Search

Importance: Baricitinib has demonstrated efficacy for treating severe alopecia areata in adults. There is currently limited information about the need for continuous therapy after achieving scalp hair regrowth., Objective: To report results from the randomized withdrawal period of the BRAVE-AA1 trial., Design, Setting, and Participants: BRAVE-AA1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial with a treatment withdrawal substudy that was conducted at 70 centers in 3 countries beginning in March 2019. It included 654 adults with severe alopecia areata (AA) (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score ≥50) who were randomized 3:2:2 to receive treatment with baricitinib, 4 mg; baricitinib, 2 mg; or placebo. Data were analyzed in August 2023., Intervention: At week 52, 154 patients who were responders (SALT score ≤20) were rerandomized 3:1 to continue to take their current dose of baricitinib or transition to placebo (randomized withdrawal). Responders randomized to placebo who experienced a loss of treatment benefit (>20-point worsening in SALT score) at any time after week 52 were retreated with their original baricitinib dose., Main Outcome and Measures: The proportion of patients who lost treatment benefit through week 152 and the proportion of patients who recaptured response after retreatment. The last observation carried forward was used to impute missing or censored data., Results: Of 654 patients who received treatment, the mean (SD) age was 37.1 (13.0) years, and there were 383 women (58.6%). At week 52, 10 of 39 responders taking baricitinib, 2 mg, and 30 of 115 responders taking baricitinib, 4 mg, were rerandomized to placebo. At 4 and 8 weeks of treatment withdrawal, 0% and 10% to 11% of patients, respectively, lost treatment benefit regardless of dose. At week 152, 80% of patients had lost benefit compared with 7% for those who continued baricitinib therapy for both dose groups. Within the follow-up observation periods, 5 of 8 patients taking 2 mg (63%) and 21 of 24 patients taking 4 mg (87.5%) recaptured a SALT score of 20 or less response after retreatment., Conclusions and Relevance: Severe AA is a chronic, relapsing condition, and this randomized clinical trial found that withdrawal of therapy for a patient population with severe AA who had achieved meaningful hair regrowth after 1 year of treatment with baricitinib resulted in loss of benefit for almost all patients, indicating that continued therapy is required to maintain hair regrowth., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03570749.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes non-scarring hair loss. Data are lacking on the epidemiology and clinical and economic burden of AA in Spain. To estimate the prevalence and incidence of AA in Spain and describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs. This was an observational, retrospective, descriptive study based on the Health Improvement Network (THIN®) database (Cegedim Health Data, Spain). Patients with ICD9-Code 704.01 for AA, registered between 2014 and 2021, were identified. Prevalence (%) and incidence rates per 1,000 patient-years (IR) of AA were calculated and clinical characteristics, treatment characteristics and HCRU/costs were assessed. A total of 5,488 patients with AA were identified. The point prevalence of AA in 2021 was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.45) overall, 0.48 (0.47-0.49) in adults, and 0.23 (0.21-0.26) in children ≤12 years. The 2021 IR for AA in adults was 0.55 (0.51-0.60). Of 3,351 adults with AA, 53.4% were female, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 43.1 (14.7) years, and 41.6% experienced comorbidities. Among adults, 2.7% used systemic treatment (0.5% immunosuppressants, 2.5% oral corticosteroids, 0.3% both). Laboratory tests and health care professional visits were the principal drivers of cost, which was €821.2 (1065.6)/patient in the first year after diagnosis. The epidemiology of AA in Spain is comparable with that reported for other countries, being more prevalent among adults. There is a significant burden of comorbidities and cost for patients, with limited use of systemic treatments, suggesting an unmet treatment need in this population.

Importance: Current measures of alopecia areata (AA) severity, such as the Severity of Alopecia Tool score, do not adequately capture overall disease impact., Objective: To explore factors associated with AA severity beyond scalp hair loss, and to support the development of the Alopecia Areata Severity and Morbidity Index (ASAMI)., Evidence Review: A total of 74 hair and scalp disorder specialists from multiple continents were invited to participate in an eDelphi project consisting of 3 survey rounds. The first 2 sessions took place via a text-based web application following the Delphi study design. The final round took place virtually among participants via video conferencing software on April 30, 2022., Findings: Of all invited experts, 64 completed the first survey round (global representation: Africa [4.7%], Asia [9.4%], Australia [14.1%], Europe [43.8%], North America [23.4%], and South America [4.7%]; health care setting: public [20.3%], private [28.1%], and both [51.6%]). A total of 58 specialists completed the second round, and 42 participated in the final video conference meeting. Overall, consensus was achieved in 96 of 107 questions. Several factors, independent of the Severity of Alopecia Tool score, were identified as potentially worsening AA severity outcomes. These factors included a disease duration of 12 months or more, 3 or more relapses, inadequate response to topical or systemic treatments, rapid disease progression, difficulty in cosmetically concealing hair loss, facial hair involvement (eyebrows, eyelashes, and/or beard), nail involvement, impaired quality of life, and a history of anxiety, depression, or suicidal ideation due to or exacerbated by AA. Consensus was reached that the Alopecia Areata Investigator Global Assessment scale adequately classified the severity of scalp hair loss., Conclusions and Relevance: This eDelphi survey study, with consensus among global experts, identified various determinants of AA severity, encompassing not only scalp hair loss but also other outcomes. These findings are expected to facilitate the development of a multicomponent severity tool that endeavors to competently measure disease impact. The findings are also anticipated to aid in identifying candidates for current and emerging systemic treatments. Future research must incorporate the perspectives of patients and the public to assign weight to the domains recognized in this project as associated with AA severity.

