Search

Financial cognitive ability is an important part of human capital, which has a direct impact on household income. The dual differences composed by rural residents’ cognition level and residents’ income make the relationship between the two complicated. Based on the analysis of the impact of financial cognitive level on rural household income, this paper takes into account the individual heterogeneity of financial cognition to build an unconditional quantile regression (UQR) model through the micro data of the China Household Financial Survey Project (CHFS). Incorporating the background of the rapid development of digital finance, this paper also studies the impact of rural residents’ financial cognition on household income. The empirical results of the article have the following conclusions: First, on the whole, the improvement of financial cognitive level promotes the increase of rural household income, but this promotion has significant differences at different quantile levels of household income. Second, the digital financial inclusion index in the region has a positive moderating effect on the impact of financial cognition on the income of rural households. Third, the heterogeneity of the impact of financial cognition on the income of rural households is reflected in the two aspects of regions and household assets.

Agricultural ecological capital investment aims to achieve the coordinated and sustainable development of agricultural and rural ecology, economy, and society through a series of inputs to a specific range of agricultural ecological resources, ecological environment, and ecological service capacity. Based on the macro data of 31 provinces (including autonomous regions and municipalities) in China, this paper uses coupling coordination and linear regression models to study the impact of agricultural ecological capital investment on green circular economy development. At the same time, considering the differences between active and passive investment, their impacts on green circular economy development are discussed, respectively. The empirical conclusions are as follows. First, agricultural ecological capital investment plays a significant role in promoting the development of the green circular economy on the whole, but the roles of active investment and passive investment are different. Second, agricultural ecological capital investment positively impacts the development of the green circular economy by increasing green inventions and promoting green credit index. Third, the impacts mechanisms of active and passive investment have on green circular economy are different. Fourth, the impact of agricultural ecological capital investment on the green circular economy is regionally heterogeneous.