Search

We report on 18 patients with myeloid neoplasms and associated tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes on treatment with the TK inhibitors (TKI) ruxolitinib (PCM1-JAK2, n = 8; BCR-JAK2, n = 1) and imatinib, nilotinib or dasatinib (ETV6-ABL1, n = 9). On ruxolitinib (median 24 months, range 2-36 months), a complete hematologic response (CHR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCR) was achieved by five of nine and two of nine patients, respectively. However, ruxolitinib was stopped in eight of nine patients because of primary resistance (n = 3), progression (n = 3) or planned allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT, n = 2). At a median of 36 months (range 4-78 months) from diagnosis, five of nine patients are alive: four of six patients after allo SCT and one patient who remains on ruxolitinib. In ETV6-ABL1 positive patients, a durable CHR was achieved by four of nine patients (imatinib with one of five, nilotinib with two of three, dasatinib with one of one). Because of inadequate efficacy (lack of hematological and/or cytogenetic/molecular response), six of nine patients (imatinib, n = 5; nilotinib, n = 1) were switched to nilotinib or dasatinib. At a median of 23 months (range 3-60 months) from diagnosis, five of nine patients are in CCR or complete molecular response (nilotinib, n = 2; dasatinib, n = 2; allo SCT, n = 1) while two of nine patients have died. We conclude that (a) responses on ruxolitinib may only be transient in the majority of JAK2 fusion gene positive patients with allo SCT being an important early treatment option, and (b) nilotinib or dasatinib may be more effective than imatinib to induce durable complete remissions in ETV6-ABL1 positive patients.

Background and objectives Bowel cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death in people with CKD. Shared decision making regarding cancer screening is particularly complex in CKD and requires an understanding of patients’ values and priorities, which remain largely unknown. Our study aimed to describe the beliefs and attitudes to bowel cancer screening in patients with CKD. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Face to face, semistructured interviews were conducted from April of 2014 to December of 2015 with 38 participants ages 39–78 years old with CKD stages 3–5, on dialysis, or transplant recipients from four renal units in Australia and New Zealand. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. Results Five themes were identified: invisibility of cancer (unspoken stigma, ambiguity of risk, and absence of symptomatic prompting); prioritizing kidney disease (preserving the chance of transplantation, over-riding attention to kidney disease, protecting graft survival, and showing loyalty to the donor); preventing the crisis of cancer (evading severe consequences and cognizant of susceptibility); cognitive resistance (reluctance to perform a repulsive procedure, intensifying disease burden threshold, anxiety of a positive test, and accepting the inevitable); and pragmatic accessibility (negligible financial effect, convenience, and protecting anonymity). Conclusions Patients with CKD understand the potential health benefits of bowel cancer screening, but they are primarily committed to their kidney health. Their decisions regarding screening revolve around their present health needs, priorities, and concerns. Explicit consideration of the potential practical and psychosocial burdens that bowel cancer screening may impose on patients in addition to kidney disease and current treatment is suggested to minimize decisional conflict and improve patient satisfaction and health care outcomes in CKD.

In advanced systemic mastocytosis (advSM), disease evolution is often triggered by

Although recombinant interferon-α (rIFNα) effectively treats patients with early myelofibrosis, the effect of driver and high molecular risk (HMR) mutations has not been considered. In this phase 2 study, for the first time, the authors correlate response to rIFNα treatment with driver and HMR mutations.Patients were diagnosed using World Health Organization or International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment criteria. Only patients who had low or intermediate-1 Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores with ≥15% hematopoietic bone marrow foci were included. History, symptom assessment, physical examination, and blood and bone marrow studies were performed. Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen cells, and next-generation targeted sequencing of 45 genes was performed. Either rIFNα-2b (0.5 million units subcutaneously 3 times weekly) or pegylated rIFNα-2a (45 μg weekly) with escalation was initiated. All patients were followed at the authors' institution, and regular bone marrow biopsies were encouraged. International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment and European LeukemiaNet treatment response criteria were used.Of 30 patients (16 women and 14 men; median age, 58 years), 22 were classified as low risk, and 8 were classified as intermediate-1 risk. Two patients achieved complete remission, 9 achieved partial remission, 4 had clinical improvement, 7 had stable disease; 3 had progressive disease, 1 relapsed, and 4 died. There were 22 patients with JAK mutations, 6 with CALR mutations, and 2 with MPL mutations. Seventy-three percent of patients improved or remained stable with acceptable toxicity, including 37% who achieved complete or partial remission. There was no correlation between treatment response and baseline driver mutations or Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores. Of 8 poor responders, 3 had ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutations.Early treatment with rIFNα in patients without HMR mutations may prevent the development of marked splenomegaly, anemia, and florid myelofibrosis. Molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis may predict prognosis and treatment response. Cancer 2017;123:2680-87. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