Trichoscopy is a simple, noninvasive office procedure that can be performed using a handheld or digital dermatoscope. This tool has gained popularity in recent years, because it provides useful diagnostic information for hair loss and scalp disorders by enabling the visualization and identification of distinctive signs and structures. We present an updated review of the trichoscopic features described for some of the most common hair loss disorders seen in clinical practice. Dermatologists should be familiar with these helpful features, as they can significantly aid the diagnosis and follow-up of numerous conditions, such as alopecia areata, trichotillomania, and frontal fibrosing alopecia., (Copyright © 2022 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease that affects the hair follicle and can present as bald patches on the scalp and hair loss in other parts of the body. Diagnosis is clinical but can be aided by trichoscopy, a simple, rapid technique that reduces the need for invasive procedures and can also help with monitoring treatment response. We review the usefulness of trichoscopy in alopecia areata. The most common trichoscopic findings are yellow dots, black dots, exclamation mark hairs, short vellus hairs, and coudability hairs. Other, less common, findings can also help establish a diagnosis. Good response to treatment is indicated by the disappearance of black dots, broken hairs, and exclamation mark hairs. The observation of yellow dots, by contrast, indicates chronic disease and poor response to treatment., (Copyright © 2022 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None disclosed.

Topical immunotherapy with dyphencyprone (DPCP) is widely used in patients with alopecia areata (AA). It can produce a contact dermatitis that is believed to decrease Th1 response, predominant in AA. It has been shown that imiquimod (IMQ), a topical immunomodulator drug, can produce sensitization to DPCP in patients that do not show signs of contact dermatitis when exposed to DPCP. Nevertheless, there is no evidence as to whether it can improve DPCP efficacy in already sensitized patients. We present a series of 9 patients, (7 females [77%] and 2 males [22%]) with a mean age of 38.4 years (range, 19-60 years), successfully sensitized to DPCP, that were treated with a combination of DPCP and IMQ. The mean SALT (Severity of Alopecia Tool) score before adding IMQ was 43.3 (range, 10-60), and the mean number of months of DPCP use prior to the addition of IMQ was 6.8 (range 0-10). After adding IMQ to their DPCP treatment, 77% of the patients had further improvement, with a mean SALT reduction of 13.3 (range, [-50] - 40), and a mean duration of response of 5.2 months. No adverse effects were reported. According to this data, we believe that the combination of DPCP and IMQ can be a promising way of improving the efficacy of contact immunotherapy in AA, and requires further study., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Importance: A recent expert consensus exercise emphasized the importance of developing a global network of patient registries for alopecia areata to redress the paucity of comparable, real-world data regarding the effectiveness and safety of existing and emerging therapies for alopecia areata., Objective: To generate core domains and domain items for a global network of alopecia areata patient registries., Evidence Review: Sixty-six participants, representing physicians, patient organizations, scientists, the pharmaceutical industry, and pharmacoeconomic experts, participated in a 3-round eDelphi process, culminating in a face-to-face meeting at the World Congress of Dermatology, Milan, Italy, June 14, 2019., Findings: Ninety-two core data items, across 25 domains, achieved consensus agreement. Twenty further noncore items were retained to facilitate data harmonization in centers that wish to record them. Broad representation across multiple stakeholder groups was sought; however, the opinion of physicians was overrepresented., Conclusions and Relevance: This study identifies the domains and domain items required to develop a global network of alopecia areata registries. These domains will facilitate a standardized approach that will enable the recording of a comprehensive, comparable data set required to oversee the introduction of new therapies and harness real-world evidence from existing therapies at a time when the alopecia areata treatment paradigm is being radically and positively disrupted. Reuse of similar, existing frameworks in atopic dermatitis, produced by the Treatment of Atopic Eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce, increases the potential to reuse existing resources, creates opportunities for comparison of data across dermatology subspecialty disease areas, and supports the concept of data harmonization.

