Search

The pouch-related fistulas range in literature from 2% to 16% and they can be cause of failure of the intervention of restorative proctocolectomy. Aim of this study was to examine factors associated with theirs development and to identify theirs possible etiology and pathogenesis.Retrospective study focusing on 100 consecutive patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy with pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Patients with fistula and patients without fistula have been identified and the fistula type, the time from surgery and the site relative to IPAA have been recorded. Patients' demographics, co-morbidity or related medical history, clinical indication for treatment, surgical method, histological diagnosis, length of follow-up, early and late postoperative complications have been reviewed, and data collected have been compared among the two groups through univariate analysis.The overall incidence of fistulas was of 10% (10 cases); 8 cases had pouch-vaginal fistulas, involving the distal tract of the vagina, and associated with pouch-perineal fistulas in 2 cases; 1 case had pouch-vulval fistula; 1 case had a complex pouch-perineal fistula. Three fistulas were precocious, all associated with an IPAA leak; 2 of these cases also had pelvic sepsis while the third had delayed diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Seven fistulas had a late development. Four fistulas occurred at the level of the IPAA; 5 fistulas were located below the IPAA, and 1 fistula originated above and below the IPAA. When the two groups of patients were compared we found that there was an higher percentage of perineal or anal disease (40.0% vs 2.2%; p0.001), of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (40.0% vs 3.3%, p0.001), and of leak of the IPAA (40.0% vs 11.1%; p0.05) in the group with fistula vs the group without fistula.A direct link with the leak of the IPAA appears in all the early fistulas, while the cryptoglandular infection was suggested as a possible cause of the late fistulas located below the IPAA; the association with the extraintestinal manifestations of IBD could show a correlation between the fistulas and an higher specific activity of the underlying chronic inflammatory disease.

Severe malnutrition (defined as weight loss more than 10% in a period of six months) is considered an important risk factor in major abdominal surgery, because of a higher post-operative mortality and morbidity. The aim of our study is to assess the role of mild malnutrition (weight loss low than 10% in a period of six months) as a risk factor in major abdominal surgery and to evaluate the efficacy of therapy in order to improve outcomes in terms of in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and post-operative complications. Moreover, we evaluated serum albuminemia and lymphocyte count, important nutritional index, as predictive risk factors.We performed a randomized prospective trial, and admitted in our institution 153 adult patients, 43 with mild malnutrition and 110 without. The malnourished patients were randomized in two groups: the first one received oral immunonutrition (Impact Oral) for 7-10 days before surgery (22 pz), the second one received no nutritional support.We observed a higher number of complications in the non-treated malnourished patients (57%) versus both the treated malnourished patients (13.6%) and the normal group (19%) (p0.001). Increased morbidity was observed in patients with serum albuminemia2.8 gr/dl (69.2%) and with lymphocyte count1.500 mm3 (57%).Nutritional enriched support demonstrated his efficacy in reducing morbidity, and length of hospital stay. Pre-operative oral immunonutrition might be suggested and established in all the patients with mild malnutrition that will be operated on major abdominal surgery.

The most frightening complication following colorectal surgery is the anastomotic leakage which is associated with an high mortality rate, and the analysis of risk factors for the anastomotic leak is of great interest. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the risk factor for the anastomotic leakage in personal series of patients who underwent colorectal surgery. We have analyzed a consecutive series of 1290 patients who underwent colorectal open surgery from 1970 to 2004. The associations between anastomotic leak and several risk factors were studied by univariate analysis. The variables considered were the following: age; sex; type of disease; elective or emergency surgery; type of surgery; type, design and site (intra or extra peritoneal) of the anastomosis; stapled or manual anastomosis; distance from anal verge of the colorectal anastomosis; intraoperative complications; protective stoma. The rate of anastomotic leakage was 4.8% (62/1290 patients). Significant factors were: the type of surgery (higher risk after restorative proctocolectomy or rectal resection), the site extra peritoneal of the anastomosis, the type of the anastomosis (higher risk after coloanal or ileal-pouch anal or colorectal), the stapled anastomosis, the intraoperative complications. After colorectal anastomosis the risk of leakage has progressively higher for low, ultra-low and coloanal anastomosis. In these conditions a protective stoma seems to be suitable.