1. A graph-theoretic approach for the analysis of lesion changes and lesions detection review in longitudinal oncological imaging.
- Author
-
Veroli BD, Lederman R, Shoshan Y, Sosna J, and Joskowicz L
- Subjects
- Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Brain Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods, Reproducibility of Results, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Pattern Recognition, Automated methods, Liver Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Algorithms
- Abstract
Radiological follow-up of oncology patients requires the detection of lesions and the quantitative analysis of lesion changes in longitudinal imaging studies of patients, which is time-consuming and requires expertise. We present here a new method and workflow for the analysis and review of lesions and volumetric lesion changes in longitudinal scans of a patient. The generic graph-based method consists of lesion matching, classification of changes in individual lesions, and detection of patterns of lesion changes computed from the properties of the graph and its connected components. The workflow guides clinicians in the detection of missed lesions and wrongly identified lesions in manual and computed lesion annotations using the analysis of lesion changes. It serves as a heuristic method for the automatic revision of ground truth lesion annotations in longitudinal scans. The methods were evaluated on longitudinal studies of patients with three or more examinations of metastatic lesions in the lung (19 patients, 83 CT scans, 1178 lesions), the liver (18 patients, 77 CECT scans, 800 lesions) and the brain (30 patients, 102 T1W-Gad MRI scans, 317 lesions) with ground-truth lesion annotations. Lesion matching yielded a precision of 0.92-1.0 and recall of 0.91-0.99. The classification of changes in individual lesions yielded an accuracy of 0.87-0.97. The classification of patterns of lesion changes yielded an accuracy of 0.80-0.94. The lesion detection review workflow applied to manual and computed lesion annotations yielded 120 and 55 missed lesions and 20 and 164 wrongly identified lesions for all longitudinal studies of patients, respectively. The automatic analysis of lesion changes and review of lesion detection in longitudinal studies of oncological patients helps detect missed lesions and wrongly identified lesions. This method may help improve the accuracy of radiological interpretation and the disease status evaluation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF