Search

Objective: This study examined the reciprocal effects between therapeutic agency, working alliance, and symptoms during psychotherapy. We aimed to predict symptom improvement by previous changes in either agency or alliance. In addition, we examined whether alliance development was predicted by previous changes in agency. Method: A sample of 386 patients in psychodynamic outpatient psychotherapy answered the Therapeutic Agency Inventory (TAI), the Working Alliance Inventory-SR (WAI-SR), and the Symptom Checklist-K11 (SCL-K11) after Sessions 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20. Dynamic panel models were estimated using structural equation modeling. Associations were tested while controlling for autoregressive effects and differentiating within-person changes over time from between-person differences. Results: Increases in agency predicted subsequent symptom improvement. Similarly, increases in alliance predicted subsequent symptom improvement. For agency and alliance, we found a more complex pattern with varying reciprocal effects over time. Conclusions: Findings show evidence for agency and alliance as curative change factors in psychodynamic psychotherapy. The study supports the importance of both agency and alliance and further suggests that both mechanisms may need to be balanced in successful psychotherapies. Public Health Significance: This study highlights the importance of including patients as active agents of change in psychotherapy. Patients who experience higher intentional influence over the process of psychotherapeutic change show an improved symptom response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate associations between patients' subjective agency, their observable in‐session behavior, and the patient–therapist interaction during the early phase of psychotherapy. Methods: The sample included 52 depressed patients in psychodynamic psychotherapy. After Session 5, the patients' agency and the quality of the therapeutic alliance were assessed. Based on session recordings, two independent observers rated the patients' involvement, their interpersonal behavior, and the therapists' directiveness. Results: Higher agency was associated with stronger therapeutic alliances. Patients who indicated higher agency in their therapy participated more actively in the session and showed less hostile impact messages. Patients' agency was not related to therapists' directiveness. Conclusions: Patients' sense of agency in psychotherapy was associated with more active involvement and affiliative interaction. The findings support the idea that patients need to feel capable of acting within and having an influence on their therapy to benefit from it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Panic disorder (PD) is associated with significant personal, social, and economic costs. However, little is known about specific interpersonal dysfunctions that characterize the PD population. The current study systematically examined these interpersonal dysfunctions. Method: The present analyses included 194 patients with PD out of a sample of 201 who were randomized to cognitive-behavioral therapy, panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, or applied relaxation training. Interpersonal dysfunction was measured with the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems-Circumplex (Horowitz, Alden, Wiggins, & Pincus, 2000). Results: Individuals with PD reported greater levels of interpersonal distress than that of a normative cohort (especially when PD was accompanied by agoraphobia), but lower than that of a cohort of patients with major depression. There was no single inteipersonal profile that characterized PD patients. Symptom-based clusters (with vs. without agoraphobia) could not be discriminated on core or central interpersonal problems. Rather, as revealed by cluster analysis based on the pathoplasticity framework, there were 2 empirically derived interpersonal clusters among PD patients that were not accounted for by symptom severity and were opposite in nature: domineering-intrusive and nonassertive. The empirically derived interpersonal clusters appear to be of clinical utility in predicting alliance development throughout treatment: Although the domineering-intrusive cluster did not show any changes in the alliance throughout treatment, the nonassertive cluster showed a process of significant strengthening of the alliance. Conclusions: Empirically derived interpersonal clusters in PD provide clinically useful and nonredundant information about individuals with PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Scholars increasingly recognize that therapeutic alliance and symptomatic change are associated with one another. A common assumption is that alliance predicts symptomatic change. However, the issue is far from settled. One challenge in determining the causality is the establishment of temporal precedence showing that alliance, as opposed to previous symptomatic change, drives subsequent symptomatic reduction. Method: To make further advances in untangling this chicken-and-egg question, we employed autoregressive cross-lagged modeling over 4 time points in a sample of 149 depressive patients receiving supportive-expressive psychotherapy or clinical management combined with pharmacotherapy or clinical management combined with placebo. Results: Using this methodology, we found that both alliance and symptoms across treatment made significant and unique contributions in predicting subsequent symptomatic levels throughout treatment. Additionally, alliance, but not symptoms, predicted subsequent alliance levels. No differences were found between treatments. Conclusions: Our findings imply that alliance temporally precedes symptomatic levels throughout treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Psychotherapy Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Psychotherapy Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

