Search

Numerous fungal canker pathogens threaten almond production in California, causing high tree mortality and reducing orchard longevity. Pruning wounds are the main infection sites for these pathogens. This study aimed to identify the lowest risk period for pruning almond trees and to determine the duration of susceptibility of pruning wounds to fungal infections. During 2 years at two locations, pruning wounds were made monthly from September to January and inoculated with Botryosphaeria dothidea, Eutypa lata, Neofusicoccum parvum or Neoscytalidium dimidiatum, at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 8 weeks after pruning. Pruning wounds were susceptible to infection by N. parvum and N. dimidiatum from September to December, with a significant decrease in susceptibility for wounds made in January relative to September. Fresh wounds had the highest probability of infection by N. dimidiatum, as wounds 1 week or older were less likely to be infected. Pruning month did not significantly impact wound susceptibility to B. dothidea; susceptibility decreased sharply with wound age. Wound susceptibility to E. lata significantly differed amongst pruning months, with pruning wounds of 1 week or older made in December and January being the least susceptible. These results indicated that delayed pruning in December and January can reduce the risks of canker pathogen infections compared to early pruning from September to November. This study showed that pruning wounds were most susceptible to infection during the first 2 weeks following pruning; thus, pruning wounds should be protected for at least 2 weeks shortly after pruning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Trunk and scaffold canker diseases (TSCDs) of almond cause significant yield and tree losses and reduce the lifespan of orchards. In California, several pathogens cause TSCDs, including Botryosphaeriaceae, Ceratocystis destructans, Eutypa lata, Collophorina hispanica, Pallidophorina paarla, Cytospora, Diaporthe, and Phytophthora spp. Field diagnosis of TSCDs is challenging because symptom delineation among the diseases is not clear. Accurate diagnosis of the causal species requires detailed examination of symptoms and subsequent isolation on medium and identification using morphological criteria and subsequent confirmation using molecular tools. The process is time-consuming and difficult, particularly as morphological characteristics are variable and overlap among species. To facilitate diagnosis of TSCD, we developed PCR assays using 23 species-specific primers designed by exploiting sequence differences in the translation elongation factor, ß-tubulin, or internal transcribed spacer gene. Using genomic DNA from pure cultures of each fungal and oomycete species, each primer pair successfully amplified a single DNA fragment from the target pathogen but not from selected nontarget pathogens or common endophytes. Although 10-fold serial dilution of fungal DNA extracted from either pure cultures or infected wood samples detected as little as 0.1 pg of DNA sample, consistent detection required 10 ng of pathogen DNA from mycelial samples or from wood chips or drill shavings from artificially or naturally infected almond wood samples with visible symptoms. The new PCR assay represents an improved tool for diagnostic laboratories and will be critical to implement effective disease surveillance and control measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]