Search

Fungal canker pathogens of almond initiate infection in trees primarily through pruning wounds. Biological control agents (BCAs) have the potential to provide long-term protection of pruning wounds by colonizing the wound surfaces and underlying tissues. Laboratory and field tests were performed to assess the efficacy of various commercial and experimental BCAs as wound protectants against almond canker pathogens. Four Trichoderma-based BCAs were evaluated using detached almond stems in the laboratory against the canker pathogens Cytospora plurivora, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum, and Neoscytalidium dimidiatum. Results indicated that Trichoderma atroviride SC1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 significantly reduced infections by all four pathogens. The abilities of these four BCAs to protect almond pruning wounds against E. lata and N. parvum were further evaluated in field trials using two almond cultivars and during two consecutive years. Both T. atroviride SC 1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 protected almond pruning wounds against E. lata and N. parvum as efficiently as thiophanate-methyl, the recommended fungicide for treatment of almond pruning wounds. Comparisons of different application timings of BCA in relation to pathogen inoculation revealed a significant improvement in wound protection when inoculations were conducted 7 days versus 24 h post-BCA application for N. parvum, but not for E. lata. T. atroviride SC 1 and T. paratroviride RTFT014 are promising candidates for the preventive protection of almond pruning wounds and for inclusion in integrated pest management programs and organic almond production systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerous fungal canker pathogens threaten almond production in California, causing high tree mortality and reducing orchard longevity. Pruning wounds are the main infection sites for these pathogens. This study aimed to identify the lowest risk period for pruning almond trees and to determine the duration of susceptibility of pruning wounds to fungal infections. During 2 years at two locations, pruning wounds were made monthly from September to January and inoculated with Botryosphaeria dothidea, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum or Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds were susceptible to infection by N. parvum and N. dimidiatum from September to December, with a significant decrease in susceptibility for wounds made in January relative to September. Fresh wounds had the highest probability of infection by N. dimidiatum, as wounds 1 week or older were less likely to be infected. Pruning month did not significantly impact wound susceptibility to B. dothidea; susceptibility decreased sharply with wound age. Wound susceptibility to E. lata significantly differed amongst pruning months, with pruning wounds of 1 week or older made in December and January being the least susceptible. These results indicated that delayed pruning in December and January can reduce the risks of canker pathogen infections compared to early pruning from September to November. This study showed that pruning wounds were most susceptible to infection during the first 2 weeks following pruning; thus, pruning wounds should be protected for at least 2 weeks shortly after pruning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]