Search

Background: During hemodialysis (HD), blood passes through an extracorporeal circuit (ECC). To prevent air administration to the patient, a venous chamber (chamber) is located before the blood return. Microbubbles (MBs) may pass through the chamber and end up as microemboli in organs such as the brain and heart. This in vitro study investigated the efficacy of various chambers in MB removal. Materials and Methods: The in vitro recirculated setting of an ECC included an FX10 dialyzer, a dextran‐albumin solution to mimic blood viscosity and chambers with different flow characteristics in clinical use (Baxter: AK98 and Artis, Fresenius: 5008 and 6008) and preclinical test (Embody: Emboless®). A Gampt BCC200 device measured the presence and size of MBs (20–500 μm). Percentage change of MBs was calculated: ΔMB% = 100*(outlet–inlet)/inlet for each size of MB. Blood pump speed (Qb) was 200 (Qb200) or 300 (Qb300) ml/minute. Wilcoxon paired test determined differences. Results: With Qb200 median ΔMB% reduction was: Emboless −58%, AK98 −24%, Fresenius 5008 −23%, Artis −8%, and Fresenius 6008 ± 0%. With Qb300 ΔMB% was: Emboless −36%, AK98 ± 0%, Fresenius 5008 ± 0%, Artis +25%, and Fresenius 6008 + 21%. The Emboless was superior to all other chambers with Qb200 and Qb300 (p < 0.001). Further, the Emboless with Qb300 still eliminated more MBs than all other chambers with Qb200 (p ≤ 0.003). Conclusion: The results from the present study indicate that flow characteristics of the chamber and the Qb are important factors to limiting exposure of MB to the return bloodline. The Emboless chamber reduced MBs more effective than those chambers in clinical use investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Venous air traps were tested in vitro with respect to presence of micro bubbles. Three types of venous air traps were measured (Bioline, Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany; Gambro, Gambro AB, Lund, Sweden; Fresenius M.C., Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, Bad Homburg, Germany). Measurements ( n = 10) were taken for each air trap, fluid flow (50–600 mL/min), and fluid level (high/low). A 1.5-MHz ultrasound probe was used with an analysis device. The probe was mounted on the outlet line downstream of the venous air trap. A semisynthetic fluid was used to resemble blood viscosity. Occurrences of micro bubbles, without inducing an alarm of the dialysis device, were detected in almost all measurements. The amount of bubbles increased with increasing flow. There were more bubbles with low fluid level compared with high level. The Bioline tubing released the least bubbles in high fluid level. At low level, the Gambro tubing showed the least bubbles at flows 50–400 mL/min, and the Fresenius M.C. tubing showed the least bubbles at flows 400–600 mL/min. High fluid level in the air trap reduced generation of micro bubbles compared to low level, as did lower fluid flow versus high flow. The design of the air trap was also of importance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]