Search

Background Thus far, four soy allergens have been characterized. Their diagnostic value was assessed only using a case-control design with controls not suspected of soy allergy or in a soy-allergic population without controls. Our objective was to analyze the diagnostic value of specific immunoglobulin E ( sIgE) to Gly m 2S albumin, Gly m 4, 5, and 6, and their possible relation with severity or culprit soy product. Methods Adult patients suspected of soy allergy were included ( n = 46). Allergy was confirmed by challenge ( n = 19) or history ( n = 16) and excluded by challenge in 11 patients. Soy components were analyzed by Immuno CAP. Diagnostic value was assessed in the challenged patient group by an area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ( AUC). Results Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the highest AUC (0.79), comparable to skin prick test (SPT) and sIgE to soy extract (0.76 and 0.77, respectively). All patients were sensitized to either soy extract or Gly m 4 ( sIgE ≥ 0.35 kU/l). sIgE to soy extract, Gly m 5, and Gly m 6 was significantly higher in patients with mild symptoms ( P = 0.04, 0.02 and 0.02, respectively). Patients only reacting to soy milk had higher sIgE levels to Gly m 4 (median 9.8 vs 1.1 kU/l, P = 0.01). Conclusion Specific immunoglobulin E to Gly m 2S albumin had the best accuracy in diagnosing soy allergy. Gly m 5 and 6 were related to mild symptoms. Higher levels of Gly m 4 were related to allergy to soy milk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Basophilsaccountforonly0.1-1%ofall peripheral blood leu-kocytes. They were considered to be a redundant cell type for a long time. However, several findings show a non-redun-dant role for basophils in type 2 T-helper cell (Th2) immune responses in helminth infections, allergy and autoimmun-ity. Both immunoglobulin-E-dependent and -independent pathways have been described to contribute to basophil ac-tivation. In addition, several recent studies reported that ba-sophils can function as antigen-presenting cells and are im-portant in the initiation of Th2 immune responses. However, there are also conflicting studies that do not corroborate the importance of basophils in Th2 immune responses. This re-view discusses the role of basophils in Th2 immune respons-es in view of these recent findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been much controversy surrounding the importance of basophils in allergy. These cells are, after all, comparatively rare and yet they display remarkable potential to contribute to the symptoms of allergic inflammation. Furthermore, by virtue of their ability to rapidly elaborate T helper type 2 (Th2)-type cytokines, they are well endowed to support ongoing allergic immunity. Despite this, basophils have often been regarded as redundant in this function as in murine models of allergy, their more numerous tissue-fixed mast cell counterparts also display Th2-type cytokine-releasing potential, which is rather different in most human mast cells. Surprisingly, it is from murine models that the basophil has re-surfaced as a key orchestrator of Th2-type immunity and chronic allergic inflammation, a property that has long been hypothesized by researchers into human basophil function but never demonstrated. Moreover, murine experimental models also highlighted the ability of basophils to take up and present antigens in an MHC-dependent manner. Controversy regarding basophils, however, has remained as recent methods for depleting these cells in murine models of allergy and parasitic infection have yielded conflicting results, where the role for this cell oscillates from essential antigen-presenting cells to mere supporting functions in controlling Th2 responses. This review highlights the recent advances in understanding the role of this rather enigmatic cell in allergy. Cite this as: F. H. Falcone, E. F. Knol and B. F. Gibbs, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2011 (41) 939-947. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background T cell responses involved in peanut allergy are poorly understood. Objective To investigate T cell responses towards major peanut allergens in peanut-allergic (PA) subjects compared with peanut-sensitized (PS) non-allergic children and non-atopic (NA) controls. Methods Eighteen PA children, seven non-allergic PS children and 11 NA adults were included. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with a crude peanut extract (CPE). Short-term T cell lines were generated and subsequently stimulated with CPE and purified Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6. The proliferation and production of IL-13, IFN-γ, IL-10 and TNF-α were analysed. Results Proliferation to CPE and major allergens was enhanced in PA subjects. The primary response to CPE was comparable with PS subjects, with increased production of IL-13 and IFN-γ compared with NA. Production of IL-10 was not observed. In short-term T cell lines, the response to CPE was stronger in PA than in PS and NA subjects. Only PA children had a detectable response to major peanut allergens, characterized by IL-13 production. The response was the highest after Ara h 3 stimulation, and the lowest after Ara h 2 stimulation. No significant correlation was observed between peanut-specific IgE levels and T cell responses to CPE. Conclusion T cell responses to CPE in PA and PS children were characterized by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Only PA children showed enhanced Th2 responses to Ara h 1, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6. Cite this as: A. E. Flinterman, S. G. M. A. Pasmans, C. F. den Hartog Jager, M. O. Hoekstra, C. A. F. M. Bruijnzeel-Koomen, E. F. Knol and E. van Hoffen, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 590–597. