclusions can be provided about the two treatment modalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective was to assess patient's perception of recovery after maxillary sinus membrane elevation (MSME) and blood coagulum (test) compared with maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) and 1:1 mixture of autogenous bone graft from the buccal antrostomy and deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) (control). Materials and methods: Forty healthy patients were randomly allocated to test or control. Oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) was evaluated by Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 (OHIP‐14) at enrollment and 1 week postsurgical. Recovery was estimated by questionnaires and visual analog scale assessing pain, social and working isolation, physical appearance, eating and speaking ability, diet variations, sleep impairment, and discomfort after 1 week and 1 month. Mean differences were expressed with 95% confidence interval (CI). Association between OHRQoL and recovery was estimated. p‐value below.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Maxillary sinus membrane elevation revealed 2.1 less days of pain (p =.03, 95% CI: 0.2–4.1) and 1.2 days of sick leave (p =.01, 95% CI: 0.3–2.1) compared with MSFA. No significant difference was observed in eating and speaking ability, physical appearance, work performance, and sleep impairment. No significant association between impaired OHRQoL and recovery was observed. Females reported 4.77 higher OHIP‐14 score compared with males (p =.01, 95% CI: 1.60–7.94), while association between age and OHIP‐14 was −0.10 (p =.28, 95% CI: −0.28 to 0.08). Conclusion: Maxillary sinus membrane elevation revealed significantly less days of pain and sick leave compared with MSFA. Harvesting of autogenous bone graft seems, therefore, to have a significant impact on perception of recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective was to assess the one year implant treatment outcome and patient‐related outcome measures (PROMs) following maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with autogenous bone graft (ABG) from the zygomatic buttress (control) compared with 1:1 mixture of ABG and anorganic porcine bone mineral (APBM) (Test I) or biphasic bone graft material (BBGM) (Test II). Materials and Methods: Sixty healthy patients (34 females, 26 males) were randomly allocated to either control or test groups. Outcome measures included survival of suprastructures and implants, implant stability quotient, health status of peri‐implant tissue, peri‐implant marginal bone loss, frequency of complications, and PROMs using Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 combined with questionnaire assessing patient perception of peri‐implant soft tissue, prosthetic solution, implant function, and implant treatment outcome using visual analogue scale. Mean differences were expressed with standard deviation and 95% confidence interval. Level of significance was.05. Results: All suprastructures and implants were well‐functioning after one year of functional implant loading. There was no significant difference between control and test groups in any of the applied outcome measures. The implant stability significantly increased from implant placement to abutment connection within all groups (p <.001). High patient satisfaction and significant improvement in oral health‐related quality of life was also reported within all groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that MSFA with composite grafts containing minimal amounts of ABG reveals comparable implant treatment outcomes as compared with ABG alone, after one year of functional implant loading. Extensive ABG harvesting in conjunction with MSFA therefore seems not to be needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Test the hypothesis of no difference in bone regeneration after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA) with different ratios of iliac or mandibular autogenous bone (AB) graft and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Materials and Methods: Forty minipigs were randomly allocated to bilateral MSFA using: (A) 100% AB, (B) 75% AB and 25% DBBM, (C) 50% AB and 50% DBBM, (D) 25% AB and 75% DBBM, or (E) 100% DBBM. The animals were euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. Percentage of bone, non‐mineralized tissue, and residual DBBM were estimated by histomorphometric analysis in a randomly selected region of interest and summarized as mean percentage with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Mean percentage of bone following MSFA with iliac or mandibular AB graft was: (A) 55.5% and 64.2%, (B) 60.3% and 61.6%, (C) 54.4% and 52.1%, (D) 51.8% and 53.1%, and (E) 47.6%, respectively. There was a significant trend toward a higher percentage of bone, with a higher ratio of AB within the graft (p <.01), regardless of the origin of AB graft (iliac or mandible). Conclusions: The hypothesis was rejected since percentage of bone was significantly increased with larger proportions of AB within the graft. Consequently, AB or a mixture of AB and diminutive quantities of DBBM seem to be the preferred graft for MSFA based solely on histomorphometric assessment. However, it should be emphasized that newly formed bone and residual AB graft particles could not be distinguished by the applied histologic procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]