We identified four patients who presented with BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and cytogenetically visible abnormalities of chromosome band 5q31-35. Fluorescence in situ hybridization indicated that the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta gene (PDGFRB) was disrupted in all four cases and 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends identified in-frame mRNA fusions between PDGFRB and WDR48 (3p21), GOLGA4 (3p21) and BIN2 (12q13). Strikingly, all three genes encode proteins involving intracellular trafficking. Imatinib, a known inhibitor of PDGFRbeta, selectively blocked the growth of t(3;5) myeloid colonies and produced clinically significant responses in all patients. We conclude that PDGFRB fuses to diverse partner genes in atypical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Although very rare, identification of these fusions is critical for proper management of affected individuals.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms with eosinophilia are commonly characterized by a normal karyotype and remain poorly defined at the molecular level. We therefore investigated 426 samples from patients with hypereosinophilia of unknown significance initially referred for screening of the FIP1L1-PDGFRA (FP) fusion gene also for KIT D816V and JAK2 V617F mutations. Overall, 86 (20%) patients tested positive: FP+ in 55 (12%), KIT D816V+ in 14 (3%), and JAK2 V617F+ in 17 (4%) patients, respectively. To gain better insight into clinical characteristics, we compared these cases with 31 additional and well-characterized KIT D816V+ eosinophilia-associated systemic mastocytosis (SM-eo) patients enrolled within the "German Registry on Disorders of Eosinophils and Mast cells." Significant differences included younger age, male predominance, and higher eosinophil counts for FP+ cases while abdominal lymphadenopathy, ascites, and serum tryptase levels100 μg/l were characteristic for those with KIT D816V. Leukocytes, hemoglobin, and splenomegaly did not differ significantly. A median of three additional mutations, most frequently TET2 and SRSF2, were identified in 12/13 KIT D816V+ SM-eo patients with available material indicating a more complex molecular pathogenesis. Median survival was not reached for FP+ cases but was only 26 and 41 months for KIT D816V+ SM and JAK2 V617F+ MPN-eo, respectively. Eosinophilia of ≥2 × 10(9) /l was identified as discriminator for inferior survival in KIT D816V+ and/or JAK2 V617F+ patients (median survival 20 months vs. not reached, P = 0.002). Thus, there is a clear prognostic and therapeutic rationale for detection of KIT D816V and JAK2 V617F in the diagnostic work up of eosinophilia.

In eosinophilia-associated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-eo), constitutive activation of protein tyrosine kinases (TK) as consequence of translocations, inversions, or insertions and creation of TK fusion genes is recurrently observed. The most commonly involved TK and their potential TK inhibitors include PDGFRA at 4q12 or PDGFRB at 5q33 (imatinib), FGFR1 at 8p11 (ponatinib), and JAK2 at 9p24 (ruxolitinib). We here report the identification of three new PDGFRB fusion genes in three male MPN-eo patients: MPRIP-PDGFRB in a case with t(5;17)(q33;p11), CPSF6-PDGFRB in a case with t(5;12)(q33;q15), and GOLGB1-PDGFRB in a case with t(3;5)(q13;q33). The fusion proteins identified by 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or DNA-based long distance inverse PCR are predicted to contain the TK domain of PDGFRB. The partner genes contain domains like coiled-coil structures, which are likely to cause dimerization and activation of the TK. In all patients, imatinib induced rapid and durable complete remissions.