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Serological tests for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) against foods are persistently promoted for the diagnosis of food-induced hypersensitivity. Since many patients believe that their symptoms are related to food ingestion without diagnostic confirmation of a causal relationship, tests for food-specific IgG4 represent a growing market. Testing for blood IgG4 against different foods is performed with large-scale screening for hundreds of food items by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type and radioallergosorbent-type assays in young children, adolescents and adults. However, many serum samples show positive IgG4 results without corresponding clinical symptoms. These findings, combined with the lack of convincing evidence for histamine-releasing properties of IgG4 in humans, and lack of any controlled studies on the diagnostic value of IgG4 testing in food allergy, do not provide any basis for the hypothesis that food-specific IgG4 should be attributed with an effector role in food hypersensitivity. In contrast to the disputed beliefs, IgG4 against foods indicates that the organism has been repeatedly exposed to food components, recognized as foreign proteins by the immune system. Its presence should not be considered as a factor which induces hypersensitivity, but rather as an indicator for immunological tolerance, linked to the activity of regulatory T cells. In conclusion, food-specific IgG4 does not indicate (imminent) food allergy or intolerance, but rather a physiological response of the immune system after exposition to food components. Therefore, testing of IgG4 to foods is considered as irrelevant for the laboratory work-up of food allergy or intolerance and should not be performed in case of food-related complaints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In peanut-allergic adults, IgE is mainly directed to Ara h1 and Ara h2. More recently, a role for Ara h6 has been suggested. In contrast to adults, IgE in children can fluctuate over time. Therefore, children may have a more dynamic reactivity to peanut. Objective To examine the IgE reactivity to major peanut allergens in peanut-allergic children at two subsequent time-points. Methods Twenty children (3–15 years old) with peanut allergy, confirmed by a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), were included. Just before and 20 months after DBPCFC, IgE reactivity to purified Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3 and Ara h6 was studied by immunoblots and skin prick tests (SPTs). Results Before DBPCFC, all peanut-allergic children showed IgE reactivity to Ara h2; Ara h6 was recognized by 16 children, and Ara h1 and Ara h3 by 10 children. After 20 months, peanut-specific IgE levels (median 23 kU/L) and the individual recognition of major allergens were comparable with the levels and recognition before challenge (median 28.2 kU/L). SPT with Ara h2 and Ara h6 was positive in most children, whereas SPT with Ara h1 and Ara h3 was positive in approximately half of the children. Ara h6 induced the largest weals. None of the parameters were related to the severity of peanut allergy. Conclusion Ara h2 and Ara h6 are the most frequently recognized major peanut allergens in children. The individual reactivity to the major peanut allergens remained stable over time, despite DBPCFC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The central role of specific IgE in cow's milk allergy (CMA) is well documented. However, less is known about the function of other immunoglobulin isotypes in allergy and tolerance to cow's milk proteins (CMPs). Objective To determine differences in the antibody responses that are associated with allergy and tolerance to cow's milk in allergic, atopic and non-atopic individuals of different age groups. Methods Nineteen infants (<1 year), 18 children (6–14 years) and 41 adults (21–68 years) were included. Each age group was comprised of subjects with CMA, atopic individuals without a history of CMA and non-atopic subjects. Levels of specific IgE, IgG4, IgG1 and IgA to whole cow's milk and the six most abundant individual CMPs were determined in plasma by ELISA. For comparison, specific IgE and IgG4 were measured to ovomucoid and house dust mite (HDM) in individuals allergic for the respective allergens, and in atopic and non-atopic subjects without allergy. Results In infants and children with CMA, αs1-casein and β-lactoglobulin induced the highest specific IgE response, whereas αs1-casein was the most allergenic CMP in adult patients. Specific IgG4 and IgG1 responses were the highest to αs1-casein and β-lactoglobulin in all age groups, while κ-casein and α-lactalbumin induced the highest levels of IgA. CMP-specific IgG4 was higher in atopic children and adults without CMA, as compared with non-atopic individuals. A similar difference between tolerant atopic and non-atopic subjects was observed for IgG4 specific to ovomucoid, whereas HDM-specific IgG4 was not detectable in these subjects. Conclusion Maintenance of tolerance to cow's milk in atopic children and adults without CMA is associated with elevated levels of specific IgG4, in combination with low specific IgE. The up-regulation of specific IgG4 in tolerant atopic individuals may be related to the type of allergen and its regular dose of exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies suggest that administration of probiotics in vitro can stimulate regulatory and Th1 immune responses. We studied both the in vitro immunological effects of probiotics and the ex vivo immunological effects after oral administration of probiotics in children with food allergy, a Th2-mediated disease. Methods: Thirteen children were enrolled. Probiotics (n = 7) or placebo (n = 6) were orally administered during 3 months. At baseline and after 1 and 3 months, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with crude peanut extract, anti-CD3, or anti-CD40 and IL-4 in the presence (in vitro response) or absence (ex vivo response) of probiotics. The proliferation and production of IFN-γ, IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, TNF-α, IL-6 and IgE were analyzed. Sensitization to peanut, cow’s milk and hen’s egg was determined before and after treatment. Results: The in vitro addition of probiotics to peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures resulted in enhanced proliferation and production of IFN-γ, IL-10 and TNF-α. After oral treatment, proliferation in the presence of probiotics increased, whereas in vitro IgE production decreased in the probiotics group compared to baseline. The ex vivo production of IL-10, TNF-α and IL-6 tended to decrease. Th1 and Th2 cytokines were not altered. Sensitization remained unchanged. Conclusion: Probiotics enhanced