Search

Background: Preclinical and clinical studies suggest an important role for cholinesterase inhibitors in pain therapy. The aim of this study was to examine the analgesic and antihyperalgesic properties of the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine and the opioid alfentanil, alone and in combination, in an experimental pain model in humans., Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled in this double-blind and placebo-controlled cross-over study. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at high current densities induced spontaneous acute pain and stable areas of hyperalgesia for painful mechanical stimuli (pinprick-hyperalgesia). Pain intensities, measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, and the extent of the hyperalgesic areas were assessed before, during, and 145 min after i.v. infusions of physostigmine (30 microg kg(-1) in 15 min), alfentanil (20 microg kg(-1) in 2 min), the combination of the same doses of both drugs, or saline 0.9%. The type of interaction was determined by fitting an interaction model to the data., Results: Starting from a baseline value of NRS=6, the maximum reduction of pain intensity was 50.4 (sd 22.3) % after alfentanil, 35.4 (20.0) % after physostigmine, and 60.4 (17.1) % after the combination. The hyperalgesic areas were reduced by 53.8 (33.2) %, 47.0 (26.3) %, and 54.8 (33.2) %, respectively. The data were best described by a model assuming an infra-additive interaction for analgesic and antihyperalgesic effects., Conclusions: Physostigmine and alfentanil showed distinct effects on pain and hyperalgesia in a human pain model. The interaction of both drugs was found to be infra-additive.

Background and Objective: For total intravenous anaesthesia an opioid is often combined with a hypnotic. A supra-additive interaction has been reported for clinical signs such as loss of consciousness or loss of the eyelash reflex. This study investigated the type of interaction of alfentanil and propofol on the electroencephalogram., Methods: Twenty patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were enrolled in the study. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with alfentanil and propofol. Each patient received a target-controlled infusion of alfentanil. Three target concentrations of 150, 225 and 300 ng mL(-1) were applied to each patient in random order. Propofol was added to the alfentanil infusion by a feedback system. The set point was the range of 1.5-2.5 Hz median frequency of the electroencephalogram. Four arterial blood samples were taken within the last 20 min of each period. The mean drug concentrations were used to determine the type of interaction and an isobole was estimated by fitting Bernstein spline functions to the data., Results: In 17 patients, all three alfentanil target concentrations could be administered. The test for supra-additivity as well as the isobole construction resulted in an additive type of interaction. The line of additivity cA/cA0 + cP/cP0 = 1 was best fitted for the values (standard deviation) cA0 = 1240 (51)ng mL(-1) and cP0 = 5.21 (0.36) microg mL(-1)., Conclusions: The type of interaction between alfentanil and propofol on the electroencephalogram in the investigated dose range is additive. This gives the freedom and need to select the appropriate dosing ratio of alfentanil and propofol by other considerations.

Objective: Population pharmacokinetic analysis and pharmacodynamic profile of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation and analgesia of intensive care unit patients for up to 24 h., Design: Institutional Review Board-approved prospective clinical trial., Setting: The ten-bed intensive care unit of an university hospital., Patients: 18 consecutive patients (ten men/eight women; age: 17-73 years, mean 51.6 +/- 16.7 years, SD; body weight: 60-110 kg, mean 82.9 +/- 11.2 kg, SD) requiring mechanical ventilation and prolonged sedation/analgesia after major surgery or trauma., Interventions: Plasma propofol and alfentanil concentrations were measured at regular intervals during the long-term drug infusion using a high-performance liquid chromatography (propofol) and radioimmunoassay (alfentanil) analysis. The depth of sedation was controlled by monitoring a two-lead online EEG. Thus, drug application was computer controlled via a closed-loop EEG median-frequency feedback system., Results: ICU long-term infusion population pharmacokinetics (open three-compartment model) revealed for propofol: central compartment distribution volume (V1): 31.2 +/- 5.3 l; steady-state distribution volume (Vdss): 499 +/- 173 l; total clearance (Cltot): 1001- +/- 150 ml/min; redistribution half-life (t1/2 gamma): 90 +/- 23 min; elimination half-life (t1/2 beta): 558 +/- 218 minutes. For alfentanil: V1: 31.9 +/- 10.1 l; Vdss: 124 +/- 41 l; Cltot: 345 +/- 70 ml/min; t1/2 gamma: 36 +/- 15 min; t1/2 beta: 275 +/- 94 min, respectively., Conclusions: The population pharmacokinetic analysis of propofol/alfentanil for ICU sedation therapy revealed increased volumes of drug distribution and decreased elimination characteristics as compared to pharmacokinetic data from short-term infusions in surgical patients. This can be attributed in part to altered distribution/redistribution processes and/or drug elimination under the condition of ICU therapy. No significant drug accumulation was observed. For future long-term sedation and analgesia of ICU patients with propofol/alfentanil, this altered pharmacokinetic behaviour should be taken into consideration to allow a more individualized and safer dosing of this drug combination.