Search

Patients with inherited α1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency (ZZ-AATD) and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently experience exacerbations. We postulated that inhalation of nebulised AAT would be an effective treatment.We randomly assigned 168 patients to receive twice-daily inhalations of 80 mg AAT solution or placebo for 50 weeks. Patients used an electronic diary to capture exacerbations. The primary endpoint was time from randomisation to the first event-based exacerbation. Secondary endpoints included change in the nature of the exacerbation as defined by the Anthonisen criteria. Safety was also assessed.Time to first moderate or severe exacerbation was a median of 112 days (interquartile range (IQR) 40-211 days) for AAT and 140 days (IQR 72-142 days) for placebo (p=0.0952). The mean yearly rate of all exacerbations was 3.12 in the AAT-treated group and 2.67 in the placebo group (p=0.31). More patients receiving AAT reported treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events compared to placebo (57.5% versus 46.9%, respectively) and they were more likely to withdraw from the study. After the first year of the study, when modifications to the handling of the nebuliser were introduced, the rate of safety events in the AAT-treated group dropped to that of the placebo group.We conclude that in AATD patients with severe COPD and frequent exacerbations, AAT inhalation for 50 weeks showed no effect on time to first exacerbation but may have changed the pattern of the episodes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Stolk reports personal fees for consultancy from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study, and grants from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Tov reports personal fees for consultancy from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study, and is an employee of Kamada Ltd, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.R. Chapman reports personal fees for consultancy from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study, and grants from CSL Behring and Grifols, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Fernandez reports consultancy fees from Kamada Ltd, during the planning, design, conduct and reporting of the study. Conflict of interest: W. MacNee reports patient recruitment fees from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study; and grants and personal fees from Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Zambon and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N.S. Hopkinson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Piitulainen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Seersholm has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C.F. Vogelmeier reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols and Novartis, and personal fees from CSL Behring, Chiesi, Menarini, Mundipharma, Teva and Cipla, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Bals reports grants from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study; and grants from BMBF, DFG, Schwiete Stiftung, Sander-Stiftung and Boehringer Ingelheim, and personal fees for advisory board work and travel to meetings from GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grifols, AstraZeneca and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. McElvaney reports personal fees for advisory board work from CSL Behring, grants and personal fees for advisory board work from Grifols, and grants from Chiesi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.A. Stockley reports personal fees for advisory board membership from Kamada Ltd, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for advisory board membership and lectures from AstraZeneca, personal fees for advisory board membership from Medimmune, Almirall, Baxter, Chiesi and Polyphor, personal fees for lectures from Nycomed and Takeda, and personal fees for advisory board membership, lectures and travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and CSL Behring, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

A female patient was first seen at age 65 due to a diagnosis of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). She was a lifelong non-smoker, with no significant history of second hand smoke exposure. There was no prior family history of AATD or liver disease. Her serum AAT concentration was measured on two occasions and in both cases, concentration was <0.21 g/L. The patient was referred for genetic testing to determine her SERPINA1 (the gene responsible for AATD) genotype. Three deficiency alleles were identified: she was heterozygous for S, a mild deficiency allele, and homozygous for Z, a severe deficiency allele. This case represents unusual convergence of three pathogenic SERPINA1 variants in a single individual. We report the investigations used to clarify her unusual genotype and propose non-crossover gene conversion as the likely mechanism., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency is a hereditary condition characterized by low alpha 1 proteinase inhibitor (also known as alpha 1 antitrypsin [AAT]) serum levels. Reduced levels of AAT allow abnormal degradation of lung tissue, which may ultimately lead to the development of early-onset emphysema. Intravenous infusion of AAT is the only therapeutic option that can be used to maintain levels above the protective threshold. Based on its biochemical efficacy, AAT replacement therapy was approved by the US Food and Drug administration in 1987. However, there remained considerable interest in selecting appropriate outcome measures that could confirm clinical efficacy in a