the production of Th1 and regulatory cytokines in vitro. Oral administration of probiotics resulted in a slightly decreased ex vivo production of IL-10, TNF-α and IL-6. This indicates that probiotics have a different potential to modulate the immune response in vitro versus ex vivo. Copyright © 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background One to two percent of infants suffer from IgE-mediated allergic reactions against cow's milk proteins. Most children develop clinical tolerance, but approximately 15% are still allergic by the age of 10 years. Little is known about the T cell epitopes in individual cow's milk protein in relation to allergy and tolerance. Objective To identify T cell epitopes in αs1-casein, the most abundant milk protein, and to investigate T cell responses toward these epitopes in allergic, atopic and non-atopic children. Methods Allergen-specific T cell lines (TCLs) were derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 11 cow's milk allergic, nine atopic and nine non-atopic children. T cell responses were measured to αs1-casein and to overlapping peptides (18-mers), spanning the αs1-casein molecule. Proliferation was determined by incorporation of 3H-thymidine, and cytokine production (IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ) was measured by ELISA. Results Four main regions (amino acid (AA) residues 43–66, 73–96, 91–114 and 127–180) in the αs1-casein molecule were immunogenic to T cells, among which the AA residues 133–156 spanned the immunodominant part. Only subtle differences were found in peptide recognition between the subject groups. Some of the peptides induced slightly Th1- or Th2-skewed cytokine responses. The increased levels of IL-10 in response to αs1-casein observed in TCLs from atopic children appeared not to be linked to recognition of specific IL-10-inducing epitopes. Conclusions The immunodominant sequence in αs1-casein is spanned by AA residues 133–156. Tolerance towards αs1-casein in atopic children may be mediated by an overall induction of IL-10 and not by recognition of certain T cell epitopes. The identified T cell epitopes in children with cow's milk allergy may be useful targets in developing peptide immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Decreased exposure to microbial stimuli has been proposed to be involved in the increased prevalence of atopic disease. Such a relationship was indicated by enhanced presence of typical probiotic bacteria in the intestinal flora correlating with reduced prevalence of atopic disease. Recent clinical trials suggested that probiotic bacteria may decrease and prevent allergic symptoms, but which (different) species or strains may contribute is poorly understood. Objective We sought to select probiotic bacteria by their ability to modulate in vitro production of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), to make a rational choice from available strains. Methods PBMCs, purified monocytes, and lymphocytes from healthy donors were co-cultured with 13 different strains of probiotic bacteria. The effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on different cell populations and effects on cytokine production induced by the polyclonal T cell stimulator phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) was evaluated by measuring T helper type 1, T helper type 2 (Th2), and regulatory cell cytokines in culture supernatants by multiplex assay. Results PBMCs cultured with different strains produced large amounts of IL-10 and low levels of IL-12p70, IL-5, and IL-13. In PHA-stimulated PBMC cultures, the tested strains decreased the production of Th2 cytokines. Neutralizing IL-10 production resulted in partial to full restoration of Th2 cytokine production and concurred with an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12p70 and TNF-α. Within the PBMCs, the CD14+ cell fraction was the main source of IL-10 production upon interaction with LAB. Conclusion Our results indicate that certain strains of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria modulate the production of cytokines by monocytes and lymphocytes, and may divert the immune system in a regulatory or tolerant mode. These specific strains may be favorable to use in prevention or treatment of atopic disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A number of allergenic proteins in peanut has been described and the relative importance of these allergens is yet to be determined. We have investigated the relevance of previously identified peanut allergens in well-characterized peanut-allergic patients by in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assays. Thirty-two adult peanut-allergic patients were included based on careful and standardized patient history and the presence of peanut-specific IgE. The diagnosis peanut allergy was confirmed using double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in 23 patients. Major peanut allergens Ara h1, Ara h2 and Ara h3 were purified from peanuts using ion-exchange chromatography. IgE immunoblotting was performed and IgE-cross-linking capacity was examined by measuring histamine release (HR) after incubating patient basophils as well as passively sensitized basophils with several dilutions of the allergens. Intracutaneous tests (ICTs) using 10-fold dilution steps of the purified allergens and crude peanut extract were performed. Ara h2 was recognized most frequently (26 out of 32) in all tests and induced both positive skin tests and basophil degranulation at low concentrations, whereas Ara h1 and Ara h3 were recognized less frequently and reacted only at 100-fold higher concentrations as analysed with HR and intracutaneous testing (ICT). Next to the three tested allergens, proteins with molecular weights of somewhat smaller than 15 kDa were identified as a IgE-binding proteins on immunoblot in the majority of the patients (20 out of 32). We conclude that Ara h2 is, for our patient group, the most important peanut allergen, and that previously unidentified peanut proteins with molecular weights of somewhat smaller than 15 kDa may be important allergens as well. ICT in combination with basophil–HR and IgE immunoblotting provides insight in the patient specificity towards the individual peanut allergens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]