1. Analysis of carry skip adder with ripple carry adder performance using VHDL language.
- Author
-
Mohithsaicharan, Karanam and Jagadeesh, P.
- Subjects
- *
RESEARCH personnel , *ORDER picking systems , *SPEED , *ALGORITHMS , *RESPECT - Abstract
A high-speed adder's size and speed may be cut in half if it were converted from an RCA to a CLA. Instruments and processes: In order to reduce the size and increase the speed of the high-speed adder, we pooled 10 samples from both Groups 1 and 2. In comparison to CLAs, Ripple Carry Adders (RCAs) require less G-Power and samples while simultaneously reducing the area and speed of high-speed adders. Carr Look-Ahead adders (CLAs) and ripple carry adders (RCAs) both need a minimum of 27.78 nanoseconds, according to the researchers. In contrast to Ripple Carry Adders (RCAs), which include 32 cells, Carry Look-Ahead Adders (CLAs) only have 28. Area and Delay are clearly different, as shown by the significant P values of 0.0328 and 0.0348, as well as the calculated significance value (P<0.05). When comparing the two algorithms, the Carry Look-Ahead Adder (CLA) outperforms the Ripple Carry Adder (RCA) in every respect: speed, area, and parameter delay removal (P=0.038). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF