Search

The control systems at Air handling units (AHUs) have nonlinear nature, resulting potentially in sluggish, aggressive, or oscillatory responses under variable operation conditions. This paper is to develop an approach for evaluating the nonlinear control performance of AHUs under variable operation conditions and for identifying the impact of varying multiple operation parameters which guides controller design. To do so, an operation parameter-based root distribution technique, intended to sketch the paths traced by closed-loop poles as multiple operation parameters are varied, is first introduced. The technique—which may be viewed as an extension of conventional, single-variable root locus—is then applied to a fan speed control system that includes a motor with a variable frequency drive and a supply fan with an air duct under variable fan speed and duct static pressure. Using the technique, the system's stability region is graphically identified. The system is also found to be aggressive and gradually lose its stability as the fan speed decreases and the duct static pressure increases, which is validated by the field tests. The root distribution approach is an effective tool to evaluate the performance of any nonlinear control systems at AHUs with multiple variable operation parameters without requiring time-domain simulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to its nonlinear nature, the supply fan at air handling units with the controller tuned at the design condition tends to be aggressive and oscillate under partial load conditions. The objective of this paper is to develop and validate a gain scheduling control strategy to improve its nonlinear control performance. First, a control-oriented model, which does not require numerous physical parameters and extensive test data, is developed to study the nonlinearity of the fan system. Based on the theoretical model and experimental verifications, the issue of an aggressive response with a conventional fixed-gain controller is caused by the fact that the system gain is proportional to the ratio of the duct static pressure to the fan speed. To address the issue, a scheduling function of the measurable duct static pressure and fan speed is proposed to be included in the conventional fixed-gain controller to compensate for the fan system gain variation. The gain scheduling control strategy is found to approximately maintain the identical control performance under all operation conditions. Most importantly, the gain scheduling control strategy can be readily implemented without intensive computation and additional measurements, showing a promising potential in industrial applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to its nonlinear feature, supply air temperature control systems at air handling units using single-loop fixed gain control frequently suffer unstable response under dynamic conditions. This paper is aimed at identifying a more effective control strategy to stabilize the valve control and achieve desirable supply air temperature response under various operation conditions by evaluating three control strategies, cascade, gain scheduling and cascade plus gain scheduling controls. Firstly, a control-oriented model is developed and calibrated through open-loop tests. Then, the control issues with single-loop fixed gain control are evaluated through simulations and field tests, which indicates that the system has more aggressive response or becomes unstable under lower load conditions when the chilled-water flow rate is less than 0.1 L/s. Finally, three control strategies are proposed and evaluated. The results reveal that all three proposed controls can achieve better robustness with the integral square error of supply air temperature decreased to 16%, 47% and 5%, respectively, under lower load condition. However, since high-frequency oscillation of the control valve occurs with cascade and cascade plus gain scheduling control, the gain scheduling control is recommended considering a trade-off among the supply air temperature response, valve lifetime and implementation complexity. • Supply air temperature control is unstable at lower chilled-water flow rate. • Cascade and gain scheduling controls are applied to solve this issue. • Cascade control has better robustness but with high-frequency valve oscillation. • Gain scheduling control cuts integral square error of supply air temperature to 47%. • Gain scheduling control improves performance with simpler and more generic design. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]