pii: zsw007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx007 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Patient-Reported Usability of Positive Airway Pressure Equipment Is Associated With Adherence in Older Adults Constance H. Fung, MD, MS 1,2 ; Jennifer L. Martin, PhD 1,2 ; Ron D. Hays, PhD 2 ; Emily S. Patterson, PhD 3 ; Ravi Aysola, MD 2 ; Nananda Col, MD, MPP, MPH 4 ; Michael N. Mitchell, PhD 1 ; Cindy Truong, BS 1 ; Joseph M. Dzierzewski, PhD 1,5 ; Stella Jouldjian, MSW, MPH 1 ; Yeonsu Song, PhD, RN 1,2 ; Juan Carlos Rodriguez, MD, MPH 2,6 ; Karen Josephson, MPH 1 ; Cathy Alessi, MD 1,2 Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; 2 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; 3 School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; 4 University of New England, Biddeford, Maine; Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; 6 Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile Study objectives: To examine the usability of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices and its association with PAP adherence among older adults with sleep-disordered breathing. Methods: We mailed questionnaires to patients aged ≥65 years prescribed PAP therapy during the prior 36 months from two large healthcare systems. Survey participants completed the Usability of Sleep Apnea Equipment-Positive Airway Pressure (USE-PAP) questionnaire, which assessed the usability of their PAP device. Other questionnaire items included demographics and self-rated health. We also abstracted adherence data (mean nightly hours of PAP use available from one site) and interface type from the electronic health record. Results: Five hundred sixty-four patients completed the survey (response rate = 33%). The mean USE-PAP score (0 = best to 100 = worst) was 20 (SD ± 20). Mean duration of PAP use (available in 189 respondents) was 5.2 hours per night (SD ± 2.0). In a nested regression model predicting nightly hours of PAP use, a 10-point (0.5 SD) increase in USE-PAP score corresponded to a 0.37 hour/night reduction in PAP use. The model including the USE-PAP score explained a signifi- cant proportion (R 2 = 15%) of the variation in nightly hours of PAP use above and beyond demographics, self-reported health, and interface type (∆R 2 = 12%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that PAP usability varies among older patients and is associated with PAP adherence, above and beyond other predic- tors of adherence. These results support measuring and improving PAP usability to further improve PAP adherence for older patients. Keywords: sleep apnea, adherence, usability, predictive modeling. Statement of Significance We conducted a survey to collect data on patient-reported usability of positive airway pressure (PAP) equipment among older patients, who may be more susceptible to user-device interaction design issues. We found variations in usability issues and showed that usability is significantly associated with PAP adherence. Patient-reported usability is not generally assessed in clinical practice. Because device usability may be a modifiable risk-factor for interventions aimed at improving PAP adherence, we recommend assessing patients’ beliefs about and experiences with PAP usability. INTRODUCTION Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is the most commonly prescribed treatment for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). 1 Although PAP is an efficacious therapy for reducing the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), many patients are non-adherent to PAP therapy, with estimates of non-adherence ranging from 28% to 60%. 2,3 Research on PAP non-adherence has focused on psychosocial factors (e.g., outcome expectancies, self-effi- cacy beliefs, socioeconomic characteristics), disease charac- teristics (e.g., AHI, sleepiness), technical aspects of devices such as interface type (i.e., nasal pillows versus nasal mask ver- sus full face mask), device modality/titration procedure (e.g., auto-titrating, continuous versus bi-level), and side effects (e.g., claustrophobia, irritation). 3 One category of barriers that has received little attention is the usability of PAP devices. 4–6 Device usability refers to design factors that impact inter- actions between individuals and devices. 7 The International Organization for Standardization defines usability as “the effec- tiveness, efficiency and satisfaction with which specified users achieve specified goals in particular environments.” 8 Usability may impact the accuracy and completeness with which patients achieve PAP therapy goals such as putting on a PAP mask, the resources expended to achieve these goals, the ease of learning how to use the PAP device, the ease of remembering how to use the device, and the degree to which the user finds the device acceptable and pleasant. 9 Beneficial outcomes of optimizing usability characteristics of medical devices include minimizing SLEEP, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2017 risk of error and ensuring device safety (i.e., promoting use of the device in a manner that does not result in harm to the patient or environment). 9 Usability test results are submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during the pre-market device approval process. 9 In addition to impacting device safety, usability has the poten- tial to impact PAP adherence, which in turn may contribute to the overall impact that PAP has on health outcomes. 10,11 Making PAP easier to set up, use, and clean may positively affect adher- ence to therapy. Large-scale surveys of the usability of PAP devices are lacking, even though interviews with patients about their experiences with these devices suggest variability in PAP usability across patients. 5 Older adults may be more likely to experience usability problems due to the higher prevalence of physical and sensory impairments that occur with advanced age. In this study, we sought to measure PAP usability and to eval- uate the associations between PAP usability and PAP adherence among older adult patients prescribed PAP therapy for SDB. We hypothesized there would be a considerable range of PAP usability scores and that usability scores would be associated with adherence to PAP. METHODS Conceptual Model The FDA’s model for medical device usability, 9 which is based upon the International Organization for Standardization Patient-Reported PAP Usability and Adherence—Fung et al.