Search

Background Flow cytometric basophil activation tests (BAT) have been developed as cellular tests for in vitro diagnosis of IgE-mediated reactions. Different markers and techniques have been used after stimulation with various allergens. Objective It was the aim of the present study to compare an established BAT (Flow-CAST®) with a newly developed basophil activation protocol using CD63 and CCR3 (Flow2 CAST®) in patients with type-I allergy to antibiotics. Materials and methods Twenty-four patients with a history of type-I allergy to antibiotics were examined. A careful allergy history was taken, and skin tests and determination of specific IgE antibodies were performed. Two different BAT using CD63 expression but different protocols were carried out after stimulation with different concentrations of antibiotics. Fifteen healthy subjects without a history of antibiotic allergy were studied as controls. Results The Flow2 CAST® showed a higher sensitivity than the Flow-CAST® (55% vs. 53%) with regard to patients' history. Specificity was 80% both for the Flow2 CAST® and for the Flow-CAST® with regard to controls with negative history and negative RAST. Conclusion These results show the value of two different BAT as cellular tests in the in vitro diagnosis of patients with antibiotic allergy with equal specificity and a slightly higher sensitivity for the Flow2 CAST®. Cite this as: B. Eberlein, I. León Suárez, U. Darsow, F. Ruëff, H. Behrendt and J. Ring, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 411–418. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is made using evaluated clinical criteria. Management of AD must consider the symptomatic variability of the disease. It is based on hydrating topical treatment, and avoidance of specific and unspecific provocation factors. Anti-inflammatory treatment is used for exacerbation management. Topical corticosteroids remain the first choice. Systemic anti-inflammatory treatment should be kept to a minimum, but may be necessary in rare refractory cases. The new topical calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus and pimecrolimus) expand the available choices of topical anti-inflammatory treatment. Microbial colonization and superinfection (e.g. withStaphylococcus aureus,Malassezia furfur) can have a role in disease exacerbation and can justify the use of antimicrobials in addition to the anti-inflammatory treatment. Evidence for the efficacy of systemic antihistamines in relieving pruritus is still insufficient, but some patients seem to benefit. Adjuvant therapy includes ultraviolet (UV) irradiation preferably of UVA wavelength; UVB 311 nm has also been used successfully. Dietary recommendations should be specific and only given in diagnosed individual food allergy. Stress-induced exacerbations may make psychosomatic counselling recommendable.‘Eczema school’ educational programmes have proved to be helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]