randomized controlled trial setting. Using computed tomography as the primary measure of decline in lung density, the capacity for intravenously administered AAT replacement therapy to slow and modify the course of disease progression was demonstrated for the first time in the Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Augmentation Therapy in Alpha-1 Proteinase Inhibitor Deficiency (RAPID) trial. Following these results, an expert review forum was held at the European Respiratory Society to discuss the findings of the RAPID trial program and how they may change the landscape of alpha 1 antitrypsin emphysema treatment. This review summarizes the results of the RAPID program and the implications for clinical considerations with respect to diagnosis, treatment and management of emphysema due to alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency., Competing Interests: Disclosure Professor McElvaney reports grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Grifols, outside the submitted work. Professor Chapman reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Baxter, grants and personal fees from CSL Behring, grants and personal fees from Grifols, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from Genentech, grants and personal fees from Kamada, grants from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Merck and personal fees from CIHR-GSK Research Chair in Respiratory Health Care Delivery, UHN, during the conduct of the study. Professor Koczulla reports personal fees from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. Dr Ferrarotti reports personal fees from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Aims: Early-onset emphysema attributed to α-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is frequently overlooked and undertreated. RAPID-RCT/RAPID-OLE, the largest clinical trials of purified human α-1 proteinase inhibitor (A 1 -PI; 60 mg kg -1  week -1 ) therapy completed to date, demonstrated for the first time that A 1 -PI is clinically effective in slowing lung tissue loss in AATD. A posthoc pharmacometric analysis was undertaken to further explore dose, exposure and response., Methods: A disease progression model was constructed, utilizing observed A 1 -PI exposure and lung density decline rates (measured by computed tomography) from RAPID-RCT/RAPID-OLE, to predict effects of population variability and higher doses on A 1 -PI exposure and clinical response. Dose-exposure and exposure-response relationships were characterized using nonlinear and linear mixed effects models, respectively. The dose-exposure model predicts summary exposures and not individual concentration kinetics; covariates included baseline serum A 1 -PI, forced expiratory volume in 1 s and body weight. The exposure-response model relates A 1 -PI exposure to lung density decline rate at varying exposure levels., Results: A dose of 60 mg kg -1  week -1 achieved trough serum levels >11 μmol l -1 (putative 'protective threshold') in ≥98% patients. Dose-exposure-response simulations revealed increasing separation between A 1 -PI and placebo in the proportions of patients achieving higher reductions in lung density decline rate; improvements in decline rates ≥0.5 g l -1  year -1 occurred more often in patients receiving A 1 -PI: 63 vs. 12%., Conclusion: Weight-based A 1 -PI dosing reliably raises serum levels above the 11 μmol l -1 threshold. However, our exposure-response simulations question whether this is the maximal, clinically effective threshold for A 1 -PI therapy in AATD. The model suggested higher doses of A 1 -PI would yield greater clinical effects., (© 2017 CSL Behring. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Purified α1 proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) slowed emphysema progression in patients with severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency in a randomised controlled trial (RAPID-RCT), which was followed by an open-label extension trial (RAPID-OLE). The aim was to investigate the prolonged treatment effect of A1PI on the progression of emphysema as assessed by the loss of lung density in relation to RAPID-RCT., Methods: Patients who had received either A1PI treatment (Zemaira or Respreeza; early-start group) or placebo (delayed-start group) in the RAPID-RCT trial were included in this 2-year open-label extension trial (RAPID-OLE). Patients from 22 hospitals in 11 countries outside of the USA received 60 mg/kg per week A1PI. The primary endpoint was annual rate of adjusted 15th percentile lung density loss measured using CT in the intention-to-treat population with a mixed-effects regression model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00670007., Findings: Between March 1, 2006, and Oct 13, 2010, 140 patients from RAPID-RCT entered RAPID-OLE: 76 from the early-start group and 64 from the delayed-start group. Between day 1 and month 24 (RAPID-RCT), the rate of lung density loss in RAPID-OLE patients was lower in the early-start group (-1·51 g/L per year [SE 0·25] at total lung capacity [TLC]; -1·55 g/L per year [0·24] at TLC plus functional residual capacity [FRC]; and -1·60 g/L per year [0·26] at FRC) than in the delayed-start group (-2·26 g/L per year [0·27] at TLC; -2·16 g/L per year [0·26] at TLC plus FRC, and -2·05 g/L per year [0·28] at FRC). Between months 24 and 48, the rate of lung density loss was reduced in delayed-start patients (from -2·26 g/L per year to -1·26 g/L per year), but no significant difference was seen in the rate in early-start patients during this time period (-1·51 g/L per year to -1·63 g/L per year), thus in early-start patients the efficacy was sustained to month 48., Interpretation: RAPID-OLE supports the continued efficacy of A1PI in slowing disease progression during 4 years of treatment. Lost lung density was never recovered, highlighting the importance of early intervention with A1PI treatment., Funding: CSL Behring., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy of α1 proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) augmentation treatment for α1 antitrypsin deficiency has not been substantiated by a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. CT-measured lung density is a more sensitive measure of disease progression in α1 antitrypsin deficiency emphysema than spirometry is, so we aimed to assess the efficacy of augmentation treatment with this measure., Methods: The RAPID study was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial of A1PI treatment in patients with α1 antitrypsin deficiency. We recruited eligible non-smokers (aged 18-65 years) in 28 international study centres in 13 countries if they had severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency (serum concentration <11 μM) with a forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 35-70% (predicted). We excluded patients if they had undergone, or were on the waiting list to undergo, lung transplantation, lobectomy, or lung volume-reduction surgery, or had selective IgA deficiency. We randomly assigned patients (1:1; done by Accovion) using a computerised pseudorandom number generator (block size of four) with centre stratification to receive A1PI intravenously 60 mg/kg per week or placebo for 24 months. All patients and study investigators (including those assessing outcomes) were unaware of treatment allocation throughout the study. Primary endpoints were CT lung density at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC) combined, and the two separately, at 0, 3, 12, 21, and 24 months, analysed by modified intention to treat (patients needed at least one evaluable lung density measurement). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00261833. A 2-year open-label extension study was also completed (NCT00670007)., Findings: Between March 1, 2006, and Nov 3, 2010, we randomly allocated 93 (52%) patients A1PI and 87 (48%) placebo, analysing 92 in the A1PI group and 85 in the placebo group. The annual rate of lung density loss at TLC and FRC combined did not differ between groups (A1PI -1·50 g/L per year [SE 0·22]; placebo -2·12 g/L per year [0·24]; difference 0·62 g/L per year [95% CI -0·02 to 1·26], p=0·06). However, the annual rate of lung density loss at TLC alone was significantly less in patients in the A1PI group (-1·45 g/L per year [SE 0·23]) than in the placebo group (-2·19 g/L per year [0·25]; difference 0·74 g/L per year [95% CI 0·06-1·42], p=0·03), but was not at FRC alone (A1PI -1·54 g/L per year [0·24]; placebo -2·02 g/L per year [0·26]; difference 0·48 g/L per year [-0·22 to 1·18], p=0·18). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups, with 1298 occurring in 92 (99%) patients in the A1PI group and 1068 occuring in 86 (99%) in the placebo group. 71 severe treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 25 (27%) patients in the A1PI group and 58 occurred in 27 (31%) in the placebo group. One treatment-emergent adverse event leading to withdrawal from the study occurred in one patient (1%) in the A1PI group and ten occurred in four (5%) in the placebo group. One death occurred in the A1PI group (respiratory failure) and three occurred in the placebo group (sepsis, pneumonia, and metastatic breast cancer)., Interpretation: Measurement of lung density with CT at TLC alone provides evidence that purified A1PI augmentation slows progression of emphysema, a finding that could not be substantiated by lung density measurement at FRC alone or by the two measurements combined. These findings should prompt consideration of augmentation treatment to preserve lung parenchyma in individuals with emphysema secondary to severe α1 antitrypsin deficiency., Funding: CSL Behring., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since 1999, as part of the Alpha1 International Registry (AIR), the Canadian Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD) Registry has maintained demographic and medical information volunteered by AATD individuals., Methods: We undertook a retrospective chart review to describe the characteristics of registry participants. Inclusion criteria were ZZ phenotype or other severe deficiency and written consent. We reviewed baseline medical records and annual follow-ups, conducted by mail., Results: The number of registrants ranged from 8.7 per million in British Columbia and Ontario to 1.3 per million in Quebec. Similarly, the rate of augmentation therapy use ranged from 7.7 per million in British Columbia to 0.1 per million in Quebec. 290 patients (146 males), most PiZZ, were enrolled by 2013. Patients with lung disease reported symptoms onset at (mean ± SD) 40 ± 11 years but were diagnosed as AATD at 47 ± 10 years. Typical patients were ex-smokers with respiratory symptoms, severely reduced FEV1, an accelerated rate of FEV1 decline, and minimal bronchodilator response. A subgroup diagnosed by liver disease or familial screening was younger and had better preserved lung function but a similar rate of FEV1 decline. There were 63 deaths, of which 29 were lung-related and 6 were liver-related. Average age at death was 60.5 ± 11.2 years., Discussion: Most patients experience a diagnostic delay of seven years after symptom onset, a period during which lung health may deteriorate further. There is marked regional variation in the rate of diagnosis and specific therapy usage for AAT in Canada.

Background: Alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is characterized by low blood levels of alpha1-proteinase inhibitor (alpha₁-PI) and may lead to emphysema. Alpha₁-PI protects pulmonary tissue from damage caused by the action of proteolytic enzymes. Augmentation therapy with Prolastin® (Alpha₁-Proteinase Inhibitor [Human]) to increase the levels of alpha₁-PI has been used to treat individuals with AAT deficiency for over 20 years. Modifications to the Prolastin manufacturing process, incorporating additional purification and pathogen-reduction steps, have led to the development of an alpha₁-PI product, designated Prolastin®-C (Alpha₁-Proteinase inhibitor [Human]). The pharmacokinetic comparability of Prolastin-C to Prolastin was assessed in subjects with AAT deficiency., Methods: In total, 24 subjects were randomized to receive 60 mg/kg of functionally active Prolastin-C or Prolastin by weekly intravenous infusion for 8 weeks before crossover to the alternate treatment for another 8 weeks. Pharmacokinetic plasma samples were drawn over 7 days following last dose in the first treatment period and over 10 days following the last dose in the second period. The primary end point for pharmacokinetic comparability was area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over 7 days post dose (AUC₀₋₇ (days)) of alpha₁-PI determined by potency (functional activity) assay. The crossover phase was followed by an 8-week open-label treatment phase with Prolastin-C only., Results: Mean AUC₀₋₇ (days) was 155.9 versus 152.4 mg*h/mL for Prolastin-C and Prolastin, respectively. The geometric least squares mean ratio of AUC₀₋₇ (days) for Prolastin-C versus Prolastin had a point estimate of 1.03 and a 90% confidence interval of 0.97-1.09, demonstrating pharmacokinetic equivalence between the 2 products. Adverse events were similar for both treatments and occurred at a rate of 0.117 and 0.078 per infusion for Prolastin-C (double-blind treatment phase only) and Prolastin, respectively (p = 0.744). There were no treatment-emergent viral infections in any subject for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or C, or parvovirus B19 during the course of the study., Conclusion: Prolastin-C demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence and a comparable safety profile to Prolastin., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00295061.

Background: Augmentation with exogenous alpha1-antitrypsin (alpha1-AT) is the only specific therapy for alpha1-AT deficiency. Uncertainty persists concerning its effectiveness., Purpose: To test the hypothesis that augmentation therapy in patients with alpha1-AT deficiency slows the decline in FEV1., Study Selection: Randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies with either parallel-group design or single cohort pre-post design were eligible if they compared augmentation therapy with a control regimen and if long-term (> 1 y) longitudinal FEV1 follow-up data were collected., Data Synthesis: FEV1 data from five trials with 1509 patients were combined by random effects meta-analysis. The decline in FEV1 was slower by 23% (absolute difference, 13.4 ml/year; CI, 1.5 to 25.3 ml/year) among all patients receiving augmentation therapy. This overall protective effect reflected predominantly the results in the subset of patients with baseline FEV1 30-65% of predicted. In that subset, augmentation was associated with a 26% reduction in rate of FEV1 decline (absolute difference, 17.9 ml/year; CI, 9.6 to 26.1 ml/year). Similar trends amongst patients with baseline FEV1 percent of predicted < 30% or > 65% were not statistically significant., Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the conclusion that augmentation can slow lung function decline in patients with AAT deficiency Patients with moderate obstruction are most likely to benefit.