Cancer is a genetic disease, but two patients rarely have identical genotypes. Similarly, patients differ in their clinicopathological parameters, but how genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity are interconnected is not well understood. Here we build statistical models to disentangle the effect of 12 recurrently mutated genes and 4 cytogenetic alterations on gene expression, diagnostic clinical variables and outcome in 124 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Overall, one or more genetic lesions correlate with expression levels of ~20% of all genes, explaining 20–65% of observed expression variability. Differential expression patterns vary between mutations and reflect the underlying biology, such as aberrant polycomb repression for ASXL1 and EZH2 mutations or perturbed gene dosage for copy-number changes. In predicting survival, genomic, transcriptomic and diagnostic clinical variables all have utility, with the largest contribution from the transcriptome. Similar observations are made on the TCGA acute myeloid leukaemia cohort, confirming the general trends reported here., The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of chronic blood cancers. Here, the authors analyse genomic and gene expression data from MDS patients to investigate how driver mutations alter gene expression, diagnostic clinical variables and survival.

The JAK2(V617F) mutation, which has been found in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), has not yet been evaluated in lymphoproliferative disorders by any adequately sensitive techniques.We investigated whether low levels of JAK2(V617F) are present in lymphoid neoplasms using a highly sensitive and highly specific amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) assay.While 234 of 237 cases did not carry the JAK2(V617F) allele, it was identified in the bone marrow of 3 B cell lymphoma patients. The mutation was found to be neither associated with the lymphomas per se, nor with any signs, symptoms or laboratory findings of MPD. Moreover, JAK2(V617F) appeared subsequently in the peripheral blood of 2 of the 3 patients.These findings suggest that JAK2(V617F) arises in the bone marrow of individuals before clinical manifestation of any myeloid disorders. Presence of JAK2(V617F) in bone marrow might therefore increase the risk of future MPD development, just as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) increases the risk of multiple myeloma. We term this phenomenon 'JAK2(V617F) of undetermined significance' (JMUS). Its clinical significance remains to be determined. To our knowledge, these findings represent the first identification of JAK2(V617F) in the bone marrow of patients without myeloid malignancies.

The aim of study was to detect mutation of tyrosine domain of c-kit gene in mastocytosis using denaturing high performance liquid chromatography technique, and to investigate the significance of this gene mutation in diagnosis and therapy of mastocytosis. Genomic DNA was obtained from bone marrow or peripheral blood leukocytes using the phenol/chloroform method from 7 mastocytosis patients. PCR was performed with AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase and 100 ng genomic DNA to amplify the entire coding sequence and exon-intron boundaries of c-kit exon 17 approximately exon 19. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) analysis was performed on a WAVE DNA Fragment Analysis System. Each PCR product was mixed with an equal quantity of amplified human placental DNA (served as normal control) and was denatured at 95 degrees C for 5 minutes, followed by slowly cooling down to room temperature by 1.5 degrees C per minute to allow heteroduplexes formation. All the conditions for the DHPLC analysis, including melting temperature and buffer gradients were determined using the Transgenomic software Navigator. Samples with extra peaks or with different peak form on DHPLC were directly sequenced using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Reaction kit and ABI 3100 Genetics Analyser. The results showed that DHPLC revealed an aberrant peak in one patient in exon 17 and the D816V mutation was identified by direct sequencing. The other two patients had an extra peak for exon 18/19 and direct sequencing revealed a conservative sequence change (L862L) within exon 18. It is concluded that denaturing high performance liquid chromatography is a high efficiency and reliable technique for mutation detection of c-kit gene and the detection results would be helpful for the selection of therapy in mastocytosis.

We have previously developed a quantitative PCR (QPCR) technique for the detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK19) transcripts in blood and bone marrow and compared this to immunocytochemistry (ICC). Together, both have shown promise for monitoring therapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and value of these assays for minimal residual disease (MRD) in monitoring efficacy of adjuvant therapy following surgery for primary breast cancer. Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples were taken at the time of surgery from patients with primary breast cancer and no evidence of metastases on conventional scans. These were tested for the presence of CK19 mRNA transcripts and cytokeratin positive cells. Follow-up bone marrow aspirates were taken at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Prior to surgery, 51% of patients displayed evidence of disseminated cancer cells in the bone marrow by either or both QPCR and ICC. Of 91 patients who had repeat samples assayed, 87% and 65% had positive results at some time using QPCR and ICC, respectively. All patients received adjuvant systemic therapy and in 44 cases where there was a positive result in either the pretreatment or 3-month aspirate, 32/44 (73%) showed a fall in CK19:ABL ratio (QPCR) and 15/24 (63%) showed a reduction in the number of cytokeratin-positive cells (ICC) during follow-up. These results indicate that MRD persists despite adjuvant therapy in a majority of patients with primary breast cancer up to 4 years following surgery.