As an addition to the ongoing discussion concerning the magnitude of therapist effects on outcome in psychotherapy, we investigated therapist variability in a large inpatient psychotherapy sample. We included global symptomatic outcome (Global Severity Index of the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised [SCL-90-R]; German version, Franke, 1995) and alliance (Helping Alliance Questionnaire; German version, Bassler, Potratz & Krauthauser, 1995) ratings of 2554 inpatients who were treated by 50 psychotherapists. Multilevel regression analyses (HLM; Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, & Congdon, 2004) were used for analyses. Overall, therapists accounted for a much greater variability on alliance (33%) than on outcome (3%). Therapists were differentially effective with regard to their patients' symptom severity at the beginning of treatment, and therapists differed in the degree that a positive alliance was associated with therapeutic outcome. The relatively small therapist effect on outcome is attributed to compensatory mechanisms in the specific context of inpatient therapy. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 64: 344–354, 2008. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractObjective:Method:Results:Conclusion:Research on nonverbal synchrony (NVS) as a core element in the therapeutic relationship has substantially increased and suggests that NVS influences therapeutic alliance and outcomes.Studies on NVS regarding body movements, vocal pitch, peripheral physiological measures, and hormonal states were included. A random-effects multilevel meta-analysis was performed on 23 publications from 13 trials.There was no significant overall association between NVS and alliance/outcome (r = .03, p = .644). Across modalities, there was a marginally significant association between higher NVS and smaller interpersonal problems (r = .10, p = .084) and a nonsignificant effect for the association between NVS and alliance (r = .06, p = .316), symptomatic outcome (r = -.06, p = .320), and other outcomes (r = .07, p = .255). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 56.47). Moderator analyses revealed that vocal pitch synchrony was negatively associated with alliance/outcome (r = -.20, p = .011), while NVS of peripheral physiological parameters was positively correlated with alliance/outcome (r = .32, p = .006).Findings suggest that specific modalities of NVS show specific associations with outcomes. More research is needed to investigate whether NVS across modalities reflects a unified underlying construct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The association between alliance and therapy outcome is one of the most investigated factors in psychotherapy research. However, even studies using advanced methods estimate effects over a specific time period (interval) between measurement occasions. Thus, it remains unknown how the magnitude and direction of effects depend on the considered time interval, resulting in limited comparability across studies. The current study examines the influence of time on the within-person relationship between alliance and symptom severity. Method: Alliance (WAI-SR) and symptom severity (SCL-K11) were assessed every fifth session in N = 650 patients receiving up to 100 weekly sessions (mode = 55; M = 41.03; SD = 27.23) of individual psychotherapy in a German outpatient clinic. Bivariate continuous-time (CT) structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to estimate within-person cross- and auto-effects. Results: Analysis revealed significant reciprocal within-person cross-effects with stronger relative effects of SCL-K11 on WAI-SR (a21) than vice versa (a12). CT analysis showed that both cross-lagged effects increased for longer time intervals with strongest effects for time intervals of about 40 sessions (a21 = -.47; a12 = --.19). Conclusions: Alliance and symptom severity showed a reciprocal relationship. Expanding current evidence, our analysis showed how the magnitude of these effects depends on the considered time interval. Applying CT-SEM on longitudinal data of the alliance outcome association complements current crosslagged panel analysis and allows to compare results of studies which are based on different time intervals between measurement occasions. Methodological, theoretical, and clinical implications are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The alliance is dyadic in its nature with both the patient and the therapist contributing. Relatively little is known about the effects of congruence between patient and therapist perception of alliance on treatment outcome. The current study investigated how patient and therapist agreement and disagreement about the alliance predict symptom severity over the course of long-term psychotherapy. We investigated N = 361 patients nested within N = 102 therapists longitudinally every 5th session across long-term treatment. Multilevel polynomial regression with response surface analysis was used to predict symptom severity five sessions later from congruence of the alliance ratings. Throughout treatment, patient and therapist agreement about stronger alliances significantly predicted lower subsequent patient-reported symptom distress. Patient and therapist disagreement was a marginally significant predictor of subsequent symptom distress. There was no significant difference in the effects of alliance agreement and disagreement on symptoms across time in long-term treatment. Findings support the importance of alliance agreement and disagreement as predictors of subsequent patient symptom severity. Public Significance Statement: This study suggests that agreement between therapists and patients about the quality of their alliance may be related to lower patient symptoms later in treatment, while disagreement about the alliance quality could be related to more severe symptoms later in treatment. The study further suggests that alliance agreement and disagreement affect later symptoms steadily over the course of long-term psychotherapy. Thus, therapists need to direct their attention toward patients' potentially diverging perspective on the alliance and take appropriate actions to foster better agreement on their working relationship throughout treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]