Search

Objectives: Women represent >50% of people with HIV globally but have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) vs continuing their current antiretroviral regimen (CAR) by sex assigned at birth (female and male) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV‐1 without prior virological failure in a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Methods: This analysis included 48‐week data from the phase 3 TANGO and SALSA studies. Primary and key secondary endpoints included proportions of participants with HIV‐1 RNA ≥50 and <50 copies/mL at week 48, respectively. Safety was also assessed. Results: Of 1234 participants, 250 (DTG/3TC, n = 133; CAR, n = 117) were female at birth. Week 48 proportions of participants with Snapshot HIV‐1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL were similar regardless of sex at birth (DTG/3TC vs CAR: female, <1% [1/133] vs 2% [2/117]; male, <1% [1/482] vs <1% [3/502]). Proportions with HIV‐1 RNA <50 copies/mL were high across sexes and treatment groups (DTG/3TC vs CAR: female, 91% [121/133] vs 89% [104/117]; male, 94% [455/482] vs 94% [471/502]). Immunological response with DTG/3TC was slightly higher in female participants. Incidences of adverse events leading to withdrawal and serious adverse events were low and comparable between treatment groups and across sexes. Weight gain was higher with DTG/3TC than with CAR among female participants aged ≥50 years (treatment difference 2.08 kg [95% confidence interval 0.40–3.75]). Conclusions: Results confirm the robustness of DTG/3TC as a switch option in virologically suppressed females with HIV‐1, with outcomes similar to those in males. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]