Search

RNA-seq technology is widely employed in various research areas related to transcriptome analyses, and the identification of all the expressed transcripts from short sequencing reads presents a considerable computational challenge. In this study, we introduce TransRef, a new computational algorithm for accurate transcriptome assembly by redefining a novel graph model, the neo-splicing graph, and then iteratively applying a constrained dynamic programming to reconstruct all the expressed transcripts for each graph. When TransRef is utilized to analyze both real and simulated datasets, its performance is notably better than those of several state-of-the-art assemblers, including StringTie2, Cufflinks and Scallop. In particular, the performance of TransRef is notably strong in identifying novel transcripts and transcripts with low-expression levels, while the other assemblers are less effective., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Classical algorithms aiming at identifying biological pathways significantly related to studying conditions frequently reduced pathways to gene sets, with an obvious ignorance of the constitutive non-equivalence of various genes within a defined pathway. We here designed a network-based method to determine such non-equivalence in terms of gene weights. The gene weights determined are biologically consistent and robust to network perturbations. By integrating the gene weights into the classical gene set analysis, with a subsequent correction for the "over-counting" bias associated with multi-subunit proteins, we have developed a novel gene-weighed pathway analysis approach, as implemented in an R package called "Gene Associaqtion Network-based Pathway Analysis" (GANPA). Through analysis of several microarray datasets, including the p53 dataset, asthma dataset and three breast cancer datasets, we demonstrated that our approach is biologically reliable and reproducible, and therefore helpful for microarray data interpretation and hypothesis generation.

Background: In traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) clinical practice, TCM syndromes help to understand human homeostasis and guide individualized treatment. However, the TCM syndrome changes with disease progression, of which the scientific basis and mechanism remain unclear. Methods: To demonstrate the underlying mechanism of dynamic changes in the TCM syndrome, we applied a dynamic network biomarker (DNB) algorithm to obtain the DNBs of changes in the TCM syndrome, based on the transcriptomic data of patients with chronic hepatitis B and typical TCM syndromes, including healthy controls and patients with liver-gallbladder dampness-heat syndrome (LGDHS), liver-depression spleen-deficiency syndrome (LDSDS), and liver-kidney yin-deficiency syndrome (LKYDS). The DNB model exploits collective fluctuations and correlations of the observed genes, then diagnoses the critical state. Results: Our results showed that the DNBs of TCM syndromes were comprised of 52 genes and the tipping point occurred at the LDSDS stage. Meanwhile, there were numerous differentially expressed genes between LGDHS and LKYDS, which highlighted the drastic changes before and after the tipping point, implying the 52 DNBs could serve as early-warning signals of the upcoming change in the TCM syndrome. Next, we validated DNBs by cytokine profiling and isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). The results showed that PLG (plasminogen) and coagulation factor XII (F12) were significantly expressed during the progression of TCM syndrome from LGDHS to LKYDS. Conclusions: This study provides a scientific understanding of changes in the TCM syndrome. During this process, the cytokine system was involved all the time. The DNBs PLG and F12 were confirmed to significantly change during TCM-syndrome progression and indicated a potential value of DNBs in auxiliary diagnosis of TCM syndrome in CHB. Trial registration Identifier: NCT03189992. Registered on June 4, 2017. Retrospectively registered (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]