Severe alpha(1)-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency is an inherited disorder that leads to the development of emphysema in smokers at a relatively young age; most are disabled in their forties. Emphysema is caused by the protease-antiprotease imbalance when smoking-induced release of neutrophil elastase in the lung is inadequately inhibited by the deficient levels of AAT, the major inhibitor of neutrophil elastase. This protease-antiprotease imbalance leads to proteolytic damage to lung connective tissue (primarily elastic fibers), and the development of panacinar emphysema. AAT replacement therapy, most often applied by weekly intravenous infusions of AAT purified from human plasma, has been used to partially correct the biochemical defect and raise the serum AAT level above a theoretically protective threshold level of 0.8 g/L. A randomized controlled clinical trial was not considered feasible when purified antitrypsin was released for clinical use. However, AAT replacement therapy has not yet been proven to be clinically effective in reducing the progression of disease in AAT-deficient patients. There was a suggestion of a slower progression of emphysema by computed tomography (CT) scan in a small randomized trial. Two nonrandomized studies comparing AAT-deficient patients already receiving replacement therapy with those not receiving it, and a retrospective study evaluating a decline in FEV(1) before and after replacement therapy, suggested a possible benefit for selected patients. Because of the lack of definitive proof of the clinical effectiveness of AAT replacement therapy and its cost, we recommend reserving AAT replacement therapy for deficient patients with impaired FEV(1) (35-65% of predicted value), who have quit smoking and are on optimal medical therapy but continue to show a rapid decline in FEV(1) after a period of observation of at least 18 months. A randomized placebo-controlled trial using CT scan as the primary outcome measure is required. Screening for AAT deficiency is recommended in patients with chronic irreversible airflow obstruction with atypical features such as early onset of disease or disability in their forties or fifties, or positive family history, and in immediate family members of patients with AAT deficiency.

Objective: To prepare new guidelines for the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) regarding severe alpha1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency and AAT replacement therapy., Materials and Methods: Previously published guidelines and the medical literature about AAT deficiency and AAT replacement were reviewed. The prepared statement was reviewed and approved by the CTS Standards and Executive Committees., Results: Three studies evaluated AAT replacement. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's AAT Registry was a nonrandomized comparison of patients receiving and not receiving AAT replacement, and evaluated the decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in 927 subjects. The rate of FEV1 decline was significantly less in those receiving AAT treatment (66 +/- SE 5 mL/year versus 93 +/- SE 11 mL/year; P=0.03) only in the subgroup with FEV1 35% to 49% predicted. In another study comparing 198 German patients receiving weekly AAT infusions and 97 untreated Danish patients, the mean annual decline in FEV1 was significantly less in treated patients only in the subgroup with FEV1 31% to 65% predicted (62 mL versus 83 mL, P=0.04). Neither of these studies was a randomized, controlled study and, thus, cannot be taken as proof of efficacy. A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of monthly replacement therapy over three years in 56 exsmokers with severe AAT deficiency and moderate emphysema showed a trend (P=0.07) favouring slower progression of emphysema by computed tomography scan in the group receiving AAT replacement., Conclusions: AAT replacement therapy has not been proven definitively to be clinically effective in reducing the progression of disease in AAT-deficient patients, but there is a possible benefit to selected patients. A placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial of AAT replacement therapy is required. The authors recommend reserving AAT replacement therapy for AAT-deficient patients with impaired FEV1 of 35% to 50% predicted who have quit smoking and are on optimal medical therapy but continue to show a rapid decline in FEV1, and participation of all AAT-deficient subjects in the Canadian AAT Registry.