Background: Alopecia areata totalis (AAT) and universalis (AAU) pose a therapeutic challenge., Objective: To describe the clinical and epidemiological features, therapeutic response and prognostic factors in a large series of patients diagnosed with AAT and AAU., Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed with AAT/AAU with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Response was assessed based on the regrowth of scalp hair., Results: In all, 132 patients (92 women and 40 men) - 80 (61%) diagnosed with AAU and 52 (39%) diagnosed with AAT - were included. The median time between the presentation of alopecia areata (AA) and the development of extensive AA was 1 year and it was less than 4 years in 121 patients (91%). There was an initial response to treatment in 64% of patients, although only 14% presented a persistent response. Adverse side effects from the medications used were detected in 33% of patients. The prognostic factors associated with poor response were the presence of AAU and a positive family history of AA., Conclusions: Treatment of AAT and AAU is challenging. Although an initial regrowth may be achieved, the duration of response is usually short. There were no significant differences on the effectiveness or duration of response between the various systemic therapies., (© 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Alopecia areata on the beard area (BAA) is a common clinical manifestation, but there are no studies about its characteristics., Objective: To describe the epidemiology, comorbidities, clinical presentation, evolution, diagnostic findings and therapeutic choices in a series of patients with BAA., Methods: This retrospective multicentre review included patients diagnosed with BAA as the first and unique clinical manifestation with at least 12 months of follow-up. Diagnosis was performed based on the typical clinical features. Extra-beard involvement was monitored in all cases., Results: Overall, 55 male patients with a mean age of 39.1 years (range 20-74) were included. Twenty-five patients (45.5%) developed alopecia of the scalp during follow-up and more than 80% of cases appeared in the first 12.4 months. Clinical presentation of AA on the scalp was patchy AA (less than 5 patches) (52%), multifocal AA (28%), AA totalis (12%) and AA universalis (8%). Multivariate analysis revealed a trend of association between scalp involvement and family history of AA without statistical significance., Conclusions: According to this study, BAA may progress to scalp AA in a significant number of patients (45.5% of the patients with a follow-up interval of at least 12 months). In the group of patients who developed scalp AA, 80% of them did it within the first 12 months, so follow-up of patients with BAA is highly encouraged., (© 2016 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Folliculitis decalvans (FD) is a rare neutrophilic scarring alopecia that represents a therapeutic challenge for dermatologists., Objective: To describe the epidemiology, comorbidities, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings and therapeutic options in a large series of patients with FD., Methods: This retrospective multicentre review includes patients diagnosed with FD based on clinical and histopathologic findings. The clinical severity was determined by the maximum diameter of the largest alopecic patch (slight: <2 cm, moderate: 2-4.99 cm, severe: 5 cm or more). Response to therapy was assessed as improvement, worsening or stabilization depending on the clinical symptoms (pruritus and trichodynia), inflammatory signs (erythema, pustules and crusts) and the extension of the alopecic patch., Results: Overall, 82 patients (52 males and 30 females) with a mean age of 35 years were included. No significant comorbidities were present. A family history was present in three males. Severe FD was observed in 17 patients (21%). The independent factors associated with severe FD after multivariate analysis were: onset of FD before 25 years of age and presence of pustules. Oral antibiotics (tetracyclines and the combination of clindamycin and rifampicin) improved 90% and 100% of the patients, with a mean duration of response of 4.6 and 7.2 months respectively., Conclusions: The onset of FD before 25 years of age and the presence of pustules within the alopecic patch were associated with severe FD. Tetracyclines and the combination of clindamycin and rifampicin were the most useful treatments., (© 2015 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

This article presents a case series of hair system-induced alopecia in six Caucasian women. The patients experienced exacerbated hair loss in areas where the hair system was attached. Trichoscopy revealed features of both traction alopecia and pressure alopecia, suggesting a combined mechanism of action. The study highlights the need for dermatologists to be aware of this complication and familiar with trichoscopy to differentiate it from other conditions. However, the study has limitations, including a small sample size and lack of histopathological studies. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp (EPDS) is characterized by crusted erosions or superficial ulcerations that lead to scarring alopecia. Objectives and Methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective clinical study including 56 patients (29 females and 27 males, mean age 62.7) with a confirmed EPDS in order to describe epidemiology, clinical findings and therapeutic choices of this disease. Results: Mechanical/chemical trauma was reported in 28.6%, a previous infection in 10.7%, a previous cryotherapy in 5.4% androgenetic alopecia in 48.2% and severe actinic damage in 25%. Trichoscopy showed absence of follicular ostia, tufted and broken hair, crusts, serous exudate, dilated vessels, pustules and hyperkeratosis. Histopathology revealed three different features, depending on the disease duration. The most prescribed therapy was topical steroids (62.5%), followed by the combination of topical steroids and topical tacrolimus (8.9%), systemic steroids (7.1%) and topical tacrolimus (5.4%). A reduction of inflammatory signs was observed in 28 patients (50%) treated with topical steroids and in all three patients treated with topical tacrolimus. Conclusion: The relatively high number of patients collected allowed us to identify a better diagnostic approach, using trichoscopy and a more effective therapeutic strategy, with high‐potency steroids or tacrolimus, which should be considered as first‐line treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1): (a) Cluster 1 grouped 25 patients (45.5%); (b) Cluster 2 included 23 patients (41.1%); and Cluster 3 with 8 patients (13.4%). The trichoscopic features of FFA have been described before in large groups of patients with FFA, often not categorized by the severity of the disease.1,2 Mild cases of FFA may not show these trichoscopic findings and diagnosis would be delayed. [Extracted from the article]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Severity Index (FFASI): a validated scoring system for assessing frontal fibrosing alopecia," by S. Holmes in the 